User talk:Filiep

Welcome!

Hello, Filiep, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ton e 20:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Personal Note of Thanks (From User: PennsylvanianSocialDemocrat

Hi! I noticed you created a page on the Zemskaya Rat. I just wanted to say this: Thank you so much for adding a little-known part of the Russian Civil War. Just out of curiosity, did you anything from my original draft of the article? I'm just saying, there's some good stuff to use there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PennsylvanianSocialDemocrat (talk • contribs) 16:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Military history of Puerto Rico

Even though the Battle of Zaragosa was a French victory, General Antonio Valero de Bernabe was considered a heroe and was condecorated by the Spanish Crown for his actions in said battle. Therefore, please do not delete anything from this article. Thank you, Tony the Marine 10:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, according to http://www.paris.org/Kiosque/aug02/history.aug.html the French armies were defeated by the Austrians in the Battle of Saragossa on August 20, 1710.

Battle of Saragossa

I am puzzled what battle this might be. It can't be the battle you refer at, because it was fought 100 years earlier. I will let you know if i find something.

Battle of Beachy head edit

Hello Filiep: You added this - "The ‘white’ squadron was commanded by Victor-Marie d'Estrées" to this paragraph:

"The French Admiral divided his force into the customary three squadrons – white and blue, white, and blue pennants respectively. Tourville, aboard the Soleil Royal, commanded the centre, or ‘white’, squadron.[16] The ‘blue’ squadron in the French van was commanded by Château-Renault. The ‘white’ squadron was commanded by Victor-Marie d'Estrées."

The addition of this last sentence contradicts the second sentence ie:Tourville commanded the White squadron. Did you mean d'Estees commanded the 'white and blue' squadron, or have I got it wrong? Cheers. Raymond Palmer 18:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I was very pleased with the links - I looked myself to find Chateau-Renault and Everstsen but couldn't find anything.

The third Allied commander I discover from 1911 Brittanica was Ralph Delaval. This seems to verify the fact (although I don't speak dutch):

'Beide vloten waren verdeeld in drie eskaders. In de Brits/Nederlandse vloot commandeerde luitenant-admiraal Cornelis Evertsen (1642-1706) op de Prinses Maria (92 stukken) de voorhoede, Torrington (Sovereign - 100 stukken) de hoofdmacht en vice-admiraal Ralph Delaval (St. Andrew - 100 stukken) de achterhoede. Aan Franse zijde leidde luitenant-generaal Francois-Louis Rouselet de Chateau-Renault (1637-1716) op de Dauphain Royal van 100 stukken de voorhoede, Tourville op Le Soleil Royal (100 stukken) het centrum en vice-admiraal Victor Marie D’Estrees (1660-1737) de achterhoede.'[1]

There's no article for him (at least I couldn't find one).

Keep up the good work. Raymond. Raymond Palmer 18:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Filiep to replying to my not so subtle hint about Ralph Delaval. If we can't find enough info to write a stub for him, well nevermind. He shall stay a red-link. Thanks for your help. If you you need any help in the future don't hesitate to ask - I have quite alot of books on the period. Are you Dutch? Your English is excellent. Raymond Palmer 15:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filiep, someones written a Ralph Delaval article :) Raymond Palmer 18:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Sir Ralph Delaval, 2nd Baronet is not our Admiral Ralph Delaval. There's a reply from another user at the bottom of my talk page who seems to know about these things. It's all very confusing at times ;) Cheers for now. Raymond

WikiProject France

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France is a relatively new and we need new members to help is various departments one of them being Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Assessment. If you feel interested you could add your name to the list of members. Happy editing, STTW (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°1

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

In an effort to determine the active members from the inactive, all members are asked to simply sign on my special userpage.
I have slightly rearranged and updated the Project page, putting all the featured lists in collapsible tables. This unclutteres the page and you only have to see them if you want to. Give your feelings at the talk page.
I have made a Wikipedia advert for our project, Image:Qxz-ad108.gif, what do you think? Personally I feel the words need improving ...
There are still map problems at Template:French commune - any help at resolving them would be greatly appreciated.
What about starting a monthly drive? We currently have no Featured Portals (except for the Basque Portal which really isn't French any way), so how about improving Portal:France??? I don't know what's exactly wrong but the criteria can be seen at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria.

