Jump to content

User talk:Desslock97

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Desslock97! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 20:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

George Soros has called Democrat Elizabeth Warren most qualified to run for President in 2020 elections.[1]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: This seems to be a newly-created SPA [1] HouseOfChange (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89(T·C) 20:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The quote box you added to this section has been removed. The first addition had no supporting citation—that problem is fixable. But a second problem remained—The section really is not about Malcolm X's thoughts on the media. The section begins to explain Elijah Muhummad's dissatisfaction with Malcolm X. The quote in the box is not related to the section contents.

Quotations and text should not be shoe-horned into articles, but should be placed appropriately so as to maintain meaning and flow. This is especially important in [[WP:Featured articles] |Featured articles]] In addition, Featured articles require the very best sources: goodreads does not meet this standard—a better source is the original publication or a well-respected biography. — Neonorange (Phil) 11:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring is not the way to work in a collaborative project. Please read my explanation and self-revert and bring your questions to the talk page. Where do you think the quote should fir into the article? — Neonorange (Phil) 11:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Neonorange and Neonorange: I created a new section titled === Media control over the population === and put the Malcolm X quote in it. Here is what I typed out for it.

Malcolm was very concerned with how the mass media could control the minds of the masses, and how it could be used to manipulate people's minds.[2]

This was backed with a huffingtonpost source. Here is another source that mention this malcolm X quote on page 4 of the article https://sophia.stkate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1478&context=msw_papers I would like for the quote to stay in the article. If you would find a better place or create another section for putting the quote in there, I would appreciate you doing so. Thanks. Desslock97 (talk) 03:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Higgins, Tucker (25 October 2019). "Soros says Elizabeth Warren 'is the most qualified to be president'". cnbc.com.
  2. ^ Crane, Elise (June 9, 2010). ""Media: The Ultimate Power T ool". Huffpost. Retrieved October 6, 2020.