User talk:Andy120290

Election of 1868

Kentucky had 11 electoral votes. Give Kentucky 11 electoral votes and then add up all of Seymour's other electoral votes. The old map had it wrong so I can see why the map is in error. Also, go to electionatlas.org to see the electoral votes.--Tilden76 (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Andy120290, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

The Journeyman Project / Red Faction Tie-in

It's been commonly accepted that the Red Faction & Mining Colony on Mars are related to the Mimoto Mars Colony (as in the Journey Man Project game itself, it describes the years of oppression and mining that occured long before the colony was finished). The development team for the "Red Faction" series has been rumored to use this as a "spiritual" influence for the storyline behind "Red Faction", though have never officially denied or approved claims, though fi you look at dates, times, and incidents in both games, they fall well into place. I've added a Legacy section to the journeyman page, and added that notation there that you removed from the header... i agree, it was a bad place to put it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.36.65 (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for VonBraun (Alien Planet)

Hello, good work on VonBraun (Alien Planet), and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to VonBraun (Alien Planet)? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! BRIAN0918 02:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ike.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ike.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 20:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Delta 3 Rocket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Delta 3 Rocket.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mars96Arrival.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Mars96Arrival.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. John254 02:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Luna_13.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Luna_13.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing spacecraft-stub

Thank you for creating the many spacecraft articles that you have. Please go through and add {{spacecraft-stub}} to them. I added it to a few, but you really should add appropriate stubs, especially when creating articles, since it is easier then. Hu 23:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 04:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hey, I won't bore you with the normal welcome template, but I wanted to take a second and thank you for your vandalism fighting contributions to Apollo 13. --Matthew 17:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Space Odyssey Series

You recently reverted a change of date back to "1953 to". Do you know why it says 1953 ? The Sentinel was earlier than that. Did something happen in 1953 ? -- Beardo 06:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kyle 1009.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyle 1009.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey thanks

thank you for "reverting vandalism" in a section of the article on American Idol on August 28, 2006, at 18:48 that wasn't vandalism, it was actually my own reversion of vandalism that I had discovered and I decided to correct, but I didn't know what to write, so I simply put "Insert real information here." I know that sentence went on and on and on, but you must understand how deeply I was insulted when I saw "reverting vandalism" appear after my own edit. A heartfelt apology would be appreciated. now. 207.255.66.200 04:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Cambot do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RJASE1 ^Talk 02:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Mystery Science Theater 3000

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Andy120290! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 19:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:318.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:318.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, another person from Winsted!

At least I know I'm not the only one. Have a good day. Mattb112885 03:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Potaending.jpg

Hello Andy120290, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Potaending.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Andy120290. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Screening color.jpg

Hello Andy120290, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Screening color.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Andy120290. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shuttle lift-off in Orbiter.jpg

Hello Andy120290, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Shuttle lift-off in Orbiter.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Andy120290. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Delta 3 Rocket.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Delta 3 Rocket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space Odyssey and IBM

Hey, I made a small addition in the "2001, A Space Odyssey" article explaining how the name HAL had been chosen (from IBM). I just saw that you deleted it; any particular reason for that ? I'd really like to know why. louisdrounau@hotmail.com

Unspecified source for Image:LUNAR_A.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LUNAR_A.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Parroty Interactive.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Parroty Interactive.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Orion III Cockpit.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Danube15.jpg. The copy called Image:Danube15.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Discovery One.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Discovery One.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Satellite_of_Love_KTMA.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Satellite_of_Love_KTMA.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MST3K_Manos.JPG

I have tagged Image:MST3K_Manos.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marooned Skylab.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Marooned Skylab.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo 12 ALSEP.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:A12array.jpg. The copy called Image:A12array.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:RTG ALSEP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RTG ALSEP.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:South Park Simpsons.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:South Park Simpsons.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Presidents (song)

Thanks for adding the lyrics -- but they had been removed because of potential copyright violation. That's why the song is written about instead of out. Good day. :) DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 13:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Docking Cargo Module.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Docking Cargo Module.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 20:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Orion III Cockpit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orion III Cockpit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Corvair Spacecraft.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Corvair Spacecraft.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mars 96 Penetrator Sequence.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mars 96 Penetrator Sequence.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade 20:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Alex Spade 20:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Firefly Thunderbirds.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Firefly Thunderbirds.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Mars96Orbiter.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mars96Orbiter.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD i4.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Russavia 16:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:STS-51-J.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:STS-51-J.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apollo 13 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo 13 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apollo 13 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo 13 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aries IB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aries IB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apollo 13 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo 13 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aries IB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aries IB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elevator Cars.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Elevator Cars.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hover Bikes.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Hover Bikes.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marooned 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marooned 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ironman One.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ironman One.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: your edit to voyager 1

