User talk:SchreiberBike
|
|||||||
List of Justices of the High Court of Australia
[edit]Hi SchreiberBike, I've got one more ongoing move discussion that's encountered some resistance. Would love to read your input on it. Cheers! Woko Sapien (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Woko Sapien: Glad to help. It's a never ending battle. For future events, I'd suggest adding a note at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Current as asking for help from people you know will probably be on your side could be considered canvasing. If there's a note at WT:MOSCAPS, I'll see it and so would many others. Regardless, keep up the good work.P.S. I've got List of Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which should be List of acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom on my list, and it's the head of a long series. I'm busy with another project until near the end of the this year, but if you're in the mood to take it on, feel free. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:51, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's my bad! As I said on the move discussion, I've been canvassed before, so I assumed it was okay. Thank you for the advice on future move discussions!
- Also, I'll definitely look into those "Acts" articles! Woko Sapien (talk) 16:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Woko Sapien: Excellent! Wikipedia's got what seems like million rules and no one knows them all (but any one can blame us for not knowing them). SchreiberBike | ⌨ 16:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Made a proposal on the "List of Acts of..." articles. I kept "the" in the title because one of my arguments is that these should all follow the precedent set by the American versions (e.g. List of acts of the 112th United States Congress). But otherwise, it tackles the issue of needlessly capitalizing "Acts". Woko Sapien (talk) 17:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Woko Sapien: Excellent! Wikipedia's got what seems like million rules and no one knows them all (but any one can blame us for not knowing them). SchreiberBike | ⌨ 16:20, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 22
[edit]- September 2023—Issue 022
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
List of cercopithecoids by PresN |
Mountain pigeon by AryKun |
Contest results
|
The first edition of our new monthly contest had perhaps a little less participation than I hoped for, but it still resulted in a huge amount of content work, mainly focussed on de-stubbing articles on little-known species, although we did also see two GAs for Holozoa and Hypericum perforatum. Overall, over 60 articles were improved, with most going from stubs or redlinks to fully fleshed out articles. The winner this month was Simongraham, who improved 21 articles about spiders, mainly to B and C class, and racked up 70 points, over twice the next highest. Hopefully, we'll continue to see such great work next month, with even more participants and even more articles improved.
|
September DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Wildlife of Zimbabwe
[edit]Hi dear SchreiberBike. The second paragraph of the lead section of the article Wildlife of Zimbabwe says: "In the 1990s, it became one of the leading countries in Africa in wildlife conservation and management with a reported income generation US$300 million per year from the protected areas of the state, rural community run wildlife management areas and private game ranches and reserves." I think that an "of" is required before "US$300 million" and also a full stop must come before "rural community". As I am not a native speaker of English, I decided not to make any changes to the article, but please do so if what I say is right or explain why what I say is not right. Thanks in advance. Taddah (talk) 11:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Taddah: Like many articles on Wikipedia, this one is badly out of date and not that well written. I copy edited the second paragraph as you suggested and made some other small changes, but it deserves more attention. I didn't follow your suggestions exactly, but please take a look at it now and see if that is better. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help (but I'm in a busy period and may not be able to do much). Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 13:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your edit on the article and your answer. I truly appreciate it. Taddah (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Polyommatus
[edit]For some reason this genus is placed in Riodinidae in the (automated?) taxobox. This should be Lycaenidae.Would you be so good as to fix this.Best regards Notafly (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC) PS Polyommatinae is also placed in Riodinidae It looks as though the "parents" part of the taxobox is incorrect
- @Notafly and Rodrigo Conte: Sorry it's taken so long to get to this. I think this may have fixed it. Take a look and see if it looks right to you. I've not worked with automated taxoboxes much recently so I'm not sure if I did it right. I've pinged Rodrigo Conte who made the change to see if his understanding matches with mine. Take care, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Very many thanks.Everything I checked seems ok.Best regardsNotafly (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Did you note we have lost Alan Cassidy as an editor.He has made endless contributions and added marvellous photos.A well known expert on Lycaenidae he has been blocked due to (to my mind) his political and social views.Alan was a military officer not a diplomat.I will try and contact him and maybe make amends.
