User talk:DannonCool

Welcome!

Hello, DannonCool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Whisperjanes (talk) 02:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Whisperjanes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dangmattsmith, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Whisperjanes (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kirwin, Wyoming, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of ghost towns in Idaho, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. You removed the sources supporting the redlink entries. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barnesville, Alabama, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh, I’ve been working for a long time on these types of stuff, and you delete it mindlessly, it makes no sense, why? DannonCool (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I’m not vandalizing. DannonCool (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karen DannonCool (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh DannonCool (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nuvola_apps_important.svg DannonCool (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] DannonCool (talk) 01:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are all my edits getting deleted by Magnolia677

Well, I don’t know, I’ve been editing useful stuff, such as: A typo in a Ghost Town: Barnsville, Alabama. Not Barnesville Adding a lot of information, on a ghost town, without the ghost towns saying it was testing, I would have left it alone then: Kirwin, Wyoming. Adding a ghost town on a ghost town list in Idaho: I forgot which ghost town, I know I added a couple though. Magnolia677 calls it vandalizing, and I call it helping people. Stop doing this, Magnolia677. -DannonCool DannonCool (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More of Magnolia677

She’s also been deleting all the towns I put in the list of USA ghost towns, there were ten more I added in Hawaii, she deleted them, around 5 more I added in Alaska, she deleted those also, and she deleted my add of one town to the Nevada ghost town list, aka, Beatty, Nevada. She is deleting info. Please ban her. -DannonCool DannonCool (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of ghost towns in Kansas

Please quit adding incorporated cities and unincorporated cities on the List of ghost towns in Kansas.

All articles in the following lists should NOT be in the ghost town list!

It's just this simple to understand what should not be in the ghost town list.

• Sbmeirow • Talk • 07:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hockerville, OK.

Hello, DannonCool. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hockerville, OK., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hockerville, Oklahoma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hockerville, Oklahoma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 19:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Hockerville, Oklahoma, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kirwin, Wyoming. You added gibberish to the article. Please stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hockerville, Oklahoma

The article Hockerville, Oklahoma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to show notabilty

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KylieTastic (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hockerville, OK.

Hello, DannonCool. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hockerville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hockerville, Oklahoma. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand nuvola.svg DannonCool (talk) 14:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agawam, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agawam, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agawam, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It’s confusing, I got enough history to not let it get deleted, I’m currently adding stuff. It’s a stub. It makes sense, why delete Agawam? DannonCool (talk) 03:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agawam, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Brewton, Mississippi. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ulan, Oklahoma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ulan, Oklahoma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Renger moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Renger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Renger (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Renger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DannonCool! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ulan, Oklahoma

Hello, DannonCool. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulan, Oklahoma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ulan, Oklahoma

Hello, DannonCool. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ulan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Renger

Hello, DannonCool. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Renger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DannonCool. Thank you for your work on Benton, Oklahoma. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I wish you and your family joy too! :D 2600:8804:6E01:7200:A1D4:D2A7:2D84:5C8D (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Button Springs, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Button Springs, Oklahoma, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Button Springs, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? DannonCool (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beck, Oklahoma

The article Beck, Oklahoma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources – neither source provided is a WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 03:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alhambra, Oklahoma

The article Alhambra, Oklahoma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources – neither source provided is WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 03:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bethel, Grant County, Oklahoma

The article Bethel, Grant County, Oklahoma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources – a short-lived post office is not the same thing as a town nor establishes notability for the place. If "not much is known" then don't create an article on it!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 03:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Box, Cleveland County, Oklahoma

Hello, DannonCool, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Edward-Woodrow, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Box, Cleveland County, Oklahoma, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box, Cleveland County, Oklahoma.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beck, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beck, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beck, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 20:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alhambra, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alhambra, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhambra, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 20:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bethel, Grant County, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethel, Grant County, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethel, Grant County, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 20:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Braithwaite, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Braithwaite, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braithwaite, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 20:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DannonCool. Thank you for your work on Cold Springs, Oklahoma. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day and Merry Christmas!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you very much, SunDawn. You are a very nice person. Merry Christmas, and happy early new year! I’ve been having a passion for Wikipedia and world history recently, and your nice words are inspiring. Some of my pages just got deleted, so thanks for being nice! Cheers DannonCool (talk) 08:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC) DannonCool (talk) 22:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Moral, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saloons.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DannonCool. Thank you for your work on Center, Oklahoma. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. An image would be nice if possible. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000:

Sounds great! Will do if I’m able to find an image.

DannonCool (talk) 04:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]