Jump to content

User talk:Capankajsmilyo/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018 Padma awardee

A tag has been placed on Category:2018 Padma awardee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Politicians by religion has been nominated for discussion

Category:Politicians by religion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Inter&anthro (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

The daughter categories of this category, such as Category:Muslim politicians, Category:Christian politicians, Category:Sikh politicians etc. have also been nominated. Feel free to participate in the discussion, thanks Inter&anthro (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Repeal of Act

Hi,

Regarding this edit. Can you please tell me when the act was repealed?

Best wishes -- Raziman T V (talk) 14:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century Indian politicians by religion

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Indian politicians by religion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century Indian politicians by religion

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century Indian politicians by religion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian politicians by religion

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian politicians by religion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Tirthankara

Hi, I just translated the template probably created by User:जैन on Hindi Wikipedia in English. As current template is not accurate enough for Tirthankara articles. It's here : Template:Infobox Tirthankara. Please review it and eliminate possible mistakes in it. Thank you Rishabh.rsd (talk) 08:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikidata Infobox

Template:Wikidata Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parshvanatha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parshvanatha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India

Namaste, Capankajsmilyo. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.



Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain temples by state

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain temples by state requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – October 2019

WikiProject India
News
Miscellaneous
Events
Events that occoured on October.
Sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – November 2019

WikiProject India
Created by Sahibdin and nominated for Featured Media by TheMandarin
News
  • A significant number of the new articles received each day are about South Asian topics, mainly biographies and cultural themes, along with the usual spam for companies. There is a huge backlog at the NewPagesFeed and more editors with experience and knowledge of Indian subjects are urgently needed to patrol the pages. If you are already a New Page Reviewer, please help out as much as you can. If you are not, please check out WP:NPP, then take a look at the requirements at WP:NPR and if you feel up to it, apply for the New Page Reviewer right at WP:PERM.
  • Kalapani territory has been a subject of edit warring by multiple editors. Kalapani is a disputed area between Nepal and India. The page was fully protected from 10 to 17 November. You're welcomed to patrol the page and keep your eyes on the new editors. Makes sure to assume good faith while editing the page.
  • An editor is pushing too high Jain POV in Jainism related articles. Join the conversation about the user at the noticeboard
  • India Search Result is a bot-generated page that tracks newly created articles related to India. It is a place to look out for new page pages. The page is updated daily and make sure to add it to your watchlist.
Miscellaneous
Sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adi Shankara

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adi Shankara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Adi Shankara GA progress

Hi, there's been no movement on this GAN for two weeks now. Could you let me know your plans for the review, which is nearly complete actually. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Chiswick Chap, was stuck somewhere. Will complete it within this week itself. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 18:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Great to hear that. I'll be around tomorrow; will probably have to finish things after the holiday. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – December 2019

WikiProject India
Created by Bellus Delphina
News
  • The holiday season has begun. WikiProject India Wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade. We look forward to working with you in 2020!
  • Editor Uanfala started a conversation about Lists of notable people in articles about places back in November and it still needs more editor's opinion on the subject.
  • Join a disscusion about formatting writing credits and music credits. The discussion is about Indian films having some differences from Western films in terms of writing and music credits.
  • India Search Result is a bot-generated page that tracks newly created articles related to India. It is a place to look out for new page pages. The page is updated daily and make sure to add it to your watchlist.


Miscellaneous
Sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Your GA nomination of Adi Shankara

The article Adi Shankara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Adi Shankara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Chiswick Chap Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 17:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parshvanatha

The article Parshvanatha you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Parshvanatha for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaurav Bhatia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Bhatia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Bhatia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 15:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Vishal Jolly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishal Jolly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Jolly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 19:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mahavira

Mahavira, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. A. Parrot (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Characters in the Ramayana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Characters in the Ramayana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters in the Ramayana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions for India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  Bishonen | tålk 12:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC).

March 2020: warning

Wikipedia is not for nationalist promotion, per Sitush's post above. You're likely to be topic banned from the area or otherwise sanctioned if you persist in it. Bishonen | tålk 12:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC).

