User talk:Emirthesenat

Welcome

Hello, Emirthesenat, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask a question on your talk page. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know in which one of my edits to S-400 system did not conformed to verifiability policy since I have included all links and citations that I've took the info from. Emirthesenat (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes correct, this does not apply to S-400 edits. I hide that part above. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also didn't found 'development' as standard section for wikipedia's aircraft articles.

Refer to it by sending a link which sets this strict guideline from wikipedia's guidelines. Emirthesenat (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is per Aircraft project guidelines; these are at WP:Aircontent. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi Emirthesenat! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sukhoi Su-57 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sukhoi Su-57, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm SchreiberBike. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evolution have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Evolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Maybe you are just a jerk. Maybe you believe this is a way of converting people to your religion. Either way please think about what you are doing and stop this. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We all know that one specie never gave birth to another in any meaning making this THEORY PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC AS IT GETS. I'm not spreading any religion while I may report you for propaganda and misinformation spreading here. Emirthesenat (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:SchreiberBike. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How did I attacked schreberbike? He added topic on my talk page, I did too. How did I threatened him? Emirthesenat (talk) 03:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You baselessly accused them of spreading misinformation and propaganda in a hostile tone. I'd also like to bring up your uncivil edit summary at Love and Monsters (film) regarding usage of the word develop. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've attacked no one. He did revision without first talking to me. That's uncivilised and improper way of editing on Wikipedia.

Secondly, is this site a propaganda tool that has specific words that MUST be used or is it your attempt of molesting me here. The word »development« is decreed only to be used as the main title of the history behind the aircraft https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aircraft/page_content

It is you two attacking me about a single word in the text, not in the title. Emirthesenat (talk) 03:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]