User talk:Edechiconza

Welcome!

Hello, Edechiconza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IxD&A moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, IxD&A, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Randykitty (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s)

Hello, Edechiconza. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s)

Hello, Edechiconza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Interaction Design and Architecture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interaction Design and Architecture(s) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Interaction Design and Architecture(s), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 00:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interaction Design and Architecture(s) (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NJOURNALS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude talk 18:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edechiconza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude talk 18:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ASLERD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ASLERD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 22:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Edechiconza. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Edechiconza. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Edechiconza|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits (pure scientific interest and voluntary work) Edechiconza (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits here and here seem to contradict that. Why did you previously declare a conflict of interest? ––FormalDude talk 02:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have understood that one should declare also cultural conflict of interest. It was not intended at all to declare any monetary of material conflict of interest. The journal, by the way, is realized as a fully no profit initiative (like wikipedia) that offers to all scholars a fully open platform and the possibility to publish at no cost their, work provided that they pass a serious double blind reviewing process. Edechiconza (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Interaction Design and Architecture(s)

Hello, Edechiconza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Interaction Design and Architecture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]