User talk:Dipralb

FC Internazionale Milano

Hi. You asked which is correct "Inter have won" or "Inter has won". I'm not sure which is correct. In American English it would be "has", but in British English it would be "have". When dealing with American vs. British English we look first to see if the subject has a strong tie to one country or the other. In this case it doesn't. After that we see which English variant was used first in the article then use that. This requires going through the history of the article and figuring it out. I haven't done this and don't feel particularly inclined to do so, but if you want to then please do so. Or perhaps you can come up with a different way to phrase it in order to avoid the issue altogether. SQGibbon (talk) 07:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

F.C. Internazionale Milano and the Italian national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Luis Suárez, Antonio Sabato, Andrea Ferrari, Alessandro Bianchi and Giovanni Invernizzi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merging articles

Dipralb, you don't need any special permission to merge the articles you posted at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. Simply:

Copy and paste the content,
Make the source article a redirect, by replacing its content with #REDIRECT [[articlename]] {{R from merge}}
Then place the template {{merged-to}} and {{merged-from}} on each talk page so that future editors know the articles were merged.

Thanks, D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:18, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot something. When you merge articles, be sure to include "Merge in foo" in the edit summary for the destination, and put "Redirect after merge to bar" in the edit summary for the source page. Thanks, D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

L'Orologiaio"

Caro Dipralb, io ti apprezzavo molto sulla wikipedia italiana, ma avevo già molti dubbi circa riuscissi veramente a capire l'italiano che è la lingua a noi due comune in tutte le mie talk che ti ho scritto. Arrivare a fare quell'errore sulla pagina inglese mi ha fatto cadere i c. per terra. Io almeno 6 anni di inglese in una scuola commerciale li ho fatti... ma tu arrivare a chiedere di tradurre "Orologiaio" imvece di "Orologio" è veramente il massimo.....--Nipas (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quando ti avevo chiesto la mail per inviati qualcosa (non l'ho mai ricevuta, oppure l'ho cancellata) sarebbe servita anche per mandarti la scansione di una delle 3 cartoline che l'anno scorso mi omaggiò il caro amico Luigi La Rocca (quello del libro del centenario del Milan edito dalla Panini). E li non puoi sbagliarti: è Ristorante "Orologio" (senza l'articolo). Ma a quanto pare tu le mail su it.wikipedia non le sai leggere visto che chi ti ha linkato un sito dove è stato scritto nel modo esatto non l'hai minimamente preso in considerazione (te l'avevo detto io....).--Nipas (talk) 00:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited History of F.C. Internazionale Milano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Dipralb. You have new messages at Dondegroovily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Inter RM

Hey man, I think it's a little too soon after the last one to be thinking about opening a new move discussion. Maybe in a month or so. – Pee Jay 22:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to start a new RM, I would support you. I just don't have time to do it myself these days. – Pee Jay 18:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aristide Guarneri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of Internazionale redirects

I don't really see a problem with having multiple directs. I assume one previously redirected to the other, and now they both redirect to the main page. – Pee Jay 11:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inter Milan

Hi there, Dipralb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from the stadium-section of Inter Milan without explaining why. It would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary in the future. I reverted your change, but feel free to revert me if you think I did a mistake, as long as you include an edit summary. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

Please have a read of WP:CANVASS. It is absolutely not OK to notify only editors who you think will support your viewpoint of a discussion. Not only is this poor form, if you continue to do it it can result in a block and it actually hurts your chances in the RM because the closing admin will take it into account and it will weigh against your 'side'. Jenks24 (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you immediately notify all editors involved in the previous RM with a neutral note about the latest RM I will report you to WP:ANI. Your selective canvassing to advance your position is reprehensible. You can redress the balance as suggested in the final section of WP:VOTESTACKING. Leaky Caldron 12:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will not. It is your responsibility and I find your explanation about canvassing as weak as your argument for the name change. You have been making noises on user talk pages about this matter since the change last year so it is no surprise to me that you have now contacted users to assist your position. WP:ANI will take a dim view and I suggest you notify others to redress the balance asap. Leaky Caldron 12:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It is not really about numbers. WP:CANVASSING#Appropriate notification & WP:VOTESTACKING suggests that all users involved in a previous discussion might be informed. You could ask whether this is appropriate on the Inter Milan talk page as part of the RM.
I would also point out that while you support the RM you have stated in the discussion that the name change should be "F.C. Internazionale" which is not the RM. You cannot sensibly support the RM if you think it should be something else. Leaky Caldron 12:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you've comprehended a single word of the 6 pieces of policy guidance I have repeatedly quoted. This is the ENGLISH Wikipedia, not the Italian. "Internazionale" is not an English word. Inter Milan is not typically referred to in English speaking sources as "F.C. Internazionale". The title must reflect accepted use in the ENGLISH language. That is the required policy, not your preferred Italian version. Leaky Caldron 16:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

another thing......

