User talk:Cocoruff

Welcome!

Hello, Cocoruff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cunard (talk) 22:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names for new articles

Hi Cocoruff. You may have noticed that I recently renamed two articles that you created:

Barry Frank (Singer) --> Barry Frank
Michael Torres boxer --> Michael Torres

The reason was that when creating a new article about a person, you only need add a disambiguation after the person's name (e.g. "(Singer)") if there is an existing article with that person's name. Also, something to note for the future: when disambiguation is required, convention is to use leading lower case and parentheses, e.g. "Joe Bloggs (singer)" and "Fred Nerk (boxer)". Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 03:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Mickens

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frank Mickens, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not an obituary.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. I dream of horses (talk) 01:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: I have completed more updated information on the entry for this acclaimed american educator, Frank Mickens, and hope the encyclopeia entry can remain. Please reconsider. Help me, however. I cannot make the two external links in the Frank Mickens enecyclopedia article work, and need someone to fix the links. Thank you.

Robert Brizel, Wkipedia contributor, July 11, 2009

How to redirect

Hi, Robert

You can create a redirect by typing:

#REDIRECT [[Target page name]]

on the page you want to redirect. I hope this helps!—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devin Gaines

A tag has been placed on Devin Gaines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Devin Gaines

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Devin Gaines. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devin Gaines

A tag has been placed on Devin Gaines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sports trainer Schaeffer with student Gabriel Bracero at Madison Square Garden June 2010.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sports trainer Schaeffer with student Gabriel Bracero at Madison Square Garden June 2010.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sports trainer Schaeffer with student Gabriel Bracero at Madison Square Garden June 2010.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Sports trainer Schaeffer with student Gabriel Bracero at Madison Square Garden June 2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sports Trainer John Schaeffer and Gabriel Bracero, June 2010.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Sports Trainer John Schaeffer and Gabriel Bracero, June 2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SportsTrainerJohnSchaefferandGabrielBraceroJune2010.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:SportsTrainerJohnSchaefferandGabrielBraceroJune2010.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ ^xplicit 19:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sports Trainer John Schaeffer with student, welterweight boxer Gabriel Bracero, at Madison Square Garden, June 2010.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Sports Trainer John Schaeffer with student, welterweight boxer Gabriel Bracero, at Madison Square Garden, June 2010.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

It appears that somebody falsely posted Paul Vogt's death on Wikipedia deaths. i was wrong to follow up on this. If so, it needs to be substantiated. It should be investigated as to who put the death notice up, if it is ultimately proven to be false.

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Tracy Posner. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ray^Talk 01:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marley

Most of the citations you are adding are not wiki reliable WP:RS please come and have a discussion about it on the article talkpage thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AviatorSports.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:AviatorSports.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aviator.Arena.jpg.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Aviator.Arena.jpg.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC) Done! August 12, 2010[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Maurice.Harris.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maurice.Harris.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Arum

A tag has been placed on John Arum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Arum

A tag has been placed on John Arum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-posted from the article's talk page: There need to be sources indicating the subject's notability. An obituary is not a sufficient reference; there must be references showing notability during the subject's life, not just recentism due to his (unfortunate) passing. Wikipedia is not a memorial, nor is it a place to report recent news. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Hi, Cocoruff. I reverted your removal of redlinks in the J. D. Sumner article. Some redlinks are useful -- they notify readers about a notable topic which is in need of an article. (See WP:REDLINK for a good explanation.) In the case of the Sumner article, those were all notable subjects. So it's a good idea to leave them in so that someone familiar with the topic will create a page for them. Just wanted you to know. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Cocowoof Sept 17.

