User talk:Drowneded

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Drowneded! I am Brewcrewer and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Amanda Kolson Hurley, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please decide which version of this draft you want reviewed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Drowneded/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Drowneded/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Drowneded! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Anne Quito

Hello, Drowneded,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Stevey7788 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Anne Quito should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Quito .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stevey7788}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Stevey7788}} Hi Stevey7788,

Thanks for starting the discussion. As you may have guessed, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia. So there may be existing discussions about this elsewhere of which I'm not aware, but it seems slightly less than welcoming to mark an article for deletion, as opposed to, say, recommending improvements. I understand the issue of having too many of the references be the subject's own work, however they're all sourced from different sites, and are representative of her range. With that said, I've added several more references and citations from outside sources, and hope that that will be enough to prevent deletion. I would hate to have one of the first articles I've taken time to create be deleted. That seems like a recipe for discouraging new Wikipedia users from continuing to participate. Drowneded (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi. We're not unfriendly, just rule bound - for excellent reasons. Such as the fact that folks constantly try to use WP as a free advertising billboard. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here are 2 tips: 1.) Tell us something about yourself and your interests and expertise on your user page. the one you get to by clicking Drowneded. 2. If you are in the process of creating a new page, it's OK to do it live instead of in you sandbox. But if that is the approach you choose, you will find it handy to place the Template:In use at the top of page. You build the page to the point where it will satisfy WP:GNG, then remove the tag. You'll find it more convenient than having a page you just started creating brought to deletion discussion. Cheers, and welcome.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Kolson Hurley (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 08:26, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 08:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kelsey Keith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kelsey Keith, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kelsey Keith

Hello, Drowneded. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kelsey Keith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley

Hello, Drowneded. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amanda Kolson Hurley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Drowneded/sandbox

Hello, Drowneded. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley

Hello, Drowneded. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amanda Kolson Hurley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI check for Curbed

Hello. Do you have any connection to the real estate website Curbed? MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, I do not. I do read a lot of their posts, though. It looks like you've taken down a post that I spent a lot of time improving at https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Draft:Alissa_Walker - this is frustrating. The person in question had been deemed not notable. I made an effort to flesh out the post and prove notability. Now the post is removed again because of concern over fan POV? This seems like an unwinnable battle: Don't write enough and the person is deemed not notable. Write too much and you're branded a fan, thus whatever you've written is dismissed out of hand. Drowneded (talk) 04:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)user:drowneded[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alissa Walker (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm struggling to see any news articles about Walker (rather than by her, or interviews where she's talking about something else). Is she possibly a notable author? i.e. has her book received multiple independent journalistic reviews?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alissa Walker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alissa Walker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amanda Kolson Hurley

Hello, Drowneded. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amanda Kolson Hurley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alissa Walker (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The awards are promising. However, the sources are very poor. Read WP:GOLDENRULE and WP:OVERKILL. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alissa Walker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alissa Walker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red

Hello Drowneded! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues. If you wish to participate, please visit our WikiProject Women in Red page and click on the Join WikiProject button on the right. Thanks! Rosiestep (talk) 23:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]