This is an archive of past discussions with User:Arjayay. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hey hi thanks for helping me in my page Raju Bhavsar but why it is not showing in Google yet Vishal 11:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalttplayer (talk • contribs)
Hi User:Vishalttplayer, welcome to Wikipedia Firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp. As for your question, articles do not show in Google, or other search engines, until they have been reviewed by an article reviewer. This can take several weeks, as there is a large backlog (currently 4392 articles). There is nothing to do but wait - although you can carry on improving your article to try and ensure that, when it is reviewed, it is approved. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi I think you are a professional Wikipedia editor ..I don't know much about editing ,so I don't got you signed all post on talk page...also please tell me how can I add image in Wikipedia ..please give me your WhatsApp no. Vishal 13:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalttplayer (talk • contribs)
Hi Vishalttplayer - you didn't sign your last post, did you? and, no, I am not a professional Wikipedia editor - we don't get paid for this. Images can be one of the most complicated things on Wikipedia - Although there are a few exceptions, unless you took the photo yourself, the image is probably copyright, so cannot be used in our articles. Some editors seem to think that if they copy an image from a website or magazine that is their "own work", but it isn't and such images will almost certainly be deleted. Please see Wikipedia:Uploading images for the official guidance, although User:Yunshui/Images for beginners is easier to understand. Finally, I do not use WhatsApp, any social media, or any other off-Wikipedia contacts, as I believe discussions should be open and on the record. - Arjayay (talk) 14:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC),
I still don't know what do you mean by sign in your post please give me your contact no. If you are from india .I want to know many things like citation ,infoboxes and categorised ..please dear Vishal 21:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalttplayer (talk • contribs)
Vishalttplayer - As explained above, for a signature and a timestamp you put 4 tildes ~~~~ at the end of your message. Alternatively you can click the squiggle symbol on one of the edit window buttons; it depends which edit window you are using, but on most it is to the right of B and I As for my contact number, as explained above, I do not use any off-Wikipedia contacts, as I believe discussions should be open and on the record. - Arjayay (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
On Wikipedia, the most consistent basic things are often the most important. This is for your tireless effort in ensuring that Wikipedia is still considered not just an encyclopaedia, but one that is free from obviously unwanted content. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ajitgore26 - this section has repeatedly been deleted, which is why the page has been semi-protected. Please see the top of the Talk:Sambhaji page - especially - Q: Why does it say "addiction to sensual pleasures"? I do not like that! for the explanation - Arjayay (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
But if the contents are wrong and there are proofs
I tried to edit an article on the wiki page of Sambhaji. This is really shameful that wrong information has been written to defame sambhaji maharaj. He is like god for maratha community and so is for all other communities. Even if I try to modify the information youthe administrators are removing it even with proper reference. All the information in english literature is not correct, you will have to read marathi literature for that. Some writers who are biased to brahmins have intentionally written bad things about sambhaji maharaj. If these administrators are not going to remove these contents, I am going to officially launch a police complaint against this website with the support of all the people who all feel that this information is wrong. Ajitgore26 (talk) 18:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Re: Engvar
Regarding your reversion on George Harrison, the guideline you linked (specifically, MOS:US) states that both "US" and "U.S." may be used, as long as they are used consistently. "US" is only mandatory when used alongside "UK" or "USSR", which are never punctuated. If you like to keep the original form just becuase (WP:STATUSQUO), obviously I can't disagree with you on that. :-) Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 21:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Stuart Pankin
I just added a source just like you said, just hope the source covers it or if it's relatable enough to be a source. I apologize of the whole situation by the way, I just don't like seeing info removed over and over again. But your still right, it's best to add and find evidence/sources to settle it instead of reverting it back and fourth over and over. You can remove this message if you want after, in just letting you know I'm sorry. 2600:1000:B02C:90C6:CDBE:5125:5160:638B (talk) 13:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Dos games master Firstly, please do not vandalize pages, as you did to this page, with multiple repetitive additions inside other people's posts. Secondly, please put new posts at the bottom of the page, and use a relevant title (click "Add topic" if you don't know how to do that). Thirdly, please sign all posts on talk pages with four tildes i.e. ~~~~ which will add your signatute, date and time. Finally, I labelled your additions at Cheeky Mouse as spam, because that is what it was, a promotional link to an external web-site. I was not the only person to delete it for that reason, and you received a final warning, from another editor, which I see you have deleted, so there is no doubt that you have read it, and ignored it. I have, therefore, removed this spam yet again. Although I could ask for you to be blocked, I have issued another final warning, but will request this if you add any more spam to any articles. - Arjayay (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Merry
Happy Christmas!