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, Chris DHDR (17:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Page creations

Hi Filiep;

When creating pages on titled royals, such as Princess Maria Teresa of Savoy (just moved from Maria Teresa of Savoy), please observe WP:NC(NT). For kings and emperors, their articles are titled Name (Ordinal) of Place. Their consorts are titled Name of Place. Grand dukes, dukes and lower are titled Name (Ordinal), Title of Place. Their consorts are titled Title Name of Place. All other royals are titled Title Name of Place and holders of substantive titles are titled Title, Name of Place. There are a few exceptions and most of those are covered at WP:NC(NT). Happy editing. Charles 21:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°2

It's been one high aiming month! The French WikiProject and related pages have been aiming high for Christmas - and have received an equal number of presents in return!

The French Portal is now a Featured Portal!!! It passed its Candidacy with 100%. Special thanks go to NYArtsnWords and all those that have made this Portal work.
The Newsletter has made it to a second issue. You can find its page at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter and its archives at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter/Archives.
A new page has been setup (WikiProject France/Links) to provide an index of the Projects/Portals pages (as well as helping newbees). When creating any pages in the Project/Portal namespace, please add them to the index page. This page also give WP:FRANCE members a handy watchlist.
As like last time, members are asked to renew their memberships at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Members.
I will be on holiday when the next issue is meant to come out so could some generous person(s) please do the next issue at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter.

Well, that's this issue. Au revoir et à bientôt till the next time, Chris DHDR (18:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Notability of Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde

A tag has been placed on Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

duplicated von Mansfeld biography?

do you know if Peter Ernst, Graf von Mansfeld the elder refers to Peter Ernst I von Mansfeld-Vorderort(an article you created)? i didn't find any usage of the phrase, "the elder", online, so am not sure whether to redirect. best, Doldrums (talk) 13:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! i've redirected accordingly. Doldrums (talk) 08:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Count and Laval Nugent

Are the Count Nugent and Laval Nugent the same person? Basketball one ten 20:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British expedition against Cuba

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of British expedition against Cuba, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=1762_-_British_expedition_against_Cuba. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of British expedition against Cuba

A tag has been placed on British expedition against Cuba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

User:Milk's Favorite Cookie/elections Any registered user can vote., so spread the word. Basketball 110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 00:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello once again

Basketball 110 wishes you a happy Valentine's Day.

British expedition against Dominica

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of British expedition against Dominica, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=1761_-_British_expedition_against_Dominica. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British expedition against Martinique

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of British expedition against Martinique, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=1762_-_British_expedition_against_Martinique. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Sforza

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Anna Sforza, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Hi Filiep. I was just about to suggest a name change to the article Action of August 1702 to the Battle of Santa Marta when I realise that you had redirected the article from that name. Was there any particular reason for this? Would you object if I were to change it back to Santa Marta. I know the name is not that common, but I have seen it called the Battle of Santa Marta in a few sources. Thanks Rebel Redcoat (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. I can't find enough credible sources to justify a name change. Best. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France newsletter

WikiProject France News

What's new?

The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.

User-related news

Notifications

Several new user has joined the project this last month: Jordan Timothy James Busson, Djwilms and Mcewan. Welcome! Please come stop by the talk page to join in our discussions.
Lazulilasher has been awarded the French Barnstar of National Merit for his contributions to this project. Congratulations!

Complete project tasks

Complete To Do List

The following is a list of all the current tasks for the project, as well as several project goals:

Wikipedia:France-related tasks

You can help! Vous pouvez aider !

Here are some France related tasks you can do

Requests: Gérard Garouste – Émile Peynot – more...
Translation from French:See TRANSWIKI/French for details. fr:Formation territoriale de la France métropolitaine to Territorial formation of France – Loi constitutionnelle du 23 juillet 2008 to French constitutional law of 23 July 2008 – fr:Arbel Fauvet Rail to Arbel Fauvet Rail – fr:Merir to Merir – more...
Stubs: Category:France stubs
Category sorting: Category:French writers – Category:History of France
Verify or Factual Accuracy: Gui de Ceriz – Rennes-le-Château – Simone Weil
Update: Bischwiller
NPOV : Foreign relations of France (Middle East section) – Torture during the Algerian War – François Mitterrand – Jean-Marie_Le_Pen – John Calvin – Marie Antoinette
Wikify: Dida Diafat – French architecture
Citations: Vichy France (section) – Falaise pocket – Charles de Gaulle – Vaux-le-Vicomte – Economy of France – Louisiana Purchase
Merge: – Bourbon Family Compact
Copyedit, Style or Cleanup: Antoine de la Sale – Albert Camus – Breton language – Claude Debussy – French Revolution – French language – Jean-Paul Sartre – Napoleon III of France – Nicolas Sarkozy – Picardy – Rennes – Sarah Bernhardt – Toulouse – Girondist – Louis XIV
Expand: Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen – Vaux-le-Vicomte – Basque language – Being and Nothingness
France-related Wikiprojects: Wikipedia:WikiProject France

