User talk:Erachima/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 17

This archive contains topics 301-325 made on my talk page. Its history on the main talk page ends at this edit.

Bleach

I rewatched episode #4 of the English anime and Rukia says something to the effect of: "In this gigai [body], I can't fly". What was that supposed to mean? The shinigami can fly? Lord Sesshomaru

I thought that was what she meant. When someone mentions flight, do fans usually think of the Dragon Ball flight or something else? Lord Sesshomaru

I suppose there is no category I can create to make up for the shinigami's unique "air-locomotion"? Something akin to Category:Anime and manga characters who can locomote anywhere? Suggestions? Lord Sesshomaru

Guess you're right. I do wish a distinction would be made so that fans who only watch the dub would know. Evidently, it is best just lefted uncategorized. Lord Sesshomaru

Aside, I have just watched episode #8 and wondered of something — do all of the shinigami in Bleach have the capability of phasing or turning intangible? I know Rukia did in the first episode when she met Ichigo and earlier, as I hazely recall, there was a minor shinigami character in YuYu Hakusho that did so as well, as I'm sure that Botan can too. Should I perhaps place the intangibility category in Category:Fictional ghosts? Ideas? Lord Sesshomaru

Since most ghosts in fiction can fly, should I place the flying category there too? I removed it some time ago, but perhaps I was incorrect. Lord Sesshomaru

Here is the link. Was this done wrongly, mind you? Lord Sesshomaru

RE: AFD - List of Saint Seiya Chapters

Was going to leave this on the AFD page, but thought I would leave it here because it isn't related to that article's deletion. As I said in the AFD, thank you for the information about Saint Seiya. As an American, it is difficult for me to keep track of every manga that hasn't made it big here in the States. I would, however, ask you not to be so sarcastic next time you inform someone about something like this. Just because it's very obvious to you that this manga is so popular doesn't mean that it is that obvious to everyone. I am doing my best to call it like I see it, and even though I try to follow anime and manga to what extent I can, it's impossible for me to get everything that's big (especially outside of this country) on my radar. Again, thank you for the information. Best regards, bwowen ^talk.^contribs 04:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Grimm

Indeed. We always end up having to revise things when the full chapter comes out, anyway. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Shinigami in Bleach

I have finally created what I felt was a much-needed article, in light of Hollows in Bleach and Bounts in Bleach. It's mostly a copy/split from the main Characters in Bleach article, as expected. Feel free to make changes. Link: Shinigami in Bleach. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 20:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank You For Your Support

Thanks for your support on my Naruto Task Force Idea. Do you think this is good?-Uchiha23 (talk · contribs) June 28 16:17 (UTC)

NARThis User is a member of The Naruto Task Force

Sorry

Sorry I was directed there by someone else. -PatPeter 17:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

They are more questions about knowledge, like I asked the questions on their respective pages but was directed towards Village Pump, I sort of knew what Village pump was, wasn't really sure it belonged there, but at least I would be redirected somewhere where my questions could be answered. -PatPeter 18:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I Finished.

Finally I finished it's not great but I finished. The Naruto Task Force and the userbox too. Uchiha23 18:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC) {{TNTF}}

Thank You.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thank you for being one of the nicest Wikipedians I know.I noticed you didn't make adminship if I was there I would've supported. Thanks Again Uchiha23 21:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your answer in the help desk. I asked about where my article went. I think it was deleted. In the future, I will try to save up thoughts then write the article in a big bang (finished product). I'll also choose a less obscure topic. I now see how it gets deleted (through the article for deletion) process. Fineday 01:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Please respect fellow wikipedians

Your comments on a picture listed for deletion here were both rude and unnecessary. Assume good faith, please. I would appreciate it if you withdrew your comments. John Smith's 14:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Well then I can't assume good-faith about your own motives. John Smith's 21:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Who said you control my thoughts? I merely pointed out that if you don't want to retract a rather rude comment then that makes it difficult for me to believe you are acting in good faith. After all no one would make the initial comment that you did if they were acting in good faith, so your own behaviour rather speaks for itself. John Smith's 21:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

If you think there is no merit in the nomination, why did an admin support me on all those other nominations? That doesn't mean I'm right, but it surely means there is cause for the nominations. John Smith's 21:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Just a small point - the admin I mentioned backed me up on the other picture you referred to and there are now two admins backing up on "Behead". So by your own logic, you allegations against me were groundless. Maybe you would reconsider withdrawing your original statement against me again. John Smith's 11:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment in Lolicon

Thank you for participating in the Lolicon RfC. Can you move your comment[1] to your own statement? This is so the previous debate is not resumed in the RfC section.

I hope this isn't a bother. My concern isn't "standard" form, but to keep the extraneous (and repetitive) debate to a minimum so that uninvolved editors can more easily read the statements. / edgarde 23:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I have said to Edgar that I think your and my comments should stay together but am happy to see them moved if that is okay with you, SqueakBox 23:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh look, it's TJ

Hey TJ, funny how I found you here so randomly on Wikipedia! I notice you got yourself a lot of cool star things, I guess that means you're doing a good job, I expect no less from you. In fact, I expect more! Keep going, haha. I'm sort of new to Wikipedia, just registerd recently so if you can, do help me out with any tips or advice you can give me. I got myself into an edit war already, way to start off my wikipedia story stupidly, I apologized for it just today. But I did make a worthy edit over at The Divine Comedy which I think I use those brackets to link to it. I changed it so it says "Written in the YEAR 1337" as it just said it was written in 1337 before that. I have no idea how to link to the actual edit I made (it's not with my username though, I forgot to login, stupid me). But yeah, just wanted to say hi! Kooper113 21:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Comments made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables

