Jump to content

User talk:Alternativecarpark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: St James's Church, Islington (June 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
(t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Alternativecarpark, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St James's Church, Islington (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Zach Vega (talk to me) 13:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:St James' Church, Islington (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Fiddle Faddle 07:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC St James' Church, Islington was accepted

[edit]
St James' Church, Islington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 20:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St James's Church, Islington concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St James's Church, Islington, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St James's Church, Islington concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St James's Church, Islington, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St James's Church, Islington concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St James's Church, Islington, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St James's Church, Islington

[edit]

Hello, Alternativecarpark. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "St James's Church".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 talk 09:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:William Lambe (philanthropist). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Lambe (philanthropist) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Lambe (philanthropist). Thanks! Domdeparis (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

request for help Draft:William Lambe (philanthropist)

[edit]

Hi you recently left a message on my talk page asking for help editing an article that you submitted. I think rather than doing the editing for you as you suggested I would prefer to point you towards different help sections guidelines and tutorials and then answer your questions if you have any after that.

A lead section or lede serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents. (click on the link for more info). A useful simple explanation that will certainly help you is here Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style. Domdeparis (talk) 08:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind I prefer to carry on the conversation on your talk page as this is where anyone who is interested in the draft will start looking to see if there is a discussion going on about it (presuming there is nothing on the article talk page yet).
You wrote
Fair enough - now I know what a 'lede' is I'll do the editing you suggested. But what has happened to all of the links in the main body of this article? It took me ages to put them in and now they've gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alternativecarpark (talk • contribs) 11:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Do you know how to use the "view history" function for an article? if not click here and then by using the "newer edit" link at the top right hand corner you can see the different differences or "diffs" between revisions and see what each person has added or removed. If you do this then you will see that another user has simply improved the way that the references were added and moved them to the reference section. From what I can tell you have simply copied and pasted the text from the DNB. This is not the advised method for creating an article using the DNB. There is a project that deals with this Wikipedia:WikiProject Dictionary of National Biography. I would advise you to read Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dictionary_of_National_Biography#Two_forms_of_adaptation and maybe join the project. Domdeparis (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a 'lede', broken up the text into a number of shorter paragraphs and have inserted links into key words within the text that refer to other pages within Wikipedia. As far as I am concerned, the entry is now 'good to go'.Alternativecarpark (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Lambe (philanthropist) (October 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We like to have a bare minimum of three sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 09:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Lambe (philanthropist) has been accepted

[edit]
William Lambe (philanthropist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lacypaperclip (talk) 14:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Lambe (cloth merchant and benefactor)

[edit]

Many thanks for your message on the above article. I am sorry for the confusion but that was an earlier draft of the article, and a more recent and a lot slicker version entitled 'William Lambe (philanthropist)' has recently been worked on by a user called 'ladypaperclip'. So, once again, sorry for the confusion. Alternativecarpark (talk) 09:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is looking way better than the earlier drafts. No worries! Editors commonly work sometimes on the different timeline, while the draft is being developed. Thanks for creating this one. You should create more. I will be glad to help if you have any questions. You may leave me a message at any time on my talk page. Love your editor name, very clever! Cheers! Lacypaperclip (talk) 10:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Alternativecarpark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Alternativecarpark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to History of Australia

[edit]

Hello

I have reverted your addition to the lead because there is already too much information about early explorers in the lead compared with the treatment of this subject in the body of the article. By the way, adding a sentence to the lead is not a minor edit and shouldn't be tagged as such. Happy to dicuss on the article's talkpage. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I added the information before I realised that there was a reference to it further into the piece. Having said that, perhaps there shouldn't be reference to other early explorers in the lead either - certainly, if other early explorers are referred to in the lead, it would be incorrect to leave out Dampier. Thanks for pointing out that editing the lead in an article is not a minor edit. I thought 'minor' referred to the size of the edit, but clearly not. I shall tick this box in future. Alternativecarpark (talk) 06:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That should have read, I shall not tick this box in future. Alternativecarpark (talk) 06:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at BLPN

[edit]

There is a discussion at the BLP Noticeboard located at Peter Fraser (judge), which you might be interested in since you have been involved with that article. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 08:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Sun newspaper is not to everyone's taste but it is a perefectly valid source of information. Many of the UK's best journalists work on the newspaper, although they have to hold their noses to do so. However, if Wikipedia's policy is to treat it as an invalid source then you are perfectly within your rights to remove any information that is derived from it. However the information that you have removed happens to be true. Alternativecarpark (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alternativecarpark&oldid=1204062755"