User talk:Aoba47/Archive 6

Naruto

Hello Aoba47,

Could you do a review of the article I linked above? It's a B class article with High Importance in the WikiProject A&M. I fixed a lot of broken references, and the over-linking. I'd like to have your opinion. I think it could be an FA. Thanks. -- 1989 (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Thank you for the message. I will look through the article over the next week if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that's fine. -- 1989 (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I was nominating this for Good Topic. It's not live yet, I just want to know whether it's acceptable before I do that. -- 1989 (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks ready to go. Great job to those who worked on the articles and list! Aoba47 (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, unfortunately, it failed because they don't allow "cherry picking". It would of likely continued, but the two articles that the reviewer described were not GAs yet. I went on and nominated them. If you want to take a look at them to see if I made the right choice, you can. -- 1989 (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@1989: Oh, that makes sense actually. I have never read or watched this manga/anime and I didn't check to see if all of the characters were included so I apologize for this oversight. I am actually working on providing comments for your peer review right now. I will take a look at the character articles later today. I always wanted to try and do something with manga/anime articles so this is definitely a good way for me to start. Good luck with this and great work so far! However, I do believe that Jiraiya (Naruto) needs more work, specifically that it needs a section discussing the development/background behind the character. I would probably fail it on those grounds so I would suggest improving that. Aoba47 (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Doing... -- 1989 (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't really find anything based on his development, however, I see a lot of references based on "Uzumaki: the Art of Naruto" on here. I'm trying to look up the book now, but not getting any luck. -- 1989 (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@1989: If that is the case, I would recommend waiting to nominate this for GAN. The article will definitely need a "Creation and conception" or "Background" section of some kind in order to reach the level of a good article. This was pointed out in the last GAN and still applies here. Without a section like this, then the article has too much in-universe information without an adequate amount of out-of-universe information to balance it out. This means that the article does not comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. The "Appearances" section seems fine, though, I would double-check to make sure you covered all of his appearances in other media in the "In other media subsection". The "Reception" section seems fine, but could use some revision to avoid the "Critic A says X" sentence construction. You can leave this up for GAN if you wish as this is just my opinion, but I really do not believe that it is ready. I will take up your other article for GAN though. Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~If the article Hinata passes for GA, I might be bold, and change the Jirayia article to a redirect. -- 1989 (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]
It may be best to make this a redirect if a significant amount of information on the character's creation and development cannot be located. Aoba47 (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The same thing for the Hinata article as well? -- 1989 (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Even though the Hinata article still needs work, it still shows potential as it seems to indicate that further information about the character's creation and development is out there so I would say no to that. You could always put it up for AfD to get responses from more experienced users, as I am not familiar with the manga/anime at all, but it looks like it has enough information to warrant a separate article in my opinion at least. It just needs work. Aoba47 (talk) 14:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice your ping. Nevermind. By the way, to your last question, not really, because the significant editors haven't touched the article since 6 to 10 years ago. [1]-- 1989 (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can comment on this page after your done looking at it, Wikipedia:Peer review/Naruto/archive2. -- 1989 (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I will try to put some comments up by the end of today. Aoba47 (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you get the chance, see this. I appreciate your feedback. -- 1989 (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I responded to it over there. Aoba47 (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~I didn't know about the post limit. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.~~ -- 1989 (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@1989: No worries, just wanted to bring this to your attention. Aoba47 (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See the FLN page. I don't know if the ping system works right now. -- 1989 (talk) 13:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@1989: The ping system does work right now to the best of my knowledge, but I have just been too busy to respond. I will get to it as soon as I can. Aoba47 (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I were to nominate the article for GA, would you be able to review it? -- 1989 (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I will not have enough time to do a review for that article, and I would prefer it a user more experienced with that subject matter (anime/manga) handle that instead. Thank you for your consideration though. Aoba47 (talk) 23:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you're interested or not, but I opened a peer review on the main character. I would like to hear your opinion. -- MCMLXXXIX 15:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I will look through it when I have the chance. Aoba47 (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that the article has been copy-edited. MCMLXXXIX 21:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Aoba47 (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated Naruto for a DYK. Could you see if it's accurate? I'm new to the process. MCMLXXXIX 20:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will check it out as soon as I have the chance. Aoba47 (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give some advice on how can I improve this list? MCMLXXXIX 13:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I am not super familiar with this type of list, but here are some of my comments to improve it. The lead needs to be expanded to fully cover all of the content from the list. I would encourage you not to use an image in the lead (as seen in List of Dragon Quest media) as I do not believe an image would be necessary in this case. I would encourage you to go throughout the entire list to make sure that everything is cited and that all of the citations are in the proper format and that are still active (any dead links will need to either be found through a website archive or replaced with an active link; I always strongly encouraging archiving references to avoid link decay and all of your hard work going to waste). For instance, I see