User talk:Ausir

WP:RFA

Sorry, I messed up in trying to move your RFA to self-nominations. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:52, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I sorted it. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 19:57, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting it proves it.

I reverted your vandalism of Fallout (computer game), restoring the information you deleted. I can understand why you'd want to remove it, but one cannot talk of Fallout without mentioning the most salient aspect of the Fallout fan community. --Scumbag|Talk Scumbag 18:21, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 23:30, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Welcome. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:56, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Wikipedians' notice board

Shortcut

WP:WNBP

Zapraszam.--Witkacy 14:56, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Italian communes

Hello Pawel, I made the article off-line with a normal database: one record for each article. Then we (I and 8-9 others contributors) added the articles with a special tecnique called copy and paste :-) So, I think I can't help you much. Sorry. Ciao 151.30.161.130 13:51, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pl wiki

Ausirze, ja się w to nie mieszam. Odszedłem z polskiej wiki i nie chce mi się w to polskie bagienko zagłębiać. Z mojej pobieżnej analizy wynika że zaiste Kwietnia zabanowano za jego poglądy i bez wystarczających dowodów przeciwko niemu. A potem, gdy zaczął bojkotować ban (najwyraźniej niesłuszny), zaczęto go blokować za to że się pojawiał. Słowem: zesłany do więzienia bez wyroku i bezprawnie, a potem sądzony jeszcze za ucieczkę z więzienia, w którym w ogóle być nie powinien.

Ale to oczywiście analiza powierzchowna i z oddali. Że źle się na polskiej wiki dzieje wiadomo nie od dzisiaj. Nie trzeba mnie porównywać z nikim, w grupie ludzi, których z wiki wypchnięto jest wystarczająco dużo sensownych wikipedystów, by znaleźć dość egzemplów. Halibu tt 05:19, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Mind Benders

Hello! I've noticed your interest in creating logos, barnstars, or your past artistic ability! Thus, I just wanted to let you know that the pre-round, an artistic competition, is now open at Wikipedia:Mind Benders (Shortcut: WP:MIND)! The competition is open to everyone and is seeking a logo/trophy, similar to Barnstars, to be placed on every winner's page. We urge you to help us out and submit an entry! Afterwards, the normal rounds, each consisting of ten or more fun, logical, brain-stimulating questions will open. Why don't you give it a try when it opens! Look forward to seeing your contribution. Thanks, Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:55, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Earth 2160

Yo! I noticed you checked out the Earth 2160 page. I created it awhile back, and am quite a fan of the series. I was wondering if you own it? And if so, is it any good? I completed the UCS and Lunar campaigns on Earth 2150 but the ED's was way too difficult...The new plot sounds pretty cool, pity the UCS got fully mechanized, makes them hard to like now heheh. Its a pity games like the Earth series aren't more popular, 2150's graphics were by far the finest for RTS's in 2000, still looks pretty good now too...yet people still have a preferance for junk like C&C Generals! User:D-Katana 23.10, 05 August 2005 (BST)

KSR photo / worldcon '05

Argh, KSR is one of my fave authors! I missed worldcon but live only 100 miles away (thereabouts) in Newcastle, I was upset at missing it /before/ I learn KSR was there :) -- Jon Dowland 14:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from India

Dear Ausir, Greetings from Kerala, India. Thank you for your post in Marayoor, I didn't notice it for long, as I was busy with writing a short review on Dungeon Siege 2, and here you are, another RPG guy... I am glad you are interested in Fallout too...too bad, it is not available in India yet, I heard a lot of news of abandoning the project though...and I am glad finally it made... BTW about your post, I will upload the pictures in wikipedia commons as you suggest, in time (that's procrastination!) Wish you all the best, --Cyril Thomas 18:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Municipalities for the Catalan wikipedia

Hello Ausir, I'd like to use a bot for importing your collected data about french municipalities into the Catalan wikipedia. Please, contact me if this is possible. -- Micru mail: dacuetu @ gmail.com

Evocati

Nice work with the Evocati article! Hiberniantears 17:05, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Geography

Some time ago at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography of Poland you proposed a series of bot-generated articles. While such articles on towns are not the best idea IMO, how about such articles on powiats and communes?

