User talk:Chrishitch

I would love to engage in creative constructive interactions with all civilities due . rahila 07:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrishitch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chrishitch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Bhumihar. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And please sign your posts properly. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am learning to use the features . Will be careful . Plz elaborate the context in which i was warned ....rahila 15:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Please do not change, repost, or modify comments like you did here. You are free to add your own comments. Also, please fix your signature. "Signatures must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log." (per WP:SIGLINK) --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lakhisarai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pala dynasty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, your tendentious editing and WP:IDHT behaviour at Talk:Bhumihar has gone on for long enough. I mentioned WP:GS/Caste there but now you can read up on it here, too. Please take note of the information below. - Sitush (talk) 18:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Bhumihar

I've closed the discussion. You lack of understanding English and your unwillingness to discuss in good faith makes this impossible.

If you want to continue on the English Wikipedia, I highly suggest:

Follow instructions that you have been given.
Egads, sign your posts. You've been told multiple times.
Use English. For example, done use "........". Spell words. There are no spaces before punctuation.
Don't bash other editors.
Don't bash sources that you happen not to like.

Two things that made me laugh out loud.

"They have not said anything about the research on which their claims were based. They have neither given any proof nor any data."
There are references given for every claim in the book. From outward appearances, the book followed standard scientific approach.
"5.Plz try to adopt a systematic approach . It would be welcome by all ."
It's clear you do not understand what "systematic approach" is. You never did a systematic approach, but the very opposite.

Bgwhite (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand you claim to have closed the discussion and on the other you could not resist from continuing it here (it means the argument is open ended). It doesn't bother us a bit whether somebody is laughing himself out loud or crying himself out loud, for one knows best about himself. The article Bhumihar is in a pathetic shape because of some inordinate obduracy.

I very much intend to have a prolonged stay here on wikipedia.

Thanks rahila 03:48, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usertalk:Chrishitch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 10:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#CIR_at_Bhumihar. - Sitush (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Questions, please reply below

Hi, Chrishitch. Have you used any earlier accounts for editing Wikipedia? I ask because only a couple of days after creating the account Chrishitch I see you using snatches of Wikipedia jargon such as "Plz refrain from making personal attacks on me" and "Comment on content, not on the contributor" (though without showing much understanding of what they mean). Where did you come across these phrases, and why do you say such things to Sitush? He certainly hasn't made any personal attacks on you, or commented on "the contributor". Please reply below. Bishonen | talk 22:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Sitush made a very direct insinuation that I supposedly was from the Bhumihar caste and suffered from their prejudices given the fact that I raised the issue on the use of the word hybridity for a ' 'human being ' as the Bhumihars were known to dislike the hybridity narrative. If this doesn't qualify to be called a comment on the contributor then may you decide better.

Here is the text - I suspect the problem here is actually found in the words preceding that one, ie The Bhumihars themselves dislike these narratives ... You may dislike it but Wikipedia is not censored and sources do speak of these relationships. The term itself is harmless and, indeed, in the context of inter-marriage etc it is a normal scientific/biological word. - Sitush (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

& then

The source is reliable, the source mentions it, and utcursch has provided links for several others that do also. You need to read WP:IDHT, WP:TLDR and WP:TE because if this continues you are likely to be sanctioned in accordance with WP:GS/Caste. I realise that you do not like it - many Bhumihars do not also - but that is not a reason to remove something. - Sitush (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Calling upon not to do so , Sitush again made the same insinustion in course of the discussion. There was no reminder to him despite I complaining of it to another editor Anastasia.

I don't claim to know all the rules and regulations here on wikipedia esp as Sitush and others have been pointing at my supposed incompetence. I may be incompetent but Wiki doesn't allow only the super competent to contribute.

No, I am fairly new to Wiki as the warnings on signature and other technicalities on my page testify .

What do you mean by where did i come across those phrases ? Any user who creates an account and wishes to contriute on wiki within the bounds of norms and propriety would go through the basic rules of behaviour to be observed by a user . If Sitush can make references to my supposed caste affiliations and casts based prejudices and go uncensored, then I too have a right to ask him not to attack me personally. Neither mine nor Sitush's caste or for that matter your caste perceived creed community or family should be made insinuations at or be made direct references to. I am a new user but these are general mannerisms and etiquettes not unique to me or him .

I think you must go through the discussion at Bhumihar talk to understand the situation better. The rest is upto you people.

Thanks

rahila 03:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bihar Sharif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pala. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumihar again

Please read the article and the source in full before making edits such as this. The article already notes Gait's opinion, and the source makes it clear that his was not an official classification. - Sitush (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine .

rahila 09:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashwani Kumar says The term Bhumihar Brahmin was adopted by the community in the late-19th century to emphasise their claim of belonging to the priestly Brahmin class.

However here is something interesting , as at pg no 27 in the book 'Women and Social Reform in Modern India: A Reader'

By Sumit Sarkar, Tanika Sarkar , 2008 , Indiana University Press,  we find the mention of the words 'Bhumihar Brahmins' for Bhumihar sepoys ,as they were called then.

Apparently Ashwani Kumar is being contradicted here . The reference dates back to 1826 AD.

rahila 13:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

You have already had a formal notification of WP:GS/Caste yet you have just now again unnecessarily removed sourced material from the Bhumihar article when a simple word change would have sufficed. This is disruptive and needs to stop. - Sitush (talk) 15:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, not a simple word substitution should suffice , would it ? I have pointed out the vagueness of the information sourced before too. What were the exact censuses being referred to or what were the dates , if any ?

I mean to say , we can't pick flaws in the sources whimsically , or can we ? The source has to be precise about the information especially in regard to well documented , official census information it purportedly reports.

I tried bringing it to the notice of all editors on the talk page , but none replied.

rahila 15:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumihar topic ban

For continued disruption at the article, and especially the WP:IDHT behavior at the talkpage, despite the feedback and numerous warnings listed above and at the ANI recently, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community's discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

You are indefinitely banned from making any edit related to Bhumihars anywhere on wikipedia.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard and to the Arbitration Committee. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Abecedare (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to follow instructions and what other people have advised you. Your continuing refusal is very frustrating.

Follow the instructions above on how to file an appeal. You do not add information to a closed discussion as you have done here and here.
Sign you talk messages with ~~~~ and stop using different names and formats. If you want to personalize your signature, follow the instructions at WP:SIG.

Bgwhite (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris, I have reverted your edit to the ANI archive (which Bgwhite also referred to above). Again, the correct venue for the topic-ban appeal is the administrator's noticeboard. Abecedare (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are still refusing to sign your posts. You've been told multiple times over multiple weeks. Your refusal to do one minor thing doesn't look good. Bgwhite (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't surrender to lies

Book : Peasants and Monks in British India

author : William R. Pinch

published by : University of California Press

Berkeley and Los Angeles, California

year : 1996

At pg no 83 and 84 .

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lakhisarai

added a link pointing to National highway

Patna

added a link pointing to Pala dynasty

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

god versus God

I've reverted you at a couple of articles - I understand why you are doing this but our guideline is at MOS:CAPS#Religion. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 16:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is for your work on Mokama arunbandana 17:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Khatri without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chrishitch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chrishitch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chrishitch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punyark Sun Temple (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles cannot be used as sources. Instead of adding Wikipedia links within <ref> tags, use Wikilinks to create links to other articles. Search engine results pages are not sources. See the information above, and read the information linked from this decline notice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punyark Sun Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Punyark Sun Temple, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Punyark Sun Temple

Hello, Chrishitch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Punyark Sun Temple, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Punyark Sun Temple

Hello, Chrishitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Punyark Sun Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]