Jump to content

User talk:Erachima/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13→Archive 15

This archive contains topics 251-275 made on my talk page. Its history on the main talk page ends at this edit.

List of fictional characters who can create illusions

I've put the revamped layout up. I think it covers you concerns... please take a look. - J Greb 00:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Pathoschild

Hee hee. Well, it was vandalism in the technical sense, but I have permission ;)--§hanel 05:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Essjay controversy

You can be my new hero today - loved the way you wrapped that up with a neat little bow. I had laboriously said more or less the same thing in my planned post, but got an edit conflict because you had done it so much more effectively. Nice work, I won't tarnish it with needless additional commentary. Thanks --Risker 06:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

See now, I had just settled in for a nice quiet evening of editing Celebrity sex tapes and suddenly I realise that my calendar is wrong. I thought it was April 1 but it seems in this alternate reality that it is indeed February 2.--Risker 06:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I think the hints simply don't get through to some people: WP:AN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Risker (talk • contribs) 07:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
This guy seems to like playing with fire on WP:AN. His posting method is bound to irritate an admin or two - smilies on AN? I can't quite rid myself of an image of a younger editor who's been taken under someone's wing, to his detriment. Risker 07:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Umm...I meant you too. If we can find a way to avoid the word "founder" anywhere in the article, that will be good. It also has the benefit of explaining why Wales would still be in position to ask Essjay to resign; by six years down the road, most founders are either gone or officially hold a position. Please watch out for 3RR, some people are very picky on it lately and we may have permanently lost Gwen Gale from Wikipedia (let alone the article) over it. Risker 19:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I eventually figured that out. I have learned more about patience and diplomacy editing this article than I have in a lifetime of working in a very sensitive career field. Sorry to disappear in the midst of it all, had to go rescue my lost wallet. I see Aza Toth has protected the article for a full week. This should be interesting, I half expect someone will take this opportunity to AfD it...Risker 22:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I see C.m.jones has reappeared. That reminds me of my last edit on this page [1]. I've never sent anything to MfD, and was sort of biding my time on this to use it when necessary, but perhaps it is time? Risker 01:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I was thinking it probably needed to be done. I have no idea how to do a multiple MfD, so will do separate ones, it will just take me a while to work through the process. --Risker 01:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay..first one is here[2]. --Risker 02:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Now you tell me...although I'm not entirely sure how I would have linked the boxes on the user subpages to the discussion. Well, if I have badly screwed up, someone will give me a blast but clean it up. Hopefully they will tell me how to do it right next time, although I will do my best not to have a next time. It took me a week to screw up the courage to nominate a single, complete hoax article for AfD the first time. Risker 03:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Category:Pages_blessed_by_the_input_of_Wikipedia_user_tjstrf

Good joke, but now we have a looping sub-category ;) – Chacor 16:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I am honoured that my talk page has been graced with this blessing ;)--Risker 22:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The Cool Wall

Could you please take a look at the cool wall section about copyright and my related user talk page please.--Lucy-marie 23:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

User Category

As April Fool's is over, and WP:SIG has been updated to specifically disallow categories in signatures, please stop categorizing pages in to Category:Pages blessed by the input of Wikipedia user tjstrf. This category has been Speedily Deleted. All pages in this category were decategorized as of about 15 mins ago. — xaosflux Talk 01:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

3RR warning

You are in violation of 3RR on Essjay controversy [3] [4] [5] [6] [7].

I have not decided to block you at this point, but if you editing style continues this way I will issue a WP:3RR block. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 01:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

User: *who cares*

Wel were about the same age so i think i can ask you this w/o offending you: Why in the hell does he need to revert my questions! Like this one:

that was NONE of his...forget it! There was no reason in hell he had to do that! I cant comfirm it but, He likely has never even seen that artical and he shoves his nose in it so im going to re do that question and if he does it again, ill take that as a lack of respect for someone and...report him!--Tatshro Satou 16:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, you should report him to an administrator, like Metros232! He be interested to hear about this! ^_^ –Gunslinger47 18:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

NHK

Thank you for your responce but i really dont get it! How is NHK romance/drama? Its more ecchi,lolicon,black comady not R/D!--Tatshro Satou 17:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

question

please tell me does this lok like a real question or a smart ass vandal:

Please tell me how it matters after you read this: Wikipedia:Assume good faith. –Gunslinger47 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment

From: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie
I would personally like to thank you for dragging me into a MFD I wasn't involved in, an MFD I never edited, and when I wasn't even active on Wikipedia at the time. And thank you so very much with the personal attack. — Moe 06:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

