Jump to content

User talk:Dwaipayanc/Archive 58

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 55Archive 56Archive 57Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60→Archive 65

Hi,

Hi there, I am very sorry to make you involved in the Hyderabad FAC, Actually there ( all established editors who are commenting and working on the FAC of Hyderabad ) conversation is above my skills to understand, that’s why I thought to be quite and observe the FAC process. Any way I appreciate and am grateful that you initiated and handled the FAC process very finely. Lets hope for the best. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

What is...

Sanyas rog and mathar bhitor shira chhinre jaowa in English? Can you please translate this portion so that we can add it in the article? --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Did you know... in a music festival in Nazrul Mancha, Kolkata on 05 and 06 January 2013 all these performers performed: Shivkumar Sharma, Birju Maharaj, Hari Prasad Chaurasia, Aashish Khan, Girija Devi, Zakir Hussain etc etc. So many eminent Indian classical musician performing in one festival in Kolkata. To add more, the festival was dedicated to Ravi Shankar and Ali Akbar Khan and it was presented by Tejendra Narayan Majumdar. Learn more here (feel free to c/e) --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jatindra Mohan Sengupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidency College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Fixed-Tito Dutta (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for making Uttarakhand a GA. Ayanosh (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi sir, I observed your sharp points on Chopra peer review. I want to ask the same for her awards list. Please, help me on the peer review Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2. Thank You—PKS (TALK) 20:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Tripura

Hi Dwaipayanc. I've added a couple of comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tripura/archive1 which you may like to have a look at. Skinsmoke (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar
You deserve this barnstar! A long time due.. Tito Dutta (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Email

Hello, Dwaipayanc. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—Vensatry (Ping me) 15:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

You deserve it! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

They have started nominating those PD-India files again. I have posted a reply here ! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Nrisingha Prasad Bhaduri

This DYK is on hold for a long time now. I have expanded his literary career section and removed some portion from encyclopedia project. Can you please make some copyedits in the article so we can go ahead? --Tito Dutta (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

List of literary works published in Asia Raja FLC

Hi Dwaipayanc, would you be willing to revisit the nom page to see if I've adequately addressed your comments? Thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Re: Swayamvaram

Yeah. I had to correct lot of reference and major ce as lots of quotes were used as is, without adding much value to the article. But I liked working on this article. If you have come across the references or sources about film's style, do let me know so that I can add those into the article. - Vivvt • (Talk) 22:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

I have checked for the online sources for copy-vio but still you may want to re-verify as I might be missing something. Let me check on styles/theme. If you come across any good ref for it then do let me know. - Vivvt • (Talk) 22:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Got one book on Gopalakrishnan, "Adoor Gopalakrishnan: A Life in Cinema By Gautaman Bhaskaran". This has lot of info on each of his films, including Swayamvaram. Let me see how can we utilize it. Be it GA or FL (In case that happens ever).
Not yet. Will add once you review the current state. I might spoil the article if I add now. So will add later. - Vivvt • (Talk) 17:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
I tried addressing them using this link. I've kept some of the quotes as is. I am not sure how useful those are. You may want to address them in the review. - Vivvt • (Talk) 06:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
I checked the link and hardly found anything. Probably I'm missing something bigtime or not sure what I am supposed to see! Though I corrected another copy-paste sentence. - Vivvt • (Talk)
I've corrected the copy-vio in the article. My Bad! I missed it in the last review. Will also check in coming days. Sorry for the trouble. - Vivvt • (Talk) 18:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I saw your comments and will work on it. Honestly, as you've pointed out this time, there are some nicely written sentences in the article. But I cannot find the copy-vio source for those so I havent removed any of those. I am not sure whether I should keep those are not. - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh. Thats good. Thanks for giving me a chance to get an article to GA. - Vivvt • (Talk) 16:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
After GA, I took a break from the article and started working on Ray's documentary expansion. Now, with all the documentaries 5x expanded, I can resume on Swayamvaram. These are the two links I was talking about 1 and 2. Let me know if you are planning to any other article. - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Alright. The other source is from Temple University and should be RS. - Vivvt • (Talk) 18:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at Talk:Vimala Temple/GA1.
Message added 05:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have addressed the second opinion comments. Please take a look. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. The article was passed as GA by a third editor. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar. --Redtigerxyz Talk 02:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thank you very much. Nice to get one from the experienced editors like you. - Vivvt • (Talk) 02:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Help in Bhubaneswar

Hope all is fine at your end. I am currently developing the article Bhubaneswar, almost from a scratch. Its still in its intermediate stage of development and I have an aim to develop the article to GA level by April. Content addition/reduction in all the sections, except History is complete. Currently working on References for all the sections. Considering the best person known to me for copyediting, I would request you to kindly have a look at the article. I would request you to kindly summarise and copyedit at least the Urban structure' and Culture section for the time being. Regards. Amartyabag TALK2ME 15:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Help in Bhubaneswar