Hello Arjayay,
Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that
Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"
My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk19:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Amazon obijan
In the page name amazon obhijan something is going wrong.The information bof box office collection on this page is not correct.It must be corrected on behalf from a trusted news information Purbayan Midya (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Purbayan Midya You would need a citation to disprove the reference used in the article - and even then we would probably keep both, as it is not up to us to decide who is "right" - especially as almost none of the figures for Indian films are based on verifiable facts - Arjayay (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Can't understand why you removed these citing them as spamlinks when they are links to legitimate manufacturers of OO9 gauge kit locomotives and rolling stock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.53.42 (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
OO9 Spamlinks
Can't understand why you removed these citing them as spamlinks when they are links to legitimate manufacturers of OO9 gauge kit locomotives and rolling stock.92.232.53.42 (talk) 23:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
As you can see at the OO9 article, I am not the only editor removing these links to sales sites - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - not a sales directory - please stop adding these adverts before you are blocked - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Why are you threatening me with blocking me? I'm new to this and genuinely thought I was helping by re-adding them as this is such a niche market. 92.232.53.42 (talk) 11:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Sir Francis Drake Association
Thank you for helping with the corrections and improvements you've made in articles I've recently begun: William Ralganal Benson and Mary Knight Benson. I have recently finished a recently written book on the Sir Francis Drake Association, a hoax organization which stole a fortune of treasure from innocent people many decades ago. I've also found a news journal which reported on the matter, so I would like to write an article about it, too.
However, there is already an article about the Sir Francis Drake Association, two legitimate organizations. This article also needs attention as it is about two separate organizations, one historical and no longer functioning. The other is active, yet maybe not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia as the edits seem to be by a member of the organization who uses the organization website as citation. I have not really found any reliable sources for the inclusion of the active organization.
So, before I start the article, I would like to know how to approach it. Considering the existence of the current article , I really do not know if the false Sir Francis Drake Association organization should partially replace, fully replace, or simply add to the current article. Or is there another alternative? I do wish to know your opinion, and I appreciate any direction you can provide to me on this matter.Hu Nhu (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I have been considering this article idea, and I believe the idea may work best as an article about the Oscar Hartzell, the perpetrator.Hu Nhu (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hu Nhu thanks for your question, and apologies for the delay in replying. I was going to start by saying please do not add to the existing article, as our articles are about individual subjects, but as you pointed out the Sir Francis Drake Association page already covers two different subjects. This needs resolving, and would only be made worse by adding a third, unrelated, subject. Normally such problems are dealt with by disambiguation so your page might be Sir Francis Drake Association (hoax) and the others Sir Francis Drake Association (1914-49) and Sir Francis Drake Association (2017) or similar titles, whilst there would be a Sir Francis Drake Association (disambiguation) pge which would list all three articles, so readers could find the one they are looking for. I agree that the current organization is not well referenced, but I suggest you leave this to another editor, as it could be seen that you are trying to "clear the way" for your article to be the primary subject. I assume you are aware that we already have an article on Oscar Hartzell and it may be better to amplify that article, rather than start a new one, just on that hoax, as there would be considerable overlap, and others might decide to merge the two articles. One final comment; when basing an article on the subject of a book, it is important that you avoid plagiarizing the book, or including sections that could be seen as a copyright violation. Presumably, in addition to the news journal you have found, the book cites other sources, which you should also try to track down. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Arjayay; I find no delay in your reply and consider it quite timely. I think it is probably best to write another article I've considered. I appreciate the information and will leave the Drake Association article alone. Perhaps someone else will attend to the problems with the article.Hu Nhu (talk) 21:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Begum
Hello, Thank you for the heads up. Have gone through the guidelines. The changes were factually correct but will look for a more reliable source as per Wikipedia guidelines before making the change again.
