User talk:Angela/Archive24

<<User talk:Angela/Archive23
>>User talk:Angela/Archive25

File source problem with File:Andrelenotre.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Andrelenotre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it was painted by someone who died in 1713, I'm sure you can tell that it's public domain, so I don't see what the problem is. However, as a better version has been uploaded since, it may as well be deleted. Angela . 08:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

Our main datacenter is down, you are accessing our backup datacenter. We are working to fix the problem</div>

What does it mean the </div> character on the end of this message? Are you all right??? O-o

<div> is an HTML tag which shouldn't usually be visible. If you have problems with Wikia, please use Wikia's contact page to report those. Angela . 05:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Pechersky Article

Hi I wrote the Alexander Pechersky (Sobibor Death Camp) article and it was given a C rating. I submitted it for a boost to at least a B, but the person in charge of making that decision is making strange requests prior to his/her approval that I feel will ruin the article. I dont know any admins or bosses on Wikipedia, I just create original content. As a neutral party would you please look at the article if you got a moment, and give a bit of input? Thank you. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Angela please rename me to Matheus! to unify with my account on wikipedia lusophonic. Thanks --NetworkTV (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The name Matheus is already taken. Please see WP:CHU. Angela . 02:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please help

hello! I am member of the Georgian Wikipedia. I have a Global Account in the name of David1010 but I can not combine it with other accounts. I do not remember my password or e-mail. Maybe you can help me to join the english account with other accounts. User:David1010--94.137.169.234 (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help you to recover your password. You might be able to get help if you write to OTRS (See WP:Contact). Angela . 23:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove the User:David1010's account, so I could re-unite with my global account--94.137.169.234 (talk) 13:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to usurp the account, please see the instructions on WP:USURP. Angela . 14:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Angela, I just noticed this edit and wanted to thank you for the work you put in as bureaucrat on this project over the years. WJBscribe (talk) 15:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

_____________________________________________________ Thank you for deleting my page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.143.234.0 (talk) 15:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Meetup :-)

See the meetup page for further information - short version is that we're hoping to meet in a fortnight in the city for a beer and a chat. Minors and Miners are welcome, with a responsible adult and a minimum of coal dust ;-) - do try and get out if you can, it's been a little while since wiki folk met in Sydney :-) cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Starling's recent leave from Wikimedia Foundation.

I just read about Tim's leave in the Signpost and wish to convey my congratulations to you and Tim. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 00:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Angela . 03:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eaton Rapids Campmeeting

The website for the page you deleted is here. http://www.eatonrapidscampmeeting.org

You identified this page as a club. It is an organization. It has over two hundred members or so. I know this because I am one myself. However I did not have time to work on the page, only to start it.

Sorry.

I don't have time, but would like the "Please help with this page" tag included.

Could you manage to do that for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Austinburk (talk • contribs) 06:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it might be better for you to draft this in your userspace at User:Austinburk/Eaton Rapids Campmeeting to start with. Make sure that some references are added. Have you seen the help page at wikipedia:your first article? Angela . 04:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I lovee youuu Legend :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.60.28 (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An Ask

Hello,please make my userpage (User:فرامرز دانا) to a semi-protected Article. Thanks (Faramarz) —Preceding undated comment added 13:12, 10 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Angela . 23:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 04:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Majid Zabuli for deletion

The article Abdul Majid Zabuli is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Majid Zabuli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. David in DC (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, but I don't think you need to inform everyone that has edited an article that it has been listed for deletion. My only involvement was adding a missing bracket 7 years ago! Angela . 08:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SmallBASIC for deletion

The article SmallBASIC is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmallBASIC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Banaticus (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above... I don't see a need to inform me about something I formatted 7 years ago! :) Angela . 10:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dancing Rabbit

The article Dancing Rabbit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable organisation

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I suddenly getting spammed about articles I edited 7 years ago? I didn't write any of these and I don't care if they're deleted. Angela . 04:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Twinkle does it automatically regardless of the age of the article. In this case you did a page move. Feel free to support or oppose the PROD. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

undo deletions by media relations head at Clearstream

. . .

I have proposed to undo deletions made by the media relations head from Clearstream, see

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Clearstream#undo_deletions_by_media_relations_head_at_clearstream

I am alerting you to this proposed Undo as you have either made edits on the Clearstream pages themselves, or interacted with other editors who have.