view • edit • discuss • history • watch

Overview
This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals. If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
Articles
Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews: Louvre Abu Dhabi Louvre Family Moving Day Napoleon I List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes Two articles have reached GA status this month: Daft Punk Louvre Abu Dhabi
Newsletter contributors
Jordan Timothy James Busson

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jor dan ^Contribs 17:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jean II de Croÿ

A tag has been placed on Jean II de Croÿ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 08:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

Filiep, an article I recently created, Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, has been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria Adelgunde of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. Please take the time to weigh in and stop its deletion. Thanks again for all your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia! Caponer (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Havenwerken

Hi Filiep,

I saw your name in the history section of an article and I wonder if you can help me to find out anything about a construction company from Netherlands named Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij Voor Havenwerken. I live in the city of Mersin, South Turkey. The harbour of Mersin had been constructed by this company back in 1950s. It was an important company then and now I am searching to find out what happened to the company. I couldn’t gather anything from internet sources. But I have a very vague idea that the compant might have been sold to another company in Spain. Thanks Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Austro-Turkish War (1526-1552)

Template:Campaignbox Austro-Turkish War (1526-1552) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Quebec Expedition/GA1

I have conducted a Good Article Review of this article, and expect to be able to promote it. However, I would first appreciate the thoughts of editors on several potential (minor) problems with the article. Please visit the review page to read the full review, and let me know on my talk page when you believe you have addressed the concerns therein. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loon and Limburg

Hello! I saw your edit to County of Loon and then noticed your editing pattern is one that suggests you would be interested to see that I have recently expanded the historical section of Limburg (Belgium). You might be able to add a bit more. One thing I was trying to work out is exactly how Wikipedia should explain whether there is any part of the Duchy of Limburg still in the Province of Belgian Limburg. I think I am right that Dalhem sometimes counted as part of the Duchy, and that this means Voeren comes into this category? I saw somewhere else on Wikipedia (I am not sure if it was Dutch or English) that Rekem in Lanakan was also in the Duchy but I can not confirm this. It seems to have been directly under the emperor, not via the his title of Duke?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Arques (1303)

Hey Filiep, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Battle of Arques (1303)--The content seems pretty substantial.It would be great if you could also add references to the related article Day of the Flemish Community.

I'm kind of new here myself but let me know if there is any way I can help. Thanks, Amy Z (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Filiep! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Henri I d'Orléans, duc de Longueville, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Holy League and Senlis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited John Louis of Nassau-Hadamar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Congress of Arras, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint-Quentin and Péronne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Caspar de Robles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harlingen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jan van Lannoy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chamberlain and Lannoy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maximilian of Austria

Jan III van Montfoort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maximilian of Austria

Second Utrecht Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maximilian of Austria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. When you recently edited Henry of Lorraine, Duke of Mayenne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aiguillon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Philip I of Croÿ-Chimay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hainaut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. When you recently edited Girolamo Caraffa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Malcontents (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absolutist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardino de Mendoza

There is no article on "Bernardino de Mendoza (Captain General)". Are you intending to create one? Until there it exists, it is inappropriate to change the title of the current article. We do not disambiguate names when there is no other article. Any links to "Bernardino de Mendoza" will still go to the same article, even if the "captain general" is intended. In such a case the links should be changed, not the article. Paul B (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not perform cut-and-paste moves. See Wikipedia:Moving a page for guidance. DrKiernan (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Charles Henry of Nassau-Siegen. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited John de Foix, 1st Earl of Kendal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Castillon and John Talbot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Sinsheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Palatinate

John of Luxembourg, Lord of Beauvoir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Piney

