User talk:Elektrik Shoos/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Elektrik Shoos. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
Protection for Seamus (dog)
I am a bit confused by you comments on the Talk:Seamus (dog) page. I already post a request for protection at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Seamus_.28dog.29_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29. Debbie W. 16:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The {{edit semi-protected}} template is only for requesting changes to pages that are already semiprotected, not to request protection on them. If you've already posted a request for protection at WP:RPP (which it appears you did), you've already done the right thing. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I never had posted a protection request before, and I was a bit confused about how to do it. Debbie W. 16:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 10 May 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
Black Ops II editing request
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Call_of_Duty:_Black_Ops_II#Edit_request_on_2_May_2012
...The page is still protected :(
Haakontje (talk) 21:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, according to the page's protection log, previous protection expired, then it got reprotected by someone else two days later. You can change the
{{{answered}}}
parameter on your edit request from yes to no if it's still relevant, or post a new one entirely. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Recent request to update section in Gambling - Fixed Odds Betting
Hi Elektrik Shoos. 18th April 12 I requested that the words Eurovision Song Contest be added to the fixed odds betting section on the gambling page. I run a small website that specializes in this and as the election betting and reality TV betting subject were mentioned I thought you might add Eurovision betting in too. If I could also add my site as a reference at the foot of the page then that would be great. I have read up about the rules and I believe this is allowed? Thanks a lot, Stefanie Stefaniereeve (talk) 07:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Adding that link wouldn't be allowed. See what external links aren't allowed and our guideline on self-promotion. I'd also encourage you to read our FAQ for organizations. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The Mousetrap FAQ
Hello Elektrik Shoos/Archive 4. So more than a week ago, I asked on the talk page of The Mousetrap if there could be a fourth question for the FAQ. The question would be something like "Shouldn't Agatha Christie's wishes be followed?" or "There is a tradition of not spoiling the ending. Why spoil it?" What do you think of adding such a question? I would add it myself, but I wouldn't want to be too bold, I wanted some consensus, and finally I'm not sure what the exact wording should be. Thank you! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
FYI
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Re-open concerns comments you made. MBisanz talk 22:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
New User Here Just Trying to Participate
Can you guys please have a little patience as I get my feet wet in the Wikipedia sea of insight and information? I promise to figure things out and be a solid contributor. Thanks for your help! : )
r — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rduvall1 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
oops
I admit it, I lol'd. --Shirt58 (talk) 01:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- I did too. I should have just left it. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
Excuse me
What was this for? I am not going to be whacked by a trout, and thus I have nominated the template for deletion. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 17:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- I think you're overreacting. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 18:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
North Yokum Township
Hi, saw your note in history on North Yokum Township, Carroll County, Arkansas. I already had created the corrected version with a copy of the data (name corrected throughout). The correct one is North Yocum Township, Carroll County, Arkansas. What should be done with two of them out there? The one with the "Yokum" ("k" as opposed to "c") is the incorrect one. Data (other than spelling issue) is identical between the two of them.Yx7791 (talk) 23:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'll tag the second one for a maintenance deletion so that the old page can be moved there. Any edit history on your new page should be preserved. (For future reference, you move pages by going to the little dropdown arrow next to the star at the top of the page and selecting "Move page." Non-administrators can't move pages over existing ones, though.) elektrikSHOOS (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks.Yx7791 (talk) 23:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also, just corrected spelling within the "k" page to reflect proper spelling of name. When the page is moved, all data within the page will be correct. Yx7791 (talk) 23:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- You didn't have to, though it's fine if you did. When admins fix copy-paste moves, they typically also merge both page's history so that it presents as one page. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 23:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also, just corrected spelling within the "k" page to reflect proper spelling of name. When the page is moved, all data within the page will be correct. Yx7791 (talk) 23:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks.Yx7791 (talk) 23:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
ANI thread
Hello Elektrik Shoos. Thanks for your quick response to my recent posting at ANI. However in your response, you implied criticism of the etiquette of my behaviour, and I should be grateful if you could clarify how you believe I failed in this area. I considered it more appropriate to ask this question here, rather than clutter up the page at ANI. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have to be honest, it's rather late where I am right now and I'm editing while half-asleep. Normally, per WP:SUICIDE, you'd want to report potential suicide threats directly to the Foundation and not to community boards. This also has the benefit of shielding the privacy of the user who is considering suicide. However, it was poor form on my part to jump the gun and not assume good faith on your part, and I'm sorry for that. Please disregard my initial response. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 07:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm wondering if it might be helpful if the wording in the header (before one posts at ANI) is changed, as it currently requests that users "please also email" (my emphasis) the Wikimedia Foundation of any potential suicide threat - it doesn't advise against making a posting on the noticeboard. Initially I had deliberately not informed the user of my posting at ANI, because if they were genuinely considering taking their own life, I didn't think it would be sympathetic to put up a sign on their talk page with words to the effect of "Oi! You're being discussed elsewhere!" Well obviously I'm exaggerating a bit here, but hopefully you understand my point. Thanks again for your conciliatory words above. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