Avaiki (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care. (See above) Angela . 12:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is the Jellochuu (now Sade) on this wiki the same as the one on Wikia? 70.90.186.145 (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I recommend that you ask them. Angela . 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My IP changed now so I asked him and I have seen not even a reply :/ why? 24.206.37.173 (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they're not replying because they're no longer active on the wiki so haven't seen your message. Angela . 03:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Seeing that I am banned on wikia infintitely, and Brandon Rhea left me a message about Piratehunter. Can you tell Brandon Rhea that I am banned cross-wikia forever and another favor. Can you please unblock me. I have been helping wikia a lot and one last thing. Can I be a VSTF there? Slipknot Darkrai (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to contact Brandon via special:contact which is also a better place to discuss Wikia issues than here. Angela . 13:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no e-mail :( also why can't you unblock me? You are the boss of the wiki and I asked you three times if I can be a VSTF on wikia and zero replies yes zero. Thanks Slipknot Darkrai (talk) 12:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to discuss Wikia issues here. You don't need an email to use special:contact if you wanted to leave Brandon a message, though he obviously wouldn't be able to reply to you by email. Angela . 12:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've contacted staff. Can you help me out now? Thanks... Slipknot Darkrai (talk) 12:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you want to be unblocked from Wikia? Being blocked was the best thing that happened to me, Solar Dragon! I am now on a better host and if I was you, I would move any wikis you edit(ed) on away from Wikia. 92.7.184.10 (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awarded Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all your contributions and hard work on the encyclopedia, I am pleased to present Angela Beesley with this Tireless Contributor Barnstar. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) I haven't had a barnstar for ages. Angela . 10:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sagittaria.jpg

Much appreciated if a more detailed description for this can be provided so the image can be moved to Commons. :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't upload this. I just renamed it. I don't have any more info than is on the page. Angela . 23:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid-metro-map-300px.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madrid-metro-map-300px.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 22:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed now there is automatic thumbnailing. Angela . 05:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikia logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikia logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 16:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented there. Angela . 04:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notzrim

I am asking unofficially on behalf of anon users in desperate need of help at Talk:Notzrim on how to deal with disruptions to team efforts by a very belligerent/aggressive sock-puppet/troll. Once upon a time anon-users were an integral part of the building of the encyclopedia, but now we are increasingly sidelined due to bad behavior of a troublesome but comparatively small minority. On principle I do not want to get a wiki account. I hope this choice can be respected. But I find that my requests for help are being ignored. I am looking for a guardian angel from someone very experienced in wiki policy to watch over our process and a friendly voice to tell us where we are going wrong. Can you recommend anyone or at least point me in the right direction? :( 81.103.121.144 (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of INFINITY (INDIAN BAND)

WHy did you delete the article on INFINITY (INDIAN BAND)? When you do not know the band or anything about the local scene, you should first do a research on them and then delete them. I want the page back.

It looks like the text had been copied from another site. Content on Wikipedia needs to be available under a free license. You might find this page helpful: Wikipedia:Your first article. Angela . 21:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of INFINITY (INDIAN BAND)

The article was not copied... I have copied my own writing because I did not want to type it again and again.

Please see this page for help with this. Angela . 06:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	This is for your infinite work here at Wikipedia. This is in recon of the effort you made to solve problems without causing conflict --VoxLive, 8 August 2011 VoxLive Architecture® 01:06, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Village pump sections

Wikipedia:Village pump sections, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Village pump sections and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Village pump sections during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	This is for your amazing work on Wikipedia. NehaMich. (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi Angela. Perhaps you're interested in this survey as well? (please revert it if you don't want this message on your user talk) Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Article-cv2

Template:Article-cv2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gh87 (talk) 02:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On wikipedia in interlingue

Why you don't work any more in interlingue? we need coworkers,I hope see you there soon, bye.

Unfortunately, I can't write in Interlingua. I just used to add interwiki links, but that's a task done by bots now. Angela . 23:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey women on Wikipedia

A while ago (on 1 October to be exact) I gave you a link to a survey about women on Wikipedia. Here are the results of it. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sagittaria.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sagittaria.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most up-to-date listing of past and present bots?

Greetings. I am reading through the archived talk:Bots pages for my dissertation work, and I am trying to learn as much as I can about Wikipedia bots. I've noticed that some bots discussed (and sometimes approved) on these talk pages are not listed on the Wikipedia:Bots/Status page, and I'd like to add the missing information as I find it (as well as flag approval dates and purpose of the bot for those that are missing that information). Before I do so, though, I wanted to make sure this is the appropriate page to keep updated. I see there is some discussion about merging Wikipedia:Bots/Status with Wikipedia:Registered_bots, but the former seems to be the more comprehensive and up-to-date list. As I came across your name numerous times in those old archived pages, approving bot flags back in 2004 and 2005, I thought you might know if this is the best page for me to be working on.

Also, as a fairly newbie, I am sometimes overwhelmed with the number of different pages that info on bots was spread out across back then (and still today), so if you have any suggestions on how to sort of organize myself as I search for and read pages on bots (and learn about bots in general), I'd greatly appreciate the direction. Thank you in advance, and if you think this inquiry is best directed to someone else, please let me know who. UOJComm (talk) 21:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can help since I don't have any idea about the current system for this. Hopefully someone can help you on Wikipedia talk:Bots/Status. Angela . 11:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Angela, thank you for the response. Do you know if there are any users who might be able to talk to me about bots historically (i.e. the development of policies, cases for approval, etc. from 04-07ish) as well as current policy and pages? UOJComm (talk) 22:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you are interested only in English Wikipedia bots, but User:Emijrp/Anti-vandalism bot census includes several anti-vandalism bots from en: and other languages. emijrp (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this reference...your census definitely seems important and will be a useful resource for me. Are you aware of any other projects or pages like this that try to chronicle a sub-type of bot? UOJComm (talk) 22:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

