User talk:Erachima/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

This archive contains topics 401-425 made on my talk page. Its history on the main talk page ends at this edit.

Planet Ladder GA review

Hi. This is about the article you reviewed August 27th (that was a long long time ago I know). Anyway, um, you mentioned that the article needed the Japanese release dates. I have searched for them, but haven't found any. Would the Japanese release dates be on Amazon? (Also I followed your advice about the Production/Media sections. If you could look at Planet Ladder and see if anything else still needs to be changed or added, that would be nice.) Thank you. Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Firestar's Quest GAN

Hello, you did the first GA review for Firestar's quest and I have fix all the problems. Can you review it again? Gears of War 2 04:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Bleach seasons FT

Thanks a bunch ;) Oh, and a quick question. I remember that you used this website as a source for some episode lists in the past and I used it for a good chunk of my FLs. Could you comment on its reliability, as it was a frequent discussion at WT:ANIME. If it's associated with some company or some official database, it'd be a great help sourcing-wise for a lot of lists. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 08:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Clarification

Hello, you have been asked to clarify your statement in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Afghanpolicy27. Thank you in advance! Kotiwalo (talk) 14:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Talkarchivehist

Hi. I noticed your comment regarding your personal archives at WP:Village pump (policy)#Does talk page archiving violate CC-BY-SA. You may be interested in {{talkarchivehist}}, which incorporates a few permanent links into the standard archive header. It looks like you create your archives in single edits rather than incrementally, so it should be compatible. If you're interested, I could apply it to one of your archives as an example. Flatscan (talk) 05:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Neon genesis evangelion

you seem to know how articles work. you tihnk you may help me remove trivial information?Bread Ninja (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

80 days

Thanks for the reminder on that one. . . I think I set the precedence of spelling it disambiguaion on the talk page. Sorry about that. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 23:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

GAN

The nominator and I have been staying at Wikimania together for the last week, hence the lack of action on his part :). He's informed me IRL that he has a few more tweaks to make before he's satisfied, so I'm going to give him a bit more time on it, since he's on holiday for most of this week as well. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's fair enough. Conference was excellent - particularly the bit when after getting a round of applause for a question I asked, I was dragged out of the audience by a moderate and plonked in the panel for a talk. Ironholds (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Zaion GAN

Thanks for reviewing the article. I have made some replies at the review, so please review them again at your convenience. Arsonal (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Smith, Jr. GAN

User talk:Gosox5555#Joseph Smith, Jr. GAN ^~Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎

Aw look...

I upset him. HalfShadow 23:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Roger Waters GAN

As far as I understand the reasons you provided for GAN failure had previously been resolved, so could you please reconsider your position, or provide new/different feedback/suggestions that can be resolved? It would be greatly appreciated, since I am not sure what you would reccomend fixing in order to bring the article up to GAN. I guess I am unsure why it is not a GA as it is right now. --GabeMc (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Wolfpuss

I think her most recent comment is pretty much 100% sarcasm; she doesn't really want suggestions as far as I can tell. -kotra (talk) 09:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

WT:NOT

I have replied on the talk page. patsw (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Highschool of the Dead edit approval

My apologies, it looked like harmless/good-faith edit by the user. I will be more careful in the future. Thanks for letting me know -- GateKeeper ^(talk) @ 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Common Pleas

Thanks for reviewing this article; I think I've fixed the points you brought up. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

rfc/u

Several months and a draft ahead of you: User:Masem/draft though it needs trimming and editing, please feel free to do so. --MASEM (t) 14:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Once it's final and I've posted it and notified Gavin, it would need to have 2 additional editors affirm they have tried resolution to allow the case forward. --MASEM (t) 17:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Descriptive & segmented article titles

I don't think that closing the discussion[1] is in any way good ettiquette. Do you wish to discuss this matter over at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts? --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 15:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I have mentioned at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts that I intend to reopen the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles, but I will pause and give you time to respond. I am open to suggestion as to how the discussion can be modified if you feel that the thread is too long, but if you feel that the proposal has "failed", then I believe you should express your thoughts as to why this is the case, as they will be most welcome. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 10:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

For your information, I have made a proposal at Wikiquette alerts that I intend reopeing the discusions at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles after starting a thread at WP:Village pump/Policy about the issue revealed in the discussion "Example: Jan Smuts in the Boer War" about segmented article titles and their interaction with WP:UNDUE. If you would like to participate in the thread, let me know. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

For your information, I have opened a thread at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Alternative_article_names to see if there will be any response to the issues raised.--Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 13:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for putting a halt to the ongoing discussion. It was still interesting BUT was chewing up my watchlist and my time in reviewing the remarks! Somebody had to do it! Student7 (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations

Hi. Please see my comment here. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

RE:Highschool of the Dead

Fine, do as you wish.

Let agrees that we disagree.

Note that i advise you to read some animanga FA/GA like School Rumble for what contents belongs to what section because to put it bluntly current contents of the production section have nothing to do with that section.

I do help especially but i won't force my point in any issue so you can disregard my piece of advise. --KrebMarkt (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Going farther than showing "my concern" over Highschool of the Dead would require a higher level of involvement from me. This is something, i don't want to because i have no particular interest for the subject. I leave it to the good or bad hands of the editors with affinity to that subject. --KrebMarkt (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Aizen Pic

Well, first off, thank you for the wonderful greeting. As a new user, it's very nice to get an actual message instead of "Reverted." So, I noticed that the old image was still up and figured I would change it to the one used on the Bleach Wiki, which I personally thought was better because it showed Aizen for who he was and was therefore more accurate. As we both now know, this backfired instantly, so let's discuss it. You mentioned that it is customary to use images of characters as they appeared but I think this might be an exception because Aizen as he appeared was just an act/illusion (in most anime/manga this is not the case). The only problem my image would cause is that it does spoil the story quite a bit (My intention was not spoil such an awesome conspiracy to new Bleach fans). But the tags are annoying to add. How do I tag the image (and find the tags)? Again, it is from the Bleach wiki, but it doesn't seem to say who owns it, or I can't find the information. Any help is appreciated. Arawn 15:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arawn V (talk • contribs)

Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom

Just to let you know, the issues at Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom and AN/I have all been worked out now. Thank you for your patience. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional magic users

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

GA Review of Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom

Hi Erachima,

I don't mean to bother you, but do you plan to return to Wikipedia? You started a GA review of Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom over a month ago, but didn't make any comments on it, and haven't edited since then, so I'm kind of in limbo. Thanks, Jayjg ^(talk) 06:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

End of year awards

	The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award
	I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) —Farix (t | c) 03:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)