User talk:DILover1

June 2021

Hello DILover1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DILover1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DILover1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --- Possibly (talk) 16:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Firstly, thanks for edjtinf the article. You’ve helped me learn more about Wikipedia editing. I’m not being immediately financially compensated for writing this article. DILover1 (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a connection to the subject of the article? The article is extremely promotional.--- Possibly (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. DILover1 (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What does "immediately financially compensated" mean-- you will be paid later?--- Possibly (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. DILover1 (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No one is paying me for making this article. DILover1 (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can only note generally that there have been several attempts to create this article, by four or five different accounts. One of the accounts was called AaronGolbin, so the attempts are presumably autobiographical.--- Possibly (talk) 17:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if you have any other questions. DILover1 (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please remove the text in the Wiki page that says that the author may be financial compensated, as I’m not being paid for making the article. DILover1 (talk) 17:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first attempt at making this article. DILover1 (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve never made this article before. DILover1 (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that you have no connection to Golbin is pretty dubious, seeing as you also created Draft:DebateIsland, on one of Golbin's companies. Multiple editors have been pushing these subjects in the past months. --- Possibly (talk) 20:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a user of DebateIsland, like many others, so I want to make a Wiki about it.

I’m a user of DebateIsland, so I want to make a Wiki about it. DILover1 (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Golbin (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linkedin.com Lostcry.com and Forbes are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Golbin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Golbin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DILover1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! DILover1 (talk) 02:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron Golbin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron Golbin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article! Why is Forbes not a credible source, but Inc. is? DILover1 (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DebateIsland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DebateIsland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Golbin (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This was already declined on notability grounds, and nothing significant has been added since then. Following the links, I have the impression that this person will be notable in time, but as long as not a single venture (DebateIsland or whatever) is worthy of a Wikipedia article, it seems unlikely that Golbin will be notable simply for founding them. My advice would be to start with an article on one of the ventures, assuming it has made waves. If they haven't really made waves, then wait a couple of years.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Golbin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Golbin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Doric Loon (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Golbin (June 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 04:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DebateIsland (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DebateIsland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DebateIsland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 04:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DebateIsland (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Their own website is not independent and Forbes is not reliable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DebateIsland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DebateIsland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DebateIsland (June 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --- Possibly (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not paid and will not be paid to write these articles. I’m a DebateIsland user, like hundreds of thousands of others, and want to make a wiki about the company and Aaron Golbin, the founder of DebateIsland. DILover1 (talk) 04:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aaron Gabriel Golbin

This not just a declined draft, it is a rejected draft. Do not move it to article space again. Meters (talk) 04:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aaron Gabriel Golbin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Aaron Gabriel Golbin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curbon7 (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DebateIsland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DebateIsland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curbon7 (talk) 04:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ever move an article out of draft into the encyclopedia when it has failed independent review, especially if you have written it yourself. The result will inevitably be deletion, as in this case. Deb (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Aaron Golbin and DebateIsland. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! DILover1, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]