User talk:BMarGlines

Welcome!

Hi BMarGlines! I noticed your contributions to WZVN-TV and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BMarGlines (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BMarGlines. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page WRNN-TV, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Do you work for RNN? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24.24.160.182 made fake affiliates!

Say KWHY and KSBO are CW affiliates, that's false! If KVMM is MNT, it HAS to be dual MNT/Estrella TV. KZDF as CBS affiliate is always false. These edits made by 24.24.160.182 are just like WSTR-TV being a Dabl affiliate or KNBX as MNT affiliate. This IP address was banned for 3 months, after more vandalism, INDEFINITELY!!! BMarGlines (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Talk:WOCV-CD has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:KWHB are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, if you need help with your edits, just ask my good friend @Sammi Brie:. She's an expert in this field! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I saw you added Category:Candidates for deletion to two articles. This is not something you should do – the articles are automatically added to a hidden category at Category:Articles for deletion, while for other methods, there's a category for PRODs at Category:Proposed deletion, and one for CSDs at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. The categories you're adding are redundant and don't help anyone, so you should stop adding them to articles that are currently deletion candidates. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to KRON-TV has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WBQC's new network

Gray Television gave WBQC "WKRP" Telemundo to become Telemundo 25 Cincinnati, WBQC would've been The CW if WKRC didn't announce "CinCW" BMarGlines (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to User talk:BMarGlines has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One of the posts, "WBQC's new network" was real, WBQC became Telemundo. BMarGlines (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. There is no indication — in listings or otherwise — that MyNetworkTV has even been affected at all by KRON-TV joining The CW (KRON has not aired MyNetworkTV in primetime in years; it airs in late night and continues to do so). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 09:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MyNetworkTV didn't air Primetime in years, but can allow syndicated programs. BMarGlines (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The CW station logos

I've seen you've done some CW logos on here, so can you do the new CW station logos (from Logopedia) for WFNA, WVFX-DT2, WCBD-DT2, WLAJ-DT2, WWLP-DT2, WEEK-DT3, WMDT-DT2, WFMJ-DT2 (with a better image or SVG image), KTKA-DT3, and WWTI-DT2. There are some others, but there not in SVG, but in PNG. OWaunTon (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That also includes KCWT, WNAC, and WBDT BMarGlines (talk) 00:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KCWT, yes, but WNAC and WBDT has a SVG on Logopedia. OWaunTon (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WXXV-TV

I reverted the change. I'm not convinced of the need for three logos to be crammed in the infobox. We do support two natively, but I'd rather have one logo with all the network affiliations when it exists. It's cleaner and less redundant. I also am unsure if some of these straggling affiliates are even using local versions of the new logo (which is why I reverted you at KASN). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gray CBS affiliates

I reverted your changes at KPHO and WVLT because it doesn't seem they've changed their logos or branding. That has certainly not been the case here in Phoenix. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gray is removing CBS eyes from multiple Gray-owned CBS affiliates. BMarGlines (talk) 18:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple does not mean "all". While Gray has indicated a desire to move away from network branding, so far this has only been done the most thoroughly at its NBC affiliates. Most of the CBS affiliates that have dropped the eye, as best I can tell, are those that have either undergone more thorough relaunches (particularly WANF, and to a lesser extent KMOV) or are also associated in some way with their market's NBC affiliation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DMA180guy: now says some of BMarGlines' logo uploads are fake. I nominated those files for deletion over on Commons. Maybe you should look into BMarGlines' behavior. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KATH-LD

The new logo is in poor quality until there a high definition logo stick with the previous one for now. Junebug3000 (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WVLT-TV

Logo quality doesn't mean anything if it isn't the right logo, and there isn't a place where WVLT has banished the CBS eye. Do your homework before trying that again. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KAUZ

zeam Facebook and website do have the eye KmTvFan [User:Kmtvfan|me]] (talk to me 01:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just speedy delete... BMarGlines (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On your speedy redirects