Do you have any reason to believe that the surname article is not a stub or would it be alright if you or I reintroduced the stub tags? Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Stub tags are typically not placed on disambig/list pages, as the tag implies there's room for content expansion where there's not necessarily. Sheynhertz-Unbayg has been warned about this before. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 02:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please note that the article was not a disambiguation page, but was a surname page. The difference can be found at MOS:DABNAME which states that "Articles only listing persons with a certain given name or surname, known as anthroponymy articles, are not disambiguation pages, and this Manual of Style does not apply to them." (Emphasis in original) To be certain, I was completely unaware of this distinction until the beginning of this ordeal. The style guidelines for this page can be found at MOS:APO. In addition, if you would like a complete list of articles that the user edited I can give it to you. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- In addition, any responses right now may be delayed, I apologize for that. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huh. I wasn't either, and was operating under the assumption that they were all disambig pages. Alright, it's probably best to replace the stub tags, though I'm not sure any template other than {{surname-stub}} is necessary. Also, I don't need a list of the user's contributions. I've been sorting through them myself, top to bottom. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- WPAPO:STUB is what I used to determine stub status. I do think you are correct in only using {{surname-stub}}. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huh. I wasn't either, and was operating under the assumption that they were all disambig pages. Alright, it's probably best to replace the stub tags, though I'm not sure any template other than {{surname-stub}} is necessary. Also, I don't need a list of the user's contributions. I've been sorting through them myself, top to bottom. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
join wikiproject
Dude If you want to make all those changes To my WikiProject Join. --Pacman451 (talk) 15:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Daniel Davis (Youtube Personality) Article
Thanks for your concern. This page was not created by me but by my fans, as you can see[here]. Apparently it was submitted to the wrong Wikipedia section and therefore deleted, so I am re-submitting it in what I think is the appropriate section. Please check the sources and if this page is less worthy of being added than Youtube personalities [Caitlin Hill], the creators of [Ask a Ninja], [Fox Bronte], [Amanda Baggs], or [Amy Walker], then I will gladly hand it over for deletion. But if that is the case, then those wiki submissions should also be removed, as they only have as much right to be on Wikipedia as this page does. If you believe it is still in the wrong section, please let me know what you think would be a more appropriate section. Tinkernut (talk) 04:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Tinkernut
- If it is created in userspace like Zaz986 did above, it isn't an article yet, it's a userspace draft and probably isn't complete yet. I'd wait to move it until the user who made it feels it's ready. Also, if you're the subject of the page, I would strongly suggest you avoid editing it to maintain neutrality - see our conflict of interest guideline. Finally, the notability of other internet celebrities isn't necessarily relevant here. (As a handy tip, if you're linking to pages inside of Wikipedia, you can just enclose the name of the page in double brackets: for instance, typing in
[[Amanda Baggs]]
will result in Amanda Baggs.) Please let me know if you have any other questions, though I'd prefer to direct this particular discussion instead to happen on Talk:Daniel Davis (Youtube Personality), the discussion page for that article, as it's more relevant there. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 04:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's actually a big help. I want to make sure it's done right, so I'll contact Zaz986 and work with him to get it to the appropriate location. Thanks! BTW, is there anyway to delete the page I created? Or do you have that ability? Tinkernut (talk) 04:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Tinkernut
- I can't delete it myself, as I'm not an administrator, but I can tag it for speedy deletion and it will be removed shortly. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 04:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's actually a big help. I want to make sure it's done right, so I'll contact Zaz986 and work with him to get it to the appropriate location. Thanks! BTW, is there anyway to delete the page I created? Or do you have that ability? Tinkernut (talk) 04:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Tinkernut
Speedy deletion of Michael Ocansey
I saw the speedy deletion of Michael Ocansey I created yesterday. Thanks for the correction. I think such info will be best put on his profile. --Nkansahrexford (talk) 06:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- If you contact one of the administrators on this list, they can restore the article for you and convert it into a userspace draft, which can allow you to work on it without risk of deletion. Hope this helps. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I rolled back your speedy deletion, because it's a valid dab page even if a sock edited it. Thank you for understanding. Bearian (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's fine. It's site policy to revert any and all edits made by a banned user, save those that reintroduce blatant vandalism or other egregious things, but it's completely acceptable to revert an edit yourself and assume responsibility for it. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 00:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
Nora Ephron
I reverted the article - see [1] - I say we wait until we get an official word on her death before being too hasty to get it up. – Connormah (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Though the article should be kept on watch for now, based on the article above. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 22:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
George Takei
I took serious offense to your suggestion on the George Takei Talk page that editor Hearfourmewesique and I break it up. IMO that editor has a maturity problem, especially now that I have seen their talk page. To suggest I am somehow on the same level as someone who bursts in on the George Takei page, posts a random appearance in the biography, when I remove it they say the page should have a filmography section, I agree, and then they begin flaming me for not creating the section myself. Really? Akuvar (talk) 03:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't particularly want to get this involved in that fight, but I'll say this: I saw two editors arguing and I cautioned likewise. I don't really care who's less mature. Arguing is arguing. And to be honest, suggesting that I was anything other than an editor who left a note on the talk page suggests a lack of good faith on your part. I'll say nothing else on the matter, because I don't want to be involved any more. Please respect this. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 04:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. Akuvar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
Accidental rollback from the watchlist
Hi! I used to have the same problem, even when not using my phone. If you'd like to hide the watchlist's rollback links (which rarely are useful), you can do so by adding the following code to User:Elektrik Shoos/vector.css:
/* hide rollback from watchlist */ .page-Special_Watchlist .mw-rollback-link {display:none;
}
—David Levy 00:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip, I'm pasting this in right now. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 00:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Author/Elektrik Shoos
My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Nutrition. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
Wikithanks
Thanks for dealing with this guy. Hope you're having a nice night.
