User talk:Chaselien

August 2024

Hello, I'm QwertyForest. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Exodus Decoded without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. QwertyForest (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with the operation although I tried edit summary, not successful.

The quote was out of context, because in the same paragraph, Jacobovici replied he brought the same skills and methods what archeologists use, and there's no difference. Chaselien (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Protegmatic (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's been edited have been the truth. Chaselien (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop covering the truth Chaselien (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Jerusalem Post has been filled with chaotic ads, pushed by money, just like media in Taiwan. Chaselien (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia exists to summarise what has been mentioned in reliable sources. When deciding what content should be included, we look for verifiability, not truth. Also, it is not a good idea to insert comments that something is false into an article. If you think information is not accurate, either be bold and remove it (while explainaing why in the edit summary) or explain why it is false on the talk page. QwertyForest (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would information reliable when the source is bombarded with filthy ads? What is even your real name? Chaselien (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Exodus Decoded shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If blocked from editing truth to authenticity, then I will stop using Wikipedia. Chaselien (talk) 05:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:THETRUTH, WP:VNT. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Standing by righteousness Chaselien (talk) 13:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaselien, do you have any sources that show that the information is false, or any good reason that the cited source is unreliable? The presence of ads does not make a source unreliable. Repeatedly adding commentary of the content into articles is not acceptable. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is not for righting great wrongs. Best regards, QwertyForest (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The article is fluctuated with filthy ads. They are desires of eyes. Wikipedia does not want to sold to a business, then this article show not appear on Wikipedia, because it's unreliable source. Do you have other source to prove this interview actually happened? Thanks Chaselien (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, has this interview actually verified? That is the question. Chaselien (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Exodus Decoded. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 03:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not neutral if one can't prove the event true Chaselien (talk) 03:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Exodus Decoded, you may be blocked from editing. C F A 💬 03:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yahuah will have correct Eternal judgement on your influence of fake news. Chaselien (talk) 03:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chaselien reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: ). Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it true. Otherwise you are arbitrary with information sharing Chaselien (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 09:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Doug Weller talk 11:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]