BTW, there's my RfA currently going on. I'd be happy if you could cast your vote there. Halibu tt 14:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moje RfA

I would like to express my thanks to all the people who took part in my (failed) RfA voting. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! I was also surprised by the amount of people who stated clearly that they do care, be it by voting in for or against my candidacy. That's what Wiki community is about and I'm really pleased to see that it works.
As my RfA voting failed with 71% support, I don't plan to reapply for adminship any more. However, I hope I might still be of some help to the community. Cheers! Halibu tt 05:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ja:Kurnik

hello. ja:Kurnik is under discussing for delection request. In jawp's policy, Removing delete tags is not allowed until an argument is completed. Thank you.Japanese Searobin 21:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)(ja:user:竹麦魚)[reply]

I would appreciate some help

Hi, I have visited the Vault and can see that you have multiple languages installed and they appear to be working correctly. I am very new to all this and I am having a great deal of trouble getting it to work Would you be able to provide me with a bit more information on how you configured it. I am using 1.5.3 btw. Can be contacted on ldlewis at swiftdsl dot com dot au. Thanks

--218.214.34.19 04:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Forgotten Realms project

Hi,

We are working on a Forgotten Realms Project to map Toril (mostly Faerûn, at the present). Since you contributed quite a lot on a Forgotten Realms-specific entry, I'd like to invite you to join the project, so we could improve the “Mapping the Realms” project.

The goal is to create a sort of World Factbook for the Realms. This means:

A consistent content
Use of templates
Entries should be limited to “sovereign places”: states and free cities, as well a moderately-inhabited place such as the Western Highlands.

On top of this, we also plan to cover Lost Empires, such as Pelvuria or Imaskar and, of course, Netheril

The project is located here
The Geographical index of Toril is a good start to get a visual of had been done, as well as the Halruaa entry.

Main contributors are presently

If you know some other person who would be interested, feel free to forward the invitation!

Feel free to take a look. We hope to see you soon mapping the Realms with us! Reply to David Latapie 13:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Ausir test

Template:Ausir test has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:If else. Thank you. —Phil | Talk 09:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

I've left this message on your Meta page as well, but I wanted to make sure you got this. At Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, a couple users and myself are attempting to gather consensus about a possible change in editing. So as not to keep the community out of the loop, we've been posting to user talk pages, which seems to have worked. If you can add your thoughts to the talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. We've gone over a few issues, ranging from perception of anti-wiki to time limits, and recycling pagemove code, so you might want to check out #Rehashing to get up to speed. Thanks in advance, Mys e kurity^{(have you seen this?)} 04:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Report an error link on sidebar

I'm sorry for adding the link without consulting anyone, but I think a link to a quick form (an an "add new section link" is just that) for reporting errors is something we could use - that's what the readers are more likely to edit, as being given a form to quickly fill in and click "save" in the sidebar is more intuitive to them than writing an e-mail or writing it at a talk page (where often no one will see it). If you think it's a bad idea, remove it, but it's working quite fine at Polish Wikipedia - so far people don't report bugs but actual factual errors in articles which we managed to fix thanks to that. Ausir 02:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, Ausir, my apologies for removing it. I've removed the "Report an error" link because I think it is bound to lead to lots of erroneous bug reports generated from users who don't understand how Wikipedia works. Also, it just presented the user with a blank edit screen to add a section to Wikipedia:Report an error without explaining what sort of thing the user should write there or when they should make a bug report. Thus, I think it is not a good idea to have it there; I think something better would be a good idea, however, perhaps a link to a page which explains what to do if you think you've found a bug. It probably works OK on the Polish Wikipedia due to a lower traffic volume, but I'm a bit apprehensive about having it on en. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 03:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:List of Poles - UTF

Sure. How? I have been slowly doing this manually, and so far I have done the first two or so pages. If you can run the script and generate updated versions of the latter pages or such, it would be great.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 03:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flamarande

Hi, I made a few userboxes about ASoIaF, you can see them at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Books and use them at your leisure. I am not finished yet, but eventually I am going to make boxes for all the Houses and perhaps some more ( Nightswatch, etc ). If you understand enough about userboxer you can even improve them. If not, then just "pass the word" about it (please).