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 23
[edit]- October 2023—Issue 023
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Mimodactylus by FunkMonk |
Contest results
|
The second edition of our monthly contest was even better than the last month, with 80 articles improved spanning the entire tree of life. The winner this month was Quetzal1964, who contributed to 47 articles, mainly relating to marine fish, and racked up 81 points in the process. In second place was simongraham, who got 60 points from 14 articles on various species of jumping spiders. simongraham is still at the top of our overall standings, with 130 points, and Quetzal1964's close behind on 108. The November edition of the contest is now open: feel free to drop by and participate if you work on any TOL-related articles this month. |
October DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 24
[edit]- November 2023—Issue 024
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Contest results
|
The third edition of our monthly contest saw Quetzal1964 win for the second month in a row, scoring 68 points from 39 articles about a variety of marine fishes. In second place for the month is Olmagon, who scored 45 points from 10 articles on extinct crustaceans and geckoes. In the overall standings, Quetzal1964 leapfrogged over simongraham into first place, with 176 points from 109 articles; simongraham is now in second place with 136 points from 37 articles. The December edition of the contest is now open: feel free to drop by and participate if you work on any TOL-related articles this month. |
New newsletter!
|
Now, this newsletter is technically not new, but I have only recently become aware of its existence and am only a month late, so it still counts. Wikiproject Fungi's Lichen task force has a new newsletter that is very nicely formatted and also features much better writing than this newsletter. Anyone interested in receiving the newsletter can add their name here. |
November DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 25
[edit]- December 2023—Issue 025
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Snowy plover by Jens Lallensack |
Alpine ibex by LittleJerry |
Contest results
|
And so ends the fourth edition of the monthly rolling contest, as well as the 2023 Tree of Life Contest as a whole. This month saw simongraham win with a very impressive 120 points from 27 articles. Quetzal1964 was second with 74 points from 37 articles. The annual contest was a close race between simongraham and Quetzal1964; simongraham won first place with 256 points from 64 articles, and Quetzal1964 was second with 250 points from 146 articles. Snoteleks was third with 79 points from 33 articles. Congratulations to everyone who won this year and my gratitude to everyone else who helped raise the quality of articles in our little corner of Wikipedia this year. Additionally, a very Happy New Year to everyone in the project and here's looking forward to continuing our good work in 2024! |
December DYKs
|
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Always precious
[edit]Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda, you've made today more special. Bless you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Gertrude Ederle
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gertrude Ederle, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed it. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 26
[edit]- January and February 2024—Issue 026
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Horned sungem by Jens Lallensack |
News at a glance |
|
January DYKs |
|
February DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
List of animal actors
[edit]Only Alfred Hitchcock thought of human actors as animals, and as cattle, not primates. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Clarityfiend: No matter. I know some people do not think of people as animals, but I do think most people do think of people as primates. I like clarity too, and it seemed to be a loss of such, but I can let it go. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 12:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, SchreiberBike,
This redirect appeared on a list I run on the Wikipedia database for redirects that are errors. I'd like you to tag it for CSD G7 speedy deletion because a) no one will know that this discussion is called "MOS:TITLETYPOCON" except for you so it really only serves a purpose for you, not for our editors, even those interested in MOS discussions. Secondly, b) as soon as the talk page gets archived, it will no longer be accurate because the discussion will be placed in the archives, not on the main talk page where this links to. I could tag it for an MFD discussion but I thought I'd first explain why these types of individual redirects are not useful and give you a chance to rethink its creation. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Liz, My rough model for this shortcut was Wikipedia:BIRDCON which has been in place without objection since 2014. As I explained in the edit summary when I created it, "I will monitor the target page and change the link when that discussion is archived." I had planned to add the {{shortcut}} template to the MoS talk page, but I started with the redirect to be sure it would work. I think this redirect is useful, so I'd like to discuss further. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 11:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've added the shortcut to the MoS talk page discussion with an explanation. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 12:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- That is appreciated. I'm still not sure about this page. I did realize that a discussion would go to RFD not MFD. Let's see if any other editors have an objection to it. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've added the shortcut to the MoS talk page discussion with an explanation. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 12:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27
[edit]- March and April 2024—Issue 027
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
News at a glance |
|
March DYKs |
|
April DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Names in French.
[edit]I realised that on wiki the common names have caps only for titles. I had never come accross since a lot of books or websites don't apply this rule but my bad. I don't really get why it would apply to name in French though. The caps are mandatory in French when you are refering to a specific species. I'm just trying to understand the logic not really force my edit. Arkin40700 (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Arkin40700: Thanks for your note. In English, species common names are often capitalized in guide books and lists for emphasis, but not in running text in general publications. I've read books about butterflies where the butterfly common names are capitalized, but the bird names are not, and vise versa. Wikipedia, being an encyclopedia about everything, decided to stick with lower case. That was a difficult decision as the people with interest in birds, especially, were used to their birding guides which consistently capitalized common names.I'm not a French speaker, but my observation of French is that species common names are sometimes capitalized and sometimes not. I just looked at the French Wikipedia articles for the first three birds on List of birds of Metropolitan France: Oie des neiges, Oie cendrée, and Oie rieuse and found that the names were capitalized mid-sentence 4 times out of 5, 2 times of 14, and 1 time out of 3 respectively. So, in that small sample it looks like in French Wikipedia they are not mandatory or even the majority. Even if capitalization was French Wikipedia's style, we'd follow English Wikipedia's style. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 13:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know it you can speak French but :French wiki on naming species.