Do we still receive transmissions from this satellite or make visual contact with telescopes(like the hubble) or anything? What's the real reason to call this space project a current one? -Mike Payne (T • C) 19:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Angry Video Game Nerd (Show)

I just wanted to thank you for your excellent help on the page! --DevinCook (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Remote Camera.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Remote Camera.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SS-v interior.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SS-v interior.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orion III Cockpit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orion III Cockpit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orion III.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orion III.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XRV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XRV.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Recovery Vehicles.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Recovery Vehicles.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Transmitter Truck.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Transmitter Truck.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Homers.JPG

I have tagged Image:Homers.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 18:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Potaending.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Potaending.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rocketman 1j.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocketman 1j.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rocketman 2j.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocketman 2j.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rocketman 3.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocketman 3.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mir Core Module.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mir Core Module.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade (talk) 09:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Planet of the Apes Ship.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Planet of the Apes Ship.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Video Game Nerd - Tribute Reviewers

Thanks for reverting all those changes on the AVGN page. Should we even mention that "tribute show" on the talk page? That might be giving it far more attention than it deserves! :) Anyway, thanks again. Cheers -23:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Apollo 16 quote

With this edit you inserted a word into a quote attributed to Apollo 16 astronaut John Young. But you did not provide a source citation for your "correction." Without a reliable source that quotation isn't going to last long in the article! (sdsds - talk) 04:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MST3K_M01_2.JPG

I have tagged Image:MST3K_M01_2.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MST3K_M01.JPG

I have tagged Image:MST3K_M01.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pendragon Flying Machine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pendragon Flying Machine.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election, 2008

Hiya Andy. Would ya mind taking it easy with the colourful expressions at that article's talkpage? I didn't want Obama & McCain in the Infobox either (during the campaign). GoodDay (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sts-48

Hello. It seems this is about to go to an edit warring. Could you explain the reason of your reverts. The content? Sources? Thanks.. Lyckey (talk) 08:19, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alternate Titan Stephen Baxter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alternate Titan Stephen Baxter.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Epcot comments

So you suddenly decide to get your netkop knickers in a knot over a comment section that's been there for 7 months?TheJazzFan (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!

The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Contact screenshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Contact screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!

The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mars-1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Mars-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Daggerstab (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC) --Daggerstab (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The_Dakotas.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The_Dakotas.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The_Carolinas.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The_Carolinas.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 00:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Armstrong GAR notice

Neil Armstrong has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Talking Rings.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Talking Rings.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Time Machine.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Time Machine.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Morlocks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Morlocks.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buzz Alrin's Race Into Space

Thanks for keeping on top of that guy Chris Lojkovic on the BARIS entry. That's some annoying stuff he's doing there.Peyre (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback?

Hello. Recently I noticed your anti-vandal work on the John Young (astronaut) article. The easiest way to clean up vandalism and spam is via the rollback tool. If you are willing to abide by the rollbacker rules (see WP:ROLLBACK), I would be more than happy to grant you access to this function. If, after reading WP:ROLLBACK, you promise to follow the rollback rules to the best of your ability, just drop a quick message on my talk page saying as much and I will update your rights. Thanks again for your help in keeping Wikipedia clear of vandalism! — Kralizec! (talk) 04:12, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After seeing your vandalism revert on the David Scott article, I would like to make the same offer again. :-) — Kralizec! (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Text removal

Andy, could you explain the reasons for your removal of text from Iraq War? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "blatant"? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 20:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If criticism has to go in its own section, should justifications not also have one? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 09:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Ap14-KSC-70P-508.jpg

File:Ap14-KSC-70P-508.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:ALSEP Ap14-KSC-70P-508.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:ALSEP Ap14-KSC-70P-508.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winston Churchill Address the US Congress.PNG is now available as Commons:File:Winston Churchill Address the US Congress.PNG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winston Churchill Address the US Congress.PNG is now available as Commons:File:Winston Churchill Address the US Congress.PNG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Bum Reviews with Chester A. Bum episodes