Voting

You might want to know that there was a voting started at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland#Vote. Halibu tt 00:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Wikinews

Hi. Since you voted to support, you might be interested in this userbox. Dovi 08:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biology Portal

I see that you at one point helped to maintain the Biology portal. I was just wondering if you'd consider helping to maintain it again. Thanks a lot. --Cyde Weys 21:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de: Georeferenzierung

Ich hoffe du kannst mein Deutsch verstehen. Du fragtest heute auf de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:WikiProjekt_Georeferenzierung nach einer Möglichkeit die CSS-Formatierung zu übernehmen. Du hast deine Frage dann aber wieder gelöscht und zu dem Punkt kann ich auch nicht viel sagen. de:Benutzer:Flacus und ich überlegen gerade zusammen nach einer Möglichkeit über die Interwikilinks und mit Hilfe von Bots die Geotags der englischen und deutschen Wikipedias auf andere kleinere WPs zu übertragen um dort eine Basis für weitere Arbeiten zu schaffen. Hast du Lust uns dabei zu unterstützen? Dann schreib mir. de:Benutzer:Kolossos 22:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thu

I was working on airports and ended up at Thu as a code for Thule Air Base. I found that before it was vandalised that it was a redirect to Sauron. It's now a disambiguation page for both the airport and Sauron. The thing is I was not sure why it would redirect to Sauron so you may want to go and put a better discription in. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

prośba

Proszę o zablokowanie konta: User:Matek. Pzdr Gdarin | talk 15:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

False Friends of the Slavist

Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there, though there is not too much to be done. See also wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. Thanks in advance! --Daniel Bunčić 18:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Boleslaus I.jpg

hi Ausir, thank you for uploading this impressive picture. However could you please provide the source of where you got this image from as soon as possible? Sources always need to be given, regardless of their status. with kind regards... Gryffindor 19:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kamionka Strumilowa

Hi Ausir, maybe you can do something about this page? If the source is from 1882 perhaps it's PD? cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 03:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout

Hey Ausir. I see that you seem to like Fallout. And you made a bunch of contributions to Fallout (computer game series). Well, that article is getting kind of dilapidated lately, and it could use some help. So, I made some changes. I would appreciate any help, comments, criticisms, and/or opinions you could provide. Thanks. Miguel Cervantes 20:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't played BoS. I just spent a whole bunch of time looking at FAQs, Walkthroughs, previews, forums, and the like looking for enough information to give it a good wikipedia article. I have played Tactics, however. Does that help any? Miguel Cervantes 19:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout Articles

Yeah, take 'em. I don't care. I have nothing to gain by withholding them. If you want to give me credit somewhere, go right ahead, but I don't really care. I'm in Wikipedia to increase humanity's knowledge, not to make a name for myself. Miguel Cervantes 00:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Ex-Yugoslavia

Talk:Kosovo#2 Administrator for Ex-Yugoslavien articels in Wikipedia- The voice of Kosovar

Bolesław III Wrymouth

Hej! In this article you added that Boleslaw's daughter Rycheza of Poland was married to Volodar, can you tell where you took this information from? If it's from the Polish article, then can you ask pl:Wikipedysta:Arthmael who wrote it there (I don't speak polski). I'm asking because I'm going to write an article about her in Russian Wiki but all existing wiki-articles give different names and dates, and only one actually (the Swedish one sv:Volodar av Minsk) cites its source. ru:User:Neko 213.100.45.227 21:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help from a Pole

There is a Polish singer named Helena Jaworska that is up for deletion. Please see if this person can be verified, as the article's fate rests in the balance. (This person is probably only on Polish websites, and I can't speak Polish!) Thank you. —EdGl 16:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout Tactics map

You might appreciate this: .

