User talk:Dpammm

Welcome!

Hello, Dpammm, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent edit to an article that is part of the Latter Day Saint movement WikiProject. We welcome your contributions and hope that you will stay and contribute more. Here are some links that I found helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction to Wikipedia and Tutorial on editing
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Policies and Guidelines
• Manual of Style
• Manual of Style (Latter Day Saints)
• Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints)

If you run into a dispute, please use the Talk pages and the Latter Day Saint movement project talk page to discuss subjects (especially controversial ones) to help reach consensus. But don't be afraid to be bold!! Also, as new Mormonism-related articles are created, please make sure to add them to List of Latter Day Saint movement topics.

Remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Book of Mormon

Hello, Dpammm. You have new messages at Talk:Book of Mormon.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Book of Mormon

Usage of "The Book of Mormon" vs. the "Book of Mormon". If you wish to get the name of the article changed you will have to provide links to reliable sources which say that the official name includes "The". You might like to know that right now, if you search for "The Book of Mormon", you are redirected to the Book of Mormon article. Editor2020 02:42, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to King Benjamin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• This is considered "hard doctrine"<ref>(“Insights from My Life,” Ensign, August 2000, p.9</ref> yet the most important question of Mormon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Study Plan (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Study Plan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yann (talk) 13:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Dpammm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yann (talk) 13:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Study Plan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Study Plan. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 17:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Dpammm! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 17:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Study Plan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Study Plan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Study Plan

Hello, Dpammm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Study Plan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gospel of Luke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atonement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Study Plan

Hello, Dpammm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Study Plan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Inline citations

Some useful videos at Wikipedia:Meetup/UMassAmherst/Intro to Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 12:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

European ass

Placing quotes inside links don't work unless they are wp:piped. i.e. use ''[[cebro]]'' and not [[''cebro'']] As there is not an article on the cebro, it is a wp:redlink is there an article with a scientific or other name? Then you can pipe it; example: [[European ass|cebro]] This shows "cebro", but links to European ass: cebro. See wp:linking Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dpammm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dpammm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tayyib Al-Ism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You have been told about MOS:MORMON but are refusing to follow it. At this article and in other places you appear to be ignoring the fact that not all Mormons belong to the same denomination. Doug Weller talk 10:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Dpammm! Your additions to Captain Moroni have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Square bales

Brick shaped straw bales are referred to as square bales because the corners are square (90 degrees), the term square used to distinguish square from round bales. If you search for a rectangular baler for sale, search AI will tell you that they have expanded your search "Including results for small square balers for sale" so you would actually have some usable results. -- Paleorthid (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC) edited 18:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

"Small rectangular bales, often referred to as square bales, have been the most popular over the past 50 years." https://www.agproud.com/articles/32770-bale-sizes-and-shapes-picking-what-s-right-for-you -- Paleorthid (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Two thoughts:

(1) I don’t know if Wikipedia message etiquette permits playfulness, but in case it does I’m wondering if correcting all the edits on this one like mine leaves you any time for work, food, sleep, etc. :)

(2) serious now, your edit description is hard on some enthusiastic Wikipedia surfers readers who are scholastically mainstream yet neurodivergent (some folks with autism, etc.) and can really struggle with cases like this per their difficulty with inferred meaning and dry/ironic/gallows humor. This is an important aspect of this item, kindly keep it in mind. Thanks! Dpammma (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)