The article List of Bum Reviews with Chester A. Bum episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

crufty linkfarm, no list item is notable. no independent sources. no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Bum Reviews with Chester A. Bum episodes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Bum Reviews with Chester A. Bum episodes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bum Reviews with Chester A. Bum episodes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bite

Please don't use editsummaries like you did in this revert. I think it is inappropriate and unnecessary. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with that comment. As well as being quite unpleasant, it's unlikely to change the behaviour of the person whose work you're apparently criticising. HiLo48 (talk) 00:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision 326446766

Why did you revert my edit? I didn't do anything bad to the article, I fixed a formatting error and removed a double space. I'm not going to revert your edit right now, so as to not create an edit war, but unless you give me a good reason I'm going to anyway. Thank you. -99.255.188.158 (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding revision 327946609

On http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Back_to_the_Future_Part_II you removed the whole "major flaw" section. If you have a problem with the way it was written then by all means change it. But to remove the entire section labeling it "unencyclopedic" is ridiculous. It's a perfectly valid section on a flaw in the plot of the film. Atmourad (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

President of the United States article

In your user page, you wrote you're "addicted to presidents", that you're an America-o-phile; that you're a WW2 buff (many Americans are -- national pride -- ever wonder why there are few Vietnam War buffs? We lost that one, but perhaps we'd not like to think about it). If you have these views, you'll want articles about the US presidency (and Congress) to be fair and neutral and not to try to cover up the flaws or downplay America's failings. If we sugarcoat our country, gloss over serious errors, then how will these ever get fixed? It's important; a malfunctioning presidency or Congress can hurt you directly if you're an American (like I am) and if you consider yourself a citizen like I do. If our nation trots off to wars which were ill-planned or ill-suited or wasteful, or has a Congress beholden to special interests which has rigged the rules of re-election, the persons who get hurt are us -- ordinary Americans -- since we're the ones taxed to pay for these wars, or sometimes the soldiers in these wars, who have trouble finding good jobs because whole industries are outsourced to foreign lands because of crazy things like an absurd tax structure.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider your life. Are you happy with your life? Is everything hunky-dorey? Got enough money? Got a good job? Got a girl? Most likely, if you're like most Americans, you want more, and part of the reason I'll bet is because of serious political flaws which mess up your life, and perhaps you just haven't realized it yet? That is, have you considered the truth-value of statements such as the following: Federal government screws Andy or US presidents screw Andy or Congress screws Andy or (check out the IRS's complex tax code -- 70K pages). And, what opinion do you have about these statements? I'm wondering what you think.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you really seek neutrality in articles like you claim. The articles are fairly well balanced now (7/8 positive/neutral, 1/8 criticism perhaps, which seems fair perhaps to most readers.) I think you identify with presidents somehow, that is, you feel the criticism which is directed at presidents is directed at you-as-an-American (it isn't). The president is the nation's top celebrity, and as Americans, we worship celebrities, movie stars, powerful people, and want to have pictures of their fancy cars in tabloids (or in Wikipedia) while trying not to acknowledge to ourselves that we pay for those fancy presidential limousines. And perhaps you'd like the "criticism" sections removed since you think, on some level, that these sections hurt America's image (they don't -- being strong enough to admit flaws is what makes America great, in my view, so being able to criticize ourselves shows we're truly a great country and have the candor and integrity to highlight flaws. Further, how will flaws ever get FIXED if they're covered up or buried in articles or glossed over? This stuff is important. I've made a solid case in the "talk" section about why the recentism tag is bogus (look at Obama's picture at the top of the article, the most recent president) but I've let it stay there in deference to you; I made a number of changes so the criticism section is balanced (so it meets the ten-year-rule) which you haven't acknowledged. And you have not addressed my comments on the talk pages. Please do so, with reasoned arguments, if you can.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current article format now, with criticism at the bottom, makes it easier for users to find what they want, whether it's the gloss and the limousines and smiling presidents (most of the article) or the criticism at the bottom. If you want to move specific criticisms throughout the article, that's a LOT of editing. I advise against it, but if you want to move stuff around, I'll watch you closely to make sure nothing gets omitted. And please consider removing the tags; I'm considering adding tags of my own all over the article to highlight what I think are serious POV concerns, presidential-worship, lack of balance, etc etc etc.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll swap ALL presidents for ONE Andy any day

You're what's great about Wikipedia. Respect yourself. I respect your Wikipedia contributions. Please consider restoring your user page and erase all my nagging comments above. (I must have been on the rag.)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mars96Orbiter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mars96Orbiter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Daggerstab (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ISS FAC4.

Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, or who has contributed to the article recently, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Featured Article Candidacy with any suggestions you have for article improvements (and being bold and making those changes), whether or not you feel any issues you have previously raised have been dealt with, and, ultimately, if you believe the article meets the Featured Article guidelines. This is the fourth FAC for this article, and it'd be great to have it pass. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on! United_States_presidential_election,_1820

I waited for two days for input. When none was forthcoming, I was bold. Perhaps my comment on my edit was ill-advised, but it was a good-faith edit, and did not deserve to be reverted like that. I am most certainly NOT disrupting Wikipedia! Also, since you are so well acquainted with wikipedia policy, what ever happened to discussing changes on the talk page??? (as well as assuming good faith?) KarlFrei (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Andy120290. You have new messages at Talk:That Guy with the Glasses.
Message added 00:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jac16888 ^Talk 00:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Ask That Guy with the Glasses episodes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Ask That Guy with the Glasses episodes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ask That Guy with the Glasses episodes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help on new articles

The article Foreign policy of the United States was almost entirely negative against the U.S.; so to make it more WP:NPOV I've been adding positive things the U.S. has done in the foreign policy sector (won WW2, Panama Canal, rescued Europeans from Hitler, etc etc). I branched off an article Criticism of U.S. foreign policy which, as an article, is about 50/50 positive and negative. And I'm continuing to revamp both articles. But I'm wondering what anti-US editors out there will do to these changes. Wondering if you might put one or both articles on your watch list and keep track of changes? I'm still working on the main "Foreign policy of the US" article, trying to make it more neutral, and keep it trimmed down, perhaps will branch off a history of US foreign policy article.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States expedition to Korea

Hi, please note that you should not alter the spellings in quotations, unless you can show that they are wrong. Although Korean is now spelt with a K, in the 19th century it was spelt with a C. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check out United States and state terrorism

Big POV concerns with the article "United States and state terrorism". The article is seriously slanted against the U.S. Needs fixing or eliminating.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson Ph.D.

This paragraph now appears twice in the Woodrow Wilson entry:

Wilson is the only President to hold a Ph.D. and the only President to serve in a political office in New Jersey before election to the Presidency. He was only the second Democrat in the White House since the Civil War, and he had to handle party demands from both the agrarian wing (led by Bryan) and the pro-business wing and resolve outstanding policy issues regarding the economy. The country was prosperous in 1913, and the Democrats had large majorities in Congress, setting up his opportunities to act.

It's at the end of "Election of 1912" and then at the beginning of "First term as President, 1913–1917." I'd say the second spot is better so that the section about the election is *only* about the election. And to me this passage reads more like an introduction to Wilson's problems as President than as anything pertinent to the election of 1912, except for the fact that he's the only P.D., but I'm not at all sure where that tidbit belongs. But certainly once is enough. Cheers. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 14:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now made a change to remove the duplication rather than leave it in place for too long.

Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Article One of the United States Constitution/GA1

You look like you keep a watch on this article page. Issues have been identified at the GA review that you might be able to help address. Take a look if it is in your areas of expertise. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Criticism of YouTube

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Criticism of YouTube. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of YouTube. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me...

What right do you have to delete constructive additions?

Either improve on it or leave it alone, lest you be labeled a VANDAL

99.139.217.9 (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

As you seem to revert lots of vandalism, have you ever considered requesting the rollback tool? It looks like you could make good use of it. Connormah (talk | contribs) 03:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know. Also, please make sure you warn vandals that you revert- you might like to use Twinkle or other scripts to help you with that. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, your anti-vandalism work is much appreciated! Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cambot5to7.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cambot5to7.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luna 1966A

The article Luna 1966A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not exist. Not mentioned in only source provided. No record of an R-7 launch on that date, which would have been required to place it into orbit.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G W… 23:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luna 1970B

The article Luna 1970B has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not exist. Unreferenced, and only launch on the date specified was a Molniya-M with a communications satellite.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G W… 23:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luna 1969B

The article Luna 1969B has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not exist. Source actually lists launch date at 15 April, and no Proton launch occurred on that date. As the only reference's title suggests, it should not be considered a reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G W… 10:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Conquest of Space.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Conquest of Space.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Darkhorse Flying Machine.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Darkhorse Flying Machine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uknown American Presidents Task Force?