TheArguer SAY HI! 05:28, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not a problem. All in a night's (volunteer) work. :) elektrikSHOOS (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Lightbourn
It appears that you placed the PROD on the Lightbourn article while I was creating an AfD nomination for it with Twinkle, I thus sent it to AfD unaware that the PROD was there and that I would be removing it. My apologies; regardless, you can comment on the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Lightbourn. CtP (t • c) 20:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
NPP backlog
Would you be willing to help me with this NPP backlog? To help, go to 9:26, 22 June 2012. Some weeks ago, there was a large amount of new articles and I couldn't review all them. If you can at least help me get to a week ahead, I'd appreciate it. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
page for "Joel Dodd"
I have just read the description of myself on the page "Joel Dodd". It is accurate and (currently) not libelous, even though I no longer play with the NP Orchestra, having withdrawn in 2010 - this is the only error that I can see.
Regards, Joel Dodd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.129.173 (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for fixing my IPSock placement errors (example). I added a note to Template:IPsock/doc to make it less likely that someone will make the same error in the future. Again thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. It's an easy mistake to make on IP addresses, as default signatures don't obviously link to their user pages. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
Talkback
Message added 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank you. TBrandley 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
Hi Ryan
Hey there Ryan! Ran across your userpage after a series of seemingly random clicks, and hey look another college student! I'll be heading back to USU in a couple of weeks, studying computer science. I'm looking forward to it. Good luck to you! • Jesse V.(talk) 06:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's actually out of date. I'm not headed to college at the moment. Thanks for the well wishes, though! elektrikSHOOS (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
Pokémon vandalism
I'm a semi-frequent 4chan user and found the thread exhorting everyone to vandalize the article pretty quickly. I've told them all to knock it off or I'll have the page protected, no need to try and warn them all individually. dalahäst (let's talk!) 21:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've got the thread open, too. (I'm not a frequent 4chan user, but it wasn't that difficult to find.) It's all good. Just wait about 10 minutes until the thread 404s, protect pages as needed and block the ones doing it in the meantime. WP:RBI. Just don't keep encouraging them. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm actually not an admin either (rollbacker, like you—though that could change in the future, who knows?), so I'm limited to filing requests for that, heh. I told them not to bother, since we'll just file RPPs on everything they vandalize. dalahäst (let's talk!) 21:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello there elektric shoes man
how are you today hey??>?@@@@!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.4.168 (talk) 22:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm fine, thanks! How are you? elektrikSHOOS (talk) 23:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 August 2012
- In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia
- Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.
- Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension
- WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
Page Curation newsletter
Hey Elektrik Shoos. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
Modification to May PC be applied to pages to protect against violations of the policy on biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)?
Hello. Because the "Yes" section was split between one group in favor of applying protection to all articles and one group in favor of applying protection to articles only when there has been a problem, I have split the section to reflect this difference. Please go back to that page and make sure that your vote is still in the section that most closely reflects your views. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Featured content: On the road again
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
Thank you for notification
Your notice directed me to this thread, where I have found out ongoing matters concerning me and I have taken part in the discussion to explain my position. It seems the user 83.81.44.205 wants me banned from Wikipedia because I undid the user's removal of cited text that I inserted. The user also accuses me of citing from unreliable online tabloid which appears to be the second most visited] among all websites in its country of origin. Thank you for you notification. The matter could have missed my eyes without your notice. -M. Tawsif Salam 01:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
Due to your prior request, I have started an RfA review for you. I have others ongoing as well, and may not get them completed in order. I will notify you when I'm done, but may also notify you if I (or others) have questions for you to answer. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 18:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've finished the review, which can be found at that link. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 07:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Dorner during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Herp Derp (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
Orphaned non-free media (File:Let's Pretend This Never Happened.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Let's Pretend This Never Happened.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels