User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2019/July-December
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Anthony Appleyard. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - Online Multiplayer listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - Online Multiplayer. Since you had some involvement with the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - Online Multiplayer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much for moving the page. Could you please help one more time? Is it possible to retain the film article (up to 07:59, 2 July 2019) from the history and fork into a separate article titled Ithikkara Pakki (film) ? 137.97.128.113 (talk) 17:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ramakrishnapuram Neredmet, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
European Space Agency Science Programme
Google: European Space Agency Science Programme. Surprise! It does not exist!. Nice job. Rowan Forest (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Rowan Forest: At 01:50, 10 April 2019 User:PhilipTerryGraham moved page Cosmic Vision to European Space Agency Science Programme and its talk page:: "Bold change to rescope the article to one about the Science Programme, including the Horizon 2000, Horizon 2000+, Cosmic Vision, and Voyage 2050 campaigns". See Talk:European Space Agency Science Programme#Requested move 7 July 2019. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- The fact is that such program does not exist. You are supporting his BS. Rowan Forest (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Ghost people listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ghost people. Since you had some involvement with the Ghost people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Restore and move Template talk:Template:2019 Thai League 4 Eastern Region table for football clubs season back
You have mistakenly moved a template talk page to a "Template talk:Template:" title. Please restore Template talk:Template:2019 Thai League 4 Eastern Region table for football clubs season back and then move it back to Template talk:2019 Thai League 4 Eastern Region table. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. Can you restore (move back) this article to where it was at (Puebla (city)) before it was moved to Puebla capital? There was no need for it to even have been moved in the first place. Thanks! --Discographer (talk) 01:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Is "Puebla City", friend. --JkMastru (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Move to → Puebla City. Disregard my above message Anthony. Okay, go ahead and move it to Puebla City then, please, for consistency, even though it is wrong as it falsifies both a city's given common and proper name, along with Aguascalientes City, Chihuahua City, Colima City, Campeche City, Durango City, Guanajuato City, Oaxaca City, Querétaro City, San Luis Potosí City, Tlaxcala City, and Zacatecas City (all wrong!). I now see that the Puebla (article) was moved late last year, I didn't catch that earlier. Only Mexico City and Ciudad Victoria are at their correct article places. Best, --Discographer (talk) 02:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @JkMastru and Discographer: Done (There seems to have been quite a move war here, judging by the amount of deleted redirect edits at name Puebla City.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I think you stepped into what @TonyBallioni: had already fixed differently. Too bad none of these guys talked to each other between moves. Dicklyon (talk) 05:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. I moved it to Puebla (city) because that was the stable title. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Anthony, please could you revert back to Puebla (city)? That's the agreed name of the article per the 2018 RM at Talk:Puebla City/Archive 1, and Tony had restored and move protected that title earlier this morning, so I'm unclear why you moved it again. Thanks! — Amakuru (talk) 05:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I thought it rang a bell. I see I was neutral then. Still neutral, but you're right. Anthony, put it back where Tony put it. Dicklyon (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- @JkMastru and Discographer: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for restoring the article title back to Puebla (city). Best, --Discographer (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Wojciech Waleczek
Hi. Could you please help me to move an userspace draft about an award-winning composer into article space? I would appreciate this a lot if you could review it or tell me who could review the article. The draft is about Wojciech Waleczek—a succesful pianist from Poland whose numerous achievements deserve to be celebrated with his own Wikipedia page. He took 3rd prize at the Premio Mario Zanfi competition and was the absolute winner of the 4th Franz Liszt National Piano Competition—to name just a few of his accomplishments. Mr Waleczek already has his articles on German and Polish Wikipedia. Hope to hear back from you. Regards, AngelOfDestiny (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done including interlanguage wiki links. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks a lot! AngelOfDestiny (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Nova (U.S. TV series)
Hey Anthony, just noticed you responded to a request to move a page to Nova (U.S. TV series). Just a heads up that WP:NCTV has recently been changed to use "American" and "British" instead of the no longer acceptable "U.S." and "UK". --Gonnym (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Campaign/campaign
There is a current discussion about Campaign/campaign at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Campaign vs campaign, it might be a good idea to hold off moves until that discussion has concluded. DuncanHill (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Why was the page on Bolic Sound deleted?
I created a page for the recording studio Bolic Sound which you deleted. Why was it deleted? I see someone made a page in 2008 that was deleted for copyright, but I created a new page properly citing credible sources. I provided valuable information and the page was deleted with an explanation other than the section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I don't see further discussion on why a page on Bolic Sound is being forbidden from being made. Where is the deletion discussion? Bolic Sound was a studio where many legendary artist recorded in the 1970s. It deserves to have it's own page.Twixister (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Restore deleted history of Kyoto Animation studio fire
The redirect Kyoto Animation studio fire had accidentally been deleted. It has since been recreated by WoodElf. You should then restore the deleted history for the redirect for completeness. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Please Restore Franky Zapata Page
I created the page as a curated translation from the French and German WP pages about him. It was nominated for speedy deletion and is not available to me. Please consider restoring this page. The page is titled Franky Zapata. Note: Zapata has made several other contributions besides the flyboard. Thanks. Codwiki (talk) 23:33, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
A fire listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A fire. Since you had some involvement with the A fire redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Please reverse the history merge. Thanks. Motizun (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Motizun: This was done at my request. Why should it be reversed, and why have you further split the page history by moving it to Draft:A Nightmare on Elm Street (upcoming film) version 2? PC78 (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Some template fixes in season articles