Apologies for initially posting the message on top instead of the bottom of the page.
I edited the page of Suman Chakraborty and just wrote the name of his school as I am a student of the same institution and personally met him and enquired about his school. If you feel you can check his Facebook profile.
Hi Putke - As I tried to explain on your talk page, you did not cite a reliable source to support your addition, so readers in the future cannot verify that the information is correct. All information in Wikipedia should be supported by citations to reliable, independent, sources. If you wish to re-add the information, please make sure that you add such a citation Please see Referencing for beginners if you are unsure how to add references correctly - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
reg:one or more external links you added to the main body of Hyderabad
recorrection
actually, I'm new to the wiki but experienced in blogs and contributions. I think that links can be added for reference to the mentioned cuisine (in this case) and internal wiki links are not available for that, so to give the reference for that, I gave ext. link to the item. Ashish16200216 (talk) 05:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ashish16200216 - I'm afraid that my comments may seem negative, but Wikipedia has many policies and guidelines, that a new editor cannot be expected to know. We do not include External links in the bodytext of articles, furthermore, your addition was to the lead section of that article, whereas the lead should only be a summary of what the main body of the article states. What you added was trivia, not appropriate to a featured article covering such a broad subject as Hyderabad - we have a specific article on Hyderabadi cuisine, but before you add it to that article, please note that, as explained at WP:NOTRECIPE:-
While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owner's manual, cookbook …. . This includes …. recipes.
Dear Arjayay,
Just now I saw that you had written to me and given me a warning, because I had added information to Chaz Jankel´s page. I don´t know if THIS is the place to write to/contact you, I have looked for somewhere to write but to me it seems rather unclear. So I hope you will see this message and come back to me. Please tell me WHERE I am supposed to write, since I cannot find that important information. I have sent money to Wikipedia before, but I think it´s such an amazing source of information on the internet. But I had not created a username before. I sis this now, because maybe that is the only way to be able to write to you?
So, let me tell you, the additions to Chaz Jankel´s page were made by me because we were married for several years and have a son Tao Hemberg Jankel. But I noticed last night that he has forgotten to honour both his sons under his information on his personal life. That is very important as I am sure you understand. I filled in the missing information and I am the most reliable source, as his first wife. I can send you proof of our marriage AND our divorce if you need it. I also corrected a date in his text, of when we moved to Los Angeles, it was 1988 and not 1986. This is very typical of Chaz, to get the dates wrong. I know he´d be grateful to me for helping him out here. We are in good contact and have a good relationship as friends.
Please come back to me, Arjayay - and I apologise if I have written this text to you in the wrong place. You need to help me out as I previously wrote, by telling me WHERE I am supposed to write to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catharina Hemberg (talk • contribs) 14:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello brother, can you please remove petta plot from the page ? Its just released yesterday and lota of people are yet to watch the movie, pls dont spoil the fun for them. Its a humble request ! Srinie er (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I worked as associate director in this movie, pls consider this humble request
Hi Srinie er Thanks for your post. It would be against Wikipedia policies and guidelines to remove the plot, as Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED, and we have specific rules about Spoliers, specifically "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." We used to include "Spoiler warnings", but as explained in SPOILER we stopped doing that in 2007. Sorry, but the plot must stay - Arjayay (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I saw an earlier version of plot which was one paragraph and was not revealing much info. Can you pls revert to that old plot please ?
No Srinie er, as explained in my edit summary, that short plot was reverted because it was too short. The guideline is at WP:FILMPLOT - plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words - The one at Petta (film) was cut from 626 words - which was fine - to 146 words - which was far too short. - Arjayay (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Refer to page Petta (Film). Refrain from posting copyrighted content. Read Wikipedia section on posting of copyright content of others and also section titled difference between summary and abridgement.
