User talk:Avcer0

Avcer0, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Avcer0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
243	Lapita culture (talk)	Add sources
37	Mason Durie (psychiatrist) (talk)	Add sources
8	World Invitational Hula Festival (talk)	Add sources
9	Southern Cross Campus (talk)	Add sources
29	RERO (Library Network of Western Switzerland) (talk)	Add sources
7	Dance in Rotuma (talk)	Add sources
69	Māori music (talk)	Cleanup
43	Music of Papua New Guinea (talk)	Cleanup
466	United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (talk)	Cleanup
477	Rapa Nui people (talk)	Expand
32	Marshallese culture (talk)	Expand
498	Ilocano people (talk)	Expand
118	Slit drum (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
262	Apology Resolution (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
131	Culture of the Native Hawaiians (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
157	Independence of New Zealand (talk)	Merge
3	The Droke (talk)	Merge
872	Collapse of the World Trade Center (talk)	Merge
8	Māori and conservation (talk)	Wikify
72	Welfare in New Zealand (talk)	Wikify
58	Pelorus (instrument) (talk)	Wikify
2	Anaru Iehu Ngawaka (talk)	Orphan
3	O Tahiti Nui Freedom (talk)	Orphan
2	Achille Ouy (talk)	Orphan
2	Tama Huata (talk)	Stub
10	Ngā Toki Matawhaorua (talk)	Stub
177	Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
13	Derek Lardelli (talk)	Stub
3	Darcy Nicholas (talk)	Stub
2	Matiu Te Rei (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jukio Kallio

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Avcer0 (talk) 03:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Debby Curreen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Debby Curreen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BEACHIDICAE🌊 13:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Debby Curreen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Debby Curreen. Thanks! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 17:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debby Curreen (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subjects of wikipedia articles need substantial coverage in independent sources. Interview-based news articles are not independent. Booksellers pages on their wares are not independent. Social media content is not independent. Without independent coverage this article is not ready; if the independent coverage doesn't exist yet, it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debby Curreen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Debby Curreen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of ambient music artists, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 04:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ivy Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivy Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivy Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HighKing⁺⁺ 18:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Debby Curreen

Hello, Avcer0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Debby Curreen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Debby Curreen

Hello, Avcer0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Debby Curreen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sparky Deathcap moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sparky Deathcap, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 11:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sparky Deathcap (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sparky Deathcap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sparky Deathcap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennyson (band) (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm declining this article for now because it's not quite there yet. I removed a lot of the worse sources (like YouTube, bandsincamp, etc) but the article needs to be rewritten to be more encyclopedic, this might mean taking out some personal details and backstory. The sources should also be gone through again. There are some good sources in the article and at the bottom. The page should be built around these sources, and any substandard sources should be removed. It's getting there, it just needs a little more work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tennyson (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tennyson (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ivy Road" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ivy Road and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 13#Ivy Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 01:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairburn, Kaitaia has been accepted

Fairburn, Kaitaia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fairburn-Kaiaka Community Hall, Fairburn Road.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Fairburn-Kaiaka Community Hall, Fairburn Road.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/fairburn-kaiaka-roll-honour-boards. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Denis Cameron in 1960.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Denis Cameron in 1960.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennyson (band) has been accepted

Tennyson (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sparky Deathcap

Hello, Avcer0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sparky Deathcap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sparky Deathcap

Hello, Avcer0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sparky Deathcap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]