User talk:Blacklemon67/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Blacklemon67. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Image:Robert Garran.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Robert Garran.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 00:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Map service icons
Work on the map icons on the Graphics Lab seems to have stalled. I think your ideas are good but agree with Ddxc in that perhaps the perspective distortion should be reduced. Would you be willing and able to do that? Then I figure they can be used and the subject closed. --Seans Potato Business 13:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Flag of Salt Lake City SVG.svg
Thank you for uploading Image:Flag of Salt Lake City SVG.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Mapaccess2.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mapaccess2.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Mapaccess3.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mapaccess3.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
salut —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.17.185 (talk) 09:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Also from the graphics lab
We've found and uploaded an SVG of "SpeedTree" and it's now on that articel. Is it good enough now to file the request as done? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, I'll do that.
Reminder to sign comments
This just a reminder, in case you didn't know, to sign your comments on talkpages (in particular the Graphics Lab page (I haven't check any others)). Failure to do so causes mysteries :) ----Seans Potato Business 23:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Slavin agency
A tag has been placed on Slavin agency, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Tandy Corporation
I've reverted your addition to Tandy Corporation again. I really could not understand what you meant by the phrase you added, and I like to think I have a pretty good grasp of English. :-) I'm not saying that your addition is wrong in any way; just that I couldn't understand what you meant. What is it you're trying to say in your addition? Maybe I can help you phrase it differently so it's understandable. (By the way, please don't forget to sign messages you leave on Talk pages using four tildes). -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 10:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, I have no idea who "Strong Bad" is. As far as I could see your update was just a string of random words. This is why you need to change the wording if you re-add the text. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 09:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting approach, although surely it's better to word the addition in such a way that people who are unfamiliar with something that is only very loosely connected to the subject are able to understand it without trawling through another article? If you point me at the source you want to cite, I'll have a look at rewording it for you. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 22:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've reworded your text so that it says what I think you're trying to say. I have to say that I'm going to revert it again at the weekend, unless you can find a source to back up what you've said. All contributions need to have reputable, third-party sources for inclusion in Wikipedia. Have a look at WP:CITE to see what I mean.-- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 09:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting approach, although surely it's better to word the addition in such a way that people who are unfamiliar with something that is only very loosely connected to the subject are able to understand it without trawling through another article? If you point me at the source you want to cite, I'll have a look at rewording it for you. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 22:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Userboxtradingcard.svg
Thank you for uploading Image:Userboxtradingcard.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Iida_Shojiro_sharp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iida_Shojiro_sharp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈talk 16:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Vista icon 45x45 change.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vista icon 45x45 change.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:BL67siggy.png
Thanks for uploading File:BL67siggy.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Manchukuo Coast Guard Flag.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Manchukuo Coast Guard Flag.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:BL67siggy.png
Thanks for uploading File:BL67siggy.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
ABC TV Logo SVG
Hey man, great job on the AVG of the logo. Maybe try creating outlines of the text to rid the box, other than that, I don't know. Connormah (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pbroks13 beat me to the punch =P --Blacklemon67 (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Jww Birch.png
Thanks for uploading File:Jww Birch.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Naveenpf (talk) 07:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Are you the author of this image? The license it was uploaded to Commons with {{PD-US-flag}} it not valid for cities. If the image is self-made as your upload indicated, can you release it under a free license. Thanks! --Svgalbertian (talk) 03:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Flag of Salt Lake City SVG.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Flag of Salt Lake City SVG.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Svgalbertian (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Airpressureonvenus.svg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airpressureonvenus.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Jww Birch.png
Thank you for uploading File:Jww Birch.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Buffalo Seal.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Buffalo Seal.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Skype logo2.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Skype logo2.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:AOI Tex Editor.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Book Place Holder2.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Discussion involving transgender issues
You may want to be aware of and possibly join in: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 121#MOS:IDENTITY clarification. Skyerise (talk) 06:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Blacklemon67testone.svg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blacklemon67testone.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Imperative
Hello. Regarding your latest edit to Medical prescription: I know the exclamation point after "take" looks odd if you're not familiar with the usage, but it's freely used in English linguistics and etymology to indicate the imperative mood. It's probably a borrowing from German, in which every imperative requires an exclamation point, no matter what the context. The quotation marks you have added don't help the exclamation point "convey meaning": it conveys meaning all by itself. They don't accomplish anything except to make the word look even stranger—nobody's being quoted, after all. I haven't removed them, because I don't want to quarrel with you, but I respectfully ask that you remove them. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think you should edit out the quotes yourself, but add a footnote or something explaining why the exclamation mark is there. If that seems too much you should at least add a wiki comment, otherwise I can see this cycle of removing the exclamation and re-adding it repeating itself over and over again. --Blacklemon67 (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hold on, take! is in quotes later in the article, what's different about those two instances, or is the second one a mistake? --Blacklemon67 (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I did as you suggested and added an invisible comment regarding the exclamation point. The later "take!" in quotation marks is in the nature of a quotation, though a previous editor has used quotation marks far too freely in this article, such as to designate words-as-words, which I have replaced with italic type. This issue really isn't worth the time and trouble we've put into it! (Exclamation point signifying strong emotion.) [I posted the foregoing on 24 May but forgot to sign it.] J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 21:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Blacklemon67. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Boreal Forest Ring.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Boreal Forest Ring.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Forest ring has been accepted
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
KSFT (t|c) 14:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)DYK for Forest ring
On 1 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Forest ring, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that forest rings had gone unnoticed by geologists until aerial photography became a common surveying tool in the 1950s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Forest ring. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Forest ring), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations! Your DYK hook made our all-time list of Non-lead hooks with over 15,000 views! See here. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Blacklemon67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Blacklemon67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
The file File:Heart lake logo.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
School logo. The uploader may have created the svg file but the logo itself would still be copyrighted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 16:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for this article!
The Video Game Barnstar | ||
I'm simply amazed that there's so much journalism out there about good ol' Half-Life: Full Life Consequences. Very happy to see that article created, made my day! -- Pingumeister(talk) 11:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Half-Life: Full Life Consequences
On 27 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Half-Life: Full Life Consequences, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original author of Half-Life: Full Life Consequences wanted it to be so bad that "it stands the test of time as one of the worst things ever written"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Half-Life: Full Life Consequences. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Half-Life: Full Life Consequences), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 12,969 views (540.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babylonokia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Museum für Kommunikation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)