User talk:EternalBaile

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at User:MajorbucksYT/sandbox. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 01:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Mimic (Roblox) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Mimic (Roblox). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mimic (Roblox) (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fandom is not considered a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mimic (Roblox) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 21:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MajorbucksYT! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 21:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Mimic (Roblox)

Hello, MajorbucksYT. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Mimic (Roblox), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mimic (Roblox) (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This could be a notable article if there's more independent review sources like the one you've found, but the sheer extent of non-encyclopedic detail and unsourced statements make this sit pretty outside what we're looking for. Check out WP:VG/MOS, particularly WP:VGSCOPE for examples of what shouldn't be in the article. WP:VG/S can give you a list of the kind of reliable sources we're looking for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mimic (Roblox) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 10:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:BlankAvatar.webp

Thanks for uploading File:BlankAvatar.webp. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mimic (Roblox) (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Samoht27 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Generally its advisable to not use user generated content as a source. I'd also be wary when using Valnet sites as a source too.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mimic (Roblox) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:K'veon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:K'veon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 07:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advert and COI warnings - final warning

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Mimic (Roblox) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Mimic (Roblox). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doors (Roblox) (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LunaEclipse were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft heavily relies on listcles and questionable sources (see this list of gaming-related sources).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doors (Roblox) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 01:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GMFU has been accepted

GMFU, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 08:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Gmfualtcover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gmfualtcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hypnotic Data (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may want to review Wikipedia's notability guidelines for songs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hypnotic Data and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kaniiwho.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Kaniiwho.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:MCQ § File:Logoantelogo.png

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:MCQ § File:Logoantelogo.png. Marchjuly (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Look Don't Touch has been accepted

Look Don't Touch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:13, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Logoantelogo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Logoantelogo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 23:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kaniiwho.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Kaniiwho.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EternalBaile. I'm sure you meant well here, but "public domain" doesn't mean "publicly available online" when it comes to image copyright. You might want to take a look at c:Commons:Licensing, c:Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Internet images and c:Commons:Own work for some general reference. They're pages on Wikipedia's sister project Wikimedia Commons, but they also apply here. Pretty much any photo you found online should be assumed to be under copyright protection unless it clearly states otherwise or there some other reason under copyright law why it is not. If you find a photo online that you think could be used on Wikipedia but aren't sure about its copyright status, you should ask for help at either Wikipedia:Help desk, Wikipedia:Teahouse, or Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. It's easy to make mistakes when it comes to image licensing, and one or two mistakes is OK. If, however, make the same mistake too many times, a Wikipedia administrator might decide to take action to stop you from doing so anymore. So, it's better to ask for help if you're not sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to XIII Sorrows. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited XIII Sorrows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SUICIDAL-IDOL (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SUICIDAL-IDOL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jnhygs (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jnhygs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 00:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted material on Draft:Wolfacejoeyy

Please remove the copyrighted material from your draft article.

His 2023 single became an overnight viral success across TikTok, leading to nearly 4 million streams on Spotify. After linking up with producer-actor WhereIs22, a.k.a. Michael Rainey Jr., to drop their joint EP, 22Joeyy, in September of 2023, Wolfacejoeyy doubled down on his newfound virality in 2024, with the track In the two months since its release, the song has been the subject of over 43,000 TikTok creations and has been viewed 2 million times on YouTube. - [1] Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 01:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I fix it up can I keep it on there or nah. Or is it just the citation itself? EternalBaile (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just no copy/paste. Reword it any way you wish! Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 02:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Let Me See Ya Move for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Let Me See Ya Move is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let Me See Ya Move until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 20:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:XIIISorrows.gif

Thank you for uploading File:XIIISorrows.gif. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LumiAthena.png

Thanks for uploading File:LumiAthena.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 16:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XIIISorrows.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XIIISorrows.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional edits and sources

Hello EternalBaile. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Lumi Athena, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EternalBaile. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EternalBaile|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid for these making articles, I'm just doing this because I'm really addicted to Wikipedia for some reason. I've always had a heart for journaling, since a kid. I used to read a lot of books, sadly I do not anymore but during that time writing and reading were my favorite hobbies. By the way, what is a paid advocate? EternalBaile (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I actually make money from making articles?? No way. EternalBaile (talk) 20:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're using a large number of paid placement and PR references for the article. You need to be very, very careful with your sourcing, especially when it applies to a WP:BLP. Please slow down and evaluate the sources you are using - if you're not able to discern between vanity press release and actual journalistic materials, it may be a good idea to keep your articles in draft until others can review. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop uploading copyrighted images as "public domain"

You just uploaded File:Suicidalidol.jpg, claiming it is in the public domain, because It was posted onto Twitter. As Marchjuly said above, images are not in the public domain just because they have been posted online. Please make sure you understand this before uploading any more images. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Suicidalidol.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suicidalidol.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EternalBaile. Non-free images of living people are pretty much never allowed per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy; so, relicensing the file as non-free content creates a new set of problems that are really too much to overcome. Basically, the only type of image of Suicidal-Idol that's going to be allowed to be used for primary identification purposes is one that is released under the type of licensing described in c:Commons:Licensing. Most images found online are licensed in ways that's too restrictive for Wikipedia's purposes by their copyright holders; so, unless the copyright holder of the image, who is typically the creator of the image, explicitly states they're releasing the file under one of the free licenses that are "free-enough" for Wikipedia's purposes, the image in question most likely can't be uploaded and used. Even if it doesn't say it's copyrighted, it's going to be assumed to be because the copyright laws of most countries automatically grant copyright protection to any image as soon as it's "published" in some sort of tangible medium (print, online, video, etc.).

You can if you want try to get copyright holder WP:PERMISSION so that an image of a living person can be uploaded and used, but there's no guarantee the copyright holder will give their permission. You also need to be careful of images posted online because only the copyright holder can release their work under the type of licensing needed by Wikipedia. Lots of people upload copyrighted content created by others to social media or other websites, but this doesn't make these uploaders the copyright holder. In this case that's not a issue because the photo is clearly a selfie taken by Suicide-idol, but you still should be careful when it comes to uploading images found online.

In addition to the aforementioned licensing issues, this image also has encyclopedic issues that are probably too hard to overcome. The purpose of the infobox image of a Wikipedia article is to primarily identify the subject of the article for readers of the article. There doesn't seem to be much encyclopedic value in using even a freely licensed image of Suicidal-Idol if their face is going to be completely blocked out. Such a photo might be seen as cool for social media, but Wikipedia isn't social media. Image use on Wikipedia is still subject to WP:CONSENSUS, and Wikipedia isn't required to use images that have very little or no encyclopedic value regardless of how they're licensed. So, if you're thinking about reaching out to Social-idol and asking for permission to use one of their photos, it would be better to ask for one in which their face can be seen instead of something like this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suicidal-Idol

The article Suicidal-Idol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are almost entirely user-generated content, self-published, or non-independent. Few to no sources to establish independent notability of artist. Will include source analysis below.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. benǝʇᴉɯ 20:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suicidal-Idol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suicidal-Idol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicidal-Idol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

benǝʇᴉɯ 20:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Krushvol1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Krushvol1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]