Hello. Can you please fix the titles linked in each of the episode lists for each of the Yu-Gi-Oh! series (such as the ones linked at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! episodes)? The title listed in the 1= or Episode list/sublist/ (if the title is listed here) needs to match the current article title exactly, otherwise the episode summaries for those pages won't even show up at all (e.g. Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters (season 1) - which I haven't gotten to yet). I've already taken care of the pages for Capsule Monsters, and the 1998 series (Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's didn't have this problem to begin with). I'm asking you since you might have a way to do this for all 21 or so Yu-Gi-Oh! episode lists faster than I can (and also since I'm just plain exhausted at this point). LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 12:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- @LightandDark2000: Sorry :: I have looked at page List of Yu-Gi-Oh! episodes, and I cannot work out what I am meant to do. Please, in detail, for each of the episodes involved, what should I do? I have never watched Yu-Gi-Oh! and I know nothing about the Yu-Gi-Oh! series's scenario or characters. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- I was referring to the episode list template syntax. For example, for one of the pages I linked above, for each episode | 1= List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters episodes (season 1) is incorrect and should be changed to | 1 = Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters (season 1), because the page being referenced by the template needs to match the article title exactly. This edit is an example; it's really a tedious task. It's a really repetitive task that could be better done by a bot or automater, but I don't have access to those kind of tools. I could do this later, but there are a lot of pages, and I don't really have the time for that today. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- @LightandDark2000: I do not have access to a bot or an automater either. Try this: Go to the page to be edited. Click on "edit this page". Right click on the resulting edit display. In the resulting popup menu click on "select all". Press ctrl-C . Open a text editor (Notepad or Wordpad). Go the text editor display. Click in the text-editing display. Press ctrl-V . A copy of the Wikipedia page in editor form should appear in the text editor. Use the text editor's Replace function to replace (say) 'xxxxxx' by 'zzzzzz' wherever it occurs :: use the "ask me for yes or no each time" mode. When that is finished: right click in the text editor's text display. In the resulting popup menu click on "select all". Select menu Edit, Cut. Go back to Wikipedia's edit display :: its editing area should still be blue all over. Press ctrl-V . That should copy the edited editing-mode into Wikipedia's edit display. Examine it. If it is right. save it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, European Volleyball Championship U17 Men, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Restore deleted edits for John Murton (or not)
The page John Murton had some deleted edits from 2009 and earlier that were also about a diplomat, perhaps the same one as the current article. You should therefore restore those edits unless you can show that the deleted version was about a different diplomat with the same name. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
But now, you have restored too much. Please delete John Murton and then restore only the article edits where the number of bytes has 4 digits (i.e. excluding 23:15, 12 June 2019 (55 bytes) and 23:18, 12 June 2019 (133 bytes)). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Burr comb moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Burr comb, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:18, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Jmertel23: I have added 2 more refs. Burr comb and removing it is an important matter in beekeeping. If you don't believe me, ask a beekeeper. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: It was never a question of not believing you, but rather that without references, the article would be at risk for deletion in mainspace. Thank you for adding the references! Jmertel23 (talk) 11:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
your climate change task force >> wikiproject assistance
Thanks for helping with the move. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Restore deleted redirects to Burr comb
Inside of an HTML comment at Burr comb, it says that the pages Bridge comb and Brace comb had redirected there. After restoring the draft to mainspace, you should then restore both of those redirects, and remove the following HTML comment from the top of the article:
<!-- Note: The following pages are redirects to [[Burr comb]]: *[[Bridge comb]] *[[Brace comb]] -->
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
The Flood listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Flood. Since you had some involvement with the The Flood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:09, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of Draft:Charles Reid
Hi Anthony, my article has been deleted today. How can I do to prove that I'm the owner of the copyright of the page http://www.andremehu-aquarelles.com/en/article-87.php . I created already a Creative Commons Licence CC-BY-SA 3.0 on this page (only this page) of my website to avoid copyright concern . You can verify it at the bottom of this page. Could you tell me what I have to do to re-submit my article. I wrote this text some years ago and I am creating the article for wikipedia with elements of this text wich is mine. I repeat that I'm the owner of this website and this page is Copyleft. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Regards --Lize56 (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Lize56: The article involved here :: is it Draft:Charles Reid? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Anthony, thank you very much for your reactivity. Yes the article involved here is Draft:Charles Reid.
--Lize56 (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Lize56: The page is now at Charles Reid (painter). It seems to be sorted: see Talk:Charles Reid (painter)#Note. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Reverted move
Cuchullain unilaterally reverted your move of WJCT to WJCT, Inc. without even discussing it at WP:RM/TR. If he wanted to challenge the move, he could have done it before you moved the article. Just take it to full discussion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- As I explained at the talk page, I had no way of seeing that a technical request had been made until after Anthony moved it. This wasn't eligible for a technical request as it wasn't uncontroversial (this is no fault of Anthony's). If you wanted to argue for a move you should have opened an WP:RM and made your case.--Cúchullain t/c 17:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Missed one
In this edit you say "done 7", but you missed my request to downcase Algeciras Campaign. Dicklyon (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi Anthony, I decided to delete the page http://www.andremehu-aquarelles.com/en/article-87.ph from my website. Please could you verify that it doesn't exist any article-87 on my website. I hope this will be enough to prove that I am the writter of this article , and that I am the owner of the website http://www.andremehu-aquarelles.com. Consequently I hope you will allow me to re-submit again for review. Thank you very much.
Please let me konw your thoughts
I look forward to hearing from you soon
Regards --Lize56 (talk) 20:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Lize56: User:Lize56 and User talk:Lize56 have no subpages whose name contains "article-87". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard and Lize56: It is cached, and there's no indication of the necessary statement of release. Deleting the article from their own site means that the statement, if there was one, no longer exists. This doesn't appear compatible with the WP:DONATETEXT process. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi it’s JescFAN32500000 I’m just wondering why you deleted the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2020 page even though The Netherlands has confirmed participation. Why did you delete the page when there was one country confirmed.
Thanks from JescFan32500000 JescFAN32500000 (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Novoland: Eagle Flag
I'm just curious about the justification for deleting Novoland: Eagle Flag. As I recall it was a good article, equivalent to any other Chinese drama's article, and the topic it dealt with is a smash hit cultural phenomenon, thus completely warranting a Wikipedia article.
Philologick (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Philologick: Novoland: Eagle Flag's log says:
- (change visibility) 05:01, 30 July 2019 Anthony Appleyard talk contribs block deleted page Novoland: Eagle Flag (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Boyhoodjams) in violation of ban or block) (view/restore) Tag: PHP7
- (change visibility) 03:42, 1 March 2019 Athaenara talk contribs block deleted page Novoland: Eagle Flag (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Xdeluna) in violation of ban or block) (view/restore) (thank)
- (change visibility) 23:11, 20 June 2018 TonyBallioni talk contribs block deleted page Novoland: Eagle Flag (G5: User:Boyhoodjams (TW)) (view/restore) (thank)
So you're saying if a user gets banned, everything they made is deleted?
If not, then why was this page deleted? Oughtn't there be some review of pages to ensure good, quality articles aren't disappearing, especially on something as already under-represented as Asian culture?
Since you are the one listed as the one responsible for the deletion, you seem like the best person to ask.
I have contributed to two projects aimed at increasing the representation of under-represented groups. This is a major issue on Wikipedia and much effort is expended in working to make Wikipedia as broadly applicable as possible, not a narrow portrait of Western life, but encompassing the entire dynamic range of human experience. Deleting perfectly acceptable pages because of a taint in the history of that page seems profoundly counter-productive. If it were any other page, others may defend it; alas, China has few defenders in the English world, so I must take up the mantle.
Philologick (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Deletion
Hey, you just speedy deleted my creation, which was previously AFDed and deleted. As you may have seen, the article was deleted for not having continued coverage. This is while, recently, AP News published a piece deeply covering death of Mohammad Habali (Ctrl+f the name please), besides addressing other files. I did not have the opportunity of contesting the deletion or I would detail what's going on. --Mhhossein talk 18:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. You deleted a page I created do to my 1) not rewording info from elsewhere enough and 2) not appearing neutral enough (e.g., I used included the Awards section other book author's pages have). I thus recreated the page as very minimal, with no mention of awards or favorable things said, etc. (hard to do while trying to communicate her contributions, but I did it). Now that I did a thorough job of rewording (so there is no similarity to other content) and just removed any content that seemed favorable, the page can be added, correct? I just submitted a new version if you want to take a look. I was modeling the page after the page I saw on Brene Brown, as her work is similar, but this time I left out anything favorable. Given Wikipedia's very publically expressed concern over pages on important female thought leaders being lacking from the site, Wikipedia's page on systemic bias (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias), etc., I would hate for the page not to be allowed at all when the copyright and non-neutrality were the only concerns and those concerns have been remedied. I want to be sure to push for Wikipedia's goals. Thank you for your consideration. Also, I'm happy to remedy anything else found (whereas a total wipe-out of the page is discouraging for people wanting to get major female authors, etc. included for a more balanced Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and help.SystemDisrupt (talk) 00:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Help in getting a page back
Hey,
2 or 3 days ago a page I made was put up for speedy demolition. Before I even had time to contest (10 mins) it was deleted. I had tried to contact the deleting admin but he has ignored me. Unistream (entrepreneurship) Thanks IsraeliIdan (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Zvikorn: At 16:47, 30 July 2019, User:RHaworth deleted page Unistream (entrepreneurship) as (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- I replied within three hours of IsraeliIdan leaving this message. I would add the suggestion that IsraeliIdan should contact ELEMyid (talk · contribs) with a view to letting Unistream merge into Elem/Youth in Distress in Israel which has been around since 1982. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Jingnan Campaign move
At RMTR I had suggested that it needed a history merge. Is there someone else I should ask for that? Dicklyon (talk) 01:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: I have performed the history-merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! I didn't know how to tell. Dicklyon (talk) 03:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Just querying this move when the the draft had been rejected twice, both times with the suggestion that content be merged into the existing page now at American Horror Story: 1984 (version 2), which until recently, had been an article itself. I don't believe that these moves were correct. PC78 (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm also a bit confused as to why you moved the existing redirect to American Horror Story: 1984 (version 2) instead of either moving it to draftspace or just deleting it under WP:G6. It looks like you did half of a WP:ROUNDROBIN, so I completed it by moving that version out of mainspace and to Draft:American Horror Story: 1984. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Move deleted edits for Talk:Red Roots to Talk:Red Roots/Archive 1
The page Talk:Red Roots had some deleted edits. You should therefore move those deleted edits to Talk:Red Roots/Archive 1 and then restore the sections from 2011. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
"Conquer the World" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conquer the World. Since you had some involvement with the Conquer the World redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Greeting Anthony Appleyard. I stumbled on this page and was wondering what happened to it? A quick Google search suggests it is fairly well established terminology. I can't see what was there or what happened to it. Several pages link to the phrase. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Pages Lithic scatter and Lithic Scatter have never existed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- I see. Apparently the page was titled Lithic scatters. Was there not much there? I'm not seeing a deletion rationale? FloridaArmy (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: Lithic scatters has 3 edits, all deleted, and their only substantial content is a redirect to Lithic flake. The edits at Lithic scatters are:-
- (diff) 05:01, 26 April 2017 . . TheSandDoctor (talk | contribs | block) 21 bytes (Nominated page for deletion using Page Curation (speedy deletion-author request, speedy deletion-no content))
- (diff) 23:55, 25 April 2017 . . DadaNeem (talk | contribs | block) empty (pls delete-NOT what I thought it was!)
- (diff) 10:46, 25 September 2013 . . Tommy Pinball (talk | contribs | block) 25 bytes (←Redirected page to Lithic flake)
- OK. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
ETH Zurich
Hi, your recent move from ETH Zurich to ETH Zürich was rather unconsidered and misled. The official English naming by ETH is without Umlaut! Would you mind to undo this move, please. -- ZH8000 (talk) 07:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Move Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 6) to Australia's Next Top Model (season 6)
Please move Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 6) to Australia's Next Top Model (season 6), redoing a move that you have accidentally reverted. Apparently, the original RMTR request had a mistake in it. It was supposed to say "Australia's Next Top Model (cycle 6) → Australia's Next Top Model (season 6)" (article to redirect), not vice versa (redirect to article). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Jammu and Kashmir (Indian state)
Hi, I saw that you moved the Jammu and Kashmir page to Jammu and Kashmir (Indian state) based on the request of an IP. As you would probably know this is a contentious topic and I believe an undiscussed move should not have been done here. Jammu and Kashmir is used to primarily refer to the state in India and a disambiguator for it is unnecessary especially with regard to the princely state (Jammu and Kashmir (princely state)) on whose basis the request was made. Please see if this can be reverted. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Dignity Health and Common Health
Hi, I saw you recently reverted the Dignity Health redirect page from CommonSpirit Health and indicated desire to have a CommonSpirit Health page. Here is a draft page with content and references for CommonSpirit Health: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:CommonSpirit_Health Jeremy at A+P (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
"Clair Kenamore and Marguerite Martyn" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clair Kenamore and Marguerite Martyn. Since you had some involvement with the Clair Kenamore and Marguerite Martyn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
"Arbaaz Khan (actor)(born 13 October 1971)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arbaaz Khan (actor)(born 13 October 1971). Since you had some involvement with the Arbaaz Khan (actor)(born 13 October 1971) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
The Unwaba Revelations (novel)
Hello, thanks for starting the history merge from The Unwaba Revelations to The Unwaba Revelations (novel). But something seems to have gone wrong: both articles still exist. Can you please check? Thanks. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 23:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Tracy Von Doom: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, can you please move the article The Unwaba Revelations (novel) to The Unwaba Revelations? It'd be more precise. User:Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yashthepunisher: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
History merge request
Could you merge the history of the redirect Mank (film) into Draft:Mank (film)? It’ll alleviate the need to address the existence of the redirect when moving the draft upon filming start. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 04:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Hoist (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable fictional character
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Now being discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoist (Transformers). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Anthony – what is the next step here, then? Amaury's draft has precedence over Starforce13's. Should the latter be moved back to Draftspace (without a redirect), and then the former moved to Mainspace, and then a "merge" carried out?... TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @IJBall: The next step here is to decide which of these 2 articles is the better description of Gabby Duran & the Unsittables, not date priority. Or to text-merge User:Amaury/sandbox/Gabby Duran & The Unsittables and Gabby Duran & the Unsittables. (I know nothing about Gabby Duran or his works.} Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Date priority is standard practice to determine draft precedence. And in this case, the drafts are comparable. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I may be biased but I think Gabby Duran & the Unsittables (version 2) has more information including the updated/correct cast names and character descriptions. Plus also episode section etc. We could do Version 1 history up to Aug 3 (when the userspace draft was last updated). Then use version 2 for everything thereafter. Starforce13 21:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Nvm, looks like new changes are already being added to the incomplete version to match mine. Starforce13 21:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- I may be biased but I think Gabby Duran & the Unsittables (version 2) has more information including the updated/correct cast names and character descriptions. Plus also episode section etc. We could do Version 1 history up to Aug 3 (when the userspace draft was last updated). Then use version 2 for everything thereafter. Starforce13 21:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Date priority is standard practice to determine draft precedence. And in this case, the drafts are comparable. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Be more careful please. You deleted an entire article just to move some random company over the top of it. —Xezbeth (talk) 10:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Brawl (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable fictional character
