User talk:CltFn/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GodsCaliph.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GodsCaliph.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:InthePathOfGod.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:InthePathOfGod.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Invasion.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Invasion.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PatrickSookhdeo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PatrickSookhdeo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JihadInAmerica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JihadInAmerica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JihadInTheWest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JihadInTheWest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JihadTheTrailOfPoliticalIslam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JihadTheTrailOfPoliticalIslam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OriginsOfTheKoran.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OriginsOfTheKoran.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MeccanTradeAndTheRiseOfIslam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MeccanTradeAndTheRiseOfIslam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Muslimseparatism.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Muslimseparatism.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sudden Jihad Syndrome

Why are the categories in a "nowiki" section? AnonMoos (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I am not sure what you mean , but if you mean in my workspace , they are not live categories.--CltFn (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I mean Sudden Jihad Syndrome in main article space, now re-deleted... AnonMoos (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:PatrickSookhdeo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:PatrickSookhdeo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. *** Crotalus *** 20:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces

An editor has nominated Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:WafaSultan.jpeg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:WafaSultan.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. *** Crotalus *** 22:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:BrigitteGabriel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrigitteGabriel.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <eleland/talkedits> 16:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Prophet of Doom

An editor has nominated Prophet of Doom, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prophet of Doom and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JihadInTheWest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JihadInTheWest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Miniatures.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Miniatures.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:InfiltrationHowMuslimSpiesandSubversiveshavePenetratedWashington.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:InfiltrationHowMuslimSpiesandSubversiveshavePenetratedWashington.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhyILeftJihad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WhyILeftJihad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Three Deleted Articles

Are you going to work on them? The concern on all of the PROD tags was that they were all orphaned articles that did not cite reliable third-party sources.   jj137 ^♠ 20:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies Against America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:WalidPharesC-Span.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:WalidPharesC-Span.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. *** Crotalus *** 00:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AsraNomani.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AsraNomani.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AmericanJihad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AmericanJihad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FromBabelToDragomans.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:FromBabelToDragomans.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FutureJihad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FutureJihad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DeclineOfEasternChristianityUnderIslam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DeclineOfEasternChristianityUnderIslam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DefeatingJihad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DefeatingJihad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Civilizationanditsenemies.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Civilizationanditsenemies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CrossroadsToIslam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CrossroadsToIslam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eurabia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eurabia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeavingIslam.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:LeavingIslam.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HowToTalkToALiberal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HowToTalkToALiberal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LebaneseChristianNationalism.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LebaneseChristianNationalism.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:InDefenseOfInternment.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:InDefenseOfInternment.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LifeAndReligionOfMohammed.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:LifeAndReligionOfMohammed.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HolyWarInc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HolyWarInc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LegacyofJihad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LegacyofJihad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JamalDerrar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JamalDerrar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IslamAndTheWest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IslamAndTheWest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IslamUnveiled.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IslamUnveiled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi

The article Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references for nearly a year.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeshoney (talk) 21:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi

The article Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very few in-line notations, a lot of un-sourced material.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeshoney (talk) 09:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi

I have nominated Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeshoney (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DefeatingJihad.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DefeatingJihad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judith Koren

The article Judith Koren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 2009. Author of one book, does not meet WP:CREATIVE. details of academic career not found, does not meet WP:ACADEMIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   Cs32en Talk to me  12:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 23 Years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 23 Years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/23 Years until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   Cs32en Talk to me  12:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Islam Unveiled for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islam Unveiled is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam Unveiled(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   Cs32en Talk to me  13:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Journey into the Mind of an Islamic Terrorist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journey into the Mind of an Islamic Terrorist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey into the Mind of an Islamic Terrorist(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   Cs32en Talk to me  13:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IslamUnveiled.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IslamUnveiled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InsideIslamforcatholics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InsideIslamforcatholics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JourneyIntoTheMindOfAnIslamicTerrorist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JourneyIntoTheMindOfAnIslamicTerrorist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Ali

The article Daniel Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual, fails WP:BIO absent significant coverage in reliable sources. The name gets a lot of Google hits, but the ones in reliable sources are unrelated people with the same name or juxtapositions of the given names "Daniel" and "Ali"; all coverage of this individual in reliable sources (like the Espresso article) is trivial.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Myth of Islamic Tolerance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Myth of Islamic Tolerance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Myth of Islamic Tolerance (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Onward Muslim Soldiers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onward Muslim Soldiers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onward Muslim Soldiers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Confrontation at Concordia

