User talk:Benmite/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Benmite. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Nomination of Akyra Monet Murray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akyra Monet Murray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akyra Monet Murray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kylo, Rey, & Finn Consortium (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
AGF
Hi, I've not come to lecture you but please Assume Good Faith, comments like this aren't really helpful and in all fairness whenever you add anything it always needs to be backed up by a few sources,
Everyone hates being reverted (inc admins) however it's apart of life here I'm afraid,
Anyway thanks and Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 03:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Benmite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Ariana Grande
I see that someone removed the sound files from Grande's article, saying that there is an NFCC issue. Did you originally add them? I like them, and if you are confident that they do not violate the NFCC rules, I'd be happy to say that I think they're helpful in the article. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Joanne the Scammer) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Joanne the Scammer, Benmite!
Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Still has major media coverage in 2017; appears to pass GNG.
To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 01:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Benmite. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Benmite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Thank you for adding information to The Chainsmokers! Cheers, Blue Adventure (talk) 20:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC) |
How do I get in contact with Ben? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byou the rapper (talk • contribs) 19:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
This is byou from lil yachtys sailing team I was wondering if you could write an article for me ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byou the rapper (talk • contribs) 19:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Sudden edition of a deceased page😣😣😣😣😣
Just saw you edited the page of Chadwick. And I'm not sure if you could have allowed to be maybe a week..... Here me1 (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think I understand. Benmite (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Chadwick
You’re honestly so annoying. Who cares if YOU think it’s overkill, having all those names there was a beautiful addition to his wiki page. Arrowversefanatic2002 (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- You've got the wrong guy. I was the one who added the names in the first place. Benmite (talk) 08:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Armond Rizzo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armond Rizzo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armond Rizzo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Armond Rizzo
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Armond Rizzo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks...
... for your Top 25 Report updates. I enjoy seeing these posted on article talk pages for future reference. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Aw, no problem! Thank you for thanking me, ha ha. Benmite (talk) 02:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts to improve Killing of Walter Wallace. I notice you have made numerous edits--including the deletion of sourced content--without adding edit summaries. Please let other editors know why you are making the edits you are making by including a detailed edit summary. Thanks for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi there, Magnolia677. I think I gave edit summaries on almost every edit where any removal was made: [1], [2] [3], [4], [5] [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] I could have missed one though, so let me know if you find one. Benmite (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Again, please start using edit summaries. You made five edits in a row without one edit summary. Please be considerate to other editors who have no idea what you are doing. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- FYI I noticed your edit[11] added the language "Wallace's family claimed Wallace..." In light of WP:CLAIM, I changed this word to stated.[12] Please keep WP:CLAIM in mind. Thank you. Biosthmors (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- With this edit you again changed one of my edits, with no edit summary to explain why. For the third time, stop reverting my edits for no reason. Your refusal to use edit summaries to explain what you are doing is disruptive. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- FYI I noticed your edit[11] added the language "Wallace's family claimed Wallace..." In light of WP:CLAIM, I changed this word to stated.[12] Please keep WP:CLAIM in mind. Thank you. Biosthmors (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Again, please start using edit summaries. You made five edits in a row without one edit summary. Please be considerate to other editors who have no idea what you are doing. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Great job for your work on creating the new article Armond Rizzo, and sorry some members of the community criticized your work on it. Glad to see the attempts to delete your article creation failed. Keep it up! Right cite (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
- Aah! My first barnstar! Thank you so much! I'd like to thank the Academy and my parents, and I would finally like to say that it matters not what you've done, but what you do with what you've done for others. Benmite (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Re: KOIN (TV)
KOIN is a station, not a network. It is an actual FCC callsign. Why did you want to move the article? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Never mind, I was mistaken. Sorry about that! :/ Benmite (talk) 04:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Benmite: No hard feelings. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi. Just wanted to thank you for expanding and improving "34+35". I'm not too good at writing articles myself, so I really appreciate your contributions! Hayman30 (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- No problem! Glad to have helped. Benmite (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ashnikko Cry Music Vid.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ashnikko Cry Music Vid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Frauds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terror Squad.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:No Frauds snippet.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:No Frauds snippet.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Let me be another one that won't stop telling you to watch this show :) CapnZapp (talk) 13:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- CapnZapp, thank you for reminding me that I will never know peace until I watch that show. I almost forgot from Netflix only shoving it in my face once every other time I use it. Benmite (talk) 04:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- I came here to congratulate you for finally relenting, but alas, it seems the writer of that report was Igordebraga! So you still have your treat :) Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 10:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, at least one of the Report's writers managed to watch it after much postponing. And Benmite, remember to do the write-ups you claimed! igordebraga ≠ 16:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Top 50 report
There's only a week left. Are you still interested in doing it? Serendipodous 10:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry, I've been super distracted, but yes! I'll get on that ASAP. Benmite (talk) 10:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Only two left of the write-ups you've claimed, still waiting on you. igordebraga ≠ 20:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sparks (Imogen Heap album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedford Park.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)