You are listed here as interested in Sydney meetups, so I thought I'd let you know about one on this Saturday at 5pm at the Alexandria Hotel. Details here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November_2011. It would be great to see you. --99of9 (talk) 00:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marvelous Work,

Thanks for giving us Wikia..!! --Faizanalivarya (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia Promotion in Pakistan

Dear Angela,

I would like to thank your for giving us such a marvelous platform called Wikia, this is really a master piece honestly, I am from Pakistan therefore I want to promote Wikia in Pakistan, you may find my details on my Wikipedia page and my contact details are given below as well, Again I honestly appreciated your work.

Regards,

Faizan ALI Varya
President
Youth Welfare Organization

I've sent you an email. Angela . 04:17, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SOPA

Wikipedia_talk:SOPA_initiative#Reddit_blackout_Jan._18 – An editor is interested in what actions Wikia is taking against SOPA. Can you please provide some insight? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any info on this beyond what's in Craig's blog post which is mentioned in that discussion. I'll let people know it's being asked about there though. Angela . 22:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Commonspar listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonspar. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonspar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 (talk) 20:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Gallagher

Hi Angela, I'm interested in making an article on Ellen Gallagher, similar in content to one for which you were the deleting administrator back in 2006. Is it alright if I make a new one? I'm still new to editing and would like to avoid the pitfalls that befell the old article, so if you happen to recall what led to the other articles deletion (or know where I can go to find out), please let me know. Thanks! --GogoW24 (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The original article didn't say anything about why this person was notable. The only content was where she lived and attended college. Please look at the notability criteria and be sure this article can meet those. You will certainly need to provide third-party reliable sources. Angela (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks! --GogoW24 (talk) 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborations redux

Hey Angela, if you're not too busy, can I ask you to recall whether the Collaboration (which became WP:ACID) ever linked directly to the main page? I can't find any. Am also proposing something for the mainpage to see if it brings in new editors. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was probably only ever on the Community portal, not the main page. Angela (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Angela, (my apologies for the second posting, dealing with some neatness issues)

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania 2012

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited!

Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up here.
Sarah (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Victorbyron (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Studies Update - August 2012

Hello, members of the Vandalism Studies Project! As some of us are quite new with the Vandalism Studies project, it would make sense for us to re-read some of the past studies, as well as studies outside the project. Please do so if you have a chance, just so we can get into the groove of things. We're planning on attempting to salvage the Obama study (or possibly simply convert it to a new Romney study), as well as hopefully begin our third study this November. If you have any ideas for Study 3, please suggest them! If you have any questions please post them on the project talk page. Thanks, and happy editing - we can't wait to begin working on the project! --Dan653 (talk) and Theo polisme _:)
11:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
_{If you would like to stop receiving Vandalism Studies newsletters, please remove your name from the member list.}

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 18:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Sydney workshop

Hi Angela, as you are listed on Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/Invite I am letting you know that there is a meetup/workshop on 10 November. I hope you can make it. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 16:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

This is for your tireless work. -- RAT -.- Poke it 03:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the bureaucrat policy that alters what you were told at the time of your decratting. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the bureaucrat user right. This includes inactive time prior to your decratting if you were decratted for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFB. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup on Thursday

Just a quick note to invite you to the next Sydney meetup this Thursday evening. Details here. Hope to see you then! (You received this invitation because you are listed here.) --99of9 (talk) 00:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

acknowledgment

The Arabic Wikipedia community Thank you for your contributions in the establishment at the beginning (see here) شكراً جزيلاً --Trabelsiismail (talk) 12:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Angela (talk) 23:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Angela/Archive24,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 14:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you! There are some very memorable names in that category. Angela (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles deletion

Dear Angela, I apologize for the inconvenience, but have no other way than appealing for administrators’ help recover a deleted article.

I published a film article entitled Drits (Derivas), a film by Portuguese director Ricardo Costa. It is the second film from an autobiographic trilogy, Faraways. The article was kept untouched by several months. To my surprise, it was recently eliminated and redirected to the director’s page with no discussion. I undid the redirection, but saw the article was proposed to deletion. Reason: independent, verifiable, secondary resources. I argued that the article couldn’t have but primary sources (the producer’s ones) as it is an upcoming film, like many others listed at upcoming films. A film that has not yet been premiered or distributed may not be commented. Besides, none of the films so listed has ever been deleted or even contested.

At last, in discussion, user User:reddogsix proposed that the article should be renamed to Drifts (film) or similar, and at the same time put at the disambiguation page of Dritf this reference «Drifs, unreleased film by Ricardo Costa (filmmaker). I created a new page for the same article entitled Drifts (Portuguese film). As the semantic root “drift” seemed to be the problem, I replaced the article name to Derivas (Drifts) and published it once more with some improvements. As a result, the article was fast deleted and I blocked for three days.

