This is an archive of past discussions about User:DaxServer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I'm getting the deletion bro in my articles and I use the correct information, please make the normal one. Please FI.214 (talk) 18:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
In reference to the recent revert of my edits on Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 page
The article had been vandalised by some troll and highly opinionated lines were added with no source which parroted the government/right-wing line. I merely edited these lines to remove the bias. I do not believe my edit should have been reverted.
However, upon checking back on the article, I have found that the problematic, biased lines that I removed/fixed have been changed so the article is neutral again. WatermelonSeller05 (talk) 08:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the revert made you in Babri masjid page
Hi DaxServer,
I have made an edit to the Babri Masjid page about Tulsidas mentioning the destruction of the temple. As you have reverted by suggesting not to use court documents, can you help in making that edit? Any suggestions would be helpful. Thank you. Take care. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Bsskchaitanya I'd suggest researching for scholarly resources in Google Books, Google Scholar, JSTOR, etc.,. Since the work had been there for a long period of time and is an important one, there're certainly studies on it about the topic you want too add. Good luck! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your inputs. Found two articles which reported about Rambhadracharya whose testimony was recorded during proceedings of the Allahabad court.
Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Rambhadracharya of the Ramanandi Sampradaya submitted in an affidavit before the Allahabad High Court on July 15, 2003, stating that in Shri Tulsi Dohashatak, the poet bemoaned the misdeeds of Babur and destruction of the Ram Temple by Mir Baqi. “The Yavanas (foreigners) filled with anger ridiculed the mantras, Upanishads, brahmanas and Puranas; after cutting the tuft of hair (shikha, choti) and yagopavit (sacred thread of Brahmins), they expelled the followers of Hari from their homes. Tulsi says this is a bad time for Hindus” (Bhad hari bhagaye desh se, TuIsi kathin kujog).
“Babur came with sword in hand in the summer months of Vikram Samvat 1585 (1528 AD) and created havoc (anarth). The beautiful Ram Janmabhumi temple was ruined and a mosque built; Tulsi felt aggrieved (Tulsi kinhi hai).” Further, Mir Baqi destroyed the temple and the murtis of Ram Darbar (family of infant Ram) as a broken-hearted Tulsi cried for protection (Trahi trahi Raghuraj). Tulsi continued, “Where there was a temple on Ram’s birthplace, in the middle of Awadh, Mir Baqi built a mosque.” In Kavitavali, Tulsidas laments, where are the ascetics (dhoot, avadhoot), the Rajputs and the weavers? He expresses detachment from society. Tulsi, he avers, is devoted to Ram, will eat by begging, will sleep in mosque (masit mein saibo).
He cited verses from two works of Tulasīdāsa – eight verses from the Dohā Śataka which describe the destruction of a temple and construction of mosque at the disputed site in 1528 CE, and one verse from Kavitāvalī which mentions the disputed site.
I will revert the edits made in some wikipedia pages accordingly. As a general question I am asking this one. How to point out if some reliable source involved in highly opiniated and one-sided in reporting. Personally, it is noticed by me there is some bias against topics related to Hinduism and India by some reliable sources such as Al Jazeera. In that case how to counter that on Wikipedia? Any suggestions would be grateful. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you friend for the information. Some changes have made by me in the Ayodhya dispute page about proceedings at a district court during Britsh era. Can you verify if the sources cited to be neutral and valid? In the timeline of the dispute it is important to add the 1985-86 district court proceedings. Thank you. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 06:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page BRICS, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
No one talks on the talk page, starting a discussion for the move will be very long and monotonic. Let the page move be and please dont revert Pharaoh496 (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
You did.. from me! Why did you think I reverted the move? Wikipedia:AUTOCONFIRMED doesn't mean you get to move pages but rather technically possible for you to move pages. Page moves are done as long as they're uncontroversial and adhere to the guidelines. From WP:RM - A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus. I've yet to hear why — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
mate, when you reverted it back you didnt give a reason, you just advocated for a discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Template Change
Hi DaxServer, thank you for your warm welcome and sharing that information. After looking through the link provided I'm unclear what I have done that does not maintain an encyclopedic appearance. Can you please quote what in the Manual of Style specifically prohibits changing the a word in a template? Thanks, Hemmingweigh (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is the first time I am editing on Wikipedia - maybe you can help me understand better what is wrong - I just submitted a more in-depth version. Saharm2 (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Your recent actions and reactions vis-a-vis the writings made by me as regards Lalji Tandon, Rajnath Singh, Kalyan Singh and Kusum Rai seems to give a clear inference that you have close association with BJP.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi,