Nationalism

Any chance of you reverting your nationalist bias at Saurabh Kalia? You should have been blocked years ago for this sort of thing. - 146.200.49.240 (talk) 07:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

You have also breached WP:CITEVAR. - 146.200.49.240 (talk) 07:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I see that you edited the article talk page some hours ago but have not responded to my request. I have reverted you myself, except for a minor point about a statue in Amritsar. You have obviously seen the article talk page so please use it. - Sitush (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

WP:ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI#User:Capankajsmilyo and infobox templates about your edits. Fram (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Voting and proposals based on an essay, without providing arguments or countering opposition

I notice that you are posting multipe "convert to wrapper" proposals for infoboxes which have more different parameters than identical ones, simply by posting a list of parameters for both infoboxes and linking to an essay "per WP:INFOCOL". You have done this on at least 4 templates, and at at least 5 TfD discussions as well. As votes they are useless and do nothing to address the arguments presented by the opposition, and such !votes should be disregarded by any competent admin as examples of "notavote" and "arguments to avoid" contributions. As merge (or convert) proposals they are equally useless, as they don't argue why, in these specific cases, a merge is better than keeping them separate even though the templates are well used and have more parameters separate than in common.

Perhaps you have good arguments, but if you don't present them, you are mostly wasting people's time and would be better to stop doing this. If you support merges at specific TfDs, argue why the actual nominated template is a good candidate, and argue why the opposition is not convincing (or the benefits of merging are more important). Linking to an essay as if such is sufficient justification to overcome such opposition won't do. Fram (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, and an edit like this one, imposing your prefered outcome from a TfD discussion, which caused half of the infobox to disappear and added the article to maintenance categories, is a good argument to keep both infoboxes separate and to keep you away from such edits and discussions. A change which adds one less important value to an infobox (religion), but loses the actual essential elements why the other one was used in the first place (the pretender status of his claims), is not "cleanup" by any stretch of the word. Fram (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

I second all of this and more. Please stop this disruptive spamming. Just take a look at the tables. There are major differences in the parameters supported by each template. Also, as I have already told you at one of the far too many pages on which you have spammed tables like this, your parameter list for {{Infobox person}} is incorrect. |1=, for example, is not supported by Infobox person. The documentation page for the tool you are using has a caveat explaining that you need to validate its output. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
It occurred to me to suggest this possibly constructive outlet for your editing energy: go to one of the templates that you are proposing become a wrapper for {{Infobox person}}, and edit the template's sandbox to show how such a wrapper would work. Demonstrate the differences (or that it is the same) on that template's testcases page. Then post a note to the template's talk page showing that you are doing some actual constructive work, and ask for feedback. Feel free to ping me or post a note here letting us know which template you have done this for. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Infobox discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atal Bihari Vajpayee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atal Bihari Vajpayee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kohlrabi Pickle -- Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atal Bihari Vajpayee

The article Atal Bihari Vajpayee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Atal Bihari Vajpayee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kohlrabi Pickle -- Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 08:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome bhai

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

GA nomination of AB Vajpayee

Hi, I'm going to be taking a wikibreak soon for roughly 2 months. If you can run through the final round of corrections on the article, and explain the text overlaps with the websites that pop up on the copyvio tool, I'll promote the article now. If you're not able to, I'll leave it on hold and return to it when I'm back, and you can edit it anytime in the next two months. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 07:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atal Bihari Vajpayee

The article Atal Bihari Vajpayee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atal Bihari Vajpayee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kohlrabi Pickle -- Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 11:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Adding links to this page to any number of tangentially related lynching articles isn't appropriate; please don't do that. The see also sections are for topics that may be immediately relevant; a single incident with very different motivation from any of the pages you added it to isn't one of them. It looks like POV editing, even if it wasn't your intention. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jain literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for informing, will take care. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 12:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Atal Bihari Vajpayee