Hope all is fine at your end. I am currently developing the article Bhubaneswar, almost from a scratch. Its still in its intermediate stage of development and I have an aim to develop the article to GA level by April. Content addition/reduction in all the sections, except History is complete. Currently working on References for all the sections. Considering the best person known to me for copyediting, I would request you to kindly have a look at the article. I would request you to kindly summarise and copyedit at least the Urban structure' and Culture section for the time being. Regards. Amartyabag TALK2ME 15:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I am doing fine. Just three more months in Bhubaneswar. This is what I have considered a tribute to the city which has hosted me for 5 years. I have got through campusing in a leading General Insurance Company and most probably moving somewhere else. You know what, I mentioned in my CV that I edit Wikipedia as a hobby, and the interviewers were keen to know more about this. Amartyabag TALK2ME 03:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kathleen B. Hogan

Hello Dwaipayanc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kathleen B. Hogan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Per awards on the talkpage. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Republic Of Chomania

Hello Dwaipayanc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Republic Of Chomania, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: No evidence that this is a hoax, it could quite well be a micronation being set up. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Pamela Yash Chopra

The article you requested for CSD is not of a completely non-important subject. She is playback singer of many songs. Also producer and co-writer to many others. Her IMDb entry seems sufficient for Wikipedia's notability. To prove that this Pamela Chopra is same as Pamela Yash Chopra, you may use this source which says "Because wife Pamela Chopra liked to sing, she not only sang in several films from Doosara Aadmi (1977) to DDLJ (1995) but also produced Aaina and co-wrote Dil To Pagal Hai." §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

No probs! Until today i was under impression that the singer has no connection with Yash Chopra. This article creation brought light. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Dwaipayanc. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
)--Omer123hussain (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

New message

Hello Dwaipayanc! It's been a while since I last talked to you. How are you? I would greatly appreciate if you could offer your inputs here! Thanks -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 03:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

LOL... that was indeed quite a coincidence. Anyways, a lot of hard work has gone into improving Kapoor's article and I believe it can successfully become a FA! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 03:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

What was the book like on it afterwards? I suppose I anticipated it might have had more information. Yes, I think its pretty much FA standard now, although you could ask Tim riley or Brian Boulton to give it a read first.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

TUJS

Hi. I could, but not right now. Please remind me in a few weeks, in case I forget. --Soman (talk) 08:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

59th NFA

Yea. I did not see the article since last FLC. Somehow it got missed while developing SR articles. Rambling man had said that article still has issues with prose and second run with GoCE might help. Though he did not mention what all those in details. I am not sure whether we should approach GoCE one more time or not. Whats your opinion on that? - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

That should be fine. The GoCE edits might take couple of months. By then, DFF might also declare winners for 60th NFA. - Vivvt • (Talk) 17:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
"Chopped off"!! But I agree to what you are saying. Unless we trim it down, it wouldnt make any move further. So lets do it that way. - Vivvt • (Talk) 20:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The separate section for all the jury members for three sections makes it little disconnected. Also, IMO, putting it at the end of all, gives less importance to the juries. In case you want to have it clubbed together, putting them before award section starts would be appropriate. Again, I wouldnt have it separate in the first place itself. :) - Vivvt • (Talk) 00:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Lets get it reviewed by someone. A curious question is your mailbox. - Vivvt • (Talk) 23:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Do you suggest GoCE copyedit? else we can also ask any INCINE members for the same. Adding a paragraph in the lead about Indian cinema would express the larger scale of the awards unlike filmfare or other similar award functions. However, I feel it fits more appropriately into the parent article than year based article. Thanks for your interest in the article. - Vivvt • (Talk) 03:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Let me put a request for it. - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Started with PR here. Might invite Rambling Man as well, in case he wants to put any comments. - Vivvt • (Talk) 04:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sure. Not a problem. I will work on those. - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Invitation from WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League

Priyanka Chopra Artistry Section

Hello sir, you made some good points over her artistry section. I reworked on her artistry and had tried to be more neutral and had used negative as well as positive analysis which is required in artistry section. The draft is currently in my sandbox. Please, review it and share your opinions on it. I think it is stable and neutral and has no fancruft feel to it. Some work us still left. Here it is. Thank you.Prashant  Conversation  17:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Sandbox

Hi, I am here to ask you that can I write an article on the Sandbox? ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 09:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Hyderabad expansion