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Cambrai (1677), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip of Cleves, Lord of Ravenstein, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gent and Peter of Portugal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean II de Brosse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited García Álvarez de Toledo, 6th Marquis of Villafranca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montalbano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating unreferenced and poorly referenced articles

You have created a slew of unreferenced and poorly referenced articles such as Philip of Burgundy-Beveren. Such articles do not improve the encyclopedia. If you have some book which contains information about a number of persons of nobility, please provide inline references to validate each statement. Also, more than one source is desirable, since if a person is notable by Wikipedia standards, there will be substantial coverage in several reliable sources. By adding such articles to Wikipedia, you perform a disservice. Please consider going back and adding references for the slew of poor articles you have created, before you create more such. Edison (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jorge de Cárdenas y Manrique de Lara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Duke of Alburquerque

Juan del Águila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Walloon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prince Philipp of Hesse (b. 1970) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Philipp of Hesse (b. 1970) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Philipp of Hesse (b. 1970) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rotten regard 17:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John IV of Glymes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William of Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sack of Antwerp, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lier and Aalst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Calais (1436), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boulonnais (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis de Nogaret de La Valette, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rivoli and Bingen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Gembloux (1578), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexander Farnese and Perpetual Edict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President of Paraguay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pedro Juan Caballero and Fernando de la Mora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anne Catherine of Brandenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Catherine of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel

Princess Wilhelmine Ernestine of Denmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Catherine of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel

Ulrika Eleonora of Denmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Catherine of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi Filiep: thanks for your work. Please note that on en.WP, years, dates, and common terms are not usually linked. Best. Tony (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John, count of Saint-Pol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marie of Brittany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to José del Campillo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''José del Campillo''' (([[Alles, Asturias|Alles]], [[Peñamellera Alta]], [[Asturias]], February 13, 1693 – [[Madrid]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicholas Haddock may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Mediterranean in April 1742 and succeeded first by [[Richard Lestock]] and then [[Thomas Mathews]]]]. He was promoted to Vice Admiral in 1741 and to Admiral in 1744.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince Augustus Ferdinand of Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Breslau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SS Gallia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transatlantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ferrante Gonzaga may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Andrea (1539-1586), 1st marquis of Specchia and [Alessano;

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Skarz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Francesco Gonzaga without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Skarz (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kosturino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Liege casualties

Merci (Thanks) for the edit but do you have a published source for the casualty figure you have added; we aren't allowed to use Wikipedia as a source. |Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keith. I understand your point. I searched on internet but I only found [2]. For the rest you find all kind of figures, even 25.000 German casualties in 1914 British newspapers ! Both sides lied about the casualty figures for political reasons, also the Germans. I just can't believe a quarter of the WWI Belgian casualties fell during these few days. Furthermore, no large military cemeteries are to be found in the Liege area. Something you would expect with some many soldiers killed. It must be an exaggeration, but I can't prove it (yet). Regards Filiep (talk) 13:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Habeas corpus indeed. I used your web source as a reference and integrated it with the others but edited the commentary to avoid a possible NPOV objection. I hope that's ok but if not we can discuss it. Several editors have added to the Belgian Great War articles this year, so I'm sure you're welcome to join in, scrutinise them and suggest improvements. User talk:Brigade Piron is worth contacting if you want to do more. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 15:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Girón Acuña Pacheco, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belmonte, Peñafiel and Villarrubia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

5th Army (Russia)

Don't think this article should have been renamed. Yes it was an Army of the Soviet Union. It is currently a Army in the Russian Military and should have it's current name as it's article title. We have hundreds of examples of Former Soviet units whose article name is not their historic name but the name they currently serve under. I suggest the article be changed back to 5th Army (Russia) for the same reason the article title was changed in 2010. Ryan.opel (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gjergj Fishta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turkish Crusade (1481) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkish Crusade (1481) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Crusade (1481) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1st Picardy

Talk:First Battle of Picardy see note here about army naming convention.Keith-264 (talk) 08:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Romoaldo Braschi-Onesti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlo Rezzonico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ismail I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited João José Sinel de Cordes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barcarena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Filiep! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice Bailloud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expeditionary force. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of maritime disasters page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Branlebas-class destroyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nieuwpoort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Senussi