On 3 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Atal Bihari Vajpayee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that India developed nuclear power when Atal Bihari Vajpayee was prime minister? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Atal Bihari Vajpayee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Atal Bihari Vajpayee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Stone pelting in India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stone pelting in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone pelting in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sona Modern Public School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sona Modern Public School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sona Modern Public School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of AirSwap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirSwap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirSwap (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fluidity (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fluidity (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluidity (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of New India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of tallest monolithic statues

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of tallest monolithic statues. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of largest monoliths. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of largest monoliths. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pink Revolution in India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pink Revolution in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Revolution in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marathi and Baladeva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jainism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

India 10,000 challenge

WikiProject India Hello Capankajsmilyo. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: 
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, Dey subrata (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism of the "Characters in the Mahabharata" page

Why did you remove entire chunks from the Characters in the Mahabharata page just because they were "unreferenced"? Wouldn't it have been better to add references to them instead? Your actions of deleting huge sections of text that were largely accurate, if unreferenced, can very easily be called vandalism. You should seriously consider restoring that text. 182.57.60.69 (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

GOCE notification for Chandragupta Maurya

Expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've left you some questions over at Talk:Chandragupta Maurya. If you have time, could you please look at them? Thanks. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 16:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Update: Request is complete and template reflects as such. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

WikiProject India Hello Capankajsmilyo. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: 
{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jainism

Hello! Your submission of Jainism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature has an unescaped pipe character (|), which must be coded as &#124; to avoid messing up templates. See, for example, Template:Did you know nominations/2020 coronavirus pandemic in Delhi, where the unescaped pipe in your signature is treated as a pipe in a surrounding template, and your signature is chopped off in the middle. (In turn, this causes the <sup> tag to be missing its ending </sup> tag, and it's possible that someone will come along and fix it before too long.)

Please change

[[User:Capankajsmilyo|Capankajsmilyo]]<sup>([[User talk:Capankajsmilyo|Talk]] | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes/assistance|Infobox assistance]])</sup> : Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance)

to

[[User:Capankajsmilyo|Capankajsmilyo]]<sup>([[User talk:Capankajsmilyo|Talk]] &#124; [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes/assistance|Infobox assistance]])</sup> : Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, please fix this. I just had to clean up a DYK page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Covid-19 India pages

Hi Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs)

Can you please help us updating any of the following pages on Coronavirus in Indian regions(States & UTs):-

Thanks,Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Vikram maingi, I would have loved to conribute in those articles, but I have been busy in other areas recently. However, I can help you through my experience so far. You can start with adding content from news articles and notable data and incidents of each states. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Capankajsmilyo I will start putting time on these. Can you please help me with updation on one, COVID-19 pandemic in Chandigarh, page?

Vikram Maingi (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jainism

Hello! Your submission of Jainism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jainism

Hello! Your submission of Jainism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Jainism

On 6 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jainism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ancient Indian religion Jainism (primary symbol pictured) holds that the universe was not created? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jainism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jainism), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Cwmhiraeth Capankajsmilyo (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Million Award for Atal Bihari Vajpayee

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Atal Bihari Vajpayee (estimated annual readership: 1,300,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Reidgreg Capankajsmilyo (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

  • Library Card Platform
  • New partnerships
    • ProQuest
    • Springer Nature
    • BioOne
    • CEEOL
    • IWA Publishing
    • ICE Publishing
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
  • Botswana The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
  • England Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, Denmark MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Harivamsa has been nominated for deletion

Category:Harivamsa has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajitabha Bose has been accepted

Ajitabha Bose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Aman.kumar.goel Capankajsmilyo (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shared Template Warning

Template:Shared Template Warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ajitabha Bose for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajitabha Bose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitabha Bose until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dial911 (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M. S. Golwalkar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article M. S. Golwalkar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 22:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of M. S. Golwalkar

The article M. S. Golwalkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:M. S. Golwalkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

  • New partnerships
    • Al Manhal
    • Ancestry
    • RILM
  • #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
  • AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