File:Judah2.JPG

Please confirm you are the author of this image, by adding your user name in an appropriate place. Alternativly please provide a verfiable source for the image concerned :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Joseph Awinongya. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cind.amuse 23:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Awinongya, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Cind.amuse 00:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huthaifa al-Batawi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huthaifa al-Batawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huthaifa al-Batawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

July 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to John C. Woods, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Sir Lothar (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Anton Dostler has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:26, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wood.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wood.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Anderson

Hi. Just a heads up that the page you recently created John Anderson (philanthropist) appears to already exist John Edward Anderson. BurienBomber (talk) 21:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wellness in the Schools

Hello, I have nominated Wellness in the Schools for speedy deletion, because it looks like almost all of its content, word for word, comes from the official website and the CBS article. Wikipedia requires that its content not be copy-pasted from other websites (or paraphrased)—you should get the information from other websites (and cite them, as you have), but present the information in your own words (otherwise it would be plagiarism). Please don't be discouraged—we appreciate your contributions—but please make sure you do not copy from other sources in the future. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I only saw your email message just now, but I have rewritten the article somewhat to remove a sentence that still sounded too much like a direct quote to me, and also to add a bit of information about the individual programs. If you have any more concerns, please feel free to reply here. Regards. wctaiwan (talk) 15:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Wellness in the Schools

Hi Cocoruff, you recently removed a deletion tag from Wellness in the Schools. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220 of ^Borg 02:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Ernest Mateen article

		The Biography Barnstar
		Thanks for creating the new Ernest Mateen article. Your contributions to help improve Wikipedia are greatly appreciated. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ernest Mateen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USBA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Robert Brizel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Page (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Buster Drayton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jack Johnson

Robert Brizel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberty, New York

Virgil Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Freddie Roach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BrizelSugar.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:BrizelSugar.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Hascup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Henry Hascup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GabrielF (talk) 02:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

I noticed that on this photo you uploaded, [1], you claim that you are Robert Brizel. I also noticed that you created and made nearly all edits to the page for Robert Brizel. Wikipedia strongly discourages editors writing autobiographies because "it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography" and if a person is notable, someone else will make the article. See Wikipedia:Autobiography. Right now there are no reliable sources in the article. I'm going to start a deletion discussion for it and you are welcome to comment and suggest more sources to improve it. Comatmebro (talk) 06:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Brizel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Brizel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brizel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back at my user page

Hello, Cocoruff. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 02:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your work and efforts to improve Wikipedia for the public, and please don't be discouraged by Robert Brizel being nominated for deletion. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussions

(received from you on my talk page)
References Added
I'm not sure what the AFD discussion is, but third party reliable source references have been provided for Robert Brizel, Henry Hascup (reposted), and Joe Antonacci contributions. Perhaps this will help save the contributions. (Unsigned comment was placed by User:Cocoruff on 03:33, 30 March 2012‎ (UTC). Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

"AfD discussion" refers to the Article for deletion discussion occurring here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brizel. Best, Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Boxing

You may be interested in checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Boxing, if you're not already aware of the project. People there share your interest in boxing-related topics. Best, Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I checked it out, Northamerica. The articles posted at the Wiki project have been addressed.

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Hascup

It doesn't matter that you wrote the article. The reference at Saddoboxing clearly states the article is copyrighted to Saddoboxing. A journalist who writes newspaper stories does not own the stories, the newspaper does. Also, please refrain from name calling. Bgwhite (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Henry Hascup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your email, I'll respond here. We have no evidence that your are the copyright owner of the website in question - as you will appreciate, it is easy for anyone to claim this, whether it is true or not. The notice above gives links to pages which explain how to prove that you are the copyright owner of the material, but basically there are two main ways:
1. Change the "Copyright © 2000-2012 Saddo Boxing" tag to a suitably licensed tag (for example to the CC-by-SA 3.0 license. If you can change the website to show this, then this (1) shows that you are the owner of the website, and (2) shows that there is a suitable license which allows us to use the material. You might also want to change your disclaimer which states "3. Copyright [...] The copyright for any material created by saddoboxing.com is reserved. Any duplication or use of objects such as diagrams, sounds or texts in other electronic or printed publications is not permitted without written agreement from saddoboxing.com."
2. Send an email to the address mentioned on one of the links above, from an email address at saddoboxing.com (saddo@saddoboxing.com) - this shows that you are the owner of the domain (a quick check will be made that the headers, etc, are actually from the saddoboxing.com domain, and that they have not been spoofed), and so have the right to grant Wikipedia the use of the copyrighted material.

Again, it is vital that the procedures in "Granting us permission to copy material already online are followed (basically the two options just mentioned).