Gasr Bu Hadi (Qasr bu Hadi or Al Ghardabiya) and 3,000–4,000 casualties and even more supplies I don't suppose you have a source for the casualties do you?Keith-264 (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, just the reference "A History of Libya, John Wright, page 118, 2012" in the Gasr Bu Hadi article itself. Filiep (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's sufficient.Keith-264 (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lasne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ohain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Navbar edit request

Hi. I reverted your protected edit request on Template talk:Navbar, as it clearly had nothing to do with that particular template (Template:Navbar). Your edit is for some other page which was unclear from the information provided there. I did find a couple of navigation templates which had incorrect "V T E" links on them, which took you to Navbar instead of the correct template. You may well be able to just edit the correct template, so I suggest you take another look and either discuss on the correct talk page or just make the changes you were requesting (if you know how to do it and it's not protected). --Murph9000 (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albania during World War I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scutari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alessia

added a link pointing to Alessio

Alexius

added a link pointing to Alessio

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Arnold von Winckler, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Could you add references to this article? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Voronezh (1943), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Erickson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberation of Serbia, Albania and Montenegro (1918), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pec and Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Articles

Greetings. I have noticed that you have created quite a few new articles. I would like to humbly suggest that you try and adopt the following referencing guidelines Wikipedia:Citing sources, as it will improve the quality of the articles. Feel free to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history, cheers.--Catlemur (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred Fletcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grodziszcze. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lord Chancellor of France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilles I Aycelin de Montaigu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles de Fitz-James

added a link pointing to Bretagne

Restaino Cantelmo-Stuart

added a link pointing to Vich

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De L'honorable...

@Filiep: Bonjour - comment ça va? L'honorable (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS. please advise if your forte is with the history of the Spanish Netherlands? If so we could be on to a winner! L'honorable (talk) 02:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trouee de Charmes

Good start, hope you like the additions I culled from other articles. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Keith, thanks for the additions. Glad you like the article. Just one question : why did you leave out the reference to Moltke deviating from the Schlieffen plan ? Something Barbara Tuchman emphasizes strongly in her book "The Guns of August" ? Filiep (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since Tuchman, the existence of a plan has been questioned never mind what it was. That article in the further reading is quite good on recent thinking and research. Schlieffen Plan has a recent summary (by me) too. Keith-264 (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Louis Bonaparte (1864-1932), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good job on that last massive edit!! Make sure you cite, though. this isn't cam, I swear 08:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis-Emmanuel d'Angoulême, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chantilly and Charles de Valois. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Query about naming – Louvain or Leuven

Editing Flaithrí Ó Maolchonaire, I see that you modified some wikilinks relating to Leuven and Louvain. I think it's proper to use the page name rather than the name of a redirect, but why not change both to be simple links to Leuven, given that both are intended to refer to the same place? There was no quotation that had to be preserved and in paraphrasing sources we are certainly allowed to make place names consistent within the article. Was there a reason behind your choice that I'm not seeing? —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{Moved back here to keep thread together}

Hi, I would gladly agree with you, but I notice English speakers have difficulties to use Flemish placenames and mostly prefer the French variant. Just see articles on World War I : Ieper - Ypres, Brugge - Bruges, Veurne - Furnes, etc... That's why I left Louvain, although here in Belgium everybody uses Leuven.

Regards

Filiep (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That explains a preference for one or the other but is not an explanation for having one be one way while another instance is the other way. I was hoping for consistency and don't have an opinion about whether Flemish names are difficult for English speakers. —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joachim Andreas von Schlick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick of the Palatinate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Filiep. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese-American War listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Japanese-American War. Since you had some involvement with the Japanese-American War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 19:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consistory of 1644 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Consistory of 1644. Since you had some involvement with the Consistory of 1644 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. I hope you agree that this redirect you created years ago is no longer need and anything that confuses consistory and conclave should be avoided. Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consistory of 1655 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Consistory of 1655. Since you had some involvement with the Consistory of 1655 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. I hope you agree that this redirect you created years ago is no longer need and anything that confuses consistory and conclave should be avoided. Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Acadia does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Also would be helpful to see some sources. Eric ^talk 17:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Filiep. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yuriy Sablin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wrangel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carl Rudolf, Duke of Württemberg-Neuenstadt

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Carl Rudolf, Duke of Württemberg-Neuenstadt, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikifor Grigoriev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UNR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of the Lys and the Escaut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Lys and the Escaut

Beste, u brengt in dat artikel een mooie foto aan genomen in Menen. Maar die dateert van 18 oktober 1918. Menen werd niet bevrijd met het offensief dat u beschrijft, maar wel in het voorgaande, dat in het Engels de Battle of Courtrai wordt genoemd.