"New India" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New India. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 13#New India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 04:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
218 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Christianity in Kerala (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C ALCO DL560C (talk) Add sources
1,130 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Thomas the Apostle (talk) Add sources
94 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Jainism and Hinduism (talk) Add sources
63 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Eastern Protestant Christianity (talk) Add sources
894 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Taxila (talk) Add sources
2,087 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Kali Yuga (talk) Cleanup
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Legend of Tirumala (talk) Cleanup
1,087 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Kuch Rang Pyar Ke Aise Bhi (talk) Cleanup
423 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Sardaar Gabbar Singh (talk) Expand
904 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Yamuna (talk) Expand
175 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dhee (talk) Expand
196 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Aniconism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Sauripura (Dvaraka) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
66 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Coonan Cross Oath (talk) Unencyclopaedic
959 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Yama (talk) Merge
353 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA Rishabhanatha (talk) Merge
138 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chitrāngada (talk) Merge
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Sudharmaswami (talk) Wikify
411 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Criticism of The Walt Disney Company (talk) Wikify
118 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Christianity in Tamil Nadu (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Origin of Malankara Church of God Thrikkannamangal (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Bankchain (talk) Orphan
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Maa Shoolini (talk) Orphan
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kunthunatha (talk) Stub
3,256 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Soni Razdan (talk) Stub
124 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Indian Army Public Schools (talk) Stub
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Padmaprabha (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Shreyansanatha (talk) Stub
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Vasupujya (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Sanskrit page

Hi, Just wanted to notify that there is a discussion going on in Sanskrit talk page, if you want to participate. Jaykul72 (talk) 10:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is England Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by England Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with New York (state) Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Gondor Hog Farm (submissions), Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions), Somerset Harrias (submissions) and Free Hong Kong Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 41

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020

  • New partnership: Taxmann
  • WikiCite
  • 1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 15:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits by a new user

Hi, perhaps you need to see this since you merged-redirect that article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

The article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chandragupta Maurya for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
179 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pauravas (talk) Add sources
618 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Battle of the Hydaspes (talk) Add sources
974 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mahajanapadas (talk) Add sources
1,503 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Rachael Ray (talk) Add sources
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Political Rowdy (talk) Add sources
339 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Haryanka dynasty (talk) Add sources
263 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Pataas (talk) Cleanup
1,247 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Green Revolution in India (talk) Cleanup
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Akrura (talk) Cleanup
1,381 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Electric car (talk) Expand
1,104 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Electric car use by country (talk) Expand
197 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Indian Army operations in Jammu and Kashmir (talk) Expand
131 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Electric rickshaw (talk) Unencyclopaedic
424 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mylapore (talk) Unencyclopaedic
144 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Hinduism and other religions (talk) Unencyclopaedic
205 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Plug-in electric vehicle (talk) Merge
34 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Stone pelting in Kashmir (talk) Merge
103 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Thirumal (talk) Merge
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Saint Thomas Christian denominations (talk) Wikify
58 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Mahanubhava (talk) Wikify
40 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Jamaat-e-Islami Kashmir (talk) Wikify
53 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Kumar Swami (talk) Orphan
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Sandhya Mendonca (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Charged Hong Kong (talk) Orphan
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aranatha (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Anantanatha (talk) Stub
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Shitalanatha (talk) Stub
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sambhavanatha (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub D N Himatsingka High School (talk) Stub
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pushpadanta (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

  • New EBSCO collections now available
  • 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
  • Library Card input requested
  • Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Vanshika Verma Khare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanshika Verma Khare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanshika Verma Khare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 15:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
  • Republic of Venice Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  • Scotland ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
  • Rwanda Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
  • Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
  • Botswana The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
  • Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
  • Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
  • United States Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
  • England Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hashgraph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hashgraph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashgraph (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ysangkok (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

  • New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

While working on a distantly related draft article I came across some sources so I did initiate Draft:Holy Rights about to release Urdu documentary on subject of Triple Talaq.

