User talk:BrendanDHarris

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Electronic article surveillance has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Electronic article surveillance was changed by BrendanDHarris (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91724 on 2014-03-31T02:01:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at Jamie Lee Curtis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nthep (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Far-right politics, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 18:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to John Campbell (YouTuber). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will, you will be lucky not too get a block for making threats, and read wp:disruption. Slatersteven (talk) 15:31, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

A post about you has been made to WP:ANI. See WP:ANI#"violently if necessary". Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 16:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]