User talk:Architecttype

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward John 'Tim' Seibert has been accepted

Edward John 'Tim' Seibert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Healy Guest House has been accepted

Healy Guest House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guy Peterson has been accepted

Guy Peterson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamolithic Houses has been accepted

Lamolithic Houses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your excellent work on Tim Seibert, Lamolithic houses, Healy Guest House and Guy Peterson thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate that. Architecttype (talk) 14:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar For You

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I am giving you this barnstar for speaking truth to power about the problems at Wikipedia. Thank you. Morgan Leigh \| Talk 22:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very grateful for the support. Thank you! Architecttype (talk) 22:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hiss Residence has been accepted

Hiss Residence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional characters get articles, too

I know the idea that pop icons get lengthy articles (Taylor Swift) is irritating, but did you know that fictional characters can end up with articles, too? And not just Sherlock Holmes (who averages more than 160,000 views per month). For the daytime soap opera Days of our Lives, this list article has links to the actors and to the fictional characters they portray: List of Days of Our Lives cast members. There is a pejorative term 'fancruft' (see Wikipedia:Fancruft) used by editors who opine that one person's all-important addition to an article is trivia or worse. One side says to be succinct; the other side points out than an electronic encyclopedia wastes no paper. Anyway, just thought you would enjoy. David notMD (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dang. You got me all excited and I almost came out of retirement to do a page on Race Bannon. It was already done. :( Architecttype (talk) 12:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on architects required

There are many hundreds of articles waiting to be created on women architects here Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Architecture Please help! Theroadislong (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page/Pages parameter in citation templates.

Hi Architecttype. A belated Happy 2019 to you!

Just for reference, the |page/pages= parameter used in citation templates like {{cite book}}, etc. is for citing the actual page or pages in the source which support the relevant article content; it's not for citing the total number of pages in the source work itself. Sometimes a url can be formatted to open directly to the desired page, but the page number(s) further helps guide readers to the actual location in the source when the url cannot formatted as such or when no url is provided.

Sources basically only needed to be reliable and published, but the latter doesn't only mean "available online". So, you can use WP:SAYWHEREYOUREADIT to cite published reliable sources which cannot be found online if you like; you can even use most citation templates to do so. The only citation template which actually requires |url= parameter is {{cite web}}. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I saw both 'page' and 'pages' in citations. I tried to do it a couple of times, but it keep barfing at me. I figured somebody might catch and correct it. I've been wrapping up a few loose ends on the pages I've already done and then I will be gone. Thanks for all your help.Architecttype (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reference, |page= will format the citation for a single cited page, while |pages= will format the citation for a range of pages. Usually, but not always, the workings of the template parameters can be found on its Wikipedia page. — Marchjuly (talk) 21:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!Architecttype (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Architecttype. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ariconte (talk) 03:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/pljones.htm, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I had pulled information and edited it in a separate file. I inadvertently placed the original copy. We will correct as required.Architecttype (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guy Peterson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guy Peterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Peterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walker Guest House has been accepted

Walker Guest House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]