I notice that that you have cited mention of Adi Sankara's visit to Ayodhya has no due weight while reverting an edit made by me in that article. However, I would like to bring to your notice that Adi Sankara holds high importance in the history of Hinduism and its revival. He is credited with identification of many teertha kshetras such as Jyotirlingas, setting up Dasanami sampradaya, writing commentaries on many important Hindu works, propagating Advaita etc. He visited many holyplaces across India (and Pakistan). From a scholarly perspective it can indicate for existence of such site in that area and how Ayodhya was revered by Hindus from other parts of India. For example, he visited Draksharama (nearby my hometown) which indicates the ancient Siva temple there was prominent even during 8th century. We can notice inscriptions by Cholas in that temple. However, this temple being in South survived the vicissitudes of time unlike the temples in other parts of India which suffered from iconoclasm and sometimes complete destruction. Therefore, information that Adi Sankara visited Ayodhya way back in 8th century indicates it was an important pilgrimage site even during that era. In that section of the article, my intention was to provide information about Rama's significance and subsequent importance of Ayodhya as a pilgrimage site owing to its relation with Rama's life events. So, it is my request to consider your reversion. Any suggestions are welcome. Thank you and have a nice day. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Truthfindervert
Have you looked at their contributions? Their article edits obviously, but also
[1][2]
And I love this category, "Ruler's" [3]
They can 't spell. So no surprise that [4] is copied from [5]
Which is whee JANTI KALAN was copying all of his stuff. Hell, now I've got to see how much is copyvio, I've got better things to do. Doug Wellertalk17:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
I had a glance at their contributions but didn't dig deeper. Thanks for looking into them. I wish I had the time and energy but had back-to-back stressors last week leading to a breakdown on Friday. Focusing on intense activity is quite challenging and limited for the time being :/ — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 19:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
HI pls intervene in the above article and stop his Wikishovel nonsense and false alarms. This is not the first time he is doing it, this has become a habitual to him nominating speedy deletions, and creating double work to other editors.(talk). Fostera12 (talk) 13:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Kindly do not remove the contents of Rajnath Singh page, which would be highly improper.
I have not added any defamatory content to Wikipedia, as in case of Rajnath Singh. Every thing I have stated is based completely on reliable and respectable magazines articles, already in public domain.
Every statement is based on facts, with definite evidences in public records.
Similarly there has been no violation of copyright infringement.
The material written by me needs to be presented in the article because it is based purely on public documents of extremely reliable acceptability.
Removing them would be shielding truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodwikie (talk • contribs) 11:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relationship with BJP
I have very strong apprehension that you have a very close relation with BJP and your reactions to my edits are primarily governed by that relationship.
I am waiting for your response to disclosure of your relationship with Bhartiya Janata Party.
Your extra-ordinary interest in selective subjects gives a very strong indication that you are not working in a neutral manner but are working here to keep certain hard truth away from Wikipedia readers, on behalf of someone, most probably BJP.
My submission is that you kindly come out with truth in this regards.
It is once again prayed to kindly not come in the way of truth and delete those articles written/amended by me which are based purely and completely on facts and reliable evidences. Such an act comes in the way of truth and justice, and also hampers the basic purpose of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genuinewikiuser (talk • contribs) 01:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Neveselbert Thanks for bringing this to my notice :) It seems the new Vector theme has hidden a lot of portlet links for me as well. I'll look into what's changed and will try to resurrect the script, and maybe improve it a bit as well while I'm at it — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 09:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
As stated in reply to the query/comment/act of Mr DaxServer, it has been completely established that the two major controversies related with Yogi Adityanath are an essential, inalienable and necessary part of his life journey, whether anyone likes it or not. They are both uncomfortable and unsavoury facts related with his life journey, but have helped shape his political rise in the immense complexities of political scenario of Easter Uttar Pradesh, and hence cannot be taken away, and need to be necessarily presented.
It is for these reasons that they have been brought back, based solely on the genuineness of the need of these two issues.
I would request Mr DaxServer not to remove these Edits, because his interactions so far give a very clear indication that he is not a neutral editor but works for the political party BJP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genuinewikiuser (talk • contribs) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Comintell I think you just need more experience on our policies and guidelines. I'd recommend editing and improving articles as a way to get familiar to those. Good luck. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Re: Your edit war message on my talk page. Noticed that you did not post this message to the guy who did two reverts (a serial reverter if I may say so), instead you chose to pick on the guy who did one revert. Kindly explain your decision. Cheers. PastaMonk17:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
March 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Muhammad zubair. We are writing to inform you that your recent edits on Wikipedia have been flagged for engaging in an edit war and disrupting the editing process. Your repeated attempts to add information without proper consensus and edit warring are in violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
We understand that you may have strong opinions or beliefs regarding the content you are adding, but it is essential to follow Wikipedia's collaborative editing process. Edit warring disrupts the ability of editors to work together and compromises the quality and neutrality of Wikipedia articles.
