Jump to content

User talk:Artix Kreiger/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Look over List of Inheritance Cycle characters

[edit]

Hey there, Artix Kreiger. I noticed that you weighed in on the deletion discussion for List of Inheritance Cycle characters a while back. I've still got some work to do on it, but I was wondering if you could swing by the article and check whether the two article issue tags at the top still apply. If they don't, could you please remove them? I'd do it myself, but I want this page to remain as in-objectionable as possible. If you're too busy, no big deal, I can put it up for a WP:GOCE review. Thanks for reading, and happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 21:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2ReinreB2, it looks like another editor removed it. I had looked over it and I think it is good with the recent improvements. The article looks good now. Cheers. Artix Kreiger (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Bamboo articles in your userpages.

[edit]

I'm currently working on the pages in Wikipedia:Database reports/Polluted categories which are categories (mostly for mainspace articles) which have both mainspace articles and userspace articles. Per WP:USERNOCAT, articles in userspace shouldn't be in categories that are designed for Mainspace. Most of these Polluted categories have 1 or 2 articles from userspace, but there appear to be 114 articles in your userspace area that have the Category:Bamboo species. User:Artix Kreiger/Bambusa angustissima looks fairly typical. Unlike most cases where the user has copied something and let it rot or have created a scrap, OTOH, yours appear to be ready for mainspace. Could you please take care of these when you can, either by moving them to mainspace (probably best) or changing the [[Category:Bamboo Species]] to [[:Category:Bamboo Species]]. Thank You.Naraht (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naraht, hi, Thanks for reminding me. I will get to a bunch of these this weekend over the course of next week, starting with the one you mentioned. Thanks. Cheers. Artix Kreiger (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I just picked that one since it was near the start of the list and User:Artix_Kreiger/Bambusa_basihirsuta had an issue in that one of the categories is mistyped start with a square bracket and a squiggly bracket. Now if I could just figure out which one the Bamboo near my house is (Washington, DC area) :)Naraht (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthrostylidium urbanii has been accepted

[edit]
Arthrostylidium urbanii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa barpatharica has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa barpatharica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa australis has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa australis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa angustiaurita has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa angustiaurita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa aurinuda has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa aurinuda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Writer's Barnstar
For many species of bamboo. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Robert McClenon, much thanks. I wrote a ton. I will submit a few more tomorrow. :) Artix Kreiger (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa basisolida has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa basisolida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa basihirsuta has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa basihirsuta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa beecheyana has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa beecheyana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa bicicatricata has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa bicicatricata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa binghamii has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa binghamii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa boniopsis has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa boniopsis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa brevispicula has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa brevispicula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa brunneoaciculia has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa brunneoaciculia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa burmanica has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa burmanica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa latideltata has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa latideltata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

I suggest that you start moving the drafts into article space yourself. You know what you are doing, and every species is notable if it is documented. (However, there might be a reviewer who doesn't agree with you and me that every species is notable.) Anyway, thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I find it hard to think that a species is not notable. Anyways, thanks for the advice. Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa cerosissima has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa cerosissima, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa glaucophylla has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa glaucophylla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bambusa funghomii has been accepted

[edit]
Bambusa funghomii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ringo comics.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ringo comics.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Technical Barnstar
Archiving dead URLs with IABot which keeps Wikipedia verifiable with all the random pages asked. Thanks, Iggy (Swan) 21:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iggy the Swan, Shwmae and thank you so much. I totally appreciate the barnstar. Glad to know at least someone appreciates the archived urls. I see you also have used the IAbot. Good work with the saved urls. I deeply appreciate it. Cheers. Artix Kreiger (talk) 21:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always aware that some of the pages in the bot jobs appear on my watchlist, so there's always the chance that the bot scans through it and appears on the recent changes page. And also it turns out that the 'Shwmae' is a Welsh word that I sometimes hear down in the South-West part of the United Kingdom. Diolch, Iggy (Swan) 21:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate entries

[edit]

Sometimes these things happen when you get an error message at the top of your screen. Once a job is submitted, it is queued so hopefully that won't happen again. Happy archiving, Iggy (Swan) 15:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How Do You Live? (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Philip Alexander

[edit]

Hi, I'm Eagleash. Artix Kreiger, thanks for creating Philip Alexander!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. May not pass WP:NACTOR ... 'significant roles in multiple notable productions'

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eagleash (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Lodge in the Wilderness.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Lodge in the Wilderness.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Close of Physical exercise move discussion

[edit]