Hi, could you kindly advice which is the right section to describe the landmarks of Hyderabad Ex: Charminar, Chowmahalla palace, Qutb shahi tombs etc. Shall we describe those when they are mentioned for the first time in the article or in the sections of Neighborhood and landmark or the Architecture. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I had restructured the sub sections and added new section of "Cityscape", I will work out to stuff the information as per sections topic. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

Re: Free advice

Yes, I have been planning to do so for a while. I guess now I'll go just ahead and do it. Btw, I am a bit worried about some of the comments being posted by certain users on Kareena Kapoor's nomination. --smarojit (buzz me) 03:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

There was a minor glitch with the system and that's the reason why I didn't receive it. Try sending it to me now! -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Light: Swami Vivekananda

This articles has been started and has been nominated at DYK. Do you think this article has GA potential? There is a message at article's talk page which you can see! I have not got any reply from them. If you can identify voice please write the name of the singers from here --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Those are not available. Film released on 1st this month. Can you work on the soundtrack section? --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Sholay

That one and MeA both deserve a good treatment, but it can be hard to find good sources. Of course the book would help. Right now I am concentrating on Priyanka Chopra as you know. I am just about ready to submit it for FA, but I am apprehensive after seeing the beating that Kareena Kapoor is taking there. So much is getting rewritten or removed; and you yourself are participating in that. I scanned some other FACs that are ongoing to see the comments, and they are pretty brutal as well. I am surprised that anything gets passed. Do you think PC stands a chance now? BollyJeff | talk 03:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Kareena FAC has had no new reviews for a couple days now. How does it come to an end? Does an administrator decide or what? BollyJeff | talk 13:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Ray filmography

Can you take a quick look at Satyajit Ray filmography for its prose and/or any other issues? I'm planning to take it for FL soon. - Vivvt • (Talk) 20:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I already have 59th NFA in PR. So will have to wait till I put another one for PR. - Vivvt • (Talk) 20:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Not that I am busy but I cannot put more than one PR at a time. - Vivvt • (Talk) 00:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ's talk page.
Message added 04:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Check your e-mail! -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 04:23, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

FAC

Hello, Bollyjeff needs your suggestions on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Priyanka Chopra/archive1, as it is currently an FAC. Please help and present your thoughts over the article.Prashant  ✉  12:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I got tired of waiting for action on Kapoor, so I just went ahead and nominated this one. It has been a couple days now without a single comment. Is that good or bad? Do you think I should ask some veteran reviews to have a look, or just be patient? BollyJeff | talk 18:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Talkback

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at CorrectKnowledge's talk page.
Message added 08:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Emraan Hashmi

Hi Dwaipayanc! Just wanted to inform you that 3 users (including me) have agreed with your idea to merge the List of awards and nominations received by Emraan Hashmi into his main article. What do you wanna do next? Should we wait for other users to comment? GleekVampire | talk! 14:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh, my bad... I'm sorry for bothering you. :) GleekVampire | talk! 15:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Omayra FAC

Hi Dwaipayanc! Thanks so much for your review - I have a question! ceranthor 17:35, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Kolkata cuisine

Kolkata cuisine is currently under AfD discussion. May be you can have a look at the article and develop it into a better article. Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at Smarojit's talk page.
Message added 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

smarojit (buzz me) 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

DYK for Tripura Legislative Assembly election, 2013

Carabinieri (talk) 08:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

How's Hyderabad?

Hi Dwaipayan. The GOCE request for Hyderabad is very near the top of the queue now, and today a very good copy editor came to my talk page offering to do it and asking about the status. Has the additional text about landmarks that you and Omer were thinking of been added yet, or do you have plans? If so, perhaps we could take off the on-hold marker now. What do you think -- is it ready? Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I had added some text at Hyd Landmarks which may require lot lot of copy editing, may you have a look at it. Mean while I will update Simon about the addition of text. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Please advice shall I submit a c/e request know, or later on. any way I droped a request here. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Dwaipayanc. You may recall that on 10 January 2013 I asked my local library for a copy of:
  • Prasad, Dharmendra (1 January 1986). Social and Cultural Geography of Hyderabad City: A Historical Perspective. Inter-India Publications. ISBN 978-81-210-0045-1.
The book has now arrived from the British Library. I have been told I cannot take the book out on loan and can only view the book within my library. As my library is some distance away from me, I will not be able to view the book often; perhaps only once or twice per week. Would you like my help with the article? I am prepared to edit the article using the book as a reference. Obviously, any subsequent changes I make can be reverted followed by discussion on the talk-page, per the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (note this is not a policy or guideline) --Senra (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Dharmendra (1986) p. 18 "Chiefly owing to the presence of a large garrison, Secunderabad [the British part of Hyderabad?] became a great sporting centre with its parade and polo grounds, its race course and cricket, foot-ball [sic] and hockey fields.". I notice our Hyderabad article does not mention Polo --Senra (talk) 11:09, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Re:Other stuff