While I do good support good number of Women's rights articles I am already occupied with too many of the articles and drafts, so I am looking for help. Please do visit Draft:Holy Rights and do provide some article expansion help if you find topic interested in.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  • Botswana The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  • Republic of Venice Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  • Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  • England Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  • England Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  • Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  • Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:4th-century BC Asian philosophers

A tag has been placed on Category:4th-century BC Asian philosophers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 13:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asian philosophers by century

A tag has been placed on Category:Asian philosophers by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 13:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suresh Pasi

Notice

The article Suresh Pasi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hindus by occupation

A tag has been placed on Category:Hindus by occupation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

  • New Library Card designs
  • 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your article Anil Rajbhar

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Anil Rajbhar to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. ━ কুউ পুলক (Talk) 07:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century Jain writers

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century Jain writers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain writers by nationality

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain writers by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain monarchs by nationality

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain monarchs by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:3rd-century BC Jain monarchs

A tag has been placed on Category:3rd-century BC Jain monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:8th-century Jain monarchs

A tag has been placed on Category:8th-century Jain monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:9th-century Jain monarchs

A tag has been placed on Category:9th-century Jain monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:12th-century Jain monarchs

A tag has been placed on Category:12th-century Jain monarchs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian Jain monarchs by century

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian Jain monarchs by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain monarchs by century

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain monarchs by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

  • Botswana The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  • Republic of Venice Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
  • England Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
  • Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain pilgrimages

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain pilgrimages indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Capankajsmilyo:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Paranjothi (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ooruttambalam (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kumudendu (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kadamba architecture (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Klemm Kl 36 (talk) Add sources
304 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Santalum album (talk) Add sources
387 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Wadiyar dynasty (talk) Cleanup
177 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Udupi district (talk) Cleanup
35 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Sports in Karnataka (talk) Cleanup
2,847 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Helmuth von Glasenapp (talk) Expand
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mallinatha (talk) Expand
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Gulbarga district (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sudi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
126 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dharwad district (talk) Unencyclopaedic
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Rodopi (publisher) (talk) Merge
329 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA TriMet (talk) Merge
35 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Western Australian Government Railways (talk) Merge
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Momolianism (talk) Wikify
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Smitha Madhav (talk) Wikify
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Schwenkfelder Church (talk) Wikify
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Asish Chakraborty (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Arjen Hagenauw (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Angelo Rovegno (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hypselobarbus carnaticus (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Shahidul Alam Sohel (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Oligomerus (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start A.T. Mine E.P. Mark II (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Grigoleti (talk) Stub
60 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Administrative divisions of Karnataka (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Indian Jain musicians has been nominated for merging

Category:Indian Jain musicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

  • Library design improvements continue
  • New partnerships
  • 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Jains by period has been nominated for merging

Category:Jains by period has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposing a new Tag & Assess

Hi @Capankajsmilyo:,

Have proposed a New Tag & Assess for WikiProject India here. Do let us know your view. :) Happy editting! Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) (talk) 05:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, Botswana The Rambling Man and New York (state) Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Republic of Venice Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, England Lee Vilenski, Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, Rwanda Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. George Floyd mural Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

  • Library design improvements deployed
  • New collections available in English and German
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Subrat Saurabh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subrat Saurabh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subrat Saurabh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 13:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

  1. Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
  3. Rwanda Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
  4. New York (state) Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
  5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
  6. Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
  7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
  8. Republic of Venice Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

  • On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
  • Search tool deployed
  • New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Raghuvamsa has been nominated for merging

Category:Raghuvamsa has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,551 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Luis Garavito (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kumudendu (talk) Add sources
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kundakunda (talk) Add sources
65 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Vengi (talk) Add sources
69 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Alupa dynasty (talk) Add sources
232 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Paramara dynasty (talk) Add sources
283 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Solar dynasty (talk) Cleanup
316 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dharmasthala (talk) Cleanup
346 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Wadiyar dynasty (talk) Cleanup
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Helmuth von Glasenapp (talk) Expand
145 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Bellary district (talk) Expand
52 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mallinatha (talk) Expand
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sudi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Moodabidri (talk) Unencyclopaedic
128 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dharwad district (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Virginia and Truckee RR. Engines No. 18, The Dayton; and No. 22, The Inyo (talk) Merge
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Superframe (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Fishing Bridge Museum (talk) Merge
99 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Gajendragad (talk) Wikify
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Smitha Madhav (talk) Wikify
34 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Schwenkfelder Church (talk) Wikify
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C April Reign (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 2014–15 Halifax Rainmen season (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aingeal Ní Chualáin (talk) Orphan
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pravachanasara (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hypselobarbus carnaticus (talk) Stub
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Belagavi division (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aranatha (talk) Stub
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Administrative divisions of Karnataka (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bhutabali (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ProjID