That is the overworld map to Fallout Tactics. I figure you could put it to good use at D&C/The Vault. Enjoy. Miguel Cervantes 02:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kto bedzie na Wikimanii z Polski?

Poza nami? Wiesz moze?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 00:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request your attention to the GoldToeMarionette case

GoldToeMarionette (talk · contribs) had a WP:RFCU inappropriately completed on their account by Jayjg (talk · contribs) and Hall Monitor (talk · contribs) blocked the account after it was identified as a multiple account despite their being no violation of Wikipedia policy by GoldToeMarionette. These users did not respond to requests to undo the action.

Other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Comments on RFCU itself [1]

Other Admins contacted [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Hall Monitor was emailed with no reply

GoldToeMarionette posted on the account's User and Talk Pages seeking assistance when the talk page was protected without the issue being discussed. User:GoldToeMarionette User_talk:GoldToeMarionette

GoldToeMarionette notified article contributors that illustrative examples were subject to an AfD. The account strictly followed the WP:SPAM#Internal_spamming guideline. The AfD was without controversy. GoldToeMarionette did not participate in the vote. HereToCleanup removed the posts following the AfD in accord with the widely accepted Wikipedia Guideline Wikipedia:Spam#Internal_spamming that states "Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete." [7]

Since GoldToeMarionette was strictly following Wikipedia Policy, there should not have been a Check User completed by Jayjg. Hall Monitor only blocked the account because it was labeled as a sockpuppet by Jayjg's completed Check User. Absent policy violation it should not have been processed in RFCU or been blocked. I am asking for your help to confirm that policy was not violated, administrative action should not have been taken, and request that the administrative action be reversed by unblocking GoldToeMarionette and unprotecting the talk page. Thank you for your time with this request. RealTime 02:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user went around spamming all the admins beginning with A, see my talk page Ashibaka tock 18:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Battlesofbeleriand

Template:Battlesofbeleriand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Because you were in the history, I wanted to pass this along. Thx. — MrDolomite | Talk 02:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NC(GN)

I apologize for spamming your talk page, but since you had contributed in the past to the WP:NC(GN) proposal, which is currently ready for a wider consultation, I thought you might want to give it another look now and, hopefully, suggest some final improvements. Thanks. --Lysy^talk 22:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Numenor.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Numenor.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 12:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estel Telecom

In case you hadn't noticed, Estel Telecom has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Middle-earth invitation

Hello, Ausir!

Thank you for your contributions to a Tolkien-related article. If you are interested, feel free to join WikiProject Middle-earth, a WikiProject focused on improving Tolkien-related articles in Wikipedia. We would be glad to have you join in the effort!

Here're some good links and subpages related to the WikiProject.

If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page.

Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing!

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Alai

Hi, I noticed that you created a fork of Alai (Enderverse) from List of Ender's jeesh. I ask that you reconsider. Per WP:FICT, all minor characters should be merged in a parent "list of" article. Alai, for all intents and purposes, is extremely minor. He's always in the background, without too much of a major influence overall through the quartets. Do you agree? Or do you think he is major enough to deserve his own article. Hbdragon88 17:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been a bit lazy there. I was planning to merge those two IF characters in (possibly to List of minor characters in the Ender's Game series) and most of the Wiggin family characters into, say, something like Wiggin family. FYI, see Han Tzu (Ender's Game) and Alai (Ender's Game) for where they used to be before I merged them. But if I merge all of those in, do you think that Alai/Han Tzu should be merged too? Hbdragon88 17:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the idea was to have Wiggin family, merge Theresa/John Paul fully, whiel leaving links to Peter/Valentine/Ender. I'd still be willing to merge Graff and Rackham - Rackham plays an absurdly minor role (always mentioned by name, mentors ender one one book), while Graff is kind of the catalyst. Even if it can be expanded, I still think that it's relatively minor enough to stick in a "list of". Hbdragon88 19:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~Well, Rackham again plays a major role in Shadow of the Giant and in the prequel short story Mazer in Prison. Ausir 20:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Still disagree, but for now, I'm more interested in preserving the edit history. I've just recreated Alai (Ender's Game) and Han Tzu (Ender's Game). Could you please tag Alai (Enderverse) and Han Tzu for deletion via {{db-author}}? Then, with those pages gone, we can move Han Tzu (Ender's Game) to Han Tzu. Hbdragon88 02:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion

I just created Enderverse Intergalactic Medicine Show to deal with the two-line stubs consisting of Cheater, Mazer in Prizon, and [{Pretty Boy (short story)|Pretty Boy]]. However, I don't want to start fixing redirects until I now that's a good title. What do you think? Should it be moved to a better title? hbdragon88 03:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fallout Tactics Map.jpg

Hello, Ausir. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Fallout Tactics Map.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Ausir. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WMF BOD election

Good Luck! I voted for you. Jerry 02:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ru.wiki is in problems. Could you look?

Hello, Ausir. I wanted to attract your attention to problems of the sister project. Some recent editions show that http://ru.wikipedia.org has administrative peciliarities. You know some Russian, and I expect it will be sufficient to understand, what is happening. I know that you are occupied, so, I suggest ony one example: [8]

My doubts in prudence of the administration are based on the following observations

The paper was nominated for deletion while tag "перерабатываю" (analogy of "under construction") was there.
The nominator did not discuss the content at the article's talk page.
Another user suggests the deletion for absence of references, and then deletes there text with references.

Such actions look strange, independently on the content of the article.

I was not successful to attract atention of admins of ru.wiki to such violations, so, I address to the international community. Will you look please? I should greatly appreciate your opinion. Do you think that, something could be wrond with election of administrators? The announcement about the election is not seen (I found it when begun to dig the example above), could it be the origen of the problem?

SIncerely,dima 13:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

szablon:Komórka

Witaj, chciałem się Ciebie zapytać, czy na angielskiej wiki jest odpowiednik dla polskiego szablonu komórka? Radziński (t) 17:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verify your candidate summary

Hello Paweł Dembowski. There is a summary of your 2007 board elections candidate platform and answers at s:Wikisource:News/2007-07-01#Candidates. Because of the great deal of text to read through for all candidates, it is possible that there are errors or omissions in your summary. Please read it and respond here or by email with any corrections or suggestions. If you'd prefer to edit the page yourself, remember that the summaries should be as neutral as possible. Thanks. —{admin} Pathoschild 15:55:11, 05 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hello admin. There are problem with one user - User:LiveLife, who often removing one external link on page Delara Darabi. This is www.savedelara.com - about a large campaing dedicated to Save Delara, but retains other links. This is totally POW. Darth Kalwejt 11:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Glogow.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Glogow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 08:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC) Conscious 08:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Minor Warcraft races

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Minor Warcraft races, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Minor Warcraft races is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Minor Warcraft races, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Witcher universe

W zasadzie mozna by przeniesc wiekszosc materialow z Wiki wiedzminskiej tutaj, tak dlugo jak nie bedziemy tworzyc masowo artykulow o indiwidualnych rzeczach ale zbiorowe (lista postaci, itp. - w zasadzie mozna wszystko upchnac na ww. artykule ktory napialem wczoraj :) PS. Masz ISBN tej amerykanskiej edycji? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 03:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classification of admins

Hi Ausir. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 23:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Warcraft universe

I have nominated Warcraft universe, an article you created, for deletion. Contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated. However, I do not feel that Warcraft universe satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and I have explain why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the open discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warcraft universe (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Warcraft universe during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. User:Krator (t c) 13:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Q Continuum

I have nominated Q Continuum, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q Continuum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wesołych!

AfD nomination of Qo'noS

An article that you have been involved in editing, Qo'noS, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qo'noS. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zenimax logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zenimax logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Meages

A tag has been placed on Template:Meages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nom.)