Sorry dat ik hier niet in het Engels schrijf, maar dat hoeft niet.

Groeten, Maurice Van Meenen (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Eastern Front (RSFSR), Filiep.

Unfortunately Boleyn has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source on Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Front (RSFSR) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eastern Front (RSFSR), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Filiep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2nd Army (RSFSR)

Thanks for creating 2nd Army (RSFSR).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add references if you can; Russian Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source, but may contain some which can be used here. At the moment, none of the information is verified. Thanks for starting this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Eastern_Front_(RSFSR)

Hello Filiep I have added projects Russia, Military, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Front (RSFSR) has been accepted

Eastern Front (RSFSR), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ural Army

Hello, Filiep,

Thanks for creating Ural Army! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Turkestan Autonomy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Turkestan Autonomy. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beltrán Vélez de Guevara, Marquis of Campo Real

Hi Filiep, I have proposed this article for deletion since it does not cite any sources and has had a tag noting this for nearly three years. Just a heads up as I saw you were the article creator. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Seishin Landing Operation

Hello, Filiep,

Thanks for creating Seishin Landing Operation! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin's listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Calvin's. Since you had some involvement with the Calvin's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolt of the Ingrian Finns

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Revolt of the Ingrian Finns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 09:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

XI SS Panzer Corps

I've noticed you recently created that. I wonder if you could stub or fix the link the German Army XXI Army Corps in an article I recently created, Zambrów massacre? TIA --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

10th Air Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fuyuan

Stalingrad Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 1st Guards Army

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army Group A, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1st Panzer Division and 10th Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Axis operational codenames in the European Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army Group Courland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 12th Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lvov–Sandomierz Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1st Panzer Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Colmar Pocket does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eric ^talk 14:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minsk Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolay Krylov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

68th Guards

Thanks for your help in getting the article on the 68th Guards Rifle Division started. It's big task writing all these rifle division histories and I appreciate any and all contributions you can make. Please continue to contribute, but please add English-language sources wherever possible. Wreck Smurfy (talk) 00:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evacuation of Novorossiysk (1920) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evacuation of Novorossiysk (1920), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evacuation of Novorossiysk (1920) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans) (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Filiep! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans) (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Inline citations would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:5th Division (Yugoslav Partisans), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 17:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May Offensive (1920)

Hi Filiep. I was wondering why, in 2019, you created May Offensive (1920) as a redirect to Eastern Front counteroffensive. The redirect's a puzzling one as the target article doesn't mention a "May Offensive" and is about events in 1919, not 1920. As such, I thought I'd take it to RfD, but also thought I'd ask here first in case I'm missing something and you're able to enlighten me. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Memel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 5th Panzer Division and 7th Panzer Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian occupation of Corsica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Motorized Corps (Italy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriele Nasci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARMIR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4th Moroccan Mountain Division

Thank you for your recent creation of 4th Moroccan Mountain Division. However, it lacks inline citations (except for one I added). This harms WP:Verifiability, which is a core Wikipedia policy. Please return to this article, and add citations to reliable sources in line in the body of the article. Here are a couple of templates you can copy & paste which may help:

<ref>{{cite book |lang=fr |last1= |first1= |title= |trans-title= |date= |url= |page= |publisher= |isbn= }}</ref>
<ref>{{cite web |lang=fr |last1= |first1= |title= |trans-title= |date= |url= |website= |access-date= }</ref>

See Help:Footnotes for additional information about adding footnotes to articles, and {{cite book}} or {{cite web}} for template instructions. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fr:2e division d'infanterie coloniale to 2nd Colonial Infantry Division (France). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 01:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at your article creations this month (September), and in addition to the article mentioned above, the following articles you created lack the required translation attribution:

9th Colonial Infantry Division created 4 September 2022‎
14th Infantry Division (France) created 10 September 2022
2nd Moroccan Division created 3 September 2022
2nd Colonial Infantry Division (France) created 3 September 2022‎
9th Colonial Infantry Division created 4 September 2022‎
14th Infantry Division (France) created 10 September 2022
1st Infantry Division (France) created 11 September 2022 – attribution added; (diff); see below
Paul-André Doyen created 13 September 2022‎