We urge you to refrain from further edit warring and disruptive editing practices. Instead, we encourage you to engage in constructive discussion on the article's talk page to reach a consensus with other editors. Consensus-building is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia, and it ensures that articles reflect a neutral and balanced point of view.
Failure to comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines may result in administrative action, including the possibility of being blocked from editing. We hope that you will take this warning seriously and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community by respecting the collaborative editing process.Sak7340 (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Mohammed Zubair (journalist)
FYI - you're at three reverts and I've gotta be fair and warn everyone on that article. I'd hate to see you get caught up by the 3RR report, when it's really likely they'll get a block for the edit-warring and hopefully disruptive editing in genera. If they keep pushing it, just let it stay until the EW report is handled. Fun stuff, I know. Ravensfire (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I was wondering if I should ask for ECP protection or just wait a tad bit longer for an admin to be available to act on the 3RR report — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 17:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Probably falls under that, but you want to mention that in your edit summary so a reviewing admin knows what you're doing. I think ECP isn't needed right now - it's one disruptive editor, so block them and it's resolved. If they try the IP route, then semi-protection. Hopefully they are getting the point - I know, not likely given their talk page comments where they steadfastly ignore the main points being made. Ravensfire (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The retaliatory and utterly bogus EWN reports have pushed this well passed disruptive on their part, so reported them to ANI and mentioned you as the other target. Hopefully this gets a quick block. Ravensfire (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi one editor is deliberately moving this film article Family Star (film) to draft space repeatedly and creating confusion among reviewers only to make it declined. The film is going to release on April 5 2024. Request you to review the article and fix the issue once and for all.Zolgensma (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
{{Unblock-auto|45.129.34.0/24|Colocation web host block but I have both local IPBE and global IPBE. I'm not sure why they're not working tho.|Blablubbs}}
{{Unblock-auto|45.129.34.0/23|Same as above but adding this as well as I have the notice from the two IP ranges separately.|ST47}}
Oh shoot, never mind. The local IPBE expired. Could a watching admin add IPBE to this account? or, perhaps I'll email CU later. cc @GeneralNotability: who added IPBE in 2022. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 04:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
DaxServer, I apologize for the recent edit warring and curt communication with you and other editors at A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and thank you for your edit aimed at improving the article in question. Will be more mindful about Wiki's guidelines and cooperative spirit. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, DaxServer. In the meantime, I tried to address some of your and other editors' feedback in the draft, reported my revisions of the draft on the talk page and, per consensus there, am rolling the draft out into mainspace, one section at a time. Will be grateful for your further comments and revisions. Happy editing. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do not use rollback to remove a PROD tag from an article. Rollback is intended to be used to quickly undo vandalism not to revert good faith edits of regular editors. Just either "Undo" or make an edit of your own, removing the PROD tag and leaving an appropriate edit summary explaining your edit. Thank you. LizRead!Talk!20:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
I am giving you these to eat fast and get back to wiki work. Don't waste your time eating this small food I can afford. It's little but from a deep heart, I am grateful for your outstanding 'saviour' act on my TP. Your contributions is superb. Happy Sunday from my time zone. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!09:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Cut the drama here and stop using threatening language
That passive agression you are showing on my talk page, "you are warned, don't do this again" stuff like that, just cut that already. Instead, explain to me in a civil manner what is the issue you got with my edits. That link leads to disambiguation page and I only fixed that. Stop assuming that other people who edit are doing disruptive edits, and only you hold the beacon of righteous authority here. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 09:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Please respond in Amaravati talk page:Old City, Hyderabad was founded by Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah (died 1612), not some Chief Minister or Politician, who built a software park 386 years later 35 km away in the city of modern Hyderabad during 1990's. Similarly old city Amaravathi is founded by Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu (died 1816) not some Chief Minister or Politician who is building a government complex 200 years later 35 km away in the city of modern Amaravati, Pls change it in the Amaravati article's infobox. This is applicable to any city of the world, Amaravati is not unique to this. Just because somebody is a fan of N. Chandrababu Naidu, cannot endorse it to the article illogically. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 05:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I will report you in admin notice board for influencing editors to block me. Without contributing to the articles I think you dont have any other work than to make editors blocked.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 03:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nellore Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page BRICS, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
The redirect LGBT reproduction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § LGBT reproduction until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Muhammad zubair. We are writing to inform you that your recent edits on Wikipedia have been flagged for engaging in an edit war and disrupting the editing process. Your repeated attempts to add information without proper consensus and edit warring are in violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DaxServer reported by User:Sak7340 (Result: ). Thank you. Sak7340 (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Done — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 05:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Subpages of Module:Inflation have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Ahecht (TALK