- I tried translating it to English on DeepL.com and it seemed accurate.
- I've updated those articles in French. I try to focus more taxonomy and scientific but when I come accross those kind of small mistakes I correct them. Arkin40700 (talk) 13:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've never looked at Conventions typographiques, but I figured there was something like that. Clearly the rules are different on French and English Wikipedia. I've no formal training in French but I know plenty of words and I've spent some wonderful time in Provence, so I feel like I can figure out a lot (and sometimes I can see where translations lead astray). My best to you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 16:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Translating French page in English
[edit]Hello,
I have made a page for a Swiss sculptor (from the same region as me), Marc Raymond, on the French Wikipedia. I was wondering how to do an English translation of this page. I have tried to translate but it is only for experience editors from the English Wikipedia.
Do you know how I could do that ?
Thank you very much and have a good day. Adamdoter (talk) 13:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Adamdoter: Thanks for your note. I'm in a busy period just now and haven't had much time for Wikipedia. I will be away from my computer completely for the next four days. I took a quick look at User:Adamdoter/Marc Raymond and it looks reasonable, but needs some work. Since you asked, I'd be happy to work on it with you next week, but if someone else can work on it sooner, they should feel free. There's all kinds of helpful information at Wikipedia:Translation and Help:Translation that I've not read, but I'll bet, like most of Wikipedia's rules, it is somewhat overwhelming. My French is not nearly good enough to translate, but I'd be happy to edit the English version. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 12:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Thank you very much, I feel relieved really, because I am a bit lost with all Wikipedia rules and my English isn't the best.
- Please take your time, no hurry, and if you can help me out with this traduction I will really appreciate !
- Thanks again and have a good summer Adamdoter (talk) 10:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
"MOS:TITLETYPOCON" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect MOS:TITLETYPOCON has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § MOS:TITLETYPOCON until a consensus is reached. Liz Read! Talk! 18:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi SchreiberBike. Thank you for your work on Fetal valproate spectrum disorder. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
A well-warranted topic, appropriately marked as a stub until it develops further. Much of this can be done from the existing sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Talk page reversion
[edit]Hi SchreiberBike - the pic I swapped out on Talk:List of birds of Yuma County, Arizona is very low quality; I was orphaning it with a view to nominating it for deletion at Commons. Does that affect your decision? Usually, a pic in use won't get deleted, though I see that several other images on that talk page are dead links, so maybe use on talk pages doesn't preclude deletion? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @MPF: I don't know anything about deletion at Commons. I wouldn't think that an image used only on a talk page would have much value, but I'm sure there's a history of precedents about such things. When I reverted your change, I was thinking of how I'd feel if someone modified a message I'd sent, even if it had been posted long ago. I think the best thing is that the image is deleted and the image turns into red text with the file name. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Can you tell if the edits being made by 102.19.xxx on that article are at all legitimate? None are sourced, and they don't engage at any of their talk page(s). I don't know enough to tell if they're making stuff up, or if it's factual information. Joyous! Noise! 00:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Joyous!: I wonder too. I sure would prefer to have a reference for each fact, but when I look at their pattern of edits they don't seem like a vandal. I've checked a few of the additions and they look reasonable, but I've not checked everything or checked thoroughly. In cases like this I assume good faith and hope I'm right. If you've got any further insight, please share. Thanks and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for checking. I'll keep the page on my watchlist and...I don't know... ponder it. Joyous! Noise! 02:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Joyous!: I do a lot of pondering too. I'll leave it at that. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for checking. I'll keep the page on my watchlist and...I don't know... ponder it. Joyous! Noise! 02:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Merseyside
[edit]Thanks for doing a much better ce job on List of people from Merseyside than what I was doing piecemeal. Dicklyon (talk) 00:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- It started with cleaning up World War Eleven (WW11), then it was a target-rich environment begging for easy fixes. It's satisfying for me. My best to you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 10:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Help need
[edit]At Mammal, “[Polyandry in animals|polyandrous]]” is missing an extra “[“ at the beginning. Greatstrongholder (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Greatstrongholder: Thanks for the heads up. I fixed it. After you've been around and editing for a while, you'll be able to do things like that yourself. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 19:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, really? Great to know! You’re welcome, btw and thx for the fix! Greatstrongholder (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Two more things
[edit]At Vulva could you link "labia vulvae" since Puppymonkey made a redirect for it?
