User talk:Donthreatenme

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Top Gun: Maverick. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should keep your nose away, mind your own business Donthreatenme (talk) 14:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Top Gun: Maverick) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Donthreatenme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't see why I have to be blocked, admin is just hearing one side of the story only which is pathetic. Are you going to just hand down judgment through being one sided?

Decline reason:

Please see WP:GAB to understand how to craft a reasonable unblock request. I was tempted to substantially increase your block based on this request. Yamla (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Donthreatenme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again I don't see why I should be blocked, one sided judgement just shows how much of a hypocrite and cowardice attitude one has

Decline reason:

Block is now sitewide. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Donthreatenme (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you absolutely sure you want this as your unblock request? It'll likely lead to your block being substantially extended. This is your choice, but you might want to rethink your approach. --Yamla (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then it just proves my point, both the person who reported me and you personally Donthreatenme (talk) 13:30, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were lucky the block wasn't made longer. See no personal attacks. Doug Weller talk 15:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

whatever, point proven, I'll be back to edit more once this one sided block ends. Donthreatenme (talk) 16:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donthreatenme. Thank you. Ylee (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi - I see that you created an alt account, Topgunfreak, and have used it in a topic area that you were recently blocked for edit warring over. Per WP:SOCK, this cannot be considered a valid alternative account or WP:CLEANSTART, and so I have indefinitely blocked that account. Since you did not use it while this account was blocked I am not blocking this account, but I strongly advise you to stick to using this account in future. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 17:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]