In the meantime, a new article about the trilogy was published: Faraways, which was proposed to fast deletion as well by the same user, User:reddogsix.

Although unreleased, although having no reliable secondary sources, Drifts is unquestionably an outstanding film for its uniqueness and characteristics: autobiography, comedy, docufiction, metafiction in one. I guess that “outstanding” may be a synonym for “notable” in such cases and that articles like this shouldn’t be deleted without previous cared analyses: important information may be lost.

This sequence of interventions is clearly a personal attack by User:reddogsix, supported by two or three user friend. It has no other explanation. It contributes in nothing to improve articles quality. Mists article, which I created on 10 September 2010, is the latest example. The article structure was unreasonably modified, loosing clarity and useful content.

NOTE: sent to 30 administrators.

Thanks for your attention, User:Tertulius 20:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Sydney editathon - Saturday 23rd November

There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on Saturday 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! (Sorry if you've received this message before - I did a quick check but didn't see it.) 99of9 (talk) 10:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Meetup on Monday evening

There's a Meetup in Sydney on Monday (tomorrow) evening from 5:30pm at the Paragon Hotel Circular Quay. We even have an international guest. See the meetup page for more details and to sign up. Sorry for the late notice - I hope you can make it. --99of9 (talk) 05:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Angela. This is Mervat from the Arabic Wikipedia. I have been reading some old posts and discussions related to the first beginnings of Arabic wikipedia and came across your profile as you were one of the pioneers in Wikipedia. How interesting knowing non-arabs were very helpful in putting the foundations and basis on which our work is building up. All the best wishes to you and accept a big thank you from me to you. --Mervat Salman (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 year club on Swedish Wikipedia

Dear Angela, I have invited you to join the ten year anniversery club on the Swedish Wikipedia, theres a link to that page and the template on your swedish user page, hope you will join! best wishes, Dan Koehl (talk) 13:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

เรียนผู้บริหารวิกิพีเดียที่เคารพ ( Dear Wikipedia administrators respected. )

ข้าพเจ้าสมาชิกวิกิพีเดียสารานุกรม มีความประสงค์ที่จะแจ้งความร้องทุกข์กับท่านผู้บริหารจำนวน 3 ข้อดังนี้ 1.ข้าพเจ้าอยากให้ท่านช่วยปลดผู้ใช้Horusออกจากผู้ดูแลระบบเนื่องจากผู้ใช้คนนี้ไดทำการนำอำนาจที่ท่านมอบหมายมาทำการโดยมิชอบ บิดเบือนข้อมูลของWikipedia Thailand หลายอย่าง ทั้งการบล๊อคผู้ใช้โดยมิชอบ การล๊อคหน้าโดยมิชอบ การล๊อคหน้าโดยมิชอบ การแก้ไขข้อมูลโดยมิชอบ อนึ่งข้าพเจ้าขอเพียงแต่ให้ท่านปลดผู้ใช้ใช้Horusออกจากตำแหน่งผู้ดูแลระบบเป็นการถาวรเท่านั้นมิได้ร้องขอถึงการบล๊อคผู้ใช้ดังกล่าว จึงเรียนมาให้ทราบขอบคุณครับ 2.จากการกระทำที่ผู้ใช้ที่ใช้นามว่าHorusได้ล็อคหน้าเพจของ โรงเรียนสามเสนวิทยาลัย โดยมิชอบทั้งมีการแก้ไขข้อมูลที่บิดเบือนบนหน้าเพจสามเสนวิทยาลัย อนึ่งข้าพเจ้าขอให้ท่านช่วยปลดล็อคหน้าเพจ โรงเรียนสามเสนวิทยาลัย จะเป็นการขอบพระคุณยิ่ง

ทั้งนี้ข้าพเจ้าคิดว่าทางWikipedia The Free Encyclopedia จะให้ความช่วยเหลือข้าพเจ้าตามที่ข้าพเจ้าร้องขอ ขอกราบขอบพระคุณท่านไว้ล่วงหน้า ขอบพระคุณครับ

Happy adminship anniversary!!!

Wishing Angela/Archive24 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Anastasia (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I'd better log in then. :) Funny that this was right after the "Happy adminship anniversary" message. :) Angela (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Never let it be said that our bots can't have a sense of irony...! WJBscribe (talk) 09:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Small Edit I Tried to Make to an Old Comment of Yours

Hi.

It's quite possible you may consider this matter to be utterly unworthy of your time. I read an old comment of yours (from 2003) entitled "Moved to Education in England" on the "Education in England" talk page. I hope you won't find this too obnoxious: I edited one sentence—'For example, Wales no longer have compulsory testing at KS1 and do not publish League Tables.'—changing 'have' to 'has' and 'do' to 'does'.

Some other user (not an administrator) then felt it was necessary to undo the edit, saying, 'don't edit other people's comments.' Of course, it's really none of that person's business, but I do realize some folks find it annoying when someone edits what they've written. That's why I'm writing now to find out whether changing those words bothers you.