The article Confrontation at Concordia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film; fails WP:NFILM absent significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Confrontation at Concordia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Confrontation at Concordia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confrontation at Concordia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Relentless: The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Relentless: The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relentless: The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Samirabellil-marianne.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Samirabellil-marianne.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Distinguished visiting professor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Distinguished visiting professor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distinguished visiting professor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Lessons of History for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lessons of History is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lessons of History until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Narratives of Islamic Origins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Narratives of Islamic Origins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narratives of Islamic Origins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:53, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Civilizationanditsenemies.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Civilizationanditsenemies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clintonhighcrimes.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clintonhighcrimes.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ken Power for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Power is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Power until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 16:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ken Power for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Power is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Power (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 17:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CroneGodsRule.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CroneGodsRule.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:InthePathOfGod.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InthePathOfGod.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ThePoliticallyIncorrectGuideToIslam.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThePoliticallyIncorrectGuideToIslam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Institute for the Secularisation of Islamic Society for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute for the Secularisation of Islamic Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for the Secularisation of Islamic Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manda Zand Ervin

The article Manda Zand Ervin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sourcing of this article is very miserable, and does not suggest the subject is notable. The only reference for Alliance of Iranian Women, which Ervin purportedly founded, is their own website. When I search for either the Alliance or Ervin herself, Google only finds blogs and pages of the organization's website, with the sole exception of Ervin being listed as a contributor on the Federalist Society's website, https://fedsoc.org/contributors/manda-zand-ervin. Note, however, that the Federalist Society states that they take no responsibilty for the info about their contributors: "A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information." The self-supplied "biographical information" about Ervin, such as "She meets regularly with the members of the European Parliament and American Congress", and "she was appointed, by the President of the United States, as the United States’ Delegate to the United Nations’ Commission on the Status of Women" appears nowhere else on the internet, as far as my googling skills go. The creator of the article is long since banned from the English Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | tålk 17:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Islam and Dhimmitude

The article Islam and Dhimmitude has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet notability guidelines in general (WP:GNG) and those for books (WP:NBOOK)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Treason.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Treason.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Bat Yeor

Responses:

• Please desist with your insinuations.
• My edits regarding Yeor's departure from Egypt have to do with a prior discussion as to the most neutral way in which to present the material.
• The last thing this article needs is to have Yeor's scholarly credentials "proven" by assorted neo-conservative sources. She's an historian; that should suffice. CJCurrie 06:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

1) This prior discussion you cite had nothing to do with Bat Ye'or's scholarship.

2) Your use of the phrase "assorted neo-conservative sources" raises further questions about a pre-existing agenda editing the article. Its not an insinuation , its you own words.

3) The citations provided meet Wikipedia standards as for Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Citing sources , thus irregardless of your opinion, her scholarship is a supported by published , verifiable and reliable sources. --CltFn 12:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding reversions[1] made on December 21 2006 to Bat Ye'or

Regarding reversions[2] made on December 21 2006 to Bat Ye'or

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 48 hours.

Please mark your reverts as such in future - use "rv" in the edit summaries. If you are in doubt as to what is a revert, pease read WP:REVERT.

William M. Connolley 20:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I've extended this block to indefinite per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Community_ban_for_CltFn. Dmcdevit·t 10:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Why are you doing this DmCdevitt??, I discussed by edits on the talk page of the article in question here.

I requested page protection of the article here

I offered compromises to my edits and added references as requested. Did you actually look at my edits carefully to establish what actually was going on on the page before making such a drastic decision as to block me indef? Look at the Bat Ye'or edit history page

Have you checked the value of my contributions to wikipedia against the alleged disputes I have been involved with?

--CltFn 17:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Conditional unblock?

I'm considering unblocking you, but it would be conditional on something like 1/7R, strict civility and extensive use of talk pages for controversial edits.

But I can't quite see why you would prefer that to simply getting a new account; if you stuck to the above, you'd be in no trouble.

Reply here.