At Talk:Physical exercise#Requested move 20 March 2018. you closed this discussion as WP:SNOW after only 4 comments and after only a little over 3 hours had elapsed. Also, the opener of the RM failed to also request a Exercise → Exercise (disambiguation) move (if that was their intent), which might have been the reason some people opposed, thinking we would lose the disambig page, and also limited the number of people who saw the RM because the editors of the disambig page would not have gotten watchlist notification. Do you stand by that close? -- Netoholic @ 10:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Netoholic, just for that page, yes. It was closed because it was incomplete. The person is welcome to open a complete one next time. Also, physical exercise is not necessarily the dominant topic that the other uses of excessive can be "ignored". This, for those reasons, yes. Please note it was more of a procedural note and less of a snow close. Feel free to open one with noth requested moves. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move review for Physical exercise

[edit]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Physical exercise. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Netoholic @ 14:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

[edit]

In answer to your question at Move review, the ping was probably connected to my condensing your comment when I gave my endorsement. Possibly has to do with the "edit revert" choice in Preferences → Notifications.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  14:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving references

[edit]

Hello, Artix Krieger. I see that under your Artix Krieger 2 account you have been doing a lot of rescuing/archiving sources, using IABot. You have been archiving every reference, even those that aren’t dead. In fact if you look at your own contributions,[1] in many or most cases there were NO dead links, or only one - so that the edit added many thousands of bytes to the article without actually rescuing anything.

I know you are doing this in good faith and an attempt to improve the encyclopedia. Thank you for that. But the practice of archiving every reference is controversial and there has been a lot of discussion about it, because of the huge volume of bytes it adds to the article. It can increase the size of the article by up to 25% - for example 18% at San Diego, an article I watch. There has been debate but there has not been a consensus at these discussions either for or against the practice. But many users oppose it and some even revert the edit. Would you consider from now on using the IABot to archive only the dead links instead of everything? Archiving only the dead links actually is the default setting of that bot; you have to click a box to archive everything. Please understand, nothing forbids you from archiving everything, and some people do think it improves the article. But some do not. Give it some thought. --MelanieN (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MelanieN, thank you for letting me know. I will take some time to think it out. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, and thanks for reverting at San Diego. There actually was one dead link there, if you want to go ahead and "rescue" that one! --MelanieN (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MelanieN, well I "rescued" 1 link. sadly, the other was not archived. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, well, it's helpful to have it tagged. I can probably do something about that. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would you stop doing this please? You just archived more than 100 links on Milton, Ontario and none of the ones I checked were dead. Meters (talk) 02:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guadua sarcocarpa

[edit]

Someone else asked me the same thing, so here's what I said to him.

Thanks for your note. The problem is that the editor in question has had a years-long history of disrupting a wide range of things; see the ban discussion for some of the issues. Since this was an obvious case of socking via IP, and since most of his edits are problematic, I had no hesitation in reverting them, but since some were helpful, you should have no hesitation in reverting me (even use rollback, if you feel like it) when you find that I reverted a good edit. Nyttend (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend, I understand since I was not too sure if my restoration was some sort of Proxying. Thanks. Artix Kreiger (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not one bit of a problem. Maybe the rules say it is (I don't remember), but if so, the rules are preventing you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, so ignore them. And if the rules don't say it is, you're fine that way too :-) Nyttend (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto: The Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you are interested in the Naruto articles. If you mind, a user and me have been working on the spinoff Naruto: The Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring to make it GA but I don't know if you want to aid. Also, if you are interested in making new articles, I would suggest searching for reviews of the light novels of the franchise that were released in the west: the epilogue novels like Sasuke's story, Sakura's story, etc. Hope you are interested in working with Flowerpiep too, the other skilled editor I mentioned. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bot cite rescues on Timeline of 1960s Conterculture

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your current work on the counterculture timeline page. I do have some concerns, however, as many of the links you have replaced were recently tested and were definitely not dead. I have no clue as to the protocols used for your work, but I am concerned.

For example, this link was not dead, and did not need to be retrieved from archive: https://www.villagevoice.com/2010/03/24/hippies-free-store-not-so-popular-with-thugs/

Any thoughts? Thanks! Learner001 (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Learner001, feel free to revert it. The bot archives links although I had clicked to "add links even if they're not dead. oh well. Anyways, Artix Kreiger (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As long as the cites are saved, right? Best wishes! Learner001 (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi Artix Kreiger, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Artix_Kreiger/Archive_2&oldid=835488692"