These articles all need to have the missing attribution added using a dummy edit to include a "repaired insufficient attribution" notice as described at WP:RIA. Note that the attribution you need to add lives in the edit summary and *not* in the article itself. That's why the three articles where you included the words, "This article is translated from French Wikipedia" do not count, and do not satisfy the attribution requirement; it must be in the edit summary, and the way to do that is described at WP:RIA. I fixed one of them up for you, so you can see what it looks like (here).

P.S. I notice that you created numerous articles prior to September, but I didn't check any of those. If any of them are unattributed translations, this notice applies to them as well.

Please take care of adding attributions for any articles that require them as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please {{Reply}} below, or feel free to contact me on my Talk page any time. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these 7 contributions; that takes care of the problem in those articles. Going forward, please follow the wording guideline at WP:TFOLWP or WP:RIA which recommends appending the following: "Please see its history for attribution". Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Filiep. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting for the record that seven unattributed translations have now been repaired by User:Filiep on their first visit after the CCI notice above. Adding Sennecaster. Mathglot (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; have seen. I found earlier problems back to at least April 2021 (I noted on the CCI) and the CCI will assist in backfilling those missing attributions. If Filiep attributes going further we have no other issues then.Sennecaster (Chat) 16:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Albert-Édouard Levieux de Caligny" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Albert-Édouard Levieux de Caligny and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 1#Albert-Édouard Levieux de Caligny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Phso2 (talk) 10:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1st Infantry Division (France) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1st Infantry Division (France) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Infantry Division (France) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Luxtay the IInd (^{talketh to me}) 16:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Francisco Javier González de Castejón y Elío" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Francisco Javier González de Castejón y Elío and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 20 § Francisco Javier González de Castejón y Elío until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inline Citations

While this has been mentioned before, please provide inline citations! (A.K.A., These ^[1]) it is often hard to see which content is being supported by your sources. Seeing your talk page history the first mention here of this happening is as far back as 2012 so please, read this and add inline citations, It's simple! Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(While you are an experienced editor, if sources confuse you, you can always read WP:CITE) Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of la Vega moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Duke of la Vega, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 13:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Anglican cemetery" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anglican cemetery has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22 § Anglican cemetery until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your creation of 5th Army (RSFSR). Many thanks!! Buckshot06 (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much appreciated ! Filiep (talk) 05:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Morocz" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Morocz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Morocz until a consensus is reached. asilvering (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis Philippe I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis-Alexandre de Bourbon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Dol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duke of la Vega (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duke of la Vega and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: French Forces of the West has been accepted

French Forces of the West, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José de la Mar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Cochrane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your massive and sustained contributions to the Venezuelan War of Independence topic area. Your drive is inimitable. - Mebigrouxboy (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! Happy to help clarify a very interesting period in history. Regards Filiep (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Spanish reconquest of New Granada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cundinamarca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colombian War of Independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1849 Colombian presidential election

Hello Filiep. Regarding this edit, are you able to provide a source with the party affiliations? It wasn't listed in any of the sources I encountered. Cheers. Number 5 7 16:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Number 57, the first 3 are mentioned in the source Banrepcultural : José Hilario López, liberal progresista, José Gori, conservador moderado, Rufino Cuervo, conservador “oficialista”. The other 4, I found in the Spanish Wikipedia. Regards, Filiep Filiep (talk) 07:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Unless we have a source, I don't think we can put a party against these candidates. Number 5 7 16:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peruvian Civil War of 1867, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soroche.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Duke of la Vega

Hello, Filiep. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Duke of la Vega, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Filiep. Thank you for your work on First Intermedios campaign. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duke of la Vega (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duke of la Vega and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murad Beg Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kipchak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Duke of la Vega

Hello, Filiep. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Duke of la Vega".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Italian Military Internees

10+ years ago you created that interesting and important article, but it is poorly sourced. Could you work on it? For example, there is an unreferenced important estimate of the total number of deaths ("The estimates of losses among the IMI vary between 37,000 and 50,000"). This is crucial information to source. (@Gitz6666 with whom I discussed this recently) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]