William M. Connolley 19:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks William Connolley. I accept the terms you propose; ie 1/7R, strict civility and extensive use of talk pages for controversial edits. As far as a new account, I did not know there was such an option but in any case I would prefer to continue editing as CltFn even if it is somewhat a more challenging road for now.--CltFn 00:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

OK William M. Connolley 13:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh - also: this section needs to stay on your talk page; and (I presume this must be obvious) this is your last chance William M. Connolley 13:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

OK agreed.--CltFn 13:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Reminder: this needs to stay here; the conditions remain.

In particular, you appear to have broken the 1/7 RR constraint [3], [4] and failed to mark reverts as such.

William M. Connolley (talk) 21:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 24h for violation of your unblock parole. Based on talk, I don't think youve been strictly civil. You've clearly broken 1/7 RR William M. Connolley (talk) 22:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

John Esposito and Bat Ye'or

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Bat Ye'or, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I refer to your campaign against John Esposito in the article, talk, and edit summaries ("shill for the Saudis", wording which implied he was personally "a recipient of a $20,000,000 endowment from Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal of Saudi Arabia", etc) which has been ongoing for over a year now. <eleland/talkedits> 15:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked again

I've blocked you for violation of your parole. You are required to use the talk page to discuss controversial matters; all reverts are controversial. All reverts must be marked as such William M. Connolley (talk) 20:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked again, 48h

You're blocked for clear violation of your parole; [5] William M. Connolley (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked: Long-term Abuse

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. To contest this block, please email me or place {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked.

Block rationale: Long-term abuse of wikipedia policies with user being blocked on and off since 2005. User was previously indefinitely blocked by User:Dmcdevit with the block summary stating "Exhaustion of the community's patience for repeated edit warring and blocks". He was then later unblocked on conditions set by User:William M. Connolley. Since then he was reblocked 3 times by the same user for parole violations (two of those blocks being a month ago). Since then he has continued to try and perpetuate political smears on the Barack Obama article using tags as weapons. It is my belief considering the long-term abuse by this user and the fact that he was given the opportunity to redeem himself after being indefinitely blocked by another admin that the community's patience is now exhausted and that the user is a net detriment to the goals of Wikipedia.--Jersey Devil (talk) 21:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CltFn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not violate any wikipedia policy, I was blocked for while participating in a discussion on Barack Obama's talk page which is hardly a valid reason for blocking.Would someone please show what violation of Wikipedia policy was commited in the discussion? Also cited is that I put a dispute tag on that page per wikipedia policy to point out that there was a content dispute about a section of the article, again hardly a reason for blocking. I re-iterate that I did not violate any wikipedia policy, instead the blocking admin is essentially citing my block history to indefinitely block me, apparantly prompted by his own partisanship towards Barack Obama as shown by the POV description of my edits in his block rationale and comments on the Barack Obama talk page [6]. My block history is used by the blocking admin , on the assumption that it is valid, a supposition which may not be accurate. What I am really guitly of? I am guilty of presenting sourced material that does not agree with some other editors, some of whom go to great lengths to get me blocked from the site for not other reason that they believe this to be their best way to prevent the inclusion of content which does not suit them. Why did I get blocked so often one might ask? Its because I normally edit very controversial topics and in the my early wikipedia history I would more easily be get ropped into reverting a revert of my edits, but I have since grown past that. Unfortunately some editors still play dirty and purposefully try to get accounts whose edits they do not like blocked. In closing , I respectfully request that this indef block be lifted as it has no merits and is an example of a partisan and excesive use of blocking powers--CltFn (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

|decline=Decline for now, pending results of ANI discussion below. Looking at the block history for this IP, there has been a long history of abuse; blocks have been done by a wide range of admins over a long period of time. I see no good faith here. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)}}

For anyone else looking at this, I'm opening a thread on ANI. This user is a long time contributor and purely on that basis, I think this needs to be more than just a unilateral decision. I'm doing this completely without prejudice - in other words, I'm not saying that there is anything right or wrong with the block - I just think based on the history that it needs to be reviewed by more than a few pairs of eyes. --B (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Have you been through any WP:DR?

I noticed this, and wondered if you've simply been blocked by admins or if something else happened. While I'm not exactly a supporter of everything you wanted to add to Obama's article, you were at least discussing the tag you added, which shows good faith to me. Anynobody 06:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

No I have not been through any WP:DR I was having a nice civil discussion on the Barack Obama talk page, albeit on a rather explosive topic judging by the general response of some editors I was debating this with and out of the blue I get indef blocked by Jersey Devil after he appears to have been steered in that direction by one of the editors I was having the discussion with. --CltFn (talk) 08:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Something weird happened to my previous talk page post, you may want to go through yours and see if the anon did any speaking for you. Anynobody 22:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The noose is already around your neck, please note this!

Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Controversial_block_needs_review The noose of an indefinite block is already around your neck. While RFA's often have the question "what is the difference between a block and a ban", if you are indefinitely blocked, it's not much different from a ban from the blocked user's perspective.

There has been some opposition to your indefinite block. B is neutral. Yahel Guhan and ThuranX are opposed. In the interest of compromise between these editors and the editors calling for your permanent block, I will unblock you on a trial 7 day basis. Your edits during the next 7 days may be reviewed. If they are not productive, I will not intervene any further and an administrator will likely block you indefinitely (forever). Guidelines for productive edits include trying to use neutrally worded phrases, use reliable sources for all edits (especially since you will be under scrutiny). Archtransit (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I have read through the ANI you pointed to and noted the concerns voiced by the various admins I appreciate the magnanimity of this offer and will adhere those guidelines .--CltFn (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

The best thing you can do is to be patient. Don't create a sock. This will harm your case. Your case has not yet been settled. Be warned, however. I am more interested in the process of how and why we ban editors than your edits. Archtransit (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the efforts to resolve this situation. I will keep your suggestions in mind and keep abreast of the ANI discussion. --CltFn (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Your block has been reinstated. The discussion on AN/I continues, despite the fact that you have clearly exhausted the patience of many administrators I apologize (and I'm sure others would agree) for the confusion surrounding your block/unblock/reblock and any future actions. ^Avruchtalk 01:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

OK understood.--CltFn (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

More effort is being spent about you. This is rare in WP. It's easy to forget about you and leave you bleeding like a injured animal in the road. I don't support you but I support your ability to defend yourself or express your opinion. Please be patient a little longer. Do not create any socks in the interim. This will only hurt your case. Archtransit (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks once again for your help on this. --CltFn (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible proposal

This proposal is made to you, not the community. Do you want the opportunity to be conditionally unblocked and be allowed the right to respond on ANI and/or DR and/or ArbCom? This courtesy is commonly allowed. I don't guarantee that I'll do it but denial of your request would look bad on the one who does.

If you do, consider clarifying which of the edits between 28 December and 17 January are in dispute and why you made them, why you are sorry, or what you promise to do in the future. If I were you, I would request conditional unblock to respond and wait a few days to contemplate a response as your wikipedia life depends on it. Be prepared for several people who will be opposed to giving you the right to make a statement. Don't depend on me to write your statement as I am not interested in being your advocate. Archtransit (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes of course I would accept a conditional unblock . The edits you refer to , I assume are on the Barack Obama article. I made them to present information in regards to Obama's early childhood religious background. that in my view was not adequately covered in the article , thus I took up the task. I made sure to fully cite the information to reliable, verifiable and reputable sources. This was clearly a sensitive topic for some editors, some of whom heavily contested any mention of the topic. The debate which ensued on the talk page seems to have led to some drastic measures being taken with the block and I have now been excised from the discussion.

This is just totally out there. CltFn, if you have responses you wish to make to the ANI discussion, you can post them here and an admin will copy and paste them over to ANI for you. What Archtransit has told you above is just not true. You're not entitled to unblock to defend yourself and it won't look bad for anyone who declines to unblock on those grounds. I'm sorry you've been hit with all this incorrect information but I'll watchlist your page and if you wish to make any comments in your own defence, post them here and I, or another admin, will move them for you. Sarah 22:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Sarah. The whole topic of blocks and unblocks is in itself seems to be a controversial one with diverging opinions being voiced amongst administrators. --CltFn (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

--CltFn (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Unblock for an ArbCom request is customary. For others forums, it is a courtesy. Neither one is to be abused. However, don't rush into ArbCom. Archtransit (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid you are mistaken about many things including the above. We have had many ban discussions with the editor blocked and there have also been many ArbCom requests made with the account under a block and the blocked user has either sent their statements to a clerk or posted them on their userpage for an admin to transfer. Same with community based sanctions. Additionally, I have never suggested arbitration for this user, I have, however, suggested arbitration for you for gross and incompetent misuse of adminship. Sarah 02:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)