Hello Tjstrf. Thanks for your active participation in the AFD discussion for the Plot of Les Mis article. I must, however, ask that you try to be more civil in your future comments on the page. For people who think that deletion would be a positive thing for the encyclopedia, making a comment in your keep opinion that "the scary thing is that I'm having to explain this to anyone" is, I feel, unnecessarily harsh to those of us who are also doing what we believe is best for the project. Differing opinions do not mean that people on the other side are stupid or ignorant; it just means they have a different view of how to make Wikipedia the best that it can be. Again, thank you for your insightful contributions, and I look forward to working with you again in the future. Best, bwowen ^talk.^contribs 03:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

My apologies, I wasn't thinking. --tjstrf talk 04:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. bwowen ^talk.^contribs 04:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your comments on my talk page [2] bwowen ^talk.^contribs 05:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion welcome at deletion review for Plot of Les Mis

After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables closed as a deletion, I'm challenging the way the closing administrator acted as in violation of Wikipedia rules. Your participation is welcome at that discussion, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 14. Please keep in mind that only arguments related to either new information or to how Wikipedia rules were violated or not violated in closing the discussion will be considered. It isn't a replay of the original AfD. I'm familiar with WP:CANVASSING and I am alerting everyone who participated in that discussion to the deletion review. I won't contact anyone again on this topic, and I apologize if you consider this note distracting. Noroton 04:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I know you're gone but

I'm on Editor Review!.Sam ov the blue sand 03:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fictional characters

Hi tjstrf. I wonder, why are there several characters in this grandfather / great grandfather cat.? I thought that characters that were part of a comic book series or tv show were already fictional based, i.e., indirectly part of this category. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru

My Editor Review

Hello! As I have run into you on Wikipedia, I was wondering if you would be willing to comment in my editor review. I know you are probably busy with other contributions to the project, but I would greatly appreciate any comments or criticism that you have that could make me a better editor! Thanks very much for your time and consideration, bwowen talk•contribs•review me please! 13:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Just following up on my previous comment, still hoping you would have time to review me. It has been nearly a week now since I put up my review, and I still have not gotten much feedback. I would really like to know how I'm doing from many points of view, to help figure out the quality of my work so far and how to improve it in the future. I'm sure you are busy, but if you could just drop me a note letting me know whether or not you'll be able to do it, that would be terrific. Thank you so much for your time. Best regards, bwowen talk•contribs•review me please! 19:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Bleach (manga)

I'm sure you're familiar with the detergent of the same name. Have you seen WP:HAT? Hence, the chemical detergent that was the entire reason why I finally decided to place both dabs. Understand that "BLEACH" redirects there, even though the brand name of the chemical is also populary seen as "BLEACH". If there's any dab that may be removed it should be the second one on the Lupin III page, can't quite decide on whether that has to be taken out or not. Ah, since you're back, you've taken a look at the bloated Category:Fictional characters I presume? It'd be great if you could assist me on unbloating that cat. whenever you're available. So, can you get back at me regarding these two matters A.S.A.P.? Lord Sesshomaru

BLEACH (brand)

I replaced the disambiguation dabs. Please talk it over with me before removing them again. See this. Lord Sesshomaru

Oh and in case you're curious, here are two Bleach brands that use their popular version of "BLEACH": [3] and [4]

Lord Sesshomaru

Luppi

Hey, do you know when it was decided that Luppi was merged with Hollows in Bleach? Or was it a one person view who merged it?--Hanaichi 04:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Bleach merger articles.

Guess what? Artist and Hartebeest just merged many many articles, with alot of information being lost. I have nothing to say. I did unmerge Shinji for the time being though. I never recalled an agreement to this. Go take a look at how everything is now.--Hanaichi 02:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Bleach Images

Hey, how are you? As with the current edits that TTN made, stating that the images should be in groups, honestly I say that about less then 10 of those pictues exist. I guess the liuetenent and captains could be found, like Isane and Uohana, or Sajin and Iba, during the Soul Society arc when Sajin, Kaname, Iba and Hisagi fight Zaraki. If you need some help finding those pictures, please let me know.--Hanaichi 04:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Wahaha I found the Classmate picture of Orihimes friends to replace the Chizuru one. I also found the Jinta Ururu one but not with Tessai. I'll go look for the Keigo and Mizuno soon, but I just started Year 10 so it'll probably take some time.--Hanaichi 13:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hyourinmaru

Well, it's just it IS a term for moon. I realize the individual kanji make "ice" and "ring".

And don't worry about the Hepburn. I just say Hyourinmaru in my edit summaries because I'm too lazy to bother getting "ō" and put it in that field. When I actually edit I use Hepburn.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 05:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

...I can only wonder why he put it into WWWJDIC. Why would you put a Korean idiom, same kanji regardless, into any Japanese dictionary?—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 05:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Negroids

the people in the image are not considered Negroid. That is why I requested to have it deleted. If the author wants he should upload it under a different name. Muntuwandi 20:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The source of the image says they are, you simply refuse to acknowledge it. --tjstrf talk 20:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The source is in german not english. So I cannot verify what it says. All I know is that by the english definition the people in it such as bushmen are not considered negroid. Muntuwandi 20:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Multiple people who can read German confirm it says they are. It's an old text anyway, it's not expected to meet up with the current definition. --tjstrf talk 20:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

But if they do why is the definition not consistent with the english definition. This is why i believe there is problem with the translation. It seems to mean black people and not the skull type Negroid. Muntuwandi 21:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Probably because different countries define the same terms in different ways, even in science. Especially historically. (Assuming you're even right about the definition to begin with.) --tjstrf talk 21:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Being english wikipedia, we should focus on the english definitions for consistency, since all other sources that we will find will be in English, Everything should support each other. It is like trying to write an article in English and chinese characters at the same time. Muntuwandi 21:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)