User talk:Cyberxperts

Please do not re-add those links to the Jhelum page, that page is a disambiguation page and all links like the ones you put in should be in the external link sections of the more specific articles, if they are appropriate.--Konstable 10:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move any more pages without gaining consensus. Addhoc (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Jhelum

Portal:Jhelum, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jhelum and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Jhelum during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Portal:Jhelum

Why do you insist on name Jhelum Portal instead of The Jhelum Portal despite of the fact that all the other portals of Pakistani cities are like The Lahore Portal, The Karachi Portal etc. I am again changing it to The Jhelum Portal. --Talha^Discuss ^© 10:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jhelum tehsil

you have done totally wrong by moving Jhelum Tehsil to Jhelum (city). All the other cities have seperate articles for tehsil ahd city. It is required to have saperate articles at certain moment, like here: Template:Tehsils of Punjab (Pakistan). Now i am looking how to undo this move. Please be carefull in future. --Talha^Discuss ^© 11:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apnajhelum

Put yourself in my shoes. If I told you that Pakistan.Com is the official website of Pakistan, would you believe me or would you believe that Pakistan.Gov.Pk is the official website of the country? Usually the official website of a country, state/province or city/town would be a DOT-GOV or similar website because these are setup and controlled directly by the relevant government or an appointed agent of that government. In certain countries the official websites are a little different; Cuba for example has very few DOT-GOV-DOT-CU but there are also severe restrictions on other Cuban websites. In the case of Jhelum, it is not good enough that you say that apnajhelum.com is the official website or you say the district coordination officer has declared apnajhelum.com is the official website. You need to satisfy the Wikipedia requirement of a reliable source declaring apnajhelum as the official website. A reliable source can be:

.edu.pk (educational institutions)
.gov.pk (federal government)
.gob.pk (government of Balochistan)
.gok.pk (government of Azad Kashmir)
.gon.pk (government of NWFP)
.gop.pk (government of Punjab)
.gos.pk (government of Sindh)
or a reliable newspaper website like Jang or Dawn

Green Giant (talk) 20:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a reliable source.--Talha^Discuss ^© 16:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	great Cyberxperts (talk) 05:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello Cyberxperts. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jhelum, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The website that you are adding is quite obviously run by the company that your username represents (which is also a violation of our username policy. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 14:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ^{( T - C - G )} 09:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jhelum Networks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jhelum Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhelum Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rehbar Development Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rehbar Development Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehbar Development Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 00:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cyberxperts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

PROMO, contains WP:OR and relies on non-independent unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charlie (talk) 03:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wireless & Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP) (August 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Saqib was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Repeated submissions without any improvements, thus rejecting.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Cyberxperts, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cyberxperts|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But i have no financial benifit in this. I am just doing it as this organization is raising voice for betterment of internet for normal community. Please suggest solution Cyberxperts (talk) 09:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with this organization? 331dot (talk) 09:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know this person who is raising voice for internet slowdown in Pakistan Cyberxperts (talk) 09:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that would be a conflict of interest (an unpaid one) that you should disclose. Click the link for instructions. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]