These were made without seeking consensus. Next time, use proposed article mergers and give others the opportunity to weigh in. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KVCW, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wouldn't be a newscast, but a pay-for-play show. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If KVCW rebranded to ARC Las Vegas, its CW branding is: ARC Las Vegas: Home of The CW BMarGlines (talk) 21:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. Please see the image use policy for appropriate use of images in Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Please do not change logos of CW stations without a reference/link to a reliable source showing the actual usage of the new logo. For instance, this could be either an article in a reliable source discussing the logo change, or a direct link to the new logo itself in use on an official account. It appears in many cases, the logos that you've been substituting were homemade copies made by a user who was not in compliance without licensing policy; these do not appear to be the actual official CW station logos and to be honest, quite a few of these changes look like vandalism given that the real logo is clearly in use on the websites for the stations you are linking. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But, KOMU-DT3 already rebranded, the proof is the station ID on YouTube! BMarGlines (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. Youtube videos, especially those uploaded that are not from the official account of the station, are typically considered unreliable sources here. Furthermore, one would expect to find a rebrand on the actual station website, where you can clearly see that no such thing has occurred. Moreover, as you can see on the CW TV website as seen here, the original logo is still in use.⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an reminder, it might take an while for The CW and KOMU-TV to update the logo for KOMU-DT3's website. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 15:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KOMU-TV. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 14:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WABI-DT2's website just got removed! BMarGlines (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to keep responding in multiple places. You began on my talk page, that's where I'm going to continue this discussion. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 13:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BMarGlines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to continue making changes to the world, not make fake stuff!

Decline reason:

Your edits clearly demonstrate otherwise. Yamla (talk) 22:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were repeatedly warned to stop uploading fan-made logos as replacements for official ones, and to cite reliable sources for your changes. You have continued to fail to do so, and have shown you do not understand and are unwilling to understand or abide by Wikipedia's policies. Frankly, it's no wonder why you've been banned by these Fandom wikis if you were exhibiting the same behavior there. Your block duration is for 1 week. When you return, I want to be very clear with you -- I expect you to read, understand, and follow the reliable sourcing guidelines and our policies on verifiability and no original research. I also expect you to refrain from editing logos of TV stations as you've clearly demonstrated that you cannot be trusted to do so in accordance with policy. Given the extensive discussion we've had on this already, if you violate these policies again when your block expires, the next one will be indefinite without further warning. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 13:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just reported BMarGlines for disruptive editing (non-logo related; e.g. changing redirect targets; putting an AFD report on an article without an AFD), but my report was quickly taken down saying BMarGlines was already blocked for 7 days! Based on this user's behavior, I think an indef block is in order. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link me to that report? ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 15:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't trust the mobile app enough to adjust anything now but I'll take a look when I get back to a laptop. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing the AIV report, I think it's fine to leave the block as it is. Frankly I have extremely low confidence that BMarGlines will not be a recidivist just over a week from now anyway, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BMarGlines has just been indef-blocked at Commons. Now let's block them here. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a male! BMarGlines (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, WPTA's photo was re-uploaded, so that means that you can revert it! BMarGlines (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Universal Ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BMarGlines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm on Wikidata and Meta!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BMarGlines (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could also have my account locked, completely! BMarGlines (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With that, I may lose privilage to edit my own talk page, AmandaNP, indefinitely! BMarGlines (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last Chance

So, when I'm unblocked, I can change the redirects on each page that redirects to another page, but also I wanted to revert any pages that don't have an image due to CommonsDelinker, if I get blocked tomorrow, but this time, infinite, then I will no longer edit my own talk page, ever again. BMarGlines (talk) 23:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you begin vandalizing these types of articles once your block expires, the next one will be immediate, indefinite, and without any additional warning⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

And also... I wound no longer type on my talk page!, plus, tell a Meta admin to lock my account, fully! BMarGlines (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SWATJester, can I revert the removal of the WPTA image, please? BMarGlines (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will get unblocked tomorrow, otherwise, my talk page will not be accessible by me, anymore. BMarGlines (talk) 23:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WTGB-LD

WTGB-LD's third subchannel is launching with MeTV Toons, but I predict its main subchannel is Telemundo. BMarGlines (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WDBB. Please do not hide existing logos behind invisible comments. If you wish to discuss with other editors, do it on the talk page, not through edit summaries. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SWATJester, I want you to find users how to get WFLI/WTTO/WDBB/KECA main logos on the page so that nobody gets confused on the main subchannels, please? BMarGlines (talk) 02:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:BMarGlines/Template:Channel Four Television Corporation

User:BMarGlines/Template:Channel Four Television Corporation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BMarGlines/Template:Channel Four Television Corporation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:BMarGlines/Template:Channel Four Television Corporation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]