User talk:Coshua23

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Coshua23, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Illusion Flame

Hello, Coshua23. You have new messages at Illusion Flame's talk page.
Message added 11:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:İlyas İlbey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:İlyas İlbey. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:İlyas İlbey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:İlyas İlbey. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC review

The backlog os not a queue, so it could be reviewed faster. That said, while waiting, try to improve the draft. Right now, half the refs confirm he owns horses, which has nothing to do with establishing notability. Need more about him related to his career. Also, address Comments by editing the draft. David notMD (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: İlyas İlbey has been accepted

İlyas İlbey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Coco moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Madame Coco, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pridemanty (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article by translating it from the Turkish Wikipedia page. I also added English sources to make it easier to verify. What issues do you see in this article? If you provide me with an example, I will better understand the problem and correct it. Coshua23 (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madame Coco (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like an advertisement for the company instead of being an encyclopedic entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madame Coco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, to be honest, I realize there is an issue, but this is how I managed to turn the Turkish content into an article format. The initial version of this article included more advertisements, but I removed them and restructured the content. Now, I’m planning to rewrite a better version. Madame Coco is actually a Turkish brand that meets Wikipedia's criteria, with nearly 600 branches. I’d appreciate it if you could review the draft page again in a few minutes. Thank you! Coshua23 (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madame Coco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madame Coco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madame Coco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]