User talk:Benison/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Benison. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Rather that just delete the redirect I actually moved the article out of Draft, I assume there's some AFC-related stuff you still need to do with it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Rejection of AfC Draft:Brian H. Cameron
Hello,
You rejected my AfC Draft:Brian H. Cameron for the reason that it is a plot summary. That doesn't make sense. The article is about a living person and describes his achievements and contribution. Was there a mistake made? Can it be undone? I've been waiting for two months for this article to get through the AfC process. Help, please. Nickmalik (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have rejected because the article in fully under linked in the opening paragraph and have few cites there. I can't approve it till more wiki linking is done in the first opening paragraph as well as in Ongoing contributions. Thank you.. The herald 17:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for commenting. I have made the changes you requested in the article Draft:Brian H. Cameron. Is there any way that I can avoid waiting another eight weeks before this article is reviewed again? Could you give it another pass? Nickmalik (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Voting system
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Proposed wikis
|
Thanks |
| Hello and thank you for your support for UserWiki; it is greatly appreciated. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 13:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 30 April 2014
- News and notes: WMF's draft annual plan turns indigestible as an FDC proposal
- Traffic report: Going to the Doggs
- Breaking: The Foundation's new executive director
- WikiProject report: Genetics
- Interview: Wikipedia in the Peabody Essex Museum
- Featured content: Browsing behaviours
- Recent research: Wikipedia predicts flu more accurately than Google
Please comment on Talk:Black mamba
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Black mamba. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
WikiCup 2014 April newsletter
Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's 
Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's 
Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's 
ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included 
Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and 
Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from 
Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from 
Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to 
Czar (submissions) and 
Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.
192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
- The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf3) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on May 1. It will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on May 6, and all Wikipedias on May 8 (calendar).
- The Compact Personal Bar was added as a beta feature to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on May 1. It will be added as a beta feature to non-Wikipedia wikis on May 6, and to all Wikipedias on May 8. To test it, you can enable it now in your preferences on MediaWiki.org. [1]
- It is now easier to disable the CodeEditor tool. [2]
VisualEditor news
- External links in VisualEditor are now in the same light blue color as in MediaWiki. [3]
- The template tool now tells you if a parameter is obsolete. [4]
- You can now add "suggested" parameters in TemplateData; VisualEditor will add them like required ones. [5]
- There is a new type for TemplateData parameters:
wiki-file-namefor file names. [6][7] - Editing formulae in VisualEditor will soon be enabled for all users. [8] [9]
- You will soon be able to try a new beta feature to edit text in another language. [10] [11]
Future software changes
- MediaViewer will be enabled for all users on the Japanese (ja), Portuguese (pt), Spanish (es), Swedish (sv) and Telugu (te) Wikipedias on May 8. Feedback is welcome. [12]
- You can help translate about 100 new language names that have been added to our data source. They are used, for example, as hover text for interwiki links. Send an e-mail to Nemo if you want to help.
- If you click on a redirect page in your watchlist, you will soon access the redirect itself. [13] [14]
Problems
- For about 40 minutes around 00:20 UTC on April 29, there were problems with page loading due to high server load.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
07:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hansoft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Various grains.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
|
Please comment on Talk:Venomous snake
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Venomous snake. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I've declined your speedy request as it does pass A7. It's claimed he was an MLC, and that passes as surely as MP, congressman or senator - see WP:POLITICIAN. It obviously needs a few tags adding... Peridon (talk) 10:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, in that case..The herald 13:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Robert Adams
Hi there, thanks a lot for creating Robert Adams (teacher)! :) Just one question. Do you think this particular Robert Adams would be more easy to locate if it were named Robert Adams (spiritual teacher) as opposed to Robert Adams (teacher). In a similar way to this article : Andrew Cohen (spiritual teacher) ? If not, no worries. I'd just thought I would run it by you. Thanks again! Bodhadeepika (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Done..You are right. I was also looking for a perfect headline. See, I have also added him to the disambiguation page. Thank you. The herald 14:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Brilliant! Thank you. Bodhadeepika (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Brett_Hearn
Brett Hearn Article
Hello,
Thank you for reviewing my article about race car driver Brett Hearn.
Is there a section specifically that I need to verify sources or does the whole article somehow need to be verified with better sources?
Any help/feedback is appreciated.
Thank you.