a few bare links (references 32 through 37 for instance. in the references, which need to be properly formatted. I would format all of the information in the list in tables (as done in List of Dragon Quest media) to make easier for the reader to go through the information (it also makes it easier for you to make sure everything is sourced and properly formatted). Remember that everything needs citations; for instance, the release dates need citations for the Japanese, American, and PAL region releases, and I notice that a few listings do not have a citation for these bits of information. On a more nitpicky note, I would replace the "Fiction" section title with "Novels" or "Books" instead as manga and anime are both examples of fiction so that does not make any sense in this context. I hope you find this to be helpful, and I apologize that I cannot be further help as I am unfamiliar with this type of list. Aoba47 (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a need to cite the release date if I have an ISBN link? MCMLXXXIX 20:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I would say yes, but I would ask someone more familiar with this type of list. Aoba47 (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does the draft here look okay? I'm finished with the structure, but there are some info I have to fill in. MCMLXXXIX 14:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Great work with this! I would still encourage you to add references to the release dates (you can use a vendor site such as Amazon.com something to support that sort of information so it should not be too difficult to pin down). I would also encourage you to put everything into the format of a table as it is confusing as why certain things (such as Rock Lee's Springtime of Youth Full-Power Ninja Chronicles and Naruto: Color Edition) are presented as subsections and other parts are presented with tables. I would also imagine that the novelizations need summaries (and I am still not a fan of the naming of a section as "Fiction"). There are still some bare links the works cited too. Such as reference 78. Overall, the structure looks good, but my primary concern is with the inconsistency of what is in a table and what is not in a table and I would encourage you to present everything in a table for consistency. Aoba47 (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give some advice about this article? It could be a GA. If you recommend an image, sadly, there are no free images released based on him. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: That is unfortunately the case for a lot of people, but that should be no issue during the GAN process or even the FAC process (if you choose to work to that level). I am not that familiar with working on articles on living people. I have tried it once in the past and it didn't end up going so well, but I will provide some pointers here: I would expand the lead to better reflect all of the contents (I would suggest doing this last once you have all of the article figured out to avoid having to repeatedly change the lead to fit the rest of the article). Instead of images of the person, you can include images of relevant places (such as her hometown or something along those lines). I think it would okay if you included non-free images of an example of her work (as long as you include a separate non-free rationale box in the image's page about it) as this FA on an artist Makinti Napanangka includes a non-free image to illustrate the subject's art and style. I would also move down the subsections listing her work from the "Works" section to a separate "List of works" section near the bottom of the article (as done in this example). I would also rethinking the title of the "Works" section. I would change it something like "Career" or something along those lines. The final sentence of the "Personal life" needs a citation and I would try to expand this section if possible, and there are other instances where things need citation. Overall, it looks like it is shaping up, but I would encourage you to work on the structure and citation and then focus on the actual prose before putting it up for GAN. I hope you found this helpful in some way. Aoba47 (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way that this list can become an GA? I notice one paragraph about the music is uncited. I could just remove it. MCMLXXXIX 23:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: This appears to be a list and not an article so this is more appropriate as a FLC and not a GA. I would recommend looking at similar lists that have passed FLCs (such as Bleach (season 1) and List of One Piece episodes (season 5)) and putting it through the FLC process when it is ready. Aoba47 (talk) 23:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the Production section for Naruto. Does it look better? MCMLXXXIX 12:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Looks great to me. Aoba47 (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just opened a new FL nomination. When you get a chance, I would like to get your feedback. MCMLXXXIX 13:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Thank you for the message. I will remove it as soon as I have the chance. If possible, could you also provide some feedback for my FAC? Aoba47 (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are subsections necessary for the theme section of Naruto? I didn't add them. MCMLXXXIX 15:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I would say that they are helpful for breaking up a rather long section of text. You can combine some of the subsections together (such as the "Mythology" and the "Confucianism" subsections together as they are only one paragraph for both). It is up to your personal preference though. If you do remove the subsection, make sure that there are transitions between each different topic. Hope this helps. Aoba47 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any suggestions on One Piece? I plan to re-promote the article to GA. I'm working on it now. MCMLXXXIX 13:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Almost everything seems to be in order. One main thing I would improve is that I think the 406 million copies worldwide sales figure should be present in the body of the article and not just in the lead. The "Events" section could use some expansion and work to make it a more cohesive narrative as opposed to a rather brief listing of items. The "Manga" subsection in the "Awards and accolades" subsection could use some work as single-sentence paragraphs are not a good idea as it makes the section choppy. These are the first things I have noticed from an extremely quick overview of the article so this is not an exhaustive list. Aoba47 (talk) 13:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the Events section, do you think it is needed at all in the article if there isn't much information? MCMLXXXIX 13:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. You could incorporate any parts of this section into other parts of the article if you feel that it is necessary. Aoba47 (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, the Naruto Uzumaki article has been promoted, and I opened this one right away. When you get the chance, could you comment on it? -- 1989 13:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Congrats on your FAC, and I will provide my comments as soon as I have the chance (most likely sometime over the next couple of days). Aoba47 (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your work at WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