In the meantime, the page will be deleted. Please do not re-create it until you have followed the procedures outlined above, proving that you are the copyright owner. Once this has been done, you will be contacted confirming that this has been verified, and the article can be re-created.

I know this may seem petty, but as I said, anyone can make claims - I could claim that I am the owner of the website, and that I definitely do not give permissions... that wouldn't make it true, would it? I hope this helps you to understand the reason for the deletion, and the way in which you can donate the material from your website to Wikipedia. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Saddoboxing article is not cited in the Henry Hascup article anymore. Why would you need to delete it? Rbert

You may not be using the citation, but the text is still a copyright violation, whether cited or not. I have mentioned several times now how you can provide evidence that you are the copyright owner, and that you wish to donate your material to Wikipedia - if you continue to ignore this advice, then there is nothing further to be said. You website is not a suitable source for the article (whether declared or not) for the reasons that myself and others have given you. Please stop re-creating this article, or you will be blocked from editing for disruptive behaviour. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cocoruff. You have new messages at Bgwhite's talk page.
Message added 22:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bgwhite (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal response to your email

Thanks for your mail, which I have responded to above - but here are some specific response to comments you made:

What the devil is wrong with you people?
Nothing is wrong with us! We are following the procedures in place on Wikipedia, and which you have been notified about in messages on this page
I am in fact the author of the same Saddoboxing article on Henry Hascup cited in the Henry Hascup Wikipedia entry, it is my website
As mentioned above, there are ways of proving this, beyond you just saying it. Please refer to the above message
the article was written for Saddoboxing specifically to provide supporting data for the Henry Hascup Wikipedia entry
This would be considered original research. You write articles which you can use as references for wikipedia articles? That's not how Wikipedia works - you would appear not to run a website which would be counted as reliable or independent if what you write there is specifically for providing references for Wikipedia articles. You would be better off finding reliable sources which provide information, with which you have no connection.
I am in fact the major boxing writer contributor to Wikipedia
Without a lot of indepth searching of your contributions and that of other contributors to boxing articles, I cannot verify this information, and it is actually irrelevant to this discussion - the issue is a copyright one, which can be resolved in the short term by the methods outlined above.
Couldn't you at least wait till I got home to answer you back?
I'm afraid not. Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously, and a "speedy deletion" nomination is just that - a nomination that an article be deleted in a speedy manner.

If you can provide the evidence that you are the copyright owner, an article can be re-created. There is no rush to do this - whether it happens this week, this month, this year, this decade is not important... if it should be created, it will be when it is suitable (this includes meeting notability criteria, etc, but we are discussing the copyright issues). The encyclopedia will be here for the foreseeable future, so we can wait to create the article!

I hope this explains our viewpoint more clearly. I must warn you, however, that if you recreate the article again without providing the required evidence of copyright ownership, the article will probably be deleted again and prevented from being recreated - you may also be blocked from editing as well, for that could be considered to be disruptive editing. Obviously, neither you nor ourselves want that to happen!

Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cocoruff. You have new messages at Comatmebro's talk page.
Message added 06:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Comatmebro (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Joe Antonacci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Robert Brizel (boxing writer)

A tag has been placed on Robert Brizel (boxing writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Ish dar ian 02:27, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lawrence Johnson (inventor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lawrence Johnson (inventor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lawrence Johnson (inventor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence Johnson (inventor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Johnson (inventor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

Hi. After concerns were raised about paraphrasing in your content at the copyright problems board, I've had a look at and confirmed issues in the article Mike Levine (newspaper writer).

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following example from the source:

He...left the Record in 2001 to accept a position as senior editor at ESPN the Magazine in New York City, where his worked helped the magazine earn the 2002 award for General Excellence by the American Society of Magazine Editors. He returned to the Record as executive editor in 2002, and during his tenure, the newspaper was named New York's Newspaper of Distinction three times by the Asociated Press. The paper's Sunday sports section was also twice named one of the top 10 in the nation by the Associated Press Sports Editors. Levine also co-authored two children's sports books on family values....