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
You've made a lot of confusion by renaming Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization) to Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, it is wrong that disambiguation is not needed here, nearly everything that links to Ukrainian Academy of Sciences is referring to National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. "Ukrainian Academy of Sciences" is former official name of this national academy and simply how people were often referring to it here, while this NGO is more or less a fraud organization that sells fake degrees of "academicians" (I don't know how it corresponds to any criteria). So now lots of well-known scientists, like Vladimir Vernadsky, are stated to be fake academicians of NGO instead of well established national scientific organization. Please fix it by making disambiguation or by checking and correcting every page that links to Ukrainian Academy of Sciences.--Igor Balashov (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Igor Balashov: The move request was made in Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests at 15:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC) :: it was "Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization) (currently a redirect to Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (non-governmental organization)) → Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (currently a redirect instead to National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) – Disambiguation is not needed and this org's name is simply "Ukrainian Academy of Sciences." However a simple page move is being blocked because the term has been redirected to the unrelated National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Remove July to September from archive
- User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2019/January-June should only include the discussions from January to June 2019. You should then remove all of the discussions from July to September 2019 there that you have duplicated here, i.e. "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - Online Multiplayer listed at Redirects for discussion" and all discussions below it. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Recent history restorations
I’m concerned recently that the history restorations/merges of Draft:Gladiator 2 (film), Draft:Baby Driver 2 and Draft:Your Name (upcoming film) that were requested by the IP address 70.21.181.186 were very specific requests. These edit histories were deleted when the draft creators User:Hayholt, User:Artix Kreiger and User:TheGreenTower were blocked for sock puppetry, with the first two being socks of User:Winterysteppe. I’m wondering if the IP has correlation to those editors and were looking to have their edit histories restored, which is in itself a circumvention of their ban. Rusted AutoParts 05:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Marg (word) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marg (word) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marg (word) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
Hello. I'm Joshy. I don't wanna bother you, but I noticed the example you added on this article, which was a feature in a YouTube video. The first thing I'm gonna say is I would rather call that a play on words, as it was a coincidence. But that's not even my point. My point is I don't believe it should be cited on Wikipedia as a feature in an individual's video. I decided to remove it for now. Again, apologies if I'm bothering you, but I just wanted to notify you of my actions that I felt necessary. GOLDIEM J (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Sami languages
As can be seen at Talk:Kildin Sami orthography#Requested move 21 December 2018, this move is far from uncontroversial. One user had previously pushed through their preferred spelling, but there absolutely isn't an agreement on that. The pages should be moved back to the original spelling of "Sami" until there is a clear consensus for another spelling. Rua (mew) 09:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Boleyn. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Osgood State Bank, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
MariaJaydHicky or MariaJaydHickey
Hi! I see you history merged two pages and left them at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHickey, which is completely wrong because the username is User:MariaJaydHicky. Please, just leave it as it is, do not make any more edits, I will fix it. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- You made several mistakes there. You history-merged and moved the whole case to "MariaJaydHickey", but left the archive at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky/Archive. Also, in the process, you removed the open case posted by Blueberry72. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
two synonyms
You moved Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company (ANGLICO) to Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company with the explanation that a title should not contain two synonyms. Please explain. Are you saying that an acronym is a synonym? In the literature before an acronym is used it is first spelled out. The term Anglico is actually more wellknown than the words Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company, hence it would be proper to title the article with the full name and acronym. don't you think. Writing Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company, is not quite analogus to writing infantry company, the later is generic, the former is specific to a particular and specialized unit, much like Seabees. Of course there is no acronym for Seabees.Oldperson (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Oldperson: It is not usual in Wikipedia for an article's name to contain both a set of initials and also the words that the initials mean. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: Ok it is not usual, and it is not usual for such WP articles that need to have their Acronyms in their title either, but just because it is not usual does not mean that it is wrong or contrary to WP:MOSIn this case it is highly appropriate. As I said persons familiar with the acronym ANGLICO are not familiar with it's long name.
And ANGLICO is just one of many such that can be hauled out as an example.Oldperson (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Oldperson: That move request was made in Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests at 19:06, 10 September 2019 by User:Gnome de plume. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Anthony Appleyard I saw that, the move was requested by Gnome de Plume, however I think he made a good faith request out of misunderstanding. The situation is so infrequent that it is not all understood. I don't want to engage in some kind of move war(is there such a thing) could you possibly undo the move?Oldperson (talk) 23:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Oldperson: Done. It could be said that the expected acronym would have been ANGLC, not ANGLICO. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Request
Please move Inshallah (2020 film), Jaya (2020 film) and Khuda Hafiz (film) to User:Mr. Smart LION/sandbox/Inshallah (2020 film), User:Mr. Smart LION/sandbox/Jaya (2020 film) and User:Mr. Smart LION/sandbox/Khuda Hafiz (film) respectively. All these three articles are about upcoming films and would like to improve them before moving them to main space. Mr. Smart LION 05:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
I've seen you work tirelessly at requested moves, a largely thankless, perpetually backlogged area and I wanted to thank you for your work here. (P.S. Good to see you're still around and editing!) Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 22:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC) |
"Seetee" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Seetee. Since you had some involvement with the Seetee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your continuous help with technical move requests! Hemant DabralTalk 19:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC) |
who was the original author of the page? the one for G13 deletion? 96.242.57.164 (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Draft:Blade (upcoming film) has 7 deleted edits:-
(diff) 17:06, 7 May 2019 . . Faromics 867 bytes (diff) 17:06, 7 May 2019 . . Faromics 884 bytes Tag: Visual edit (diff) 17:05, 7 May 2019 . . Faromics 425 bytes (Blad) (diff) 04:40, 26 August 2017 . . Legacypac 1,898 bytes (diff) 18:40, 8 September 2016 . . Wg110497 1,854 bytes (diff) 03:39, 26 August 2015 . . Captain Assassin! 1,805 bytes (Wesley Snipes) (diff) 03:38, 26 August 2015 . . Captain Assassin! 1,794 bytes (new draft created for a Marvel's potential film)
You deleted List of compositions by Johannes Brahms!
What the hell are you doing?! You deleted (blanked) the entire page List of compositions by Johannes Brahms, and Undo doesn't work. Then you put a redirect line that points to itself (circular redirect). And most of the History has been removed as well, so I can't see any previous versions! I've been working very hard on this page for a couple weeks now, and the whole thing is gone. What the fuck!
Your note says you did a Page Move to this page, but the move you refer to was already done yesterday! You overwrote the new page with data from the old page which was just a redirect after yesterday's move.
Undo undo undo dude. And restore the edit history too. And while I'm here, I need to point out that the person who successfully did yesterday's move User:JalenFolf also deleted the history on the new page; it was a page name already in use and had an extensive history. Edit histories need to be preserved, by WP rule. For instance in just such an event as someone like you blanking a page! Can you restore the history User:JalenFolf deleted too?
I'm gathering you aren't a vandal, but please pay attention: the records of yesterday's move are there (still) in what's left of the history, and you should know better than to make a circular redirect. The fact that the page you moved from List of compositions by Johannes Brahms by opus number had a redirect from a move and SAID it was from a move, should have told you it's been done already. But what's the idea of deleting edit history?! You really screwed up here.