Hi Andy120290! I am thinking about starting an "Unknown Presidents" task force and I noticed that you are an active contributor to WP:USPREZ articles. I was wondering if you would like to join me in starting this task force. The following Presidents would be included:

*Millard Fillmore
*James Monroe
*Zachary Taylor
*Franklin Pierce
*Rutherford B Hayes
*James Garfield
*Chester A Arthur
*James Buchanan

Our Mission: To expand the knowledge of the "Unknown Presidents." Specifically getting all these articles to GA class or higher. Let me know what you think. Thanks!--Schwindtd (talk) 00:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States Congress. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're doing lots of undos and reverts on highly-visible articles within the past two days. There is a complaint about your edits already filed at WP:AN3#User:Andy120290 reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: ). To avoid a block, I urge you to respond at WP:AN3 and explain what you're up to. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has your account been compromised?

You've been indefinitely blocked, on the assumption that someone else has taken control of your account. If this is really you, can you provide a good explanation of a sudden turn to widespread edit warring on highly-visible articles? See WP:GAB for how to request unblock. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Andy120290 reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: Indef). EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andy are you okay?

I've tried to fix up United States Congress by proposing an expanded version in the sandbox here United States Congress/sandbox and it merges the criticisms within the article and adds a lot of positive things about the US Congress too -- like its resilient, the heart and soul of democracy. The article needs more pictures. Wondering what you think and whether you like it better than the old one. Generally I'm coming around to agreeing with everybody that a separate criticism section isn't such a great idea. I hope you don't get too turned off by Wikipedia since you've been a good contributor. If you want to write stuff without other people deleting it, check out Google knols. You control the content (but there's much less readership of course). In a place like Wikipedia, everybody can undo everybody else and it can get quite contentious; I hope you're okay. There were times before when I get into contentious situations and it can be quite frustrating, but I hope you still continue to contribute here. :) --Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andy, I am sorry you have chosen to leave Wikipedia, but I hope you might reconsider your decision. You're a good man and you've contributed excellently here. And while I'm not that crazy about your recent rub-out method with the Congress article, you did call attention to the article's deficiencies, and you did spur me and others to try to make it better, and I hope the outcome will be something more to your liking. I hope that you will reconsider and help us improve the Congress and other articles since your perspective is important and valuable.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to request unblock

Add {{unblock|Your reason here}} to your talk page. But so long as you 'stand by what you did' it will be hard for admins to consider unblock. We hope you will agree to behave differently in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Presidents of the United States

You might remember that, a while back, you commented that you liked the look of my proposal for a new format for the list. I am now looking for consensus to replace the list, at the conversation here. Many thanks. BartBassist (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ask That Guy with the Glasses.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ask That Guy with the Glasses.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chester A Bum.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chester A Bum.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Icarus (Planet of the Apes) for deletion

The article Icarus (Planet of the Apes) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icarus (Planet of the Apes) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Heat Flow Experiment.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Heat Flow Experiment.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lunar Seismic Profiling Experiment Charge.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Lunar Seismic Profiling Experiment Charge.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lunar Surface Gravimeter.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Lunar Surface Gravimeter.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Passive Seismic Experiment.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Passive Seismic Experiment.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RTG Cask.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:RTG Cask.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Solar Wind Spectrometer.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Solar Wind Spectrometer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SIDE CCIG.gif

Thank you for uploading File:SIDE CCIG.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mir Core Module.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mir Core Module.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apollo 13 1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Apollo 13 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:S112e05823.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S112e05823.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 16:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Wotw1p65.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wotw1p65.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lunar Neutron Probe Experiment.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lunar Neutron Probe Experiment.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 19:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Use of derviative works templates

As the creator of {{The War of the Worlds}}, I thought you might be interested in the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:S100e5958.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S100e5958.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lunar Orbit Rendezvous.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lunar Orbit Rendezvous.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Theinternetftw (talk) 07:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United States House Rules Subcommittees

Template:United States House Rules Subcommittees has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]