Jeff Jeff Lambert (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- I say, you can add more inline cites, about a half dozen more, (reliable ones), and ping me. I'll create the article. Thank you. The herald 16:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
10-4,
Thanks for the info. I appreciate it. I will make some changes ASAP.
Jeff
Jeff Lambert (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I went back an added about 8-10 more inline citations to my article. Most of the statistical data comes right off of his website but I added other sources such at the SuperDIRT series stats and his accomplishments from other tracks as well.
If you ever find the time, can you kindly review once again? I'm in no hurry. This is an article that, over time, would like to add photos to and fine-tune and update.
Thanks so much for helping me improve this article and make it better and more reliable. I appreciate it.
Jeff Lambert (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
5/8 -
Thanks for making improvements to my Brett Hearn article. I just saw them.
Question: Since it was denied yesterday, do I have to re-submit the article back into the queue for review? I'm very new at this and just wanted to know what the next step is after making my edits yesterday.
Thanks again for any info.
Jeff
Jeff Lambert (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, just submit it for a review and I'll do the rest. The herald 12:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
5-8,
Done. Thank you very much, Herald. You've been a great help.
I will keep tweaking my article and fine-tune it and improve, improve, improve.
Jeff
Jeff Lambert (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES)
Dear "The Herald",
Could you please explain how we can improve the article about PRIMES so that it can be suitable for Wikipedia?
Why aren't the National Science Foundation website and the official MIT website reliable enough?
The PRIMES program is the only all year math research program for high school students in the US.It has dozens of alumni, produced dozens of research papers, and claim dozens of prizes in US science competitions in just 3 years. Why is it not notable?
There are Wikipedia articles about all the similar summer programs:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Program_in_Mathematics_for_Young_Scientists
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Arnold_Ross#Ross_Mathematics_Program
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Canada/USA_Mathcamp
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hampshire_College_Summer_Studies_in_Mathematics
and it's not clear why PRIMES is less notable than these or why the references in the PRIMES article are less credible than the references in these articles.
P.S. An article about PRIMES in the "Notices of the AMS" (American Mathematical Society) is being currently prepared.
Thank you.
Dodecahedronic (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Here, reliable sources doesn't mean that they are Govt. based. Even Wikipedia is not a reliable source and we never cite from Wikipedia. If PRIMES is such a notable entity, you may get more web cites (references) and it would be better to add them. May be Help:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:Citing sources can be proved useful for you. Once you are done, ping me again and I'll review the article. Thank you. The herald 12:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 May 2014
- Traffic report: TMZedia
- WikiCup: 2014 WikiCup enters round three
- In the media: Google and the flu; Adrianne
- WikiProject report: Singing with Eurovision
- Featured content: Wikipedia at the Rijksmuseum
Please comment on Talk:Information revolution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Information revolution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Videos
They're promoted through the featured picture process (as "moving pictures"), so get listed under pictures. If you wait until just after midnight tonight, I'll set up the report for you - the lists haven't yet closed for the week. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, why did you delete the credits sections from the template? (Also, it's usually better to choose landscape-oriented side images. Too tall and they go down too far and leave a huge gap before the final image at full width) Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for that. But do you think that you are putting stress on ships in most of the Signposts recently. We need a change. Don't we? So let's go for another title and lead image. The herald 05:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
AFC -decline - bharathgyan https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Amudha_ram/sandbox
Hi Herald
i have noted your decline. The reason for the decline is referred to notability.
I had done some patient research into different secondary sources of the subject (note I started this work last May13). Reputed English dailies, web-sources have been the main secondary sources for info of the subject (most of which I have linked). I need to understand more on why these sources are being questioned for notability. The last time around (pl check drafts around 09Feb when it was rejected the first time), the entire compilation was verbatim (iwth no syllable changed) from these secondary sources. I was asked to "add value" - without being verbatim alone - and bring about "neutrality", which I have endeavoured to the best of my ken.
While the subject is a research collater he is not a researcher himself. I have read all his works, and have researched all his references - on whose researches his collations are based. A few of these who have www presence, I have linked them as well.
A peer-review of his compilations - most of which are published as books and videos- would need me to look for sources such as book-reviews, and news content providers reporting his compilations, which is exactly what i have done. I fail to understand what is missing here, which disqualifies it from being in the published domain. I am looking for objective inputs from Wiki.