Sreekanthgs I see you have been temporarily blocked, and the Petta (film) page has increased protection, as I requested. A plot description does not infringe on the copyright of a film, provided the description is not excessively long. This is why we have a limit of 700 words on plots. A plot description copied from another source, e.g. a magazine, could be a breach of copyright for that specific description, but not of the film. Effectively, a plot description is plagiarism, but plagiarism is not a crime, although in certain circumstances, it could be an academic violation. Finally, the Indian Copy Right Act of 1957, covers copyright, not plagiarism, but even if something did breach that act, as Wikipedia's servers are in the US, Wikipedia's content is covered by US law, not Indian. - Arjayay (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Delaware Valley Friends School
I am the marketing manager for the school and was trying to update the wikipedia page to make it accurate. The information keeps getting deleted and saying I'm being disruptive. How do I add our info to that page?
Hi TheTrueGilben - no worries - All wikis have their own rules, but there too many to read before you start editing. When editing a different Wiki, it can help to look at a similar article first. Thanks for your additions on that article in any case - Arjayay (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Can you nominate the page "Mikhael (film)" for page protection ? Lots of vandalism and unsourced edits, fan IPs adding exaggerated gross collection and hiding the poor reception of the film by misrepresenting the reviews section. 137.97.144.208 (talk) 18:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello IP from Thrissur. thanks for your post. I'm not sure that there is enough vandalism to merit protection at the moment, but if you think there is, you can ask at WP:RPP, you don't need an account to make such a request. However, if you ask too soon, and it is refused, then it will be flagged up that a request has recently been refused, which can make it more difficult to get it protected later. I have added it to my watchlist - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Sir, why you changed My edits?
Sir.. I edited that bcz of the people think that south indian brahmins and north indian brahmins are differemt they can't marry.. Plz coperate with me to make them sure about the topic of Pathak Caste - a teaching and was brahmin, same as namboothiri, nambiar is brahmins and their job also was teaching. So i was giving examples of both so that it will create a good relationship with South and North India plz.. Undo my edits.. Amrita Pathak (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Amrita Pathak - as explained in my edit summary "Rv unsourced, unclear, additions" which I then amplified on your user talk page - all additions to Wikipedia should be sourced to reliable sources, which should be cited as a reference when making the addition, For more information, please click the blue links on your user talk page, particularly the links about Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. - Arjayay (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Why do you keep defending some biased article on James Watson?
Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj
You have provided completely wrong information of the great maratha warrior Sambhaji Maharaj. Correct it . And stop spreading wrong information Madbunny1995 (talk) 12:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Madbunny1995 I assume you are talking about my reverting the whitewashing at the Sambhaji article, by a now blocked editor, which I assume you are related to? I suggest you read the Q + As at the top of Talk:Sambhaji in particular Q: Why does it say "addiction to sensual pleasures"? I do not like that! As an observation, telling other editors what to do, as you did above, rarely produces the desired effect - Arjayay (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Qadiriyya
hello requesting you not to change my edits on Qadiriyya as in th youtube link to qadiriya tariqa zikr because of the way of Qadiriya zikr is being lost and more and more people need to now the legacy of Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani thanks in advance.
The history written in the tile "Thirubuvanai" on Wikkipedia is a real story of a freedom fighter who fought against French India Government. But the real historical leader name was totally hidden for political reason. He captured a French Police Station in Thirubuvanai with arms and ruled over a reason about 23.54 sq. miles and formed First French Liberation Government against French Government. Sanwaa (talk) 10:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Request from SANWAA ABOUT REVERTING 'THIRUBUVANAI' IN WIKIPEDIA.
SIR/MADAM,
On 06.04.1954, the three members liberation struggle group Kalitheerthal Kuppam lived headed by S. Narayanasamy took over the Tribuvane Commune(in English: Thirubuvanai Commune) from the French Indian Government and declared independence. The Liberation Government changed the name of the Commune as "Mannadipet Commune". Till now the name is existing with the name of Mannadipet commune. It is not legally binding on the Government of Mannadipet to incorporate the Indian Government agreement with the French Government under the name "Tribune Commune", as the Government headed by Tribuvane headquarters with an area of 23.54 square miles. It's is not legally valid. The Liberation Government came to power from 06.04.1954 to 30.10.1954.