At Ear could you at the beginning of the first sentence in first paragraph type in “In therians, the pinna helps direct…” in Other animals since the pinna is a trait only in Theria? Greatstrongholder (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Greatstrongholder: I made the change at Vulva, but not at Ear. Ear is marked as a good article, which means there has been some review and what is there has some validity. I think your note at Talk:Ear asking for the same change will probably get a response from someone with more expertise and experience with the article than I. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Reverted edits on List of birds of Papua New Guinea
[edit]I removed the Dusky Megapode because it is simply not in Papua New Guinea. I removed and added a few more birds, since it seems like someone assumed that the article was for list of birds of new guinea as a whole, which it is not. Qwexcxewq (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Qwexcxewq: That makes perfect sense. A note in the edit summary tells other editors why an edit is made. Without that note it's hard to tell what is an edit made for good reasons and what is random vandalism. Thanks for your note above and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Happy (Belated) First Edit Day!
[edit]Happy First Edit Day! Hi SchreiberBike! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |
P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Wow! Thirteen years ago and it's still there and much improved. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Thank you for being one of the improvers :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
[edit]I don't understand why you insist that this species lives in Mongolia. If you have evidence, we can discuss this topic. Meaning the Gobi pit viper Erdenetushig (talk) 08:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Erdenetushig: It looks like you are writing about List of reptiles of Mongolia where you have removed "
* Gobi pit viper ( ''[[Gloydius stejnegeri]]'')
" three times without explanation. Edit summaries are one of the simplest ways the editors of Wikipedia communicate. The two times I have reverted your unexplained change I have used the edit summary "Undo unexplained edit". That's the edit summary I usually use if someone removes content which looks reasonable and doesn't explain why. I also did a quick web search and found that some sources, including Wikipedia, report Gloydius stejnegeri in Mongolia. If you make a change to a page, please explain to other editors why you are making the change.Why do you think Gloydius stejnegeri should be removed from List of reptiles of Mongolia? I've done further research this morning, and it looks like there is not general agreement on taxonomy, with some treating it as a species and others treating it as a subspecies of Gloydius halys or Gloydius intermedius. I have no specialist knowledge about snakes, but that's what I found. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 14:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)- Sorry, but you won't find in any sources that this species lives in Mongolia. If your sources point to Inner Mongolia, let me point out that these are completely different countries. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Gloydius&species=stejnegeri&search_param=%28%28search%3D%27Gloydius+stejnegeri%27%29%29 Erdenetushig (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe someday we will find this species in Mongolia. But for now, after 30 years of research, I can't include it in this list Erdenetushig (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Erdenetushig: The source you linked above says "Distribution China, SE Mongolia". I read that as China and south-east Mongolia. That's different from Inner Mongolia. That source says the species is found in Mongolia.I know little about reptiles or Mongolia, and I suspect you have much more knowledge about both. I respect that, but Wikipedia has to report what reliable sources say. Do you have other better sources that meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability? SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- kkkk Erdenetushig (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Even here you can see the habitat https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/31063-Gloydius-halys-stejnegeri Erdenetushig (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- if you noticed this far from Mongolia Erdenetushig (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Erdenetushig: You know what? I found that the species was added by @Comores 123 without an explanation, just like you tried to remove it without an explanation. I didn't revert it at the time because it was confirmed by Gloydius stejnegeri, but Wikipedia is not a reliable source either. Unless Comores 123 makes a counter argument (I've pinged them above), let's leave it out. Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- I do not create publications, herpetology is just my job. And I try to correct mistakes that are made due to ignorance of the Mongolian herpetofauna. Erdenetushig (talk) 02:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Erdenetushig: You know what? I found that the species was added by @Comores 123 without an explanation, just like you tried to remove it without an explanation. I didn't revert it at the time because it was confirmed by Gloydius stejnegeri, but Wikipedia is not a reliable source either. Unless Comores 123 makes a counter argument (I've pinged them above), let's leave it out. Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Erdenetushig: The source you linked above says "Distribution China, SE Mongolia". I read that as China and south-east Mongolia. That's different from Inner Mongolia. That source says the species is found in Mongolia.I know little about reptiles or Mongolia, and I suspect you have much more knowledge about both. I respect that, but Wikipedia has to report what reliable sources say. Do you have other better sources that meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability? SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)