Template:ProjID has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 09:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Indian legislation

Template:Indian legislation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

  • 1Lib1Ref 2022
  • Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Second swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Peter Ormond 💬 04:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Delhi medical cases chart

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Delhi medical cases chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Haryana medical cases chart

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Haryana medical cases chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox recurring event/Wikidata

Template:Infobox recurring event/Wikidata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox religious building/Wikidata

Template:Infobox religious building/Wikidata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikidata Infobox/line

Template:Wikidata Infobox/line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
  • Christmas Island AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
  • Philadelphia GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
  • SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
  • United Nations Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Give Me Trees Trust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Give Me Trees Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Give Me Trees Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 10:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Peepal Baba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peepal Baba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peepal Baba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AAP government advertisement controversy

Notice

The article AAP government advertisement controversy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphan article created that fails WP:NOTNEWS, based on allegations of one source (CAG report) with no follow up in 5 years. The sources are discussing govt expenditure and not calling it controversy, so this is in WP:Original Research territory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

  • New library collections
  • Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Swati Singh (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swati Singh (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swati Singh (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 14:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  1. New York (state) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
  2. Christmas Island AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
  3. Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
  4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
  5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
  6. United States Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
  7. England Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Capankajsmilyo! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Capankajsmilyo! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed on the AFC's participants list, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to regain access to the AFCH script, you can do so at any time by visiting WT:AFCP. Thank you for your work at AFC, and if you start editing Wikipedia again we hope you will rejoin us. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

  • New library partner - SPIE
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox religious text/color

Template:Infobox religious text/color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
  • Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

  • New library partners
    • SAGE Journals
    • Elsevier ScienceDirect
    • University of Chicago Press
    • Information Processing Society of Japan
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
57 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Malkheda (talk) Add sources
78 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Indian Arrival Day (talk) Add sources
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kadamba architecture (talk) Add sources
70 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Belawadi Mallamma (talk) Add sources
274 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Santalum album (talk) Add sources
94 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Haridwar Kumbh Mela (talk) Add sources
269 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B History of Andhra Pradesh (talk) Cleanup
239 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Udupi district (talk) Cleanup
914 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Ajatashatru (talk) Cleanup
301 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Cilappatikaram (talk) Expand
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B History of Bidar (talk) Expand
32 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pratikramana (talk) Expand
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Sarak (talk) Unencyclopaedic
122 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Bagalkot district (talk) Unencyclopaedic
119 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Moodabidri (talk) Unencyclopaedic
663 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Yaksha (talk) Merge
154 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Hinduism and Sikhism (talk) Merge
335 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Semi-vegetarianism (talk) Merge
1,405 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mount Abu (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Vattakera (talk) Wikify
42 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Shiva Puja (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kamalakar Tripathi (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Berenika Glixman (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alexandra Trofimov (talk) Orphan
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sthulabhadra (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Uttaradhyayana (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Itnal (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Dhyanatray (talk) Stub
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Administrative divisions of Karnataka (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Prem Suri (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Flügel

Notice

The article Peter Flügel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incredibly poorly-sourced BLP. The subject has a lot of credits being the editor of books, but I'm unable to find significant mentions about him. WP:NACADEMIC is the guideline, and doesn't appear to me to meet it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SWinxy (talk) 06:23, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Capankajsmilyo! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

  • New instant-access collections:
    • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
    • Project MUSE
    • Taylor & Francis
    • ASHA
    • Loeb
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rohtak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chahamanas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

  • England Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
  • New York City Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
  • Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
  • Chicago PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
  • Toronto Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

  • England Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
  • United Nations Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
  • Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
  • Toronto Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
  • SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
  • England Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
  • Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
  • Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
  • Kingdom of Scotland Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