QuackGuru RFC

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/QuackGuru, just started. Any help in setting this up would be appreciated. -- Ned Scott 02:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Bleach

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Bleach is now an official task force. If you would like to become a member, just add you name to the appropriate place on the page. Thank you for your support, and happy editing. // DecaimientoPoético 21:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Response to the superhuman category

You're right. I'm sorry why I didn't think of it before. This [what I'm doing now] is too painstaking. I'm reverting myself (the category placements at least) and putting the supershuman cats. in the characters category section. Perhaps, can I ask for your assistance? ~I'm anonymous

So, should we just remove them entirely? That's what I've been doing up until now. Let me do this: for the time being, they'll be put into Category:Naruto characters and Category:Bleach characters. Is that understandable? ~I'm anonymous
I had a second thought on that one on Ichigo's article. That's why I had the category stay in the Shinigami category. Is he the fastest in the series? ~I'm anonymous
Oh, it was an accident on my part (on Chad's article). I was distracted about it, sorry. Still, the super speed cat. on Ichigo shouldn't be there. Hmm... ~I'm anonymous
I won't argue. I trust you know what you're doing though. ~I'm anonymous
Hi there. I have a few more things to say, if you don't mind:
  1. Is there anyone in BLEACH that can fly? The Shinigami's perhaps? Or anyone you know of other characters in other manga and/or anime series?
  2. Looking back at Ichigo Kurosaki's article, instead of leaving him in the fictional character with superspeed cat., he should be in Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds instead because his origin was in a manga, not another type of written fiction, far as I know. ~I'm anonymous
I shall add Toshiro to the category then. Oh, by the way, I sent a message to User:Someguy0830 (a user who sometimes edits the BLEACH articles) on his opinion regarding whether Ichigo should individually be in the super-speed category or not; as far as I'm concerned, he is a Shinigami and I believe he obtained that power after he became one. If he had it when he was a "normal human", I'd understand. It just still bothers me, no offense — I just want a third person's opinion on this. Peace. ~I'm anonymous
I see where you're coming from, however, it was an ability he attained after he wielded the zanpakutō and/or became a Shinigami. Understandable? I've seen some of BLEACH on Cartoon Network to know some things; its not a bad show, it just isn't interesting in my eyes. But likewise, he "used to" be a human, ergo, once Rukia (I'm sure it was her) introduced him to that stuff, he then later developed that signature super-speed ability, right? Is there anything I've said wrong here? ~I'm anonymous
My whole point here is that if it weren't for that girl, he wouldn't have attained such powers, period. He would never (I believe) had notably been as fast as said to be. Let's use Son Goku of Dragon Ball for example: his speed was so astounding since his childhood years that he eventually became the fastest character in the entire series (in his Super Saiyan 3 and 4 forms, that is) yet, he is not individually in the category. He is in the Z Fighters cat. which leads to the DB superhuman cat. Is my point clear? I don't know how to explain it further, but maybe you can reconsider Ichigo being in the category? Peace ~I'm anonymous
That bankai is sort of like what Goku's Kaio ken is, or an "Eight Gates" ability I read that Rock Lee and Might Guy (from Naruto) can perform. Regardless — Goku is the fastest in his own universe; Might Guy may be the fastest in his own universe, and Ichigo may be the fastest in his: evidently, they all share a "super speed ability" in their own respective categories — Category:Dragon Ball superhuman characters, Category:Naruto characters, Category:Shinigami in Bleach. Convinced? If things were like this then Goku, Guy, and anyone else who has the signature move of super-speed would individually be put into the category. This is why I'm bothered by it, it makes it sound like Ichigo is the only one who deserves to be put in there, whilst there are probably others out that actually need to be in the cat. because they don't share a characters only cat. with superhuman abilities. If this doesn't cling to you and make you reconsider, then I give. ~I'm anonymous
No thanks. I've repeated myself enough. Sometimes I wish people would think the same. Sounds like we're very different in ideals. ~I'm anonymous
If you want, could you get someone else to share their thought in light of the subject? Also, about that Flash guy, he should be placed in Category:DC Comics characters who can move at superhuman speeds (which is nominated for deletion for some reason). ~I'm anonymous

User:Delwyn96

There's no sign of an autoblock either. As this account has been used three times – twice on its own user page, and once to leave me an unsigned and uncivil message, I suspect that it's either simply a troll account or a sock-puppet of someone that I did block. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think a lot of us (judging by the block logs I see when I'm following up on vandalism) are taking advantage of the fact that we can block anons while leaving accounts (and account creation) unaffected. But that's also why it's very unlikely to be an autoblock — I almost always make blocks "anon only", and always when it's more than twenty-four hours. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Barnstar of Diligence
Those few who still explain in edit summaries what they're doing seem to me to deserve recognition. Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Even then it's better than most people manage. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Loituma Girl