The article said:

He left The Record in 2001 to accept the position of Senior Editor of ESPN The Magazine in New York City for one year, where his work helped the magazine earn the 2002 award for General Excellence by the American Society of Magazine Editors. Levine returned to the Times-Herald Record as Executive Editor in 2002. During Mike Levine's tenure as Executive Editor, the Times-Herald Record was named New York's Newspaper of Distinction three times by the Associated Press. The paper's Sunday sports section was twice named one of the top 10 newspaper sports sections in the nation by the Associated Press sports editors. Levine also co-authored two children's sports books on family values.

There were a few other passages that also followed quite closely. As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch.

Closely paraphrased or copied content has been revised or removed from this article. If the material can be verified to be compatibly licensed or public domain or if permission is provided, we can use or closely follow original text from our sources with proper attribution, as described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Otherwise, so that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, content must be written from scratch, except for brief and clearly marked quotations. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Wikipedia:Copy-paste includes a little more information about using content from copyrighted sources.

Please let me know at my talk page if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Booth (boxer)

Hey Robert. I was looking at the Tony Booth article you created, and there appear to be a couple issues with it. Biographies of living persons need to be handled with absolute diligence. I made an edit to the article to fix some grammar and formatting, and also to remove some possibly contentious material. I've noticed you greatly contribute to boxing-related articles, so you might want to check out the boxer notability guideline. Right now, the Tony Booth article doesn't seem to meet NBOX, but I wanted to see if you had any additional sources handy before taking it to AfD. If you have any questions, respond here and please leave me a {{talkback}} template on my talk page. Cheers! Ish dar ian 02:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got your email. It's not so much that the article needs to be slimmed down; it actually needs more added to it. It needs more sources that verify the majority of the info and establish his notability. Right now, it doesn't read like an article that meets inclusion criteria. Ish dar ian 04:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Booth is of boxing historical significance. The references have been adjusted and the entry edited down to its current form, but it is referenced.[reply]

Nomination of Arthur MacArthur IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur MacArthur IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur MacArthur IV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 02:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still believe that the article violates the policy on biographies of living people but you should make your case for keeping the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur MacArthur IV. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 07:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Jones (football)

The article Michael Jones (football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One of hundreds of murders that happen in New York every year. Person wasn't notable before the murder. He never played football at the highest level and wasn't one of the main coaches for the team. Also WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:ONEEVENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:04, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Brizel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Brizel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LiptonRef.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:LiptonRef.JPG, which you've attributed to Robert Brizel. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Brizel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Brizel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brizel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fallsburg Central School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omar Henry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name dropping

Hi Robert. I noticed that you readded your name to the list of alumni at Fallsburg Central School District, which I have again removed. You keep trying to drop your name everywhere, including several attempts at creating an article about yourself over the last few years. It's coming across as self-promotion and you really need to stop. You've been doing great work on biographies and it's really appreciated, but you can't keep using Wikipedia as a vehicle for self-promotion. If one day you become notable by Wikipedia standards, I'm certain someone will create an article about you. Until that day, however, I suggest you give it a rest. Ish dar ian 11:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you removed everyone from the grad and faculty list in a mass purge. I also notice you did the same thing when I removed your name last April. Please don't resort to this kind of petty vandalism. You proven to be a great content contributor; there is no need to resort to this type of behavior. I didn't want to give you a templated warning because I think you'll understand better this way. Ish dar ian 13:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gerstenberg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gerstenberg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Mancuso COI?

Hi Cocoruff - I noticed that you donated an image of Joseph Mancuso to Wikipedia, and that a lower resolution version of the same image appears on the CEO Clubs website. Are you associated with CEO Clubs? If so, you may have a conflict of interest and should not contribute to articles about CEO Clubs or their personnel. Pburka (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not I am not affiliated with CEO Clubs, but it is a free image. I may replace it shortly.