  • New collections:
    • Edward Elgar
    • E-Yearbook
    • Corriere della Serra
    • Wikilala
  • Collections moved to Library Bundle:
    • Ancestry
  • New feature: Outage notification
  • Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashwin Porwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashwin Porwal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwin Porwal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikidata Infobox

Template:Wikidata Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
13 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Rania, Sirsa (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jai Pal Singh (talk) Add sources
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hem Chandra Raychaudhuri (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Hermann Jacobi (talk) Add sources
58 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Valari (talk) Add sources
166 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nellore district (talk) Add sources
312 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bharuch (talk) Cleanup
115 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ancient Greece–Ancient India relations (talk) Cleanup
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dhvaja (talk) Cleanup
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Akividu (talk) Expand
99 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Architecture of Tamil Nadu (talk) Expand
334 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nellore (talk) Expand
148 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Parantaka I (talk) Unencyclopaedic
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Hith Harivansh Mahaprabhu (talk) Unencyclopaedic
52 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Catuṣkoṭi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,560 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Reincarnation (talk) Merge
148 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Pradyota dynasty (talk) Merge
264 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bhagalpur (talk) Merge
385 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Anti-Indian sentiment (talk) Wikify
40 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Simandhar (talk) Wikify
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Jainism in the United States (talk) Wikify
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Marrimakula Kandriga (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ana Flavia Nogueira (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alex Natan (talk) Orphan
246 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Vidadala Rajini (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mary Pat Fisher (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Museum of Oriental Art (Turin) (talk) Stub
74 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Siddhartha of Kundagrama (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chausa hoard (talk) Stub
59 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Nabhi (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Mahapurana of Jinasena

You had written:

That is wrong. The quote is from the Sanskrit Mahapurana of Acharya Jinasena. It is from the early section called Adipurana.

"स्वष्टास्य जगतः कश्चिदस्तीत्येके जगुर्जडाः । तदुर्णयनिरासार्थ सृष्टिवादः परीक्ष्यते ॥१६॥ ..."

The Apabhramsha Mahapurana of Pushpadanta is a different book.

Malaiya (talk) 03:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shvetambara Terapanth

Information icon Hello, Capankajsmilyo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shvetambara Terapanth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
  • New York (state) Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
  • Germany FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
  • United States TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
  • Byzantine Empire Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included Berkelland LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, New England Trainsandotherthings, England Lee Vilenski, Indonesia Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, Washington (state) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and Chicago PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
611 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Ambala (talk) Add sources
135 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bhiwani (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Jain terms and concepts (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Rania, Sirsa (talk) Add sources
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Upadhan (talk) Add sources
299 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ongole (talk) Add sources
35 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Naugaja Peer (talk) Cleanup
139 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Ancient Greece–Ancient India relations (talk) Cleanup
117 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C GungHo Online Entertainment (talk) Cleanup
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Vuyyuru (talk) Expand
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Iraiyanar Akapporul (talk) Expand
8,006 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Andhra Pradesh (talk) Expand
325 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Vaiśravaṇa (talk) Unencyclopaedic
128 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Parantaka I (talk) Unencyclopaedic
730 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Yudhishthira (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,317 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Reincarnation (talk) Merge
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Culture of Washington, D.C. (talk) Merge
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Clermont Carn (talk) Merge
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Simandhar (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Vattakera (talk) Wikify
208 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Chittoor (talk) Wikify
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Narketpally - Addanki - Medarametla Road (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Marrimakula Kandriga (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Carlo Jungbluth (talk) Orphan
82 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Siddhartha of Kundagrama (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Jambuswami (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nemichandra (talk) Stub
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Padmaprabha (talk) Stub
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mahanandin (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hansi hoard (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shvetambara Terapanth

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shvetambara Terapanth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, Chicago PCN02WPS, and London AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Merged Motor Vehicles Act articles

Merged Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 to the main page as per your proposal

Nkb 21 (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

  1. ^ Umakant P. Shah 1987, p. 239.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capankajsmilyo/Archive_2&oldid=1155895178"