The Liberation Government came to power from 06.04.1954 to 30.10.1954. In the period of the Liberated Government, the government has not been informed of any action of the state. Indian newspapers are afraid to release these messages. The Indian press also reluctantly refrained from releasing news of the governing body of the Mannadipet Government. The media was reluctant to release the Communique by name and change the name of the "LIBERATION GOVERNMENT" and rule against the French state.
As if the Indian media has been reluctant to release the news that the French government has been seized and fired since 06.04.1954, it is as if the modern World WIKIPEDIA NEWS HAS BLOCKED THE ARTICLE written in the title of "THIRUBUVANAI" the present editor.
History of the French India Liberation struggle was reportedly titled "Thirubuvanai", the title of the WikiPedia to inform the public about the hidden history. During the French rule, the name was changed to the Mannadipet Commune and the Liberation Government was in control of the 22 villages that had been held by the Thirupuvanai, Mannadipet and Kalitheerthal Kuppam. No one knows anything to tell any other historical event in the outside world. In the name of the history of the French Liberation War, the news will reach the readers and historians only if they tell the true limit. Historical article in the title titled Thirubuvanai in WikiPedia is a hidden history. There is no reversion in this.
Therefore, it is requested to rewrite(release) the reverted content given in Wikipedia written by Sanwaa. Otherwise, Wikipedia will only be known as a medium that hides history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanwaa (talk • contribs) 02:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sanwaa Thanks for your post Firstly. please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp You appear to be trying to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS which is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Please note that, after my initial deletions, the rest of your additions were removed by User:JJMC89 - a Wikipedia administrator, who felt that the rest of your additions were "inappropriate". Our Thirubuvanai article is about the village in the union territory of Puducherry, it is not about a claim that there was a "governing body of the Mannadipet Government" news of which was suppressed. If you wish to write an article on that, you should read WP:Your first article and create the article through the articles for creation process. However, you will need to base you article solely on reliable, independent sources, not unsourced claims, self-published sources, or promotional material prepared by one side of the dispute. Finally, please stop SHOUTING, i.e. writing in block capitals, or trying "blackmail" - Wikipedia reports what reliable, independent, sources have already stated, not what activists wish to promote. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Re: AIB
I think the AIB allegations should go second because they remain the most topical news about the subject. Also, until a resolution or 2nd statement is made, I think it's what people should see first after the introduction.
Hi User:Ketlag - Thanks for your post Firstly. please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp The All India Bakchod should be about All India Bakchod, not be dominated by an event regarding someone who was just "a frequent collaborator", which you appear to be adding using this article as a WP:COATRACK, rather than creating a stand-alone article about it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, recording long-term events, Wikipedia is not a news-sheet reporting "topical news", as you are arguing above. Please read and follow WP:NOTNEWSWikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Too much detail Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Got it User:Arjayay. Thanks for the clarifications. I'm new here, so still learning.
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.
I had recently a pending edit on wikipedia with you about wiki/Pashtuns You have sent me a message to discuss this :) I just wanted to discuss and clarify this. Pashtuns are an eastern Iranian ethnic group located in Afghanistan and North western parts of Pakistan (along the border with Afghanistan) During the British Raj, Indian merchants came mostly to Kabul and other city for trade purposes see: Hew McLeod (1997). Sikhism. New York: Penguin Books. p. 251. ISBN 0-14-025260-6. Along with them also Hindus etc. This page that was used as a source to "clarify" the reason why Hindus should have been included in the religion section is not based on anything please see that newspaper page. Yes, Sikhs and Hindus in Afghanistan are Pashtunized but they are not ethnic Pashtuns. For example you cant count Asian into ethnic English in the UK but you call them British Asians etc etc. But by ethnicity, you cannot call the Sikhs and Hindus Pashtuns. They are Afghans (or Pakistani by nationality) but not ethnic Afghans/Pashtuns.
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hindki this page is about these "Pashtun" Hindus. They are called Hindki and are speaking Pashto outside but Hindko/Punjabi among themselves. Please read this page its very important. Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Hindki" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
and A glossary of the tribes and castes of the Punjab and North-West provinces, compiled by H A Rose, vol II Page 333
Please see the "Hinduism in Afghanistan" page as well You can even go and travel to Afghanistan or western Pakistan and ask a hindu himself whether he is a native Punjabi/hindki haha. I hope you get my point.
