Jump to content

User talk:Anoopggggg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anoopggggg, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Anoopggggg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Suresh kumar big producer Anoopggggg (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, he is not. 2409:4073:29E:FD68:21D2:2966:7E44:FDCC (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You dont know him Ask any Superstar Anoopggggg (talk) 09:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manju Warrier, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 06:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Dileep. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David Biddulph (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He is called JANAPRIYANAYAKAN I added that Just srarch google big magazines refer him

Anoopggggg (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://newsable.asianetnews.com/amp/editorial/being-human-salmanification-of-janapriya-nayakan-dileep


Asianet biggest malayalam TV Anoopggggg (talk) 09:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.sify.com/movies/janapriya-nayakan-dileep-is-all-set-to-rule-mollywood-this-vishu-season-news-malayalam-senlmFecdddgi.html Anoopggggg (talk) 09:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even mention inside movie Anoopggggg (talk) 09:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why wikipedia mention manju warrier as ladysuperstar First it is Nayanthara Second she is not mentioned any where Anoopggggg (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is bloody femnist Anoopggggg (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alina Padikkal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 05:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She is an actress on television and contestant in Bigg Boss Anoopggggg (talk) 05:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She is merely a "small artist". 2409:4073:29E:FD68:21D2:2966:7E44:FDCC (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on G. Suresh Kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Arya (actress). Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

[edit]

I don't know what this was, but talk pages are for discussing changes to articles, not for general banter. We probably also don't need three different comments. One will typically suffice. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G. Suresh Kumar moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, G. Suresh Kumar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Dileep. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 09:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you can't add claims based on a single source, or any promotionally worded claims, as if they were facts or in Wikipedia's voice. In addition, the "title" claim is impossible to understand and tells our readers nothing unless they already know what that title means. --bonadea contributions talk 09:21, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dileep. Nyook 09:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JANAPRIYANAYAKAN

[edit]

Nook who are you

Mind you business


Dileep is JANAPRIYANAYAKAN Feminist prostitute hate him Which source u wan Anoopggggg (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manju Warrier. bonadea contributions talk 09:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Manju Warrier, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Stop adding incoherent gibberish (yes, I realise that it is actually content in two different languages but it amounts to gibberish) in some kind of retaliation. Info about her personal life is already in the article. If you have content you want to add to Dileep and other editors disagree, you go to the article's talk page and discuss, without attacking other editors and without vandalising other articles. bonadea contributions talk 09:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:G. Suresh Kumar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:G. Suresh Kumar

[edit]

Hello, Anoopggggg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "G. Suresh Kumar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alina Padikkal moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Alina Padikkal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JK (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alina Padikkal1 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alina Padikkal1. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albinjose636, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Fiddle Faddle 14:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]