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 17:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inter

Hello, Dipralb. You have new messages at Luxic's talk page.
Message added 15:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derby della Madonnina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shkodran Mustafi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qed237 (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dipralb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dipralb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DC Extended Universe

I have restored the page to what it was prior to your deletions of information. You cannot delete info without citing reasons, and discussing why you are doing so. Each of the movies listed in the 'In development' section are any of the projects that at this point in time are in some form of production development. The studio is slow to release information and so it is simply a chart to show films that the studio has announced and their current/most recent crew members. For example - we know that Matt Reeves is directing and 'has a story figured out', but as far as we know without any press release from the studio, he has reworked Ben Affleck & Geoff John's story treatment and there is no official screenwriter yet. Anyway, please do not delete info without cause or reason. Thank you. --DisneyMetalhead (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stefan de Vrij, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Transfer is sourced in the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F.C. Internazionale Milano RM

There's always the possibility of a new RM, I just don't think it would do any good. The idiots got their way when the article was moved to Inter Milan, and now they don't see any good reason to move it back. The club may not refer to themselves by that name, but there are plenty of third-party sources that do, and that's what matters. If the article were still at F.C. Internazionale Milano, I don't think there would be a good reason to move it anywhere else, but that's not the situation we're in, and I can't find an overriding reason to change the status quo right now. – Pee Jay 16:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The trouble with appealing to WP:NC is that Inter Milan fits just as many of the criteria as F.C. Internazionale Milano. "Inter Milan" fits the recognizability, naturalness, precision and conciseness criteria, while "F.C. Internazionale Milano" fits recognizability and consistency (and perhaps arguably a couple of others). The guideline you really want to cite is Wikipedia:Naming conventions (sports teams), which says that the official name should be used, provided it is at least used to a certain degree in the English-language media. Do you think we have a good case? Also, User:GiantSnowman, what do you think? – Pee Jay 17:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be moved back - otherwise we will end up with teams at Man Utd and Sporting Lisbon etc and it's sloppy. Giant Snowman 18:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman and Dipralb: Cool, I've opened an RM at Talk:Inter Milan. – Pee Jay 19:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Been meaning to message you since the RM ended. Yet again we have a "no consensus" result, which is an absolute nonsense considering the travesty of the original RM. Out of interest, User:GiantSnowman, I noticed that you originally voted for the article to be moved to Inter Milan - what made you change your mind? – Pee Jay 14:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Radja Nainggolan

Hello there, from Portugal,

sorry for not writing to you before, but I reverted you so many times in this player's article because: 1 - the part of him smoking should not be removed, he's a top level athlete and his habits are not "in line" with his profession; 2 - Inter Milan should go in his career summary in intro, because he has already signed - when the 2018/19 season ends, we will update the number of appearances.

Happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 08:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inter Milan

See Use commonly recognisable names. Internazionale Milano is not common among English speakers, Inter Milan is almost universally used. In an English Wikipedia we use the most common terminology to English speakers. F8RIL (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further, we don’t say Milano for Milan either, hence the term Milan is used throughout. F8RIL (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not common to use Internationale, or Milano. The first name on the English language Google search engine for the club is Inter Milan. Italian language is a different story. F8RIL (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do English speakers say Bayern Munich or München? You clearly don’t speak English (as your first language) with your comments. Google search engine, the club first appears as Inter Milan. F8RIL (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @F8RIL: Do you know why the club appears as "Inter Milan" on Google? It's because Google takes a lot of info from Wikidata, and the club's name (correctly or otherwise) on Wikidata is Inter Milan, and the reason for that is because the Wikipedia article also has that name. – Pee Jay 14:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I don’t see why Inter Milan is an issue though. Perhaps for an Italian? it seems odd that the team you know as Internazionale Milano is more broadly known in the English speaking world by its ‘nickname’ as you put it? In all my years following the sport I’ve know them as Inter Milan (Inter for short), from tv shows, newspapers etc. F8RIL (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronaldo (Brazilian footballer). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Please be aware of WP:POINT in the English wikipedia. Your edits could be considered in breach of this as you are fully well aware that the English WP has restated for the 4th time that the name of the club is Inter Milan for the English WP. Introducing the Italian non-English alternative name in spite of that recent decision and your justification for it appears to be an attempt to make a WP:POINT. Leaky Caldron 16:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted Italian language variant to the pages of many recent articles in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English, especially where that has been decided in a policy based decision as with Inter Milan earlier this week. Do not add native Italian to English language articles when the decision to leave the article name as English for the fourth time. I appreciate that English is not your native language, but you are quite capable of following formal Admin. decisions. Leaky Caldron 11:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dipralb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dipralb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Demba Ba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: 2019–20 U.S. Città di Palermo season

Hello Dipralb, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2019–20 U.S. Città di Palermo season, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is about a season, not the club itself, so A7 does not apply. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Palmares Lukaku

Ciao! Posso chiederti un piacere? Puoi modificare la parte Palmares di Lukaku nella pagina inglese? Dovresti aggiungere la FA Cup 2011-2012 che ha vinto con il Chelsea. Vorrei farlo io ma mi dice che la pagina è bloccata per evitare vandalismi (non capisco perché altri hanno modificato lo stesso). Precisione1982 (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 Manchester United F.C. season

What info do you think the table is missing? All I see is opposition goalscorers (irrelevant) and referees (rejected by editors a couple of years ago). The {{footballbox collapsible}} template takes up far more space and isn't as easy to read, and in fact removes the league position after each game. I see no benefit to this change. – Pee Jay 22:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And they're all ugly, in my opinion. There is no consensus for this change. Please stop. – Pee Jay 22:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Romelu Lukaku. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Filip Stanković (footballer, born 2002) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filip Stanković (footballer, born 2002) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Stanković (footballer, born 2002) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Sánchez

I will not continue this nonsense with you and will let it go for now. You are clearly not editing this article in good faith. Sakiv (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakiv: where's the official announcement?--Dipralb (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We follow secondary reliable sources as far as we can.--Sakiv (talk) 18:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Inter Milan. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 12:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Scheidler moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Paolo Scheidler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]