The Battlestar Wiki aritlce has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Feel free to add your comments to the corresponding discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Sejm

Template:Sejm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Meweapons

Template:Meweapons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Khorne

I have nominated Khorne, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khorne. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Allemandtando (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Malal

I have nominated Malal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Snotling

I have nominated Snotling, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling

Hi there. I noticed that you made a contribution to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling indicating that you think the article should be kept. Your comments don't appear to address the fact that no mention of the Games Workshop "snotling" can be found in reliable, third-party, published sources. As the AfD debate has been relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached, I thought you might like to elaborate on why you think the article should be kept, bearing in mind WP:RS. Many thanks. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 14:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dwarfs.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dwarfs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sandstein 19:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please return to WikProject Media franchises

Dear Ausir...You are invited to come back to discuss WikiProject Media franchises. Since you participated in one or more discussions of the project, possibly when it was known as WikiProject Fictional series, I hope to see you return to it. The project needs your participation. Currently there is no activity on the project's talk page about the reorganization which is discouraging. I had great expectations for this project as it touches so many topics but am becoming discouraged. I hope to see you return. LA (If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 19:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Snotling

I have nominated Snotling, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 12:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gnoblar

I have nominated Gnoblar, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnoblar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 15:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pytanie do administratora

Dlaczego usuwane są linki do dat (np. May 2 zamiast May 2)? Nie widać w tym żadnego sensu Darth Kalwejt (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lem

A tag has been placed on Lem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Treygdor (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mad Max 4: Fury Road

I have nominated Mad Max 4: Fury Road, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Max 4: Fury Road (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. magnius (talk) 16:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mad Max 4: Fury Road

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mad Max 4: Fury Road. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Max 4: Fury Road (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings

The article The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article shows no signs of notability and doesn't have a release date mentioned. Since there are no reliable sources in the article, there is nothing to establish notability of this software title.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArcAngel (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the vault not working for me!!!

I can't get into the vault! PLEASE HELP MEEEEE!!!! Nooooooooo Tehuberleetmaster (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ausir! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Edmund Wnuk-Lipiński - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Feliks W. Kres - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christopher Taylor (game designer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:City race

Template:City race has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Middle-earth characters

I have nominated List of Middle-earth characters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Middle-earth characters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DES ^(talk) 02:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Henryk Walezy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Henryk Walezy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Hello AUSIR. We are looking for someone who could translate into Polish a page about an artistic movement, founded in 2007 (and upload it on Polish Wikipedia, if possible):

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/IMMAGINE%26POESIA

Could you help us or suggest what to do ? Thanks a lot--Alessandroga80 (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Error reporting revived

See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#"Report an error" feature. Fences&Windows 22:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Biology has been nominated for a Featured Portal Review

The biology portal is one of the Featured Portals, but I don't think it matches the standards required of portals these days. I've therefore listed it for review and possible defeaturing at Wikipedia:Featured portal review/Biology. If you can help to improve the portal, or you have any comments to make about it, please join in the discussion. I've notified you as you are one of the names listed at Wikipedia:Portal/Directory for this portal. Thanks, Bencherlite ^Talk 11:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Rebecca Heineman

Hello, Ausir. You have new messages at Alansohn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alansohn (talk) 01:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boldog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boldog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boldog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BigDom (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zenimax logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zenimax logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kungfu2187 (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The SVG logo is now on Commons. --Kungfu2187 (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jakub Ćwiek

The article Jakub Ćwiek has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 23:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Vault (wiki) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Vault (wiki) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vault (wiki) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 04:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Vault wiki.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Vault wiki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 22:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Ausir,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 04:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mithral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 20:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wasteland 2 Wiki