I hope all's well, and thank you for reading this!

Thevictor99 (talk) 22:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't bother me but I know that it bothers others so I wouldn't suggest doing it. There's a policy page about this at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments. Angela (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiVIP

Hello! As there is a Wikipedia article about you, you are cordially invited to contribute a short audio recoding of your spoken voice, so that our readers may know what you sound like and how you pronounce your name. Details of how to do so, and examples, are at Wikipedia:Voice intro project. Please feel free to ask for help or clarification on the project talk page, or my talk page. --1Veertje (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Kitten of the Best Wikipedian

Wosky87 (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sajora Nayasa (WikiPeace)

	Sajora Nayasa (WikiPeace)
	I like you because of peace on WikiPedia (or you can call WikiPeace "Sajora Nayasa".) Wosky87 (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

Hi. You've been listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose to not be listed, feel free to remove your name from the list. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still here, always will be. :) Angela (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to know you are not!! :) Antonio el Retrasado Martin (dilo aqui) 09:55, 9 January, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Good to see you're still here too, Antonio. Angela (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been nominated for deletion (again)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley Starling (2nd nomination). Everymorning talk 17:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be useful if you could verify if your preference for deletion still stands, so we know whether WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE is relevant. CorporateM (Talk) 10:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ALUG

Dear Angela, since it is hard to contact you why you do not DELETE ALL the pages previous created ? Including you. That would be an advantage. My page created was for history since it was the first Linux User Group abroad Finland, the first big Debugging group for hardware and Software. The First Linux UserGroup in Antwerp who helped Linus Torvalds in the first years before firms came into the picture. Thanks for Deleting this wonderfull historic info!!! I have still a lot of historic info but since you like to delete I must save my info to the local Archive not consultative via internet ! Congratulations....

Patrick.Op de Beeck at gmail, Linux Pioneer, Chairman of ALUG till 2005

Hello Patrick. I think you are referring to the ALUG article, which I deleted in 2011. Articles on the English Wikipedia need to be written in English and need to meet certain notability requirements and reliable sources would be required if you wanted to recreate an article on this topic. You may want to read the help page about writing your first article. Angela (talk) 11:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Award — Platinum Star

Hi Angela. I recently returned to Wikipedia after an 8-year hibernation ... only to find that you don't seem to be much around these days. But for all the work you did for so many years, I want to award you the Platinum Star. I was going to put it on your user page, but I'll respect your privacy there:-)

This editor is a
**Master Editor II**
and is entitled to display this Platinum
Editor Star.

David Cannon (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, David! I'll add it here. Angela (talk) 09:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements

You are receiving this message because you are listed at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Former bureaucrats. Writ Keeper pointed out that these users were not directly notified of the community discussion ending August 2015, where consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years.

As of 1 October 2015, any former bureaucrat who has not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years that wishes their bureaucrat permissions restored will need to request reinstatement at RFB.

If you intend to return to bureaucrat activity, please request restoration of permissions before 1 October 2015 or three years passes since your last bureaucrat activity, whichever is later.

“

Bureaucrats are expected to exercise the duties granted by their role while remaining cognizant of relevant community standards concerning their tasks. In addition to the "Inactive bureaucrat accounts" requirements, if a bureaucrat does not participate in bureaucrat activity^[1] for over three years, their bureaucrat permissions may be removed. The user must be notified on their talk page and by email one month before the removal, and again and a few days prior to the removal. If the user does not return to bureaucrat activity, another bureaucrat may request the removal of permissions at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Permissions removed for not meeting bureaucrat activity requirements may be re-obtained through a new request for bureaucratship.

^ Bureaucrat activity is widely construed and includes acting or commenting as a bureaucrat at any venue including WP:BN/RFA/RFB/RFBAG/BRFA and responding to requests in their capacity as a global renamer or subscriber to the bureaucrats' mailing list or signalling that they remain actively engaged and available for bureacrat tasks.

”

To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity. Modeled after Wikipedia:Inactive administrators and similar to that process, the log page will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal.

If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFB. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. –xeno^talk 20:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that any potential restoration of permissions is also subject to Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Inactive bureaucrat accounts: a former bureaucrat who has been completely inactive for three years would need to seek reinstatement at WP:RFB notwithstanding the above. –xeno^talk 12:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Test intro

A tag has been placed on Template:Test intro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This one got missed in Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_26#Old_Test_Edit_Warnings

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 04:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

San Angelo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect San Angelo. Since you had some involvement with the San Angelo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Meetup next Thursday evening

You are invited to the Sydney Meetup!

Thursday 15 September at 6PM at Petersham Bowling Club.
(a) accessible by train - Petersham station

(b) has some nice draught beers

(c) has some nice food

(d) has some quiet areas outside and inside...so people can chat without getting a hoarse voice by shouting over 100 decibels of muzak etc.

