User talk:GogoW24

Hello, GogoW24 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

DYK for Ellen Gallagher

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Your edits to Giuseppe Penone

Hello! I undid an edit you did to this page because we do not allow inline external links in articles, like the one you added to the gallery. Instead, please add it as a reference, perhaps linking to a page where his work is featured, or preferably to a third-party source. Thank you! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Gagosian Gallery links

Hi, GogoW24. I reverted your addition to Andy Warhol, then noticed you've been adding similar content to a multitude of articles. There are two problems with this, one minor and one potentially major. First, the minor one. External links are almost never placed inline with article text. If we have an article for whatever you want to link—and in this case, we do—one should always use an internal link instead. If we don't have an article, it's best left unlinked.

My bigger concern is that the addition of content about Gagosian Gallery to so many articles raises red flags; it appears promotional in nature and runs counter to the guideline on spam. I don't know if you have any connection to the gallery, but either way it probably doesn't rate a mention in all these articles. I'd appreciate your thoughts about this. Rivertorch (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Added: Since you have made several more edits in this vein without responding to the three editors who have raised the topic here, I've opened a thread at the External Links Noticeboard. Rivertorch (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm Weedwhacker128. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Richard Phillips (artist), because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks, Weedwhacker128 (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Richard Avedon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Adding links to a commercial site selling works by the artist who is the subject of the article is 100% pure spamming Biker Biker (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps it may help you to understand the above warning messages if I give you a little more explanation than you have so far been given. Such a large predominance of your editing is related to Gagosian Gallery and artists associated with it, that it is perfectly clear that at best you have a conflict of interest, and at worst it is possible that your purpose in editing is to use Wikipedia to promote your gallery and/or the artists associated with it. The latter is made to seem likely in view of edits such as this one, which added absolutely no information about the subject of the article at all, but merely replaced a legitimate link to a Wikipedia article with an inappropriate inline link to your gallery's web site. If it is not your intention to use Wikipedia as a medium for promotion or advertising, then you need to be aware that you are inadvertently editing in a way which has that effect, probably because your close involvement in the subject prevents you from seeing how your editing will look from the detached perspective of an outside observer. (This difficulty in seeing your own business objectively is, in fact, one of the main reasons why Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages us from editing on a subject in which we have such personal involvement.) If, on the other hand, is your intention to use Wikipedia as a medium for promotion or advertising, then you need to be aware that doing so is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is not a free advertising service. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Y.Z. Kami (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Y.Z. Kami.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SarahStierch (talk) 18:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello! GogoW24, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Y.Z. Kami (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Y.Z. Kami.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GogoW24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katharina Grosse has been accepted

Katharina Grosse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

License tagging for File:KG Portrait 2015 Andrea Stappert.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:KG Portrait 2015 Andrea Stappert.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Oldest to newest

Hello; please see this, and respond there. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 00:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GogoW24. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)