Did you take the image from the website, or are you the photographer? Pburka (talk) 11:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The new image you've uploaded appears to be a candid shot of the subject in his home, and you claim to have taken the photo yourself. Are you sure that you don't have a relationship to the subject? Pburka (talk) 02:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Magomed Abdusalamov may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

10 is accepting contributions for Abdusalamov, who remains unconconscious at [][R9osevelt Hospital]] in New York City with his wife at his side.<ref>http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more-sports/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Peppard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tracy Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reading, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Little (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sebastian Marroquin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored photos

Hi Robert. I have restored the photos you removed from Monte Barrett and Magomed Abdusalamov, since they still exist and you didn't provide any rationale for removal. Was there a reason you removed them? Ish dar ian 04:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BrizelBarkley.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Levin High School for Media and Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taft High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rommel Rene may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Rommel Charles Rene''' (born 1986-04-09 in [[Brooklyn, New York]], was a southpaw professional [[cruiserweight]] [[boxing|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rommel Rene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cruiserweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julio Cesar Matthews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman Martinez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur MacArthur IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur MacArthur IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur MacArthur IV (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 19 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Riddick Bowe page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roheet Singh (boxer)

A tag has been placed on Roheet Singh (boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article was earlier deleted SIX times. User changed the first name and created the article. Please refer Rohit Singh. Kindly SALT this name too. Thanks

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Herschel Jacobs (boxer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Herschel Jacobs (boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NottNott talk|contrib 19:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Peter Rehse (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Fallsburg Central School District

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fallsburg Central School District, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hamzah Aljahmi

The article Hamzah Aljahmi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOXING

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 06:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamzah Aljahmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamzah Aljahmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamzah Aljahmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phil Williams (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cruiserweight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Everett McGowan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raleigh Hotel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cocoruff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Christina O page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chad Douglas (porn star)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chad Douglas (porn star) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Avicennasis. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brizel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ^Avic _ennasis @ 19:44, 29 Tevet 5777 / 19:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chad Douglas

The article Chad Douglas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No assertion of notability. No independent reliable sourcing. Atrociously sourced (mostly unsourced text. Laced with third party BLP violations. No encyclopedic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danilo Velasquez

Hello Cocoruff,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Danilo Velasquez for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Your addition to MS-13 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with David Dao. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at David Dao, you may be blocked from editing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll cooperate. Dr. Dao has gained international status, though, and I guarantee it will just keep getting reposted. Like it or not (and United Airlines certainly doesn't like it) Dr. Dao has become world famous, and the incident involving Dr. Dao will never be forgotten in public consciousness, especially in the United States and Asian countries. He is noteworthy, whether you like it or not.....Cocoruff April 12 2017.

The next time you get the urge to use Wikipedia as a soapbox, please use Twitter instead. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sonny West (actor)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sonny West (actor), Cocoruff!

Wikipedia editor Killer Moff just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good and solid article.

To reply, leave a comment on Killer Moff's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Killer Moff (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Your addition to Sonny West (actor) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cocoruff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Ponce, Puerto Rico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menudo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gallows.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gallows.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Inquart.png

Thank you for uploading File:Inquart.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cocoruff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cocoruff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devin Gaines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Maxim Dadashev

On 25 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maxim Dadashev, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Step hen 04:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Werner Doehner

The article Werner Doehner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:1E. Their sole claim to any significance was being the last living survivor of the Hindenburg crash. I have been unable to find any other claim to significance. If this tag is removed please explain how the subject passes our notability guidelines including 1E on the talk page and ping me. Thank you... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Werner Doehner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Werner Doehner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Doehner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carl Davis (boxer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Davis (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Davis (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 01:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Carl Davis (boxer). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yendris Rodriguez Valdez

The article Yendris Rodriguez Valdez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, fails WP:NBOXING, won only two fights in his career

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BrizelAntonacci.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:BrizelAntonacci.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sealle (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahmoud Fadel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmoud Fadel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Fadel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 19:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boris Stanchov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boris Stanchov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Stanchov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

².O.^Boxing 21:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ruth Dayan

On 7 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ruth Dayan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 16:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Schaeffer

The article John Schaeffer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benson Ford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Barris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Torres for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Torres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 03:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deaths in 2022, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will do this. Thanks for letting me know. Cocoruff (talk) 00:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luis Cream

The article Luis Cream has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only fought in four bouts, none that were notable. I could not find any real notable references to him barring one article that seems to have been written by the page creator, considering the photo used in the page is similar to the ones in the article. Failing to see a reason why this should be on Wikipedia, being the grandson of a famous boxer in itself is not notable, and who even is Chuck Diesel?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ré union! 08:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]