(e) accessible by car with straightforward parking nearby

This message was delivered to the invitation list - to opt out of future invitations please remove your name from the list. 04:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Angela. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Angela.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Angela. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Angela. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.1

Newsletter Nr 1 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)

Participation:

This is the very first newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, see below)

Progress report:

Since the Projects very first edit 9 december 2002 by User:Dan Koehl, which eventually became the WikiProject Genealogy, different templates were developed, and the portal Portal:Genealogy was founded by User:Michael A. White in 2008. Over the years a number of articles has been written, with more or less association to genealogy. And, very exciting, there is a proposal made on Meta by User:Another Believer to found a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you havnt done so already.

Future:

The future of the Genealogy project on the English Wikipedia, and a potential creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

You can

discuss on the projects talk page how the project should be developed
sign as member or supporter at the projects member list
Check the goal, tasks and see if something interest you.
put the User box on your user page by inserting the Template:User WikiProject Genealogy with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}.
develop or update the Portal:Genealogy?
in case you havnt read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look
support that project with your vote.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy founder and coordinator Dan Koehl

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery Dan Koehl (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Angela, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13

Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

A recent RfC has redefined how articles on schools are evaluated at AfD. Specifically, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
AfDs that receive little participation should now be closed like an expired proposed deletion, following a deletion process RfC.
Defender, HakanIST, Matiia and Sjoerddebruin are our newest stewards, following the 2017 steward elections.
The 2017 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Góngora, Krd, Lankiveil, Richwales and Vogone. They will serve for approximately 1 year.

Technical news

A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

TheDJ

Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim

Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Wikipedia forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.

Technical news

You can now see a list of all autoblocks at Special:AutoblockList.
There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
Administrators, bureaucrats and stewards can now set an expiry date when granting user rights. (discuss, permalink)

Miscellaneous

Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capital of Holland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capital of Holland. Since you had some involvement with the Capital of Holland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 23:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn

ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
An RfC regarding the bot policy has closed with changes to the section describing restrictions on cosmetic changes.

Technical news

Users will soon be able to blacklist specific users from sending them notifications.

Miscellaneous

Following the 2017 elections, the new members of the Board of Trustees include Raystorm, Pundit and Doc James. They will serve three-year terms.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

Happyme22 • Dragons flight

Zad68

Guideline and policy news

The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.

Technical news

Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding ?fuzzy=1 to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.
A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.

Miscellaneous

A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 2 – 13 July 2017

Facto Post – Issue 2 – 13 July 2017

Editorial: Core models and topics

Wikimedians interest themselves in everything under the sun — and then some. Discussion on "core topics" may, oddly, be a fringe activity, and was popular here a decade ago.

The situation on Wikidata today does resemble the halcyon days of 2006 of the English Wikipedia. The growth is there, and the reliability and stylistic issues are not yet pressing in on the project. Its Berlin conference at the end of October will have five years of achievement to celebrate. Think Wikimania Frankfurt 2005.

Progress must be made, however, on referencing "core facts". This has two parts: replacing "imported from Wikipedia" in referencing by external authorities; and picking out statements, such as dates and family relationships, that must not only be reliable but be seen to be reliable.

In addition, there are many properties on Wikidata lacking a clear data model. An emerging consensus may push to the front key sourcing and biomedical properties as requiring urgent attention. Wikidata's "manual of style" is currently distributed over thousands of discussions. To make it coalesce, work on such a core is needed.

Links

WikiFactMine project pages on Wikidata, including a SPARQL library (in development).
Fatameh tool for adding items on scientific papers to Wikidata, by User: T Arrow. It has made a big recent impact. Offline for maintenance as we go to press, it is expected back soon.
As of July 2017, Zotero has a Wikidata translator. A personal Zotero library acts as an intermediary in managing and storing citation metadata.
GLAM Newsletter June 2017, Wikidata report. This is a good monthly round-up to follow, and welcomes contributions.
Exciting and Impressive! The Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) was launched in April: Infodocket on the first three months.
Olivia Solon in San Francisco, Why the net neutrality protest matters, opinion piece in The Guardian on 11 July.

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 ^{(first RfA to reach WP:300)}

Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.

Technical news

LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Wikipedia. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 3 – 11 August 2017

Facto Post – Issue 3 – 11 August 2017

Wikimania report

Interviewed by Facto Post at the hackathon, Lydia Pintscher of Wikidata said that the most significant recent development is that Wikidata now accounts for one third of Wikimedia edits. And the essential growth of human editing.

Impressive development work on Internet-in-a-Box featured in the WikiMedFoundation annual conference on Thursday. Hardware is Raspberry Pi, running Linux and the Kiwix browser. It can operate as a wifi hotspot and support a local intranet in parts of the world lacking phone signal. The medical use case is for those delivering care, who have smartphones but have to function in clinics in just such areas with few reference resources. Wikipedia medical content can be served to their phones, and power supplied by standard lithium battery packages.

Yesterday Katherine Maher unveiled the draft Wikimedia 2030 strategy, featuring a picturesque metaphor, "roads, bridges and villages". Here "bridges" could do with illustration. Perhaps it stands for engineering round or over the obstacles to progress down the obvious highways. Internet-in-a-Box would then do fine as an example.