BTW thanks for your feedback here. Didn't mean to ignore your request for comment on the Sharon Stone FLC. Honestly I've never participated in FLC (from either end) in the past and just didn't feel confident giving advice in that format. Perhaps in the future. Looks like there's no shortage of support for it, though. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: No worries; thank you for your message and I hope you have a wonderful weekend. Aoba47 (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Manos Arriba

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manos Arriba you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 06:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help with reviews

Yo Aoba, I was wondering if you could look into my nominations of Fate/kaleid liner Prisma Illya 2wei for FL-status or Final Destination 3 for GA-status. Whichever you prefer. If you don't have time to do a full review that's alright, just maybe a few pointers of what I can fix. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PanagiotisZois: Thank you for your message. I will pick up Final Destination 3 for GAN and try to get the review complete by the end of the week. Aoba47 (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Private Practice (season 1)

Hello! Your submission of Private Practice (season 1) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vidiians

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Vidiians has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you very much! Aoba47 (talk) 20:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mother's Day (Rugrats)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mother's Day (Rugrats) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Private Practice (season 1)

Hello! Your submission of Private Practice (season 1) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Vivvt (Talk) 14:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hello. I just want to thank you for reviewing my FAC and FLC. I'm so sorry that I did not review your FAC Eve Russell, it is just that I have not got the time to do it properly, because College is draining my time. Anyway, congratulations on both works. Regards, --Paparazzzi (talk) 05:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Paparazzzi: Thank you for the message, and there is no need to apologize. I enjoyed working with you so it is all good. Good luck with college. I know that can be very stressful so it is good to put your focus on that. Aoba47 (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Manos Arriba

The article Manos Arriba you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Manos Arriba for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Manos Arriba

The article Manos Arriba you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Manos Arriba for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Vidiians

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vidiians you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 23:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Breathe on Me

Shouldn't the article above (Breathe on Me) also nominated for deletion? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioSoulTruthFan: I agree that it should be put up for AfD for the same reason that "Touch of My Hand" is up for AfD. Aoba47 (talk) 20:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioSoulTruthFan: I have created an AfD for it; feel free to comment there. Aoba47 (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have commented. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 22:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FLC request