Thanks for responding. GA reached. LordHarris 11:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

User:saikano(dead)

I know im going to wish i never even talk to but i want you to know i am not a problem anymore! Ihave done GREAT edits on 2 different wiki's and i have studyed the rules so dont worry ok! Just calm down! --Lolcon-R-US 17:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Signatures

Your edit summary on Wikipedia talk:Signatures ("Why must this page double as Wikipedia talk:Questions from the clueless and semi-deranged rants?") made me laugh, thanks :) ~MDD4696 05:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you~

Hello! Thanks for the welcome!

I just like putting what I did on the discussion to make sure that people know where I'm coming from and whatnot. And to make sure people actually check up on my facts in the case that I'm not 100% up to date (Like in the case of +anima, where I'd not gotten to volume 4 yet. I'm remedying that right now, though).

I'm also not entirely sane. I just try to look like it whilst writing, 'cause it makes it look cool. And, y'know, so that people can actually read it and understand it/not feel compelled to gourge out their eyes with rusty sporks (if such a thing exists). DaniDaniDanica 02:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Bleach

Sorry, I must've read it wrong. Mwsilvabreen 12:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring

Why are you telling me to stop edit warring while engaging in said edit warring yourself? Who are you to decide what the article is about? Looks like you are making an rfc inevitable, which is a shame but a pro paedophile article is worse, SqueakBox 23:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I am geting support too. I am far too experienced to think edit warring achieves anything though in this case perhaps it is a staement. Anyway thanks for acknowledging that you are edit warring too, SqueakBox 01:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

LatespringDrizzle

Hi, tjstrf. I don't remember if we've actually "met" on here before, but yes, I do seem to be the Chosen One of the moment. He seems to have shifted attention from Szyslak to me in the past week or so. I expect him to find someone more interesting by and by. If you wouldn't mind, could you watchlist my talk, user, and subpages for a while? It'd be better to have a few pairs of eyes watching rather than just one. We've just gotta completely stonewall the dumb bastard until he gives up or discovers online pornography or heroin or something else that engages his fragile, easily-amused mind more than Wikipedia. --Dynaflow babble 08:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

He's currently obsessed with UC Riverside-related pages (which is where I first got into a tussle with him), pages related to Harvard, talk and discussion pages of his old socks, and the userpages of his "enemies," starting his most recent antagonist and going backwards, it seems. He also recreates the UCR mascot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) articles, but he'll be disappointed to discover, whenever he makes his next attack, than an admin finally got around to salting all variations of the title. We've managed to stop him really quickly as of late (10-15 mins.), so I'm not sure how a full-scale attack would pan out were it left to run its twisted course. Oh, I also have a possible, partial ID on who he might be (see User:Dynaflow/Wikihilarity#The_continuing_saga_of_SummerThunder.2C_the_sock-puppet_edit_warrior). I've also updated the Wikipedia:Long term abuse/SummerThunder page with the latest details. --Dynaflow babble 09:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

What about being an admin?

Hi Tjstrf, I want to nominate you for adminship, I'm pretty sure you would be a good sysop.
Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators to check what are admin's roles, and let me know if it's ok for you ;-)
«Snowolf How can I help?» 22:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Fate/stay night

The FSN article has currently 18 categories, including Category:Type-Moon. That category specifically is meant to categorize articles related to Type-Moon, so I don't see how it's in any way redundant. I would agree if say there was also a category on Type-Moon games, then I wouldn't agree that the Type-Moon category should be used, but as of now, you cannot remove that category on the basis of it being redundant as I do not see how that is possible.--十八 22:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The third guideline listed says itself that there are exceptions, and this is one of them. The example used is that Golden Gate Bridge should be in Category:Suspension bridges and not Category:Bridges and this of course is obvious to reduce redundancy. But if we use that as an analogy, let's say Category:Type-Moon is to Category:Bridges as Category:Type-Moon games is to Category:Suspension bridges. There is no (current) subcategory to list the Type-Moon games in, so thus the Category:Type-Moon itself must be used to show how this game is connected to all of Type-Moon's products since it is one of the companies most popular works to date. See Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories#When to duplicate for more.--十八 22:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Fine then, do as you wish. Though I believe the reason why we have Category:Fate/stay night and Category:Tsukihime is because there are a bunch of articles related to each and a category aids in navigation. And IMO 18 is not too many as it takes up merely 2 lines at the bottom of the article.--十八 23:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Erachima/Archive_11&oldid=1146634751"