The only "Source" the person who made that change about Hinduism in Pashtuns was a random Hindu newspaper as you can see by yourself. thehindum/news/national/tattooed-blue-skinned-hindu-pushtuns-look-back-at-their-roots/article22645932 This is not a legit page to use as a source its not even sourced biased, not to be racist but even the surnames arent Pashtun. . Please look at the pages I gaven for more info ;)
So in short these people are ethnic Hindki/Hindko (so they are an indo-aryan ethnic group part of the Punjabi people) and moved to the region. You can look it up.
But the most clear and best source to use for my argument are found in this book Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). "Hindki". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. which is sourced in this wiki page as well https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hindkowans [1]
I am very open to discuss and hear your arguments if you have :) My apologies for not explaining much during the edit I made, I hope its now clear (my sources and my argument)
Please change it to the change I made (deleting the hindu section) I do not have the power to do that. I have been visiting the Pashtun page for years and this so called info on religion is changed recently because I have never saw it in previous years.
Journal of Asian history, Volumes 35–36. O. Harrassowitz. 2001. Retrieved 2008-08-17. The real opposition to Pashto came, however, from the speakers of Hindko. A large number of Sikhs and Hindus, all speaking Hindko, lived in the cities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and had a voice in the legislative assembly, this was often perceived as the non-Muslim opposition to Pashto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casperti (talk • contribs) 16:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Casperti - I see this has "moved-on" since my reverting your deletion about 3 hours ago. in simple terms - information from reliable sources cannot be dismissed because you don't like it, and Wikipedia, and any other user-generated source, e.g. wordpress, are not reliable sources. If you wish to discuss this further, please do so at Talk:Pashtuns, where other editors can join in - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloween 3D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CyberGhostface (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi 217.155.32.221 - no worries - it is what us WP:WikiGnomes do - Double words are often the hardest thing to spot, especially if occurring across a line break. - Arjayay (talk)
Sorry i made a mistake and thank you very much for your help. Can you let me know if Pastuns love greek-makedonian customs? I read somewhere that this tribe feels progeny of Alexander the Great and dances greek-macedonian dances. I read it in website PONTOSNEWS. It is in greek language but you can translate it in English. The title is " PASTUNS SPEAK GREEK DANCE MACEDONIAN DANCES "
I hope you read it. Then if you want sent me your reply with your opinion.
Thanks you again for your help. I am looking forward to receiving your reply.
The article Nahienaena requires a reversion, which is something I don't know how to do. If you have a moment would you mind restoring it from the work of this morning's vandalism? Mahalo! --Kiwikiu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Kiwikiu thanks for your post, but please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp As for your request - Done - for the "how-to" please see Wikipedia:Reverting - Arjayay (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Islam in India
Firstly no one put a source there and the article was update so the numbers should be updated you seem not to have taken a look at the history page of the article and said "unsourced" vaguely. Next time try to make sure you look into the history page of the article before reverting, thanks--SharabSalam (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
No SharabSalam - it is the WP:BURDEN of anyone adding information to an article to provide the citations to support that information, which you did not. As I said in my second edit summary "Still unsourced - previous bad edits are no excuse" - please do not add further unsourced material to our articles - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Just to make what you did clear is that you removed "unsourced figure" and replaced it with an unsourced figure. The article was updated here with new sources that are reliable. That's why I told you to look in the history of the page before reverting I am not saying "because the figure was unsourced in the first place that means you have no right to question if it changed" as you are trying to imply I am saying that the figure was updated with new sources that seem reliable and I don't think we should reuse the sources again in infobox when they are in the body of the article--SharabSalam (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
No, SharabSalam I very clearly did not "replace[d] it with an unsourced figure". In both my deletions, here and here, I just deleted the unsourced information - I did not replace it with anything. I also note that it has since been re-deleted by another editor, for exactly the same reason - Arjayay (talk) 10:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Warning left on user page?
