User talk:ChessFiends

Welcome!

Hello, ChessFiends, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 11:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Falko Bindrich

Very well written article. :) NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 01:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Nice of you to say. I've played vs. this guy on chess.com, very strong, felt he deserved an article. ChessFiends (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Falko Bindrich

Talk:Falko Bindrich/GA1. Epicgenius^{(talk to me • see my contributions)} 20:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Falko Bindrich

Hello! Your submission of Falko Bindrich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 19:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmate GA (again)

Hi. I have nominated Checkmate for GA again and thought that you could have some feedback on this. Would you please review it on Talk:Checkmate/GA2? Thanks. Epicgenius^{(give him tirade • check out damage)} 17:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chess.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of chess grandmasters by country, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ivan Saric, Michael Adams and Vladimir Georgiev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chess960 Lichess EL

The Lichess site is a pretty decent EL site for Chess960, and no advertisements are obvious. So what is your problem? IHTS (talk) 22:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It just didn't seem to fit the article. It's not a site specifically for Chess960, there are plenty of places just for chess that also offer 960, like Chesscube, FICS, ICC... just seems like advertising for one site in particular to me. ChessFiends (talk) 12:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO the EL fits the article perfectly. The EL doesn't have to be dedicated to the article topic, it just needs to add value to it. When you wrote in your editsum that the EL description text "no registration, downloads, plugins, or ads" was "advertising", no, it was text that I wrote in order to describe the EL in a way so that editors wouldn't delete the EL on the basis of the site requiring registration, requiring download, requiring a plugin, or containing ads. (Do you have a suggestion for better way to describe the EL?) To be "advertisement", someone needs to be selling or promoting. The description of the EL wasn't selling or promoting, it was describing. Again, I wrote the description that way in order to attempt to preempt another editor from deleting the EL on one of those bases. (But you deleted it anyway!)
I looked at several other sites and the Lichess site seemed to me to be the best one for the purpose. (It was clean, simple, direct. The other sites' home pages were filled with lots of confusing clutter, ads, etc.) It seems to me your objection might be that you want *no* such EL. (If so I disagree, I think there s/b one. And I think the Lichess one is the best one for the reader. I'm gonna restore the EL, and if you delete again, I'll be opposing again, at article Talk, and if necessary and if I have time/energy, at WP:ELN.) IHTS (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, thanks for the explanation. Although it still reads a lot like site advertising to the naked eye. ChessFiends (talk) 15:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The current description is: "play against a Chess960 AI; site is free and open-source – no registration, download, plugins, or ads". (Do you have suggestion how to make better for the naked eye? Or, what aspect creates the problem you're detecting; maybe we can fix it thru trial-error. Help me by giving hint what specific part of description makes you feel that way.) Ok, IHTS (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is better/simpler?: "play Chess960 against an AI (no registration, download, plugins, or ads)". IHTS (talk) 16:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(I changed it to the latter. Please let know if you think it's not a slight improvement. Ok, IHTS (talk) 01:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ChessFiends. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chess.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ChessFiends. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Falko Bindrich

Falko Bindrich has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Nameless One

There was an active cleanup effort on WP:VGCHAR to tidy up Start-class articles, which should still be viewable in the archive there. All the information that could be salvaged from that one was already present in Planescape: Torment, and honestly unless you plan to work on it with sources you managed to find I don't see any reason to revive it: it's been at start for decades, and what's there didn't illustrate separate importance from teh game. AfD's themselves are not meant for cleanup, and WP:BLAR is a viable tool that can be used in instances such as this. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PC-NamelessOne.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PC-NamelessOne.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Murray

Both the references you just removed from Douglas Murray do in fact contain the statements you are saying aren't there: are you sure you are checking in the right places? Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are the full articles, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 and https://www.academia.edu/11653451/Beyond_Islamophobia_The_Role_of_Englishness_and_English_National_Identity_within_English_Defence_League_discourse_and_politics. Where precisely are the statements which state that Murray is Islamophobic? The first says this "Ye’Or’s Eurabia: the Euro-Arab Axis (Citation2005) is the canonical work of the genre (Bangstad Citation2013; Larsson Citation2012), but extemporizations on her basic theme can be found in the work of many conservative writers during the late 2000s and 2010s, such as Melanie Phillips, Mark Steyn, Bruce Bawer, Christopher Caldwell, Douglas Murray and, more recently, Alt-Right-linked figures such as Lauren Southern and Raheem Kassam." That is not support that he is Islamophobic. The second article does not mention him once.

The first is entirely the wrong article, and the second is a conference paper, not the published version. If you're not able to access the actual papers via TWL, send me an email and I'll respond with PDFs. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing exactly the same as Firefangledfeathers using the articles at [1] and [2]. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both, my bad, got the papers mixed up! ChessFiends (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]