Chuckstreet (talk) 06:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Chuckstreet: Sorry. I blundered. Thanks for telling me. I may have accidentally clicked on the "move" box twice. Sorry. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Ditz Crackers
Ditz Crackers was deleted by Hadal on May 30, 2011 like Dladdy, Woca Wola, etc. When was the redirect page built? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Both deleted edits are redirects:-
- 22:15, 15 April 2011 . . Endingsesame 27 bytes (←Redirected page to Ritz Crackers)
- 22:14, 15 April 2011 . . Endingsesame 18 bytes (←Redirected page to Ritz)
- When was Zadeline (also deleted by Hadal on 5/30/11) created? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 19:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- 18:03, April 23, 2011 SQLQuery me! 19:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Zadeline has one deleted edit: 18:03, 23 April 2011 . . Endingsesame 22 bytes (←Redirected page to Madeline). (Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC))
- and SQL was right. 150.176.13.103 (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Zadeline has one deleted edit: 18:03, 23 April 2011 . . Endingsesame 22 bytes (←Redirected page to Madeline). (Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC))
- When was Piggy Pig (also deleted by Hadal on 5/30/11) created 150.176.13.103 (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- One edit: 22:18, 1 May 2011 . . Endingsesame 17 bytes (←Redirected page to Pig)
- When was Summer School Friday after 2007 ended (also deleted by Hadal on 5/30/11) created? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 19:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- One edit: 20:21, 16 April 2011 . . Endingsesame 28 bytes (←Redirected page to School holiday)
Space Force (TV series)
Hey Anthony Appleyard, you recently moved Space Force (TV series) from its draft page and it's moved the history from before I created the draft. Would it be possible to delete the revisions from before I created the article? Thanks, Vistadan 09:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Vistadan: The information in your edit ([1], at 22:40, 26 September 2019) seems to be all present in the current edit (Space Force (TV series), at 05:11, 27 September 2019 , by Elainasla. Which edits do you want to be removed? If you want to edit the current version, you can. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Anthony Appleyard, I should have specified from before the Draft was deleted a few days ago, from revisions here to here. Thanks, Vistadan 09:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Vistadan: That is, all edits earlier than your edit at 22:40, 26 September 2019. The edits before and after this requested cut point resemble each other, and they seem to be parts of the same or closely parallel editing processes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Anthony Appleyard, I understand. Thanks again for the page move. Vistadan 10:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Technical moves
Hi Anthony. Thanks for all your hard work in this area. Just a heads-up about a banned user (Film Fan) who is evading their block with IP edits. From time to time, they'll request a (technical) page move on foreign language films. I'd be grateful if you could make a mental note of this, and if you spot anything like this in the next few days from this IP based in the North East of England, to revert per WP:BANREVERT. This is in relation to this list, which has a submission deadline of tomorrow (1st October). Any questions, please ping me or drop me a note on my talkpage. Many thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Nelvana, INc.
Nelvana, INc. was deleted by Discospinster on July 13, 2011 like Mario (Mario Series) and other pages. When was it created? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- It has one deleted edit: 15:30, 10 April 2011 . . Endingsesame, 21 bytes (←Redirected page to Nelvana).
When was June 31, 2003 (also deleted by Discospinster on 7/13/11) created? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- It has one deleted edit: 17:10, 4 June 2011 . . Endingsesame 23 bytes (←Redirected page to July 2003)
When was T.V. Televison (also deleted by Discospinster on 7/13/11) created? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- I want you to let me know what time T.V. Televison was created on? 150.176.13.103 (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- It was created at 22:05, 15 April 2011. It has 3 edits, all redirects. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect title
In this edit, why did you not move the page to Hysteretic model (which is its present title after two subsequent moves)? Plainly the title to which you moved it has an incorrect plural and an incorrect capital. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Would you reverse the page and put a 2nd article for deletion tag for the page, because I have improved the page reliable references and I hope it will pass in the new articles for deletion discussion. Lazy-restless 11:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Lazy-restless: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalki Avatar and Muhammad (book) (2nd nomination). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Move October requests for history merge to the correct section
The page Wikipedia:Requests for history merge currently has a few requests from October listed under "Completed requests September 2019". You should therefore move all of those requests to a new section named "Completed requests October 2019", and also add a "Rejected requests October 2019" section. November and December should also be kept separate from September and October. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
But I still see two requests from October under the "Completed requests September 2019" section. Please move both of them to the "Completed requests October 2019" section. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
John Howe (Australian settler)
My first version of this article was deleted as a copyvio.
The latest version, much amended and expanded, is in User:Downsize43/Sandbox. I believe it is now ready for publication. Can you check it for me, please. Downsize43 (talk) 02:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Downsize43: Done John Howe (Australian settler); I have moved the old edits about other topics, back to User:Downsize43/Sandbox. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:51, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Downsize43 (talk) 07:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Havana D'Primera
Hello, the page that I wrote and created, Havana D'Primera, was deleted mistakenly. The page in question that you believed it was copied from actually copied the text from Wikipedia, and from my own writing.
I think the confusion arose because they copied an earlier version of the page, which was deleted before for not having enough reliable sources. It was deleted due to inactivity (I left it for a while), so I wrote a new one with more sources and this time it was accepted. The website copied the text directly from an earlier version of this page. I'm positive about that because they're my own words! Nicksufc (talk) 08:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
You just executed a move request Shahrukh Khan to Shahrukh Khan (disambiguation). Thank you. I'm a little confused that a page Shahrukh Khan (version 2) has been left behind. It appears to include the extensive revision history (it isn't pretty!) from Shahrukh Khan, which now shows as a new article (R from move) that has already been edited several times in its short life. Did you want to re-attach this history to the new redirect? Or delete it? My apologies if this is a standard practice that I have misunderstood. Lithopsian (talk) 14:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Lithopsian: Before I moved Shahrukh Khan to Shahrukh Khan (disambiguation), I looked first to see what was already at Shahrukh Khan (disambiguation), and I found there a big accumulation of old redirects and old short abortive starts at writing articles. So I moved all that junk aside to another name, and I then made the move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- That's fine. So long as it was intentional to ditch the junk. Lithopsian (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Move deleted parallel history for John Howe (Australian settler)
The page John Howe (Australian settler) had some deleted history, which unfortunately is WP:Parallel histories. You should therefore do the following:
- Move the deleted edits for John Howe (Australian settler) to John Howe (Australian settler) (version 2).
- Redirect John Howe (Australian settler) (version 2) to John Howe (Australian settler).
- Finally, revdel the text of all of the previous non-redirect edits for John Howe (Australian settler) (version 2), including the move.
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Find My
Hi Anthony,
I was hoping you could reconsider and hopefully retract your comments at Talk:Find_My#Requested_move_24_September_2019, especially about calling for a "text-merge" of two articles that really doesn't make sense to me, and I think is confusing further an already confusing situation. Thanks, --В²C ☎ 19:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Nonsky (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Nonsky: I cannot find any article named CHUKWUNONSO EZEKWUECHE or similar created by you, either deleted or undeleted. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Here is the link again
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chukwunonso_ezekwueche It was speedy deleted by an administrator PhilKnight Here is the screenshot. Please I would appreciate any help you would render. Thanks so much.
Nonsky (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I did not create the article myself because its my biography and I am aware it is against the terms and conditions of Wikipedia to create your own page. I had a freelancer create it Nonsky (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
If by any chance the page is not recoverable, could you please use your good office to help me make a new one that would stick. That would really make my day. Thanks in advance Nonsky (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
@Anthony Appleyard: I think Nonsky may be a spammer. Look at his contributions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I am not a spammer, I am a pharmacist and an influencer on instagram @_nonsky and a responsible human being. i am simply desperately appealing for my article to be reviewed and undeleted thats why i contacted a few admins. I also attached a screenshot of my deleted page. Sorry if my repetitive emails goes against your policies. Im hoping someone helps me out. ThanksNonsky (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Nonsky and Mvcg66b3r: To Nonsky :: sorry, but the matter in article Chukwunonso ezekwueche is clearly advertisement and someone's curriculum vitae (CV) and thus cannot stand as a Wikipedia article. (I am an administrator and thus I can read deleted articles.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:29, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
To Anthony Appleyard: Yikes! That's what happens when you contract an amateur and inexperienced wiki writers who claims to have written 1000 articles. Please could you recommend someone to help me create a good one while following the guidelines. I would be very happy if you can be that person. Thanks in anticipation of your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsky (talk • contribs) 11:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Anthony Appleyard: Trust your day is going good. Could you please help me in creating a new article (Chukwunonso Ezekwueche and Nonsky are one and the same person) even if I have to pay a stipend please. Is there a way to reach you faster? My email is charlscee@gmail.com. Hope to hear from you Nonsky (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Further discussion has taken place at User talk:Nonsky. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Move deleted parallel history for Minerva Bunkering
The page Minerva Bunkering had some parallel history that was deleted at AfD. You should therefore do the following:
- Move the deleted edits for Minerva Bunkering (including the latest redirect) to Minerva Bunkering (version 2).
