User talk:Krimuk2.0

Joker

I noticed your edit(diff) I added the name as originally credited to the notes column, because some (very pedantic, but possibly correct) editors would consider it WP:EGG to link to the page for The Joker using the label "Unseen Arkham Prisoner". I was trying to make minimal changes and restore things to how they had been before (page version in April 2022). -- 109.77.193.207 (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, but I still believe that character names should reflect exactly how they are credited in the film. The linking issue makes sense, so perhaps a footnote saying that the character is identified as the Joker possibly solves the issue. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Stan's Blue Banks

Filming was concluded on this movie (see). Please don't delete it as it is important to note he is the Producer.

In addition, a separate table was inserted to align with other Actors turned Producers e.g. Leonardo DiCaprio.

Happy to discuss this issue. Anythingidontevencare (talk) 05:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leo has over 10 production credits. We don't need a separate producer table for one entry. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How many credits do you need for a producer table? Anythingidontevencare (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be substantive enough to warrant one. One is definitely not it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 or 4? Including Executive Producer credits? Anythingidontevencare (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. The table is perfectly fine, as is. Look at the one at Jennifer Lawrence's page. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But for future edits, what is the number? In general? Anythingidontevencare (talk) 10:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

??? Anythingidontevencare (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Message got deleted I think Anythingidontevencare (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Demi Moore

Sorry about the edit warring (I'm not really sure what that is). I didn't look at the talk page for the article, so I just edited on a whim. I meant no disrespect! Watagwaan (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. You're good. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Short films for Sophie Thatcher

Sorry, but why did you remove the list of short films I added to Sophie Thatcher? What do you mean by "unsourced"? I wasn't aware a source was even need for a filmography. Her list of full length films doesn't have a 'source' provided either, and neither do her music videos or her discography by the way. Why isn't that a problem in those case, but it suddenly is a problem in the case of the short films? I don't understand that.
Same goes for the mention of the fact that she's also a singer. Why did you remove that? There's a discography section in the article now. Do I need to add a source for the fact that she's a singer? Same question here: the fact that she's an actress isn't "sourced" either, other than the fact that the article mentions the projects she's been in. So why is it suddenly a problem if the article also mentions that she's a singer?
By the way you could have just added a "citation needed" if you feel that way, or posted a message on the talk page or contacted me directly. I don't really like it or think it's very productive if people start simply removing/reverting additions done by other people in good faith without any further conversation. I'd appreciate a more cooperative/productive way of doing things.
Anyway, what would be considered a "source" in this case? A link to IMDb? Greetings, RagingR2 (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]