Hi. I am not sure if the topic interests you but I would appreciate if you could find some time reviewing the FLC nom for List of Sahitya Akademi fellows here. - Vivvt (Talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will look at it as soon as I have the chance. Aoba47 (talk) 05:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shruti Haasan filmography

Hope you would throw some comments here. Pavanjandhyala 10:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: I will look at it as soon as I have the chance. I would greatly appreciate it if you could do a review for my FAC as well. Aoba47 (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I need some days, though. :) Pavanjandhyala 14:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thank you! I will get to your FLC in a few day as well. Aoba47 (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yu Kanda peer review

I've just requested a peer review of Yu Kanda here and I was wondering if you could give a suggestion, criticism or anything else. I still don't plan to nominate it to FAC as I'm busy with D.Gray-man and then I will try nominating the Millennium Earl to GA once the guild copy-edits it. Regards and good luck.Tintor2 (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I will take a look at it as soon as I have the chance. I will try to get to it by the end of the week by the latest if that is okay with you. Good luck with this article and the Millennium Earl one as well. Aoba47 (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Diamond Crowned Queen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Diamond Crowned Queen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Game of Thrones: Season 1 (soundtrack)/GA1

I've addressed your issues and concerns so far, but I would appreciate it if you could check back and see if I've done them sufficiently. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 01:24, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing my comments. I will look through the article again. Aoba47 (talk) 01:30, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Diamond Crowned Queen

The article Diamond Crowned Queen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Diamond Crowned Queen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RugratsMothersDay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RugratsMothersDay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret (singer) GA nomination

Hi, I have noticed your recent involvement in reviewing the Inna article, and would like to ask if you would have an interest in reviewing this article as well when you're free to do so? Regards. ArturSik (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ArturSik: Thank you for your message, but unfortunately, I will not have the time to review the article. Aoba47 (talk) 01:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for the quick response. ArturSik (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SorryMrsCarterSounds.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SorryMrsCarterSounds.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stronger (Kelly Clarkson album)

OK, first of all, hi. Second, I nominated the article quite a while back, and right now, I'm extremely busy (with my studies), I would be very grateful if you could extend the period for another four days (i.e. Friday, when I'm no longer super pressed for time), or just re-evaluate it at a later date. I'm extremely sorry for my impoliteness in ignoring your messages, so I understand my inactivity might been really frustrating for you, but the timing was just off. I love your name, btw ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°). If your name's just a total coincidence, sorry for that awkwardness. Є𐌔ⲘО𐌔𐍄 ^{𐍄𐌀ℓК} 19:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Esmost: No worries, take as much time as you need. I usually allow the GA review to go as long as the person needs so you should definitely focus on your studies as much as you can. There is absolutely no rush with this. I was more so checking in with you about so I apologize for the intrusion. And thank you about the name. I love Dramatical Muder a lot! It is cool to meet another fan of it :). Aoba47 (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, Aoba. I'm just posting to let you know that Shannen Doherty filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 10. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

Hey Aoba47,

When you get the chance, could you review The Great Gatsby: Music from Baz Luhrmann's Film for GA? It was copy-edited, and I fixed the dead links. It should be in good shape. -- MCMLXXXIX 22:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will review it as soon as I have the chance. Aoba47 (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Starting GA reviews

Aoba47, I noticed that you've been editing article talk pages when you start a review to add the "onreview" status and transclude the review page, as you did here.

You don't need to do this. In fact, when you do it yourself, you short-circuit the bot that would normally do so, which prevents it from posting a notice to the nominator's page that you've started the review. Next time you start a review, just open the review page as you normally do, and let the bot find it and do the talk page update and the notification. It runs every 20 minutes or so; you won't have to wait long for it to do its job. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note, and I apologize for my mistake. I will be more aware of this in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mercy Point

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mercy Point you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PanagiotisZois -- PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Eve Episodes

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article List of Eve episodes has been completed.