- Retarget the redirect Minerva Bunkering (version 2) to Minerva Bunkering.
- Revert the page Talk:Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. to the revision as of 10:47, 11 September 2019.
- Finally, move the page Talk:Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. to Talk:Minerva Bunkering (version 2) without leaving a redirect behind.
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:34, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Fix histmerge for September 1913
You have left one edit from March 2015 in the history of September 1913 (disambiguation). You should therefore move that edit to September 1913 also. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hagerstown Suns
- @NatureBoyMD:
- What in detail do you want me to do with pages Hagerstown Suns and History of the Hagerstown Suns? At about 13:38, 10 October 2019 you cut-and-pasted part of page Hagerstown Suns to History of the Hagerstown Suns in a text-split :: the history-transfer that you seem to want, would cut one edit history while re-connecting another edit history.
- As you wrote, the edit history of History of the Hagerstown Suns before 21:16, 7 October 2019 seems to have been carried across from a sandbox; where do you want me to move it back to?
- @Anthony Appleyard: Hagerstown Suns is fine as it is. History of the Hagerstown Suns, which was split from the previous article, contains the history of my sandbox. While there's nothing wrong with its edit history from my sandbox, it seems inappropriate for History of the Hagerstown Suns to contain my prior sandbox history with work on unrelated projects. Is it possible for the history article to have the edit history up to Old revision of Hagerstown Suns and continuing from Old revision of History of the Hagerstown Suns? NatureBoyMD (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NatureBoyMD: I have moved the older edits of History of the Hagerstown Suns to History of the Hagerstown Suns/old sandbox. Then I merged older edits of Hagerstown Suns to History of the Hagerstown Suns. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: Follow-up question: Is it possible to restore the edit history of Hagerstown Suns up to and including Old revision of Hagerstown Suns to Hagerstown Suns so its complete edit history can be seen there as well as at History of the Hagerstown Suns? NatureBoyMD (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NatureBoyMD: Currently Hagerstown Suns and History of the Hagerstown Suns and History of the Hagerstown Suns/old sandbox have no deleted edits. All of their edits are visible. About "so its complete edit history can be seen there as well as at ...", sorry, an edit can only be in one place at a time. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- I see. Thank you. NatureBoyMD (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
History merge request
Could you merge the history of Draft:Masters of the Air into Masters of the Air? Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 21:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Re: Infobox tropical cyclone/temp
{{Infobox tropical cyclone/temp}}
Hey,
Ordinarily, I would do a round-robin move with pageswap.js, however with the high usage of the template, I thought it unwise to suppress the redirect even for a second. The alternative would be, of course, moving it over {{Infobox hurricane}}, but as a lowly page mover, I can't do that myself. Sceptre (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Sceptre: What is the situation here? The histories of Template:Infobox tropical cyclone/temp and Template:Infobox hurricane are both only a string of redirects ending in a redirect to Template:Infobox tropical cyclone. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- There was a requested move which resulted in a move; because I'm not an admin, I had to do a round-robin move. Because of the move today, {{Infobox hurricane}} has a trivial edit history, but because it's high-transclusion, an move overwriting {{Infobox hurricane}} suppressing the redirect is probably the best to preserve the longer history of the temp page. Sceptre (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Fifteen years of editing!
Wow, congrats, Anthony, and thanks for your tireless service to the project! Dicklyon (talk) 02:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear Anthony Appleyard/2019/July-December,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 01:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Let's drink to getting older. It beats the alternative. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day!
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Page mover#RfC: Should Page Movers be permitted to move move-protected pages?
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Page mover#RfC: Should Page Movers be permitted to move move-protected pages?. — IVORK Discuss 08:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Looking at the edits you have made 15 years ago, the first (non-deleted) one with an edit summary was to the article Jacques Cousteau at 06:50, 27 October 2004 (I added a fact to the paragraph "Married in...": info from his book "The Silent World"..). All of your non-deleted edits before 06:50, 27 October 2004 lack edit summaries. Do you also have a deleted edit before 06:50, 27 October 2004 with an edit summary? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GeoffreyT2000: "All of your non-deleted edits before 06:50, 27 October 2004 lack edit summaries" :: of my deleted edits before about then, a few have edit comments, but most do not. I started using edit comments for all edits after that because I was told that I had to start using edit comments for all edits for me to have a chance of becoming an administrator. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:37, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Count Iblis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Count Iblis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Iblis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Redirect deletion request
Would you be able to delete the redirect French Exit (upcoming film)? It had been initially redirected into a draft so that the redirect could be deleted for such but was subsequently redirected elsewhere. Anyway, the film is now shooting and I would like to be able to move Draft:French Exit (upcoming film) into that space. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 16:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Rusted AutoParts: Not yet, sorry: French Exit (upcoming film) has incoming links. Best ask me when the time to move Draft:French Exit (upcoming film) comes, Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- It is time to move the draft article, filming has now began. Source. Rusted AutoParts 17:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Rusted AutoParts: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Dana Gas
Hi, Anthony. Could you please move User:Fatima at Dana Gas/Dana Gas to Dana Gas together with history merger? Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anyuyskiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilibin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
DIA talk redirect?
