User talk:By caner28
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]Hello, By caner28, and welcome to Wikipedia!
An edit that you recently made to Reformism (historical) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.
Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Dear By caner28, you shouldn't copy-paste text as in this change. Because, the history gets lost this way. You should rename the article to create a redirect. If you cannot do that, please file a requested move request. Joseph (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Dcotos (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Forwardism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
copied from wiki, no sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Readingpro256 talk to me contribs 20:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Forwardism for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forwardism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Pichpich (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Cockerel as food moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Cockerel as food. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Social radicalism
[edit]Hello By caner28, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Social radicalism, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social radicalism.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Remsense}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Remsense ‥ 论 18:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- In a similar vein, you seem to be making mistakes with respect to terms of art translated from other languages. Your edits at Halkçılık, Radicalism (historical), and Social radicalism all seem to be making this similar error of assuming a translation based on the etymological structure of a word or phrase, rather than its actual usage in high quality sources. signed, Rosguill talk