Not having seen the series, I had trouble figuring out for myself what had been written about Beverly's pregnancy in the introduction to season three. I went with what appeared in the episode summary which did make sense to me. You'll want to check this to make sure I haven't made a mistake.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: Thank you as always for the copyedit. I have actually never seen the show either and cobbled together the introduction from the little bits and pieces that I could find about the series. Your revision definitely improved that part a great deal; I am not sure what I was going for now that I look back at it lol. Aoba47 (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Well it sounds plausible - well as plausible as these shows are - why not leave it for now? If it's wrong, someone will correct it, no doubt.Cheers Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me. Aoba47 (talk) 03:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Be Still My Soul

Hey, I hope you're doing well. I am not sure if you actually follow the series, but, this was a pretty great installment. The entire cast at the top of the game ((Kelly McCreary and LaTanya Richardson were the highlights). Also, particularly impressive was Ellen Pompeo in her directorial debut. If you get a chance you must check it out. NumerounovedantTalk 11:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Numerounovedant: Thank you for your message. I used to watch the show a lot in its early seasons, but I am not a fan of it anymore to be honest. I am glad that you enjoyed the episode though! Aoba47 (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what you're saying, I think for me its just the fact that I stuck around through the lows of the show (and yes there were some very low lows), and now that the show has managed to breathe a new life into the characters (Meredith Grey had the most amazing evolution out of the batch, Kudos to Pompeo), I just can't seem to have enough. NumerounovedantTalk 20:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I am glad you enjoy it. I completely abandoned the show a couple years ago. I saw an episode earlier this season to see what it was like, and I strongly disliked it so I don't see myself watching it in the future tbh. Aoba47 (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I'll keep you posted on any interesting developments, even if you decided to bail out, XD I left some comments at Simone's Russel's FAC, but it doesn't feel like your characteristic article. You might want to take a second look. NumerounovedantTalk 20:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I will address your comments now. I didn't even know that I had a particular style on here lol. Aoba47 (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mercy Point

The article Mercy Point you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mercy Point for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PanagiotisZois -- PanagiotisZois (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mary Kom (film)/archive1

Would you please come back as I want another reviewer to solve one problem. I would appreciate your help. Thanks. Checkout "Comments from Vedant".Krish | Talk 08:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: I would suggest turning to a more experienced user/FAC reviewer for this. Aoba47 (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manos Arriba

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Manos Arriba has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with your eventual FAC request.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thanks for your help on my comments at Mary Kom's FAC, and as I said before, I had a good laugh at the comment here. You sure do make Wikipedia a better place to be, NumerounovedantTalk 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this! I greatly appreciate your feedback as it helps me to grow as a writer and contributor on here. I am glad that I could help as much as I could on Mary Kom's FAC; there are just some moments you have to laugh at on here lol. You also make Wikipedia a major enjoyable place to work on. Aoba47 (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mother's Day (Rugrats)

The article Mother's Day (Rugrats) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mother's Day (Rugrats) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:

Content

Interview with Coin945 and Deltasim about the edutainment video gaming genre

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages

Main project – talk

Project category – talk

Portal – talk

VG Project Departments

Assessment

Reference library – talk

Newsletter – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mother's Day (Rugrats)

The article Mother's Day (Rugrats) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mother's Day (Rugrats) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats again on the pass :). Since the episode's 20th anniversary is next month, feel free to take to DYK so it makes the front page on that day, and you can specifically request a day in advance for it to be featured. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your help with the review! That is a great idea, and I will definitely take it to DYK. I didn't realize it was the episode's 20th anniversary next month; it makes feel super old now lol. Aoba47 (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FL

Would you please look at this? I am planning this for TFL for the 28th April, the release of the second part.Krish | Talk 06:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will provide comments for this as soon as I have the available time. Aoba47 (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what

