User talk:EEverest 8848

Proposed deletion of Mrigendra raj pandey

The article Mrigendra raj pandey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ULPS (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, EEverest 8848. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ma Pani Doctor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ma Pani Doctor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ma Pani Doctor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Pani Doctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

nirmal (talk) 06:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jiwanta Sambandha has been accepted

Jiwanta Sambandha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much 🙏 EEverest 8848 (talk) 09:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nepal Bidya Bhusan Padak

The article Nepal Bidya Bhusan Padak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wyndhan Han (talk) 10:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Social media use in health awareness

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Social media use in health awareness, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Medical Education Commission

Hello, EEverest 8848,

Thank you for creating Medical Education Commission.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Eeverest. Please improve this article with clearer English. Please check the date of the National Medical Education Act - 2075 is in the future! The last two clauses of the second sentence don't make any sense, and the reference does not back up the sentence. The article should be included in addtional categories and be added to appropriate Wikiprojects.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. EEverest 8848 (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anjani Kumar Jha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anjani Kumar Jha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions EEverest 8848 (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much. i was not aware of this. will love to join it and contribute as well as learn from senior editors. EEverest 8848 (talk) 11:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Medical College moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nobel Medical College. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ram Mandir Prana Pratishtha

Hello, EEverest 8848,

Thank you for creating Ram Mandir Prana Pratishtha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Requires cleanup and copyedit

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Herald}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank u sir EEverest 8848 (talk) 14:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your requests for permission

I am declining all your requests since you are hat collecting with no idea of what the permissions actually do. Familiarise yourself with what each permission does, the granting guidelines, and read the blue box that is shown in each WP:PERM page. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 12:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @DatGuy. It is not about hat collecting or misusing the authorities. Getting any of those requested positions would have been beneficial to me in my further edits. That was the only motto. I have requested for each after completing the criteria and after reading all the blue boxes and granting guidelines. Welcome your decision Sir. EEverest 8848 (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you did read, you shouldn’t have applied for autopatrolled rights, which you were clearly under the minimum threshold. – robertsky (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky I accept that was a mistake from my side. Besides Autopatrolling I guess i fulfilled all criteria. EEverest 8848 (talk) 12:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See DatGuy‘s assessment below. – robertsky (talk) 12:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Sir. Thank you EEverest 8848 (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how they would be beneficial to you. You requested 8/13 possible permissions on WP:PERM, even one you already have. I don't know how page mover, considering your only moves are from draftspace to mainspace and you've zero edits any requested moves. Same with template editor, since you've made no edits to the template or module namespace. I could go on, but you don't meet the granting guidelines for the rest of the permissions too. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 12:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info. Will request once all the criterias are fulfilled. EEverest 8848 (talk) 12:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy @Robertsky Actually I m enjoying doing Wikipedia edits. Was probably more excited after getting Extended Reviewer. I saw that 500 mainspace edits will enable other features. That's why I requested for those except some exceptions like Autopatrolled. Could you please guide me about what will be my next step if I keep editing and how can I get new page reviewer ? EEverest 8848 (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "next step". The goal of Wikipedia isn't to win as many hats as possible. You want a goal? Write a featured article. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 13:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Cardiac Centre (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no substance here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Cardiac Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EEverest 8848! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank u sir. I have got insight about reason for decline. have tried to edit from NPOV. still there can be something to improve, plz guide. EEverest 8848 (talk) 11:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Cardiac Centre (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read what is required for an organization to be notable. You have refbombed it without adding value.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Cardiac Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 14:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wedding of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wedding of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Star Mississippi 17:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir @Star Mississippi. I accept with full respect to my senior editor's decision of deletion of the page "Wedding of Anant Ambani and Radhika Merchant" recently created by me but wanted to make you aware of the fact that I have attempted to create the article out of my curiosity not because of any connection with the subject. Before creating this article, I checked if there is any article like this on Wikipedia and I found several such articles. How a beginner like me should know that such articles are not meant to be made when the event has got widespread global coverage? Most humbly I want to ask If I am not connected at all with the subject, was the deletion of the article justifiable ? EEverest 8848 (talk) 08:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to create it in draft space, but I don't think you're familiar enough with notabilty guidelines to understand what is required so I'd recommend AFC, although it's not required. A wedding being the "talk of the town" does not mean it's notable. There are many celebrity weddings.

I realize there's a cultural element to it, but I suggest you don't address editors as Sir, we're all equal here. Star Mississippi 15:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank u very much for explaining. your answer has relieved me to an extent. hoping for your support n guidance in future. i will be obliged. EEverest 8848 (talk) 06:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nobel Medical College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nobel Medical College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobel Medical College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank u sir. i understand it sir. But, my response was for another article wedding of anant ambani and radhika mechant where i received warning. as i am completely innocent in this case, i felt disheartened to get such response from very senior respectable editors. It was discouraging . i still wonder and trying to find out my mistake in that article. i dont feel bad at all for deletion of that article ( just a time waste, nothing more ), but its difficult to accept the blame which i did not do. I am sorry to say this EEverest 8848 (talk) 10:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @EEverest8848: this is not warning as you seems like very new to wikipedia, it is just an deletion discussion which is going on please check WP:AFD to know more about it. If you are somehow affiliated with Nobel Medical College please enlist coi in your userpage like i had one which is for paid editing but for coi please check WP:COI if not just ignore this message and follow my suggestions and add some reliable sources following WP:RS. DIV IN E 09:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cardiovascular risk screening

Hello, EEverest 8848. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cardiovascular risk screening, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cardiovascular risk screening

Hello, EEverest 8848. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cardiovascular risk screening".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Cardiac Centre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Cardiac Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Cardiac Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 12:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/everestbot8848

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/everestbot8848, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Primefac (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]