"Bridging the gap" explains a take on that same metaphor, with its human component. If you are at Wikimania, come talk to WikiFactMine at its stall in the Community Village, just by the 3D-printed display for Bassel Khartabil; come hear T Arrow talk at 3 pm today in Drummond West, Level 3.

Link

Plaudit for the Medical Wikipedia app, content that is loaded into Internet-In-A-Box with other material, such as per-country documentation.

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

Nakon • Scott

Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news

You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 4 – 18 September 2017

Facto Post – Issue 4 – 18 September 2017

Editorial: Conservation data

The IUCN Red List update of 14 September led with a threat to North American ash trees. The International Union for Conservation of Nature produces authoritative species listings that are peer-reviewed. Examples used as metonyms for loss of species and biodiversity, and discussion of extinction rates, are the usual topics covered in the media to inform us about this area. But actual data matters.

Clearly, conservation work depends on decisions about what should be done, and where. While animals, particularly mammals, are photogenic, species numbers run into millions. Plant species lie at the base of typical land-based food chains, and vegetation is key to the habitats of most animals.

ContentMine dictionaries, for example as tabulated at d:Wikidata:WikiFactMine/Dictionary list, enable detailed control of queries about endangered species, in their taxonomic context. To target conservation measures properly, species listings running into the thousands are not what is needed: range maps showing current distribution are. Between the will to act, and effective steps taken, the services of data handling are required. There is now no reason at all why Wikidata should not take up the burden.

Links

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem

Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news

You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration

Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chortle

Hi Angela, I'd like to recreate Chortle as a page about the comedy website. I wanted to check with you first though as you previously deleted the original in 2006. My thinking is that the publishing environment has changed in the years since. Chortle is now nearly 20 years old and is the recognised comedy website of record for the UK. It runs the Chortle Awards (which might be a candidate to merge into the recreated page) and is a vital part of the British arts media infrastructure. It is particularly active during the Edinburgh Festival Fringe (which is where my interest comes in - I'm working on expanding that topic). The current page redirects to Laughter but most of the pages that link to it are actually attempting to reference the website. Would you have any objections to me recreating the page? Peaky76 (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peaky76. I don't think I was involved in that deletion. You'd need to see whether it meets WP:WEB. Angela (talk) 06:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Angela, my mistake. It looks like you deleted an earlier version of the page which had little content. That discussion is from later the same year. It definitely now meets WP:WEB in my view. I will go ahead and recreate with suitable commentary on the talk page. Thanks. Peaky76 (talk) 09:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being harassed by editor EddieHugh, please help me.....

Hello Wikipedia Administrator,

I've been trying for days now to reason with an editor. He's obsessed with removing my actual fact history as one of the premier saxophonist in Jazz. Two previous editors approved my article Robert Stewart (saxophonist) almost a year ago now. EddieHugh has come and attempted to delete most of my actual fact history with over 100 citations in the article as evidence. My talk page is filled with my attempts to reason with him and resolve without issue. But, I need the help of an authority as soon as possible. I sincerely thank you for your time. Professor Reason (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC) Professor Reason (talk) 00:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Angela, you can read all about it at Talk:Robert Stewart (saxophonist), plus bits at User talk:Professorreason and User talk:EddieHugh. There's also an ongoing case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. EddieHugh (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the same note was placed on several other user talk pages. I took it seriously and penned a long, kind reply. You need not bother. The user has been indeffed, for good reason. --MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 5 – 17 October 2017

Facto Post – Issue 5 – 17 October 2017

Editorial: Annotations

Annotation is nothing new. The glossators of medieval Europe annotated between the lines, or in the margins of legal manuscripts of texts going back to Roman times, and created a new discipline. In the form of web annotation, the idea is back, with texts being marked up inline, or with a stand-off system. Where could it lead?

ContentMine operates in the field of text and data mining (TDM), where annotation, simply put, can add value to mined text. It now sees annotation as a possible advance in semi-automation, the use of human judgement assisted by bot editing, which now plays a large part in Wikidata tools. While a human judgement call of yes/no, on the addition of a statement to Wikidata, is usually taken as decisive, it need not be. The human assent may be passed into an annotation system, and stored: this idea is standard on Wikisource, for example, where text is considered "validated" only when two different accounts have stated that the proof-reading is correct. A typical application would be to require more than one person to agree that what is said in the reference translates correctly into the formal Wikidata statement. Rejections are also potentially useful to record, for machine learning.

As a contribution to data integrity on Wikidata, annotation has much to offer. Some "hard cases" on importing data are much more difficult than average. There are for example biographical puzzles: whether person A in one context is really identical with person B, of the same name, in another context. In science, clinical medicine require special attention to sourcing (WP:MEDRS), and is challenging in terms of connecting findings with the methodology employed. Currently decisions in areas such as these, on Wikipedia and Wikidata, are often made ad hoc. In particular there may be no audit trail for those who want to check what is decided.