You write "the wiki is official, with permission from inXile". Can you point to something which shows that it is in fact an official wiki? What makes it "official" in your experience? --82.171.13.139 (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been granted "official wiki" status by inXile, with permission from Brian Fargo himself. This is the thread for the wiki in the ofifical forum, in which (admittedly, by myself) it is called the official wiki - note that the thread was made a "sticky" by inXile's forum admin. Ausir (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can an outsider like me verify that inXile/Fargo granted that Wiki the "official" status? I do see you and other people call it "official", but that's not a reliable source. In fact, someone writes about the Wiki problems and claims that Curse "pays better" and that you're employed by Curse. --82.171.13.139 (talk) 01:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed a Curse employee. And Curse does have arrangement with several game developers/publishers wherein we host official wikis. Same is true for e.g. Minecraft, for which we run official forum and wiki as stated on the official site. We would not claim official status if we did not have blessing for it from the developer/publisher - we do host many wikis that are not officially recognized, such as Wiki SWTOR. If we announced our wiki to be official like we did here for Wasteland 2 and we did not have it, Curse, Inc. would be liable in court for such false claims. I see no reason for you to doubt it until proven otherwise. Ausir (talk) 02:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that makes sense, thanks for the reply. --82.171.13.139 (talk) 07:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you in Project Eternity. Is there any stament from Obsidian about the (official) status of http://eternitywiki.com/ I trust you that wiki will become a nice source, but It would be nice to have some guy at Obsidian say 'Yup, we endorse that wiki'. --Tgor (talk) 00:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gothmog (Third Age) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gothmog (Third Age) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothmog (Third Age) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 21:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Argon (Middle-earth) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argon (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argon (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 11:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! LovelyEdit ^talk_edits 19:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kai (LEXX) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kai (LEXX) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai (LEXX) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzejki listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Andrzejki. Since you had some involvement with the Andrzejki redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Widefox; talk 10:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Middle-earth weapons

Template:Middle-earth weapons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 11:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)

Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sylvan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sylvan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PanchoS (talk) 22:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 15:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikolai Dvortsov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subdomain of Wikimedia

Hi

I am writing on behalf of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal. Recently there has been a proposal to define a separate sister project for journals under Wikimedia and to move the pages under journal.wikimedia.org similar to the case of WikiSpecies. You have been one of the early contributors to Wikispecies. Could you please guide me as to what is to be done for the same?

Seeking your cooperation. Diptanshu^Talk 14:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Ausir. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Ausir.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ausir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ausir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m just a little annoyer sending You an annoying message to annoy You with a pointless notification

Hi, I’m just a little annoyer sending You an annoying message to annoy You with a pointless notification — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.28.155.211 (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sydney James Harcourt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sydney James Harcourt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney James Harcourt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 13 years ago...

Hey, Ausir. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roboticist

The article Roboticist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article cites no sources and presents an incomplete and personalized summary of Wikipedia articles on robotics. The article was created in 2007 and has had a number of issues with vandalism and self-promotion over the years. Given that it is ten years old and still has issues meeting Wikipedia standards, deletion is likely the best course of action.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blueclaw (talk) 01:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On this day, 12 years ago...

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ZeniMax Online listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZeniMax Online. Since you had some involvement with the ZeniMax Online redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=1R1zIzg92FHco4d_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_e2JtOVu5mfb70VL&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Filicollosis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filicollosis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filicollosis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DferDaisy (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kasia Babis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kasia Babis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasia Babis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Emesik (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ausir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Necromancer (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Necromancer (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Necromancer (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Permafrost46 (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mud Duck Productions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mud Duck Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mud Duck Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 18:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moirai

Hello! Your recent edit to this article left the IPA you perhaps copied from the Oxford dictionary floating at the beginning of the paragraph. I would just "fix" it, except that I'm not 100% clear on what's hapening here. The pronunciation actually in the dictionary is ˈmɔɪrʌɪ, but what you have left in the pronunciation slot looks more plausible to me. But I get less clear what ʌ means every time I read about it. Anyway, perhaps you can have a look. Imaginatorium (talk) 12:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Portal:Biology for deletion

A proposal has been made to delete Portal:Biology, which you have made significant contributions to, as well as all other portals on English Wikipedia. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion if you'd like, which is located at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC: Ending the system of portals. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ausir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ausir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help

Hi! can you please check out this Florian Munteanu case. I've seen plenty of pages here on Wikipedia with actors who played a single role in a movie. I don't understand why some people complain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4F8:1C17:404A:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Information technology

Portal:Information technology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Information technology (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Information technology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lexico

I'd like your response to my inquiry at Talk:Lexico#Split. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 07:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dawid2009/The Most Holy Virgin Mary, Queen of Poland