Hi Arjayay! I hope you're doing well; it's been awhile since we've said hello to one another. I'm messaging you because I just ran into a warning here that you left on someone's user page instead of their user talk page. Was this done on purpose? Your edit summary made it seem like so. Why leave it on the user page instead of the user's talk page? Maybe so (s)he'll see it? Let me know. :-) I'm just curious if anything... ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)21:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
HA! Me too! I'm quite good at stupidity and making idiot edits, as you may already know. ;-) No worries; just figured I'd message you about it and ask. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)22:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi IP from Maryland - I'm afraid I have no idea what you are talking about. Although your IP has made edits prior to this post, they were over 10 years ago, and do not seem relevant to your question - Arjayay (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't give out such information - as explained at the top of this page - "discussions should be open and on the record." - Arjayay (talk) 09:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Arjayay,
I am responding to your message to me on 26 March at 16.03.
The article I wrote about myself was a rewrite of a bio uploaded by Dr Alistair Sinclair some years ago, and present on your website for all this time. I simply slightly changed the short bio and then uploaded a much larger number of publications. Each publication (journal article, book chapter or book) was fully referenced as required. Each pubication is publicly available and verifiable.
The only papers probably not verifiable are the conference papers listed at the end of my publications.
So is the problem that it is I rather than someone else who has uploaded this information?
Or is it that I did not follow the correct procedures?
I hope you will see that everything I have written, apart possibly from the conference papers at the end, are verifiable.
YOu said that I did not provide a verifiable source - I am not sure what this means as each publication is fully sourced.
Thank you for your time,
Miriam Green — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miriam R Green (talk • contribs) 13:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Miriam R Green - thank you for your post, although it appears that others have already answered your questions in my absence. Firstly, as explained on your talk page, and at the Wikipedia:Teahouse we do not recommend people editing our article about them as it extremely difficult to do from a neutral point of view as they have a clear Conflict of interest. Secondly, as explained in my edit summary, reverting your changes, and also pointed out at the Teahouse, Wikipedia is not the place to put a resume, as WP:NOTRESUME, or a long list of papers - this list had previously been reduced in October 2013, as Wikipedia is not a publications database. Thirdly, the article had three references before your edit, all of which you deleted, leaving an article with no references whatsoever. All of the information should cite references to reliable, independent, sources, where it can be checked - this is to try and safeguard the subject of the article from false claims. This is what I referred to as providing a verifiable source. Finally, please re-read and follow the recommendation in WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Almost every content of this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maninder_Singh_(kabaddi) is directly based on Various national dailies so the information contained herein is not based on primary research. I have also added several citations. Still, it's displaying at the top that, it needs additional citations. Please have a look. Deoxys32 (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Note for the archive - My only edit in the last 18 months was changing "The officer and was suspended" to "The officer was suspended" - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
I probably went overboard with the de-facto "please notify everyone who was ever involved" rule. For the record, the above in no way implies any wrongdoing by Arjayay, just that someone else misbehaved on a page that Arjayay edited and might be interested in. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Baisla
Arjayay who made you Wikipedia corrector. In the article Baisla which source is unsource and poorly tell me. In future first see carefully before deleting the article loude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karan Baisla Gom Bhudia (talk • contribs) 02:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Karan Baisla Gom Bhudia - Large sections were entirely unsourced, other sources were not reliable sources and much of it was so unclear I couldn't understand what you were trying to say, so I couldn't correct it. If you wish to continue trying to contribute, please make small, incremental additions/changes, make sure that everything is sourced, and try using a spelling/grammar checker. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Why did you remove 10bytes about Jungkook?
I saw wikipedia about Jungkook of BTS k-pop boy band.
You removed 10 bytes “He serves as the group ‘s main vocalist, lead dancer, sub rapper” two days ago.
The content is exactly right.
Why did you remove it?
I’m very upset!
Were there any people who asked you to remove them?
Or Are you Jungkook’s hater??