Hey, I have seen Argo and loved it. Though, my favourite film of last year was probably Zero Dark Thirty or Life of Pi. Seen them? I had seen J. Edgar last year and was a bit disappointed with it. I am a huge fan of Clint Eastwood's work, so this one seemed far inferior to his other films. But Leonardo was fantastic (as usual). --smarojit (buzz me) 05:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Not as big a fan as myself Smarojit! Interested in getting a few of his films up to GA status? Excellent in regard to Mother India Dwai, but can we please hold off FAing until Kapoor and Chopra are done, there's a lot going on at the moment to keep track of and I don't just mean Indian articles!.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Of course I'll read it LOL, I'd like to think you'd consider me a co-writer on it, I have made 191 edits to it after all! I believe I added as much as I could find on it, not having the book that you had of course!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Started Zia Sarhadi, you might be interested in expanding it. Have you and Redtiger checked Highbeam and JSTOR for possible further content for Mother India? I think it's nearly ready for FA now. I can still spot quite a few things, some which I've fixed myself, but no doubt will be addressed during the FAC.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

How about nomming it on March 1, St. David's Day here in Wales.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Mark seems to be done. PR says "but that's all my comments". Let us nominate on tomorrow's auspicious day and complete Mark Arsten's comments over the weekend latest. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

My draft for FAC, feel free to modify: A tale of a woman's battle against the world, Mother India (1957) is an epic Indian film which was the most expensive Bollywood production and earned the highest revenue for any Hindi film at that time and even made it to the Oscars. The article is GA since last March. The article underwent an exhaustive peer review by Crisco 1492, Tim riley, Bollyjeff and Mark Arsten, and was copyedited by User:Rothorpe. We are nominating this article for featured article because in our opinion, it satisfies all FA criteria after the copyedit and the peer review. --Redtigerxyz Talk 19:12, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Excellent, agreed, it's ready for FA.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, this sounds nice. So, March 1 is the day. Please go ahead.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother India/archive1. Though I archived PR to start FAC, will recheck if any comments are pending. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks Dwai! I guess all our hard work paid off! BTW you deserve credit as well; your edits only helped the article get better! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:The Mirror Never Lies/GA1

Hi there Dwai, just a heads up: I've already finished replying to your comments. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Editing

Why did you remove my edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 9711CA (talk • contribs) 00:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Dwaipayanc. You have new messages at CorrectKnowledge's talk page.
Message added 23:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Imran Khan PR

Hey Dwaipayanc! I would greatly appreciate if you could offer your inputs here! Thanks GleekVampire | talk! 08:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Nomination of Indraprastha Abasan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indraprastha Abasan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indraprastha Abasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Dwaipayanc. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Redtigerxyz Talk 18:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

:Reply Hyd

Hi, I am doing well, yes your edits on Hyd landmark were very helpful, As you are busy with Mother India article i don't wanted to bother you for hyderabad C/e issues, until you are done with Mother India article FA, shall we proceed for the nominating Hyderabad India at guild of c/e's. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Ami Aadu

It went very fast. Article creation, DYK nomination, DYK review, DYK promotion- all happened within 13-14 hours. Have you watched this film Template:Did you know nominations/Ami Aadu? Last part of the plot needs some work (Suleman loses one hand in Iraq bombing). Have you seen the film by any chance? --Tito Dutta (contact) 03:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

PC Public image and personal life

Why did you feel it necessary to redo this section again, after one of the FAC reviewers re-wrote it recently? This thing is a constantly moving target. BollyJeff | talk 18:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes, he did it on March 6. he was concerned about keeping like data together also, which seems not as good now. BollyJeff | talk 18:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I am not saying that your version is bad, but after the reviewer made his comment, I changed the section, then he changed it (presumably to his liking), then you changed it again, even removing stuff. Now today PKS has added a bunch of stuff that needs some copy editing. Too many cooks in here. BollyJeff | talk 18:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Dilip Kumar Roy

Hallo, I like to upload your picture of Dilip Kumar Roy on the German wikipedia. May ou help me and upload the picture on Wiki Commens or on the site of German Wikipedia or give me an information on my side of (German) Wikipedia: Josef K. Josef K. (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians

Hello Dwaipayanc/Archive 58, you are cordially invited to join the initiative Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians. We're a group of editors working to maintain and improve databse of those editors who are no longer with us. All of these deceased Wikipedians have changed Wikipedia for the better in some way. Now, it is our turn to pay them tribute and obituaries.

If you know any Wikipedia editor, who is no longer with us, but their name is not included in our list still, please let us know. Visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Tito Dutta (contact) 03:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dwaipayanc/Archive_58&oldid=1144751726"