Annotations are subject to a World Wide Web Consortium standard, and behind the terminology constitute a simple JSON data structure. What WikiFactMine proposes to do with them is to implement the MEDRS guideline, as a formal algorithm, on bibliographical and methodological data. The structure will integrate with those inputs the human decisions on the interpretation of scientific papers that underlie claims on Wikidata. What is added to Wikidata will therefore be supported by a transparent and rigorous system that documents decisions.

An example of the possible future scope of annotation, for medical content, is in the first link below. That sort of detailed abstract of a publication can be a target for TDM, adds great value, and could be presented in machine-readable form. You are invited to discuss the detailed proposal on Wikidata, via its talk page.

Links

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93

Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration

Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
Following a request for comment, Ritchie333, Yunshui and Ymblanter will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries

The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facto Post – Issue 6 – 15 November 2017

Facto Post – Issue 6 – 15 November 2017

WikidataCon Berlin 28–9 October 2017

Under the heading rerum causas cognescere, the first ever Wikidata conference got under way in the Tagesspiegel building with two keynotes, One was on YAGO, about how a knowledge base conceived ten years ago if you assume automatic compilation from Wikipedia. The other was from manager Lydia Pintscher, on the "state of the data". Interesting rumours flourished: the mix'n'match tool and its 600+ datasets, mostly in digital humanities, to be taken off the hands of its author Magnus Manske by the WMF; a Wikibase incubator site is on its way. Announcements came in talks: structured data on Wikimedia Commons is scheduled to make substantive progress by 2019. The lexeme development on Wikidata is now not expected to make the Wiktionary sites redundant, but may facilitate automated compilation of dictionaries.

And so it went, with five strands of talks and workshops, through to 11 pm on Saturday. Wikidata applies to GLAM work via metadata. It may be used in education, raises issues such as author disambiguation, and lends itself to different types of graphical display and reuse. Many millions of SPARQL queries are run on the site every day. Over the summer a large open science bibliography has come into existence there.

Wikidata's fifth birthday party on the Sunday brought matters to a close. See a dozen and more reports by other hands.

Links

Wikidata statistics
I4OC progress in its first year, with 47% of scientific citation data now open (announced two days ago)
The flowering ORCID, Magnus Manske blogpost on identifying authors of scientific papers
@querybook, a Twitter feed devoted to SPARQL queries
Massive progress on Wikidata coverage of the UK parliament
Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM

Editor Charles Matthews. Please leave feedback for him.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

Joe Roe

JzG

Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration

Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous

Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Angela. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Bureaucrat activity is widely construed and includes acting or commenting as a bureaucrat at any venue including WP:BN/RFA/RFB/RFBAG/BRFA and responding to requests in their capacity as a global renamer or subscriber to the bureaucrats' mailing list or signalling that they remain actively engaged and available for bureacrat tasks.

[1]

File source problem with File:Andrelenotre.jpg

WTF?

Alexander Pechersky Article

Rename

please help

Thank you

Sydney Meetup :-)

Tim Starling's recent leave from Wikimedia Foundation.

Eaton Rapids Campmeeting

An Ask

WikiProject Dacia

Nomination of Abdul Majid Zabuli for deletion

Nomination of SmallBASIC for deletion

Proposed deletion of Dancing Rabbit

undo deletions by media relations head at Clearstream

Question

Help

Awarded Barnstar

File:Sagittaria.jpg

File:Madrid-metro-map-300px.png listed for deletion

File:Wikia logo.png listed for deletion

Notzrim

Deletion of INFINITY (INDIAN BAND)

Deletion of INFINITY (INDIAN BAND)

A barnstar for you!

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Village pump sections

A barnstar for you!

Survey

Nomination for deletion of Template:Article-cv2

On wikipedia in interlingue

Survey women on Wikipedia

Possibly unfree File:Sagittaria.jpg

Most up-to-date listing of past and present bots?

Sydney meetup

Marvelous Work,

Wikia Promotion in Pakistan

SOPA

Archives

Template:Commonspar listed at Redirects for discussion

Ellen Gallagher

Collaborations redux

MSU Interview

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania 2012

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Vandalism Studies Update - August 2012

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Sydney workshop

A beer for you!

Notice of change

Sydney meetup on Thursday

acknowledgment

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Editor @ ar.wiki

Articles deletion

Invitation to Sydney editathon - Saturday 23rd November

Sydney Meetup on Monday evening

10 year club on Swedish Wikipedia

เรียนผู้บริหารวิกิพีเดียที่เคารพ ( Dear Wikipedia administrators respected. )

Happy adminship anniversary!!!

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

A Small Edit I Tried to Make to an Old Comment of Yours

WikiVIP

A kitten for you!

Sajora Nayasa (WikiPeace)

Missing

Your article has been nominated for deletion (again)

ALUG

Award — Platinum Star

Implementation of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements

ArbCom elections are now open!

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Test intro

San Angelo listed at Redirects for discussion

Sydney Meetup next Thursday evening

Extended confirmed protection

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.1