I want your answer Vianaka901 (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks so much for getting in touch. I updated a link last night that you noticed, I apologise, I was a visitor there a few time to varkala. I noticed the backpacker accomodation link was wrong or broken so I gave correct one. What do I need to do to make it work? VesnaCiricVC (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
VesnaCiricVC - You don't do anything - as already explained on your talk page, we do not want spam links in our articles, like the one you added to the booking site of a guesthouse. We are not here to promote any business in any way. Please do not re-add it, as it will be deleted and if you continue, you will be blocked. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
You responded here asking if this could be established when sources are not accessible to all. It has been around a while. I didn't look at your talk page archives but maybe someone told you already.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
For doing the clean-up on duplicate words. I'm amazed and embarrassed by the number I seem to have missed when editing! (Probably a sign that I should stop before getting tired...) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the unsourced information from the Jimmy Hibbert page. I was going to remove it myself but you have saved me the trouble so once again, Thank you. Blockheadqp (talk) 09:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Blockheadqp - in return - thanks for your edit at Geoffrey Whitehead. We have an IPV6 user whose actual address keeps changing and who is repeatedly adding information and claiming that it doesn't matter that it is unsourced - We'll win in the end - Arjayay (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
It seems that you are not willing to promote truth on wikipedia. This is a universally accepted fact what i have added. Do not act oversmart. You yourself can search online and you will find plenty of authentic research on Chandrgupts earlier religion and identity. You are contributing to distortion in . history but not allowing the truth. Lalit Jugtawat (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
No Lalit Jugtawat, you are not willing to abide by Wikipedia's basic principles All information must be verifiable by citing references to reliable sources and it is the burden of the person who wants to make an addition to our articles to add those references when adding to Wikipedia articles. Your latest addition to Chandragupta Maurya was reverted by an admin and you have received another warning - please edit within Wikipedia's rules or you will end up being blocked - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Daily Press (Virginia)
What the reason you have reverted my note about access from Europe to Daily Press (Virginia)? From Czech (and with other European country proxies) I can see only this message: «Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism.» And this is a permanent situation. I can see the Daily Press web-site with Asian and American proxy. So they intentionalу block their site for Europeans, and this is important fact in the context of freedom of information. Algen (talk) 21:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Algen - apologies for the delay in replying, but I have been away. You appear to be reading far too much into the Daily Press (Virginia)'s unavailability. Since the General Data Protection Regulation came into force many companies outside the EU, whose websites might not comply with the requirements of the GDPR, have chosen to make those websites unavailable in EU countries, rather than installing in-house systems and regimes to ensure that they are compliant, or risk being fined for non-compliance. The companies who have opted-out includes numerous US news sources, particularly the local/smaller ones, for whom the ongoing cost of ensuring compliance would exceed any possible benefit. This is not, therefore, an attempt by the Daily Press (Virginia) to stifle freedom of information, indeed, the General Data Protection Regulation itself, is seen by many people as the "culprit" in restricting the availability of information. This has been discussed on several occasions on Wikipedia, including here - which was easy for me to find, having contributed. Please also see "Your Teahouse response" 2 sections above, on this page, which provides another option to using proxy-servers - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Arjayay, thank you very much for your comprehensive reply. As a Russian emigrant in Europe I underestimated restrictiveness of European legislative against the background of Russian censorship. It seems the threats to freedom of information in the world are much more serious than I thought. Algen (talk) 11:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence
This is for your efforts and hard work in serving Wikipedia in the field of policies, guidelines, technical issues, etc. Thank you. PATHSLOPU10:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Please try not to confuse the ~400,000 beetles with the band
The "Not to be confused with The Beatles." is rubbish, remove it or place it where I did, do not remove because you are a vandal star, whomever placed this on the article 28 Mar was either joking or drunk and it does not make any sense! 2404:4408:207A:3200:9087:1533:F564:9BB5 (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Edit on Curse LLC Article
I saw that you reverted my edit on the page. I have clearly mentioned the type of edit I did in the article. I can explain it in detail here. First, the typo - There was a typo of two periods at the end of a sentence.
Second, redundant information - In the last para it was mentioned twice that Curse Gaming merged with Team Liquid so I removed the one that was not needed and kept the other one.
If you still think the edits are not justified then we can discuss it further on the article talk page. Amazomagisto (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Amazomagisto, thank you for your post, which was very polite in the circumstances. I have reverted my edit at Curse LLC and apologized to you in that edit summary. I'm not sure why I did not see that the text you deleted was amplified in the following paragraph - apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Done - for the "how-to" please see Wikipedia:Reverting - Arjayay (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Identity Evropa. Guy Macon (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
