User talk:Danieleb82

Welcome

Hello, Danieleb82, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Danieleb82's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Reason Boner (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A song does not automatically get a Wikipedia article just because it exists; it must be reliably sourced as passing a notability criterion in WP:NSONGS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:No Reason Boner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:No Reason Boner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danieleb82! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pages moved to draft space - need inline citation/source

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of the below pages have been move to draft -

Heaven (The Rolling Stones song) moved to Draft:Heaven (The Rolling Stones song)
The Crooked Beat (song) moved to Draft:The Crooked Beat (song)
Don't Lose Your Head (song by Queen) moved to Draft:Don't Lose Your Head (song by Queen)
Gimme the Prize (Kurgan's Theme) moved to Draft:Gimme the Prize (Kurgan's Theme)
Dead on Time (Queen song) moved to Draft:Dead on Time (Queen song)
If You Can't Beat Them (Queen song) moved to Draft:If You Can't Beat Them (Queen song)
All Dead, All Dead (Queen song) moved to Draft:All Dead, All Dead (Queen song)
Hungry Freaks, Daddy (song) moved to Draft:Hungry Freaks, Daddy (song)
The Rage (Judas Priest song) moved to Draft:The Rage (Judas Priest song)
Grinder (Judas Priest) moved to Draft:Grinder (Judas Priest)
Ivan Meets G.I. Joe (song) moved to Draft:Ivan Meets G.I. Joe (song)
Rapid Fire (Judas Priest song) moved to Draft:Rapid Fire (Judas Priest song)
Steeler (Judas Priest song) moved to Draft:Steeler (Judas Priest song)
Metal Gods (Judas Priest song) moved to Draft:Metal Gods (Judas Priest song)
Rapid Fire (Judas Priest song) moved to Draft:Rapid Fire (Judas Priest song)
You Don't Have to Be Old to Be Wise moved to Draft:You Don't Have to Be Old to Be Wise

The reason of the moves are the articles have no sources and citations as written to remain published. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1 reliable source - see WP:RS (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR) 2 primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS 3 verification - see WP:V 4 notability - see WP:N

Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the info as per the Template: cite web below 5 citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources 6 citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page to get it publish. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Ping me if you need futher help and thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danieleb82, Greetings to you. You The Rage (Judas Priest song) has been reviewed. Please do not recreate the same article. Just click on the Draft copy ) highlighted in blue and working on it. When it is done, I will review it. Pls see what I have done on the The Rage (Judas Priest song) (view source editing mode and the different on the history page) so, you would like to understand further how to edit in Wikipedia. Please ping me if you need help. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danieleb82, You have worke do the other articles and believe you have time to to the above to avoid other editor helping you for no reason. Please help to do your bit as other has helped you. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junco Partner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Streets of Love. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA:

@CASSIOPEIA: Danieleb82 (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniele82, Good day. Understand that you ping me. Anything I could help you? CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 20:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Yes, can you review my articles/drafts?[reply]

Daniele82, see msg on my talk page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doing All Right (Wuen song)

Hello Danieleb82,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Doing All Right (Wuen song) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Doing All Right (Queen song).

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doing All Right (Queen song) moved to Draft:Doing All Right (Queen song)

Danieleb82, You have created other articles which other editors and I have helped you. You have learned from what edited in the articles and worked on it on the new one you are doing, instead of still doing the same thing. There is no citation on the above article and the title should not have ' ' in the body text. Further more, the title should not have (Queen song) which is not as per guidelines. Please rework. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Fairy Feller's Master-Stroke (Queen song)

Hi Danieleb82, Please rework on the inline citation for the above page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Queen II to The Fairy Feller's Master-Stroke (Queen song) (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to The Night Comes Down (Queen song). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tupper Ware Remix Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tupper Ware Remix Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flash of the Blade (Iron Maiden song)

The article Flash of the Blade (Iron Maiden song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. A few appearances in pop culture are not enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 23:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Career Opportunities (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Nevermind, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 16:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don't Start (Too Late) (song)

Hello Danieleb82,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Don't Start (Too Late) (song) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Earthh (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Danieleb82, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Electric Funeral (song) have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shakin' All Over, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Kidd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced song genres

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dirty Women (Black Sabbath song)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dirty Women (Black Sabbath song), Danieleb82!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add sources indicating independent notability from the album before restoring.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 23:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Master of Puppets, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Delirious (ZZ Top song)

The article Delirious (ZZ Top song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Home Lander (talk) 19:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don't Start (Too Late) (song)

The article Don't Start (Too Late) (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Home Lander (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Don't Start (Too Late) (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Song notability and copying within Wikipedia

Please read Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Songs and Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did with this edit to Don't Start (Too Late) (song). Shellwood (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Boie

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 15:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding multiple infoboxes

Not all renditions of a song need infoboxes. It's important that articles have a balance between text and infographics. Please consider discussing first, especially for articles that are good articles. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soon Forget & Parting Ways (song)

I saw that you had restored Soon Forget from a redirect to an article. I have reverted it back to a redirect. Most of the links on that page no longer are active and the ones that are don't necessarily help to establish Notability for Reliable Sources. I also note that the main author of the original page was the one who redirected it to the album in the first place. Happy to discuss further - just ping me here or leave a note on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see the same thing is true for Parting Ways (song) (poor sourcing, redirect created by a prolific editor of the article) except that the sourcing is even worse on that song. I think it's possible that Soon Forget is notable and there would RS to prove it (largely owing to the ukulele bit). I am much less sure that the same is true of Parting Ways. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Song notability

Why were the articles Parting Ways (song) and Soon Forget redirected even if they have several references and information? Danieleb82 (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Rival (Pearl Jam song). Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 08:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blood (Pearl Jam song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vinci2005 (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop it with these kinds of edits. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl Jam. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

You may want to read WP:NSONGS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Killiondude (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bad Reputation (Thin Lizzy song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Downey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danieleb82, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Popcornduff (talk) 01:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]