Hey, I made some changes to Vincent's article, but there are still some more concerns. I think it'll be better if you take a look first. And guess what? I was so intrigued by reading so much about the show that I ended up watching it. And what better episode to start with other than the series finale. NumerounovedantTalk 12:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Numerounovedant: Thank you for your help; I greatly appreciate your edits and feedback. I assumed that there would be a lot of issues with the Vincent article in particular. I think it is a decent GA article, but it still far away from meeting the standard for an FA. I primarily just wanted to revise it and make it stronger. I will definitely take a more thorough look through it again when I have the time to do so. It is a completely ridiculous and campy show, and I really enjoyed how it was a complete parody of the soap opera genre in the beginning. I know at one time someone uploaded every episode to YouTube, but they were removed due to copyright violations. I stopped watching about half-way through the show as the central focus turned to a group of characters that I was not terribly fond of, but I think the series finale did a very job with the amount of time given to them and the amount of material that they had to wrap up. Thank you again and sorry for the long response back lol. Aoba47 (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was a treat, I too loved the bizarre humor in the episode. Anyways, I have made some very basic changes in the article and will be happy to help as and when you decide to work on it further. Good luck. NumerounovedantTalk 17:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I am glad you enjoyed it. I will definitely let you know when I work on it more in the future. Thank you for your help and kind words. I could use all of the luck that I could get lol. Aoba47 (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Baker

Hey, I hope that you're doing well. I need your help; i just started working on the Hannah Baker's article (from this tv series) and am not sure if the "Storylines" section reads in a manner that it should. Will you mind taking a look, as I would not want to proceed without being sure. It'll be really difficult to change the entire section, once its complete. Thanks a lot either way. NumerounovedantTalk 16:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I am doing well, and I hope you are doing well too. I would love to look through the article. I will try to look through it by the end of today if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, though I am guessing that you haven't watched the series? It came out recently on Netfilx. NumerounovedantTalk 16:18, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; I actually have not watched a lot of recent shows, and this is no exception. I have heard about it and it sounds interesting so I may check it out someday in the future. I will have to add it to my never-ending list of television shows to watch. A suicide storyline in a high school setting kind of gives me Life is Strange vibes lol. I am really behind on television (which is ironic considering I used to want to either be a screenwriter or a director for television and/or film). Aoba47 (talk) 16:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my notes after giving the article a rather quick speed-read. I would focus your attention on expanding the "Development" and "Reception" section to support that this character has received significant coverage by third-party, reliable sources to avoid any attempts to delete it (either through reverting to a redirect, going through the AfD process, or anything else). As for the storyline section, remember to add specific citations for each individual episode that the events occur. I do not believe the quote at the end of the first paragraph is necessary, and I would suggest removing it as it does not illustrate much to the reader. You can paraphrase this in a much more concise manner. Other than that, it reads decently overall at the moment for a first draft. As you work through it more, it will definitely improve as some of the language could use some revision (people/revisions is a little awkwardly constructed and too informal for Wikipedia). I would just focus on making sure that everything reads cohesively and to avoid repeating names when possible (for instance, the name Clay is repeated a lot in the third paragraph). It could also use more expansion to clearly identify everything that occurred to the character as there appears to be gaps in the storyline as it currently stands; some aspects of it are rather vague. Also, it would be helpful to clarify this section is about the television series and it would be helpful to note if there are any changes between the book and the television series if you would like to work on this further in the future. Also, just as a word of caution, I find it odd that the main series article and this article said that this received "universal" praise when I have seen articles criticized this show (I saw one publication give a completely negative review of this show actually) so just be wary about that in the future. Hope this helps a little. Aoba47 (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, although on second thoughts I don't think that I have the frame of mind or the patience for taking this all the way, but I'll at least give it a shot. (Fictional characters can be hard and their story arcs become monotonous after going through them so many times.) I'll keep your comments in mind while working on it. NumerounovedantTalk 17:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely takes time so don't be too hard on yourself. You can definitely work on this bit-by-bit if you would like; it is tough for a newer character that is still receiving a lot of attention. Good luck with this and your future projects. I am taking a break from working on articles about fictional characters for that very reason so I completely understand. Aoba47 (talk) 17:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see how it goes. Oh and I hope that you reconsider your screenwriting/directing dream. I wouldn't mind making an article or two on shows/films that you write/direct. 😁 NumerounovedantTalk 13:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, and that would truly be awesome! Aoba47 (talk) 13:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Vidiians

The article Vidiians you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vidiians for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 02:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]