Hi. You "moved page Talk:Defense Intelligence Agency to Talk:Defense Intelligence Agency (United States) without leaving a redirect". Was the lack of a redirect intentional, given that there is a redirect from Defense Intelligence Agency to Defense Intelligence Agency (United States)? Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 23:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- @AlanM1: Like you say, I did not think that a redirect from talk to talk would be necessary, after I checked which pages redirected to Talk:Defense Intelligence Agency. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I can't revert the silly page move here. Please return to the old title, thanks, Johnbod (talk) 03:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy review
Hi Anthony Appleyard, you speedied Bagio White as WP:G4, the AFD is 4 years old and the subject has since gained significant coverage in reliable sources. Thanks Ceethekreator (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done @Ceethekreator:: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagio White (2nd nomination). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Keep up the good work Anthony Appleyard! Good luck! Cheers! CentralTime301 03:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC) |
Your behavior is absolutely unacceptable
I caught your horrible edits to the raids article. You had the nerve to write in the edit summary that you provided references specifically "as asked", even though you just made a list of books at the bottom of the page, and did not use proper Template:Sfn citations as I specifically told you to. Also, you failed to make ANY copyedits to the list, and by doing so, you published the most god-awful unprofessional rough draft I have ever seen. It is absolutely not OK for text in a Wikipedia article to contain so many question marks (that aren't even quotes, but from a confused writer) like that. It is not acceptable to bring up Russian Wikipedia as being the source of the list in the article text. It better not be the only source, because WP:CIRCULAR is a rule. It is not unreasonable, in fact it is generous, to ask only for at least one citation per paragraph and basic copyediting so that the list is at least slightly comprehensible to an English speaker as opposed to looking like a robot spit it out. And in your reversion to the list, you brought back many other problems with the article that I spent my time taking care of - you merged the references and footnotes section and messed up many citations that I took my time finding ISBN, OCLC, author, and page number information for. THAT IS NOT OK. Put the list in your sandbox and fix it before even considering putting it back in the article, and DO NOT hit the revert button again. Damaging the article by going back to old, bad formatting just to add your precious list is not OK. Adding that list, which was trash not content, at the expense of other parts of the article IS NOT OK. You are not a new user, you should know how to edit things in your sandbox by now. And you should know better than to publish such a long amount of text that is not supported by sufficient IN LINE citations to reliable sources. Since you clearly just want to base English Wikipedia off Russian Wikipedia without any checking of Russian Wikipedia itself, perhaps you would be better off editing on Russian Wikipedia instead. You would like editing there, since most of the stuff they make is uncited like your work anyway. I hope to never see your username in the page edit history again.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: I directly literally translated the references that were in the Russian article ru:Крымско-ногайские набеги на Русь. (click on "История" (= "history") ("байт" = bytes)). The above complaints should be addressed to whoever wrote those parts of the Russian article. If Russian referencing is not acceptable by English standards, I will accept that. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- First of all it's rather generous to call what you added to the article to be a translation. It looks far more like a copy-paste google translate without any copyediting and numerous basic english errors. Just because you "translated" references listed at the bottom of the Russian page doesn't mean you provided the in-line citations required by English Wikipedia. As you know, Russian Wikipedia is far less strignent about sourcing and citation matters, resulting in hoaxes and unsourced claims being very common. Point being, if you can't support what you get from Russian Wikipedia with enough inline citations and are unwilling to do basic copyediting, don't even bother putting it in the article. This is not Russian Wikipedia, citations are not a "bonus feature" here, they are required.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- In case it isn't incredibly obvious - Russian Wikipedia is very lenient about sourcing stuff compared to english Wikipedia. Something being on Russian Wikipedia isn't an excuse to barf it up through google translate onto enwiki. I don't care who wrote it on ruwiki, or who brought it to enwiki; YOU restored it knowing it was poorly written, poorly sourced, and that consensus was against restoring it without SERIOUS changes. But you restored it anyway. Not ok.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- First of all it's rather generous to call what you added to the article to be a translation. It looks far more like a copy-paste google translate without any copyediting and numerous basic english errors. Just because you "translated" references listed at the bottom of the Russian page doesn't mean you provided the in-line citations required by English Wikipedia. As you know, Russian Wikipedia is far less strignent about sourcing and citation matters, resulting in hoaxes and unsourced claims being very common. Point being, if you can't support what you get from Russian Wikipedia with enough inline citations and are unwilling to do basic copyediting, don't even bother putting it in the article. This is not Russian Wikipedia, citations are not a "bonus feature" here, they are required.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: I understand. Thanks for pointing it out. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Re: Gas van
The original move had no discussion and no consensus supporting it (the person making it admitted it was WP:BOLD.) I'm concerned that you opened WP:RM without first reverting it (after all, that could go on for an entire week, with the page remaining split the entire time; and leaving it in this state increases the complexity of reversing the merge if, as seems likely, the discussion fails to reach a consensus to support the split.) My understanding is that the whole purpose of a "Requests to revert undiscussed moves" option is that such moves get reverted immediately, no questions asked, and then discussions are held to determine what happens. Otherwise, I mean - is your interpretation of the relevant policy that if someone (with no prior discussion or consensus) moves a page, edits the redirect, then contests the reversal of their action, their edit remains in place the entire time the RM is open, simply because, as a technical matter, it is impossible to revert without admin action? (And, to be clear, a failure to reach a consensus in the WP:RFC will result in the split being reversed - that is, the article being moved back to Gas van, correct? Since the original move was undiscussed.) Plainly moving an article and then editing the redirect to prevent revision is improper and doesn't result in Nug's proposal becoming the longstanding version we default to if he fails to produce a consensus supporting it. --Aquillion (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your moves relating to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gay Nigger Association of America (10th nomination). DannyS712 (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC) |
Move Talk:Chill Out to Talk:Chill Out (KLF album)
You have left Talk:Chill Out behind while moving Chill Out to Chill Out (KLF album). To complete the move, you should also move Talk:Chill Out to Talk:Chill Out (KLF album). The target has no significant history that needs to be preserved. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Eloah
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Eloah. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Elohim. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Elohim. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~riley (talk) 07:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- @~riley: I created it as a redirect, way back at 18:53, 8 December 2004. Since then, I have not touched it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please ignore this, this is a m:SWViewer error. My apologies! ~riley (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
AfD of Jersey's population
Please complete your nomination of Jersey's population or withdraw it. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 06:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Opinions invited
Hi Anthony, It has been almost a year and a half since I was granted the page mover bit after which I started helping at WP:RMT. I have learnt a lot in the past months. I wanted to get some feedback on my workdone at RMT, and asking you since you are the most active admin over there. Is my work good/satisfactory/poor etc ? Is there something that I can improve so that I can contribute in a better way ? Please ping me when you reply.--DBigXrayᗙ 06:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
"Untitled Judd Apatow/Pete Davidson film" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Judd Apatow/Pete Davidson film. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Judd Apatow/Pete Davidson film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Tag Question
Hi i see a tag on my created article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kamal_Mustafa_(filmmaker) it is in mainspace can you tell me how to fix this tag ? i mean should i move it or will admin do it if admin will do it then how ? a little confused.
Thanks Memon KutianaWala (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The article Northstar Electronics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this company passes WP:NCOMPANY. BEFORE doesn't show anything but mentions in passing/primary sources/press releases and like.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Help with Page Move
Hi Anthony, thanks for sorting out the David Wanklyn article name. I got into a bit of a pickle with the temporarily-named page. Regards, MidnightBlue (Talk) 16:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Restore improper deletion
Please restore Sistine Stallone. The page was deleted against policy as it consisted of numerous substantial edits by others, invalidating the reason for deletion (WP:G5). 193.109.85.12 (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Stranger to Stranger move
I noticed that you moved Stranger to Stranger to Stranger to Stranger (Paul Simon album). The page originally had the latter name until a discussion voted to move it per WP:TWODABS. Poydoo (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, hate to be a bother, but can you get the talk page too: Talk:Stranger to Stranger (Paul Simon album). Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 04:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Question
Hi, I was wondering, who is the blocked user who created the article of the battle of Aden. I see no mention of him in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Aden (2019).--SharabSalam (talk)
- @SharabSalam: At 15:49, 22 August 2019 User:Bill497 created Battle of Aden (2019). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Carlos de León → Carlos De León
Hi Anthony. De is correct in caps in this boxer's article name, as shown via all sources. I'm not sure why the article's name has been incorrect on this matter for so long, but am requesting that if you could move it back to where it correctly was prior to the article's inappropriate move to begin with. Please move article from Carlos de León to Carlos De León, if you would. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Discographer: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Discographer (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of History of the Hagerstown Suns/old sandbox
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on History of the Hagerstown Suns/old sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 14:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
I realize that this happened two weeks ago, and you might not remember everything specifically, but I have a question. You moved Draft:Amit Ramani back to User:Rishabhbehre/sandbox. This prevented my usual step of moving the sandbox back into draft space and took me a few minutes to figure out what had happened. I am planning to move the redirect into neverland so that I can move the draft back to where it belongs. Is there a reason why that is dangerous? Exactly what was done to require a histmerge? And are Rishabhbehre and Peterdeegan really two different accounts? And do you have any thoughts except that the previous versions of the BLP were not ready for mainspace? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Robert McClenon: Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Completed requests November 2019 shows that I history-merged Draft:Amit Ramani to User:Rishabhbehre/sandbox (asked for by {{db-copypaste}}) at 22:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC), as it was in Category:Candidates for history merging. If you want me to move either of those 2 pages to somewhere else, please say what you want me to move to where. I have never had any contact with users User:Rishabhbehre and User:Peterdeegan, and I have not seen any suspicion about one being a sockpuppet of the other. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I see that I replaced one of the drafts with a redirect to the other one and rejected it. I think that is that, unless one of them asks for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- They are the same person. They have been blocked for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I see that I replaced one of the drafts with a redirect to the other one and rejected it. I think that is that, unless one of them asks for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
ANI NOTICE
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regice2020 (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
pages
Draft:2025 in film and Draft:2026 in film
Can u restore edits not deleted as hoax? The first bits deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:45 (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Move deleted edits for Yaroslav Volkov to Yaroslav Volkov (disambiguation)
The page Yaroslav Volkov had some deleted disambiguation page edits. You should therefore move the deleted edits for Yaroslav Volkov and Talk:Yaroslav Volkov to Yaroslav Volkov (disambiguation) and Talk:Yaroslav Volkov (disambiguation) respectively. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
"Report (noise)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Report (noise). Since you had some involvement with the Report (noise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Smjg (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Page moves
Hi, could you move "Chuck Hall" back to "Chuck Hall (Florida politician)", and make "Chuck Hall" a disambiguation page? That was always the intention, but the disambiguation page was quickly deleted minutes after creation, and the page for the Florida politician was moved before I could finish creating the page for the Oklahoma politician.
