User talk:PhilKnight

; Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116
	edit

Block evasion

Please see Special:Contributions/182.191.134.147 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block review

Hi Phil, not sure if this is the place to do this, but I believe I've shown change. I was going to edit the response there, but sort of got distracted. Since the block, I've focused on what user @Valereee: suggested and focus on other topics. Since then I've discussed the topics several times before making more bold changes and have alerted the respected users. This ranges from Below the Root (video game) (started discussion about changes to the article, and reached out to other users heavily involved with the article to discuss changes made to it (here, and here here). Similarly with Les Mains d'Orlac (here for discussion) and here for responses: here, and [User_talk:Paleface_Jack#Les_Mains_d'Orlac here] (with this user, we've even collaborated more since as we seemed to hit it off pretty well!). Also since then, I've applied work on other articles bringing Megamania and Dracula (Universal film series) to good article status. While I respect your review, I disagree with your assertation that I haven't learned to communicate with others. As I feel like I've kept a cool head since. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrzejbanas, I suggest you say that in your next unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Figured. Thanks. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking assistance with a case on WP:ANI

Hey there! Could you help have a look on this persistent deletion of content case? It is unbecoming with the repeated pattern of edits by associated IP addresses. Appreciate your assist on this. hundenvonPG (talk) 16:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP evading a block

Hi @PhilKnight, You recently blocked @79.17.172.126 for one week, now they are edit warring again. And apparently they are evading the block of @95.248.34.201 . 2A02:8388:8C04:1500:6C9C:8259:8ECA:C7D8 (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Biharsamajabudhabi

I found your decline of the unblock technically correct, but rather odd in the reply because the appeal clearly states that the user already created another account, basically renaming and unblocking himself.

Not sure what to do about it, if anything. I'm inclined to let it go for now and watch the new account's activities. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, nevermind. The new username isn't registered. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping me!

CuteRoby4 (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

85.118.78.134

Can you apply a ban to the above IP address, so they can't spread the vandalism elsewhere? Thanks! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re rv on World language

Hi, I saw you just reverted uncited changes on this article and you're an admin. I actually just listed the IP range that made the changes here at AIV, if you want to handle it. Thanks. — W.andrea (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I found the article from your AIV report. PhilKnight (talk) 21:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, PhilKnight. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Maliner (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for George W. Bush

George W. Bush has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]