Hi Ausir, I have question to you. Could you help me with improving of that page? I would like to add it to main space into Enlish Wikipedia. Yours sincelery. Dawid2009 (talk) 14:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Computer science

Portal:Computer science, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Computer science and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Computer science during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Vault wiki.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Vault wiki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snotling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snotling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snotling (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 10:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Bohdan Butenko, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Round World version of the Silmarillion

The article Round World version of the Silmarillion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Super minor fictional concept. Fails WP:NFICTION, WP:GNG. Possible WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Werewolf (Middle-earth)

The article Werewolf (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional race passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daughters of Finwë

The article Daughters of Finwë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional group of characters passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daughters of Finwë for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daughters of Finwë is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daughters of Finwë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Werewolf (Middle-earth) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Werewolf (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werewolf (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dwarfs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dwarfs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hareth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hareth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hareth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outline of Middle-earth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outline of Middle-earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Middle-earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 03:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Máhanaxar" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Máhanaxar. Since you had some involvement with the Máhanaxar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mahanaxar" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mahanaxar. Since you had some involvement with the Mahanaxar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Amon Uilos" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amon Uilos. Since you had some involvement with the Amon Uilos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Morwen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morwen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morwen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Silmarillion

Template:Silmarillion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spacer (Asimov) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spacer (Asimov) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spacer (Asimov) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Durin II" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Durin II. Since you had some involvement with the Durin II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Afterborn" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afterborn. Since you had some involvement with the Afterborn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:History of Arda

Template:History of Arda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BenKuykendall (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Round World version of the Silmarillion" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Round World version of the Silmarillion. Since you had some involvement with the Round World version of the Silmarillion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Arda Realms Age1

Template:Arda Realms Age1 has been nominated for merging with Template:Middle-earth. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Ainur

Template:Ainur has been nominated for merging with Template:Middle-earth. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Amon Dîn" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amon Dîn. Since you had some involvement with the Amon Dîn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Troll (Middle-earth) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troll (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Andúnie" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Andúnie. Since you had some involvement with the Andúnie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! A a s i m 20:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dagmor" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dagmor. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 25#Dagmor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kasia Babis

Hey, can you tell me if there is something new in her personal biography? Notability was the main point in the discussion in the afd, so it will be the same, when I translate it for the German language WP. (The notability criteria are even tough there). Might be good to have some citable sources to encounter that. Thanks, Amtiss, SNAFU ? 12:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Solisimpi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Solisimpi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Solisimpi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Zai ^{(💬 • 📝 • ⚡️)} 15:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fallout Wiki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallout Wiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout Wiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 17:17, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kasia Babis

FYI, an article you created, Kasia Babis, has been nominated for deletion. You do not seem to have received the usual message, so I am leaving one for you now. --- Possibly ☎ 18:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ibun" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ibun. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 10#Ibun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 03:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Michał Śledziński

{{subst:Taggednote-NPF|1=Michał Śledziński|2=Whiteguru|3=This article needs additional references to meet [[WP:GNG]. A suggestion is to look at WP:THREE as a guide.}}

Whiteguru (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A token of thanks

Hi Ausir! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Article s6 (init)

Good morning Ausir. This article s6 (init) is as a draft, I think it should be published because it is relevant to the world of operating systems. Thank you very much. --Rstmnq1000 (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yoram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jehoram. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar proofread request

Dear Sir,

I have added content to this article today. Could you help proofread the text to ensure that the Polish translation is correct? Any corrections would be appreciated. Thanks in Advance. --Sigurður41 (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CLARIN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data-driven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Proposed deletion of Welcome to the Discworld

The article Welcome to the Discworld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Ausir a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! interstate five 00:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Category:Fictional American people of Polish descent

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Category:Fictional American people of Polish descent has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Ausir,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Butler

The article Jan Butler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Broc (talk) 15:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tolkien fandom has been nominated for deletion

Category:Tolkien fandom has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 10:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fallout (series) developers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fallout (series) developers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 09:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Galactic Empire (Asimov) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galactic Empire (Asimov) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Empire (Asimov) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]