Lastly, over the last few centuries, history's dominant narrative has stifled different ancient knowledge systems. I dedicate my free time ( i am software engineer by profession)to lend my support to those who are approaching these knowledge systems with a scientific temper, revering our ancestors, which have otherwise been consigned to "mythological dustbins". Living in India, which is one of the last outposts of that paganistic world with its roots to the pre-historic world intact, I realize we have a lot to share to the rest of the world, on how the ancient world lived as one family. I look forward to Wiki as a platform for this revival.
Looking forward for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amudha ram (talk • contribs) 18:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for writing. Please wait till I go through it before my vacation. The herald 05:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Herald- I've reworked the image from the RAW file to try and fix/improve the sky. I left it un-cropped as you suggested. If you have a chance, perhaps you could have another look? Many thanks in advance.--Godot13 (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Done..Sure, I'll will support now. The herald 05:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, can you give me some directions?
Hi Herald,
Thank you for accepting the Cloudmachine article. You labelled it 'stub' and I want to try and improve it. Sometimes you spend hours on additional information after which it gets deleted in a flash for being too long or not neutral enough. Could you specify a little bit, how I can improve it? Would be great! Have a wonderful vacation,
Berkum, Berkum (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi and thank you for writing. We review and grade the articles according to this page. You can go via that. The herald 05:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
- The latest version of MediaWiki (1.24wmf4) was added to test wikis and MediaWiki.org on May 8. It will be added to non-Wikipedia wikis on May 13, and all Wikipedias on May 15 (calendar).
VisualEditor news
- A new citation system in VisualEditor was enabled on the English Wikipedia. It will soon be enabled on more wikis. [15]
- Templates that were previously broken in VisualEditor should now appear correctly. [16]
Future software changes
- It will soon be possible to move category description pages. Pages in changed categories will still have to be moved independently. [17] [18]
- You will soon be able to clear your watchlist with one click or through the API. [19] [20] [21] [22]
- You will soon be able to link to Flow posts and workflows with
Special:Flow. [23] [24] - The jQuery JavaScript library will soon be updated. Please check that your gadgets and scripts will still work. [25]
- The Vector skin will work faster, as the sidebar will no longer collapse partly after being loaded. [26] [27] [28]
- MediaViewer will be enabled for all users on Wikimedia Commons on May 15. Feedback is welcome.
- An IRC discussion about Phabricator will take place on May 14 at 18:00 UTC on the channel #wikimedia-office on freenode (time conversion). [29]
- Toolserver tools will be stopped on June 30. Please make sure to change gadgets that link to the Toolserver to point to Tool Labs instead. [30]
Problems
- There were problems with generating file thumbnails for all wikis between May 3 and May 6 due to a configuration error. [31] [32]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by MediaWiki message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
06:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Snakebite
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Snakebite. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles_for_creation/Ronald_L._Mondrush
Thanks for the review and feedback on our attempt at a new article of Articles_for_creation/Ronald_L._Mondrush.
Your feedback was simply- "Need a trim". Can you elaborate? Or is it that simple, it is too long?
Thanks again,
Dan Delaney
Ronald L. Mondrush 02:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delaneys1 (talk • contribs)
- Well, you have made it alright. You have fine references, fine contents but you lack a style. Just look into any other biography and compare it with yours. You need:
Then when you are done, submit the article for review and then it will be done. Thank you. The herald 08:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles_for_creation/Hussein_Sabbour
Hello, You have declined a page that I created for Hussein Sabbour. I just need to know what are the reasons behind your decision as he is a notable person in Egypt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.161.60.251 (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for writing for me. It is not me who decides whether he is notable or not. In oprder to prove that he is notable, you must provide references and web cites which can show it. The more refs you add, the more notable he becomes. Thank you.. The herald 14:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Accuracy
The edit removing Scott Fravala as founder is accurate and common knowledge, I am Ronnie Winter. The band was founded by Duke Kitchens and Ronnie Winter. Edmund Lowman has never been a member so removing him was also accurate. The matter regarding the alleged copyright violation is still under investigation per the fact the band was invited to use the photo by the accredited website so it was also removed. Once the matter is officially and legally resolved it should be posted with accuracy. Other than that everything looks good, thanks. Please restore the edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.120.146 (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
You coming back to this? I've rearranged the images a little to make everything fit a bit more neatly (though I think we should put the Bolbyshell back if there's room for it). Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)