Also, could you take a look at "Matt Silva"? Currently, the page redirects to Buddy Murphy. I think there could be a case for Matthew Silva, the former dual code rugby player and current coach. The BBC and Wales Online, have referred to him as such, although he did go by Matthew as a player. There are two other sportsmen with similar names: a Canadian footballer (Matt Silva (soccer)) and a Portuguese footballer (Matthew Silva (footballer)), but both are too minor to be the primary topic. However, I'm not against having a disambiguation page for either name.
Many thanks, APM (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Cinema of Georgia
Please review WP:RMUM:
If you disagree with such a move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.
A revert requested of an undiscussed move, as I made here[2], should not be contested. Please revert as requested and close the discussion you started at Talk:Cinema_of_Georgia_(country)#Requested_move_10_December_2019. If an RM was necessary I would have opened one myself with a proper nomination. --В²C ☎ 01:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Never mind. I realized I was able to move it myself, and did so, per WP:RMUM. --В²C ☎ 01:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Move Maharishi University of Management to Maharishi International University
Someone has asked Maharishi International University to be deleted so that Maharishi University of Management can be moved to it. Unfortunately, there are WP:Parallel histories. You should therefore do the following:
- Undelete Maharishi International University and move it to Maharishi International University (version 2).
- Move Maharishi University of Management to Maharishi International University.
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- @GeoffreyT2000: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Also, someone has since deleted Maharishi International University (version 2). You should then restore that page and redirect it to Maharishi International University. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- @GeoffreyT2000: Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Cheers
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well AA. MarnetteD|Talk 19:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
Brahma Chellaney
Hi Anthony, I noticed that you deleted the page "Brahma Chellaney" on grounds that it was promotional. I may be wrong but the action seems a bit drastic. The page had existed for over 10 years on Wikipedia. Professor Chellaney is a notable personality, as a quick Google search will reveal. In fact, he is one of India's best known public intellectuals.
Wikipedia pages of living personalities, at least to some degree, tend to be promotional. As you would appreciate, strictly objective pages of living persons are not easy to create.
May I request you to please reconsider your decision to delete the page? You may delete any sections that you believe to be promotional while keeping the rest. Otherwise, it might seem odd that lesser known Indian academics are featured on Wikipedia but not someone prominent like Brahma Chellaney.
Best regards. --Alpinespace (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Alpinespace: Done See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahma Chellaney. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Anthony,
I sent you a request yesterday to consider restoring the page "Brahma Chellaney." In response, I received your message saying "Done." Has the page been restored? I am unable to see it.
If you have not already done so, may I again request you to please restore the page? If you need my help to clean up anything that may be promotional in nature on that page, I will be happy to help out.
Best regards. --Alpinespace (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Alpinespace: I undeleted page Brahma Chellaney,it, and it has been deleted again: for reason, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahma Chellaney. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Anthony, I now see that you undeleted the page Brahma Chellaney yesterday, but a few hours later, it was deleted again. Can you please undelete the page again to give me an opportunity to revise it, including by eliminating any promotional references? Best regards. --Alpinespace (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Alpinespace: If I merely undeleted it again, somebody would likely re-delete it. I have copied its latest edit into User talk:Alpinespace/sandbox. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Many thanks Anthony for sharing the editable file of the deleted page "Brahma Chellaney." I need your advice, as you are an experienced and respected Wiki editor and administrator. Is it okay if I create a shorter, more objective version of the deleted page? I will appreciate any advice from you. Best regards. --Alpinespace (talk) 06:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Alpinespace: Best first read Wikipedia:Advertising. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Merge pages?
for Draft:2023 in film (non hoax), Draft:The Lego Batman Movie 2? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.201.87 (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Good luck
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはAnthony Appleyardたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
"Roman and Byzantine Greece" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roman and Byzantine Greece. Since you had some involvement with the Roman and Byzantine Greece redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Move deleted edits for Institute of Democratic Society to Institute of Democratic Society (Ukraine)
The page Institute of Democratic Society had some deleted history as the result of an AfD. You should therefore move the deleted edits for Institute of Democratic Society and Talk:Institute of Democratic Society to Institute of Democratic Society (Ukraine) and Talk:Institute of Democratic Society (Ukraine) respectively. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Move Hispanic Americans to Hispanic and Latino Americans and Hispanic Americans (version 2) to Hispanic Americans
The discussion at Talk:Hispanic Americans#Requested move 22 December 2019 has been closed as "page moved". You should therefore move Hispanic Americans to Hispanic and Latino Americans, and Hispanic Americans (version 2) to Hispanic Americans. Both of these moves should be done without leaving redirects behind. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 06:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
How to deal with some old edits in a deleted draft
Hi Anthony. Could you take a quick look at [3]? I see a bunch of edits in the deleted version, and I'm unsure if those can be deleted via G6 (which I just did). There has been a dispute for the last couple of months on whether a certain institution should be called Punjab Sports University or Maharaja Bhupinder Singh Punjab Sports University. There have been two RM's this fall at Talk:Punjab Sports University which declined the move to the longer name. Since I haven't done a history merge lately I'm unclear on whether these old edits are deletable or if they need to be kept somewhere in mainspace. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: I have undeleted Draft:Maharaja Bhupinder Singh Punjab Sports University. Its latest edit redirects to Punjab Sports University. It is WP:Parallel histories with the edits now in Punjab Sports University. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- If it is now viewed as a parallel history situation, then presumably we don't object if another admin wants to delete the draft? EdJohnston (talk) 16:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: Do whatever you like with it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)