User talk:Alexeyevitch

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 10 sections are present.

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Alexeyevitch! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 11:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Karaka (tree)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karaka (tree) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude for GAN assistance

@Alexeyevitch, thanks for your help and guidance during the GAN review process! Very excited to have a real GA that I've written from scratch now, and hopefully it makes knowledge about the event more accessible to the general public. Cheers. SunTunnels (talk) 06:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you're satisfied with the result! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 06:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Karaka (tree)

The article Karaka (tree) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Karaka (tree) for comments about the article, and Talk:Karaka (tree)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GA backlog drive. Your noteworthy contribution (12 points total) helped reduce the backlog considerably! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch

The article Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch for comments about the article, and Talk:Statue of Robert Falcon Scott, Christchurch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Abduvaitov Sherzod Wiki 88 (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 23:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are you? Are you tired of editing Wikipedia? How do you get the article infobox when creating an article on Wikipedia? Thank you. Happy editing! Abduvaitov Sherzod Wiki 88 (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

When you started editing Wikipedia I considered you to be my friend and I always enjoyed working with you. At the time, you were the Wikipedian who I was the closest with. I still don't know why our interactions got sour, and I've realised that it is possible that you may not realise either. Maybe you do, I don't know. Maybe it was some form of miscommunication done by both of us that escalated into something that neither of us wanted.

The way we have interacted with each other is not something that either of us wants, and it is something that cannot continue, otherwise Wikipedia will not be enjoyable. I am truly remorseful for my actions in the past, but my problem is that I don't know what it was I did that upset you, because you didn't communicate that in a way that I understand. I hope that you can also be apologetic, so we can sort out this situation. But don't get me wrong; I still want you to be topic banned from making spelling changes.

I do think that you are a valuable contributor to this project, and I think that if our conflict is resolved we will be useful in some sort of symbiotic relationship, as strange as that sounds. Since we are both interested in Christchurch, it would be a net positive if we collaborated together on those articles without any troubles. I am really interested in the earthquake content, but writing about the non-earthquake stuff really bores me. Maybe we could collaborate on new articles where I do the earthquake stuff, and you do the non-earthquake stuff. ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Apologies for the delay in getting back to your comment. When I started editing in 2023, I was largely an uncommunicative-shy person and didn't know people were at the core of Wikipedia and thought most content was written years ago, maybe that's part of the reason and I was uninterested in other people, but I've gotten past that. Regarding the topic ban, I'm not opposed to it, I will add a further comment to WP:ANI that you or another New Zealand Wikipedian might give clarification to.

I was surprised no one in 13.5 years created an article for the December 2010 Christchurch earthquake and was pleased to see it created from my end. I would love to see more variety on GAs for WikiProject:New Zealand and there needs to be more people making Wikipedia more comprehensive. A suggestion from me is to use Wikipedia Library to get access to reputable sources from peer-reviewed articles (like this). There is really helpful content on Wikipedia Library that could assist when your editing articles.

I think most New Zealand Wikipedians noticed this conflict over the past year and would also like to see it resolved since they both consider us two valuable contributors to Wikipedia. New Zealand topics need more coverage on Wikipedia and it's great to see more editors editing these pages. Christchurch is a fascinating city with a long history and there is still work to document it on Wikipedia. I noticed Mike will start a similar project relating to the Port Hills and Banks Peninsula. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 02:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that our personal conflict could get resolved and I am excited to collaborate with you. I hope if that tensions between us rise in the future, for whatever reason, that we communicate well in order to prevent it from escalating into something that neither of us wants.

I'm planning on creating an article for the Edmonds clock tower and perhaps the Commons if you are interested. I've also been working on Draft:Timeline of the Canterbury earthquakes and you are welcome to add to it if you want. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive

January 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas

Hello Alexeyevitch: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Happy holidays to you too! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 23:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Question

Would you like to be my friend? You don't have to do anything. I also like Christchurch articles. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Just reach out if you need help in an article. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 01:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry xmas, I've begun GA reviewing your rātā article, aiming to get it done this afternoon. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 23:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Metrosideros bartlettii

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Metrosideros bartlettii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cloventt -- Cloventt (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Hello Alexeyevitch: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —Ganesha811 (talk) 12:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Happy holidays to you too! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 13:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Your GA nomination of Metrosideros bartlettii

The article Metrosideros bartlettii you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Metrosideros bartlettii for comments about the article, and Talk:Metrosideros bartlettii/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cloventt -- Cloventt (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. It is an interesting read. ―Panamitsu (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to you both. I think tree-related articles have become somewhat of an editing addiction to me ;-). Alexeyevitch^(talk) 11:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Carlile House

Thanks so much for taking on the review of Carlile House! Would it be appropriate for me to edit the article to fix the citations and formatting issues that you've picked up while the review is still ongoing? It's my first GAN, and I wasn't sure. Ewhite31 (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes :-]. The issues I addressed are not requirements, but instead recommendations, it is most welcomed to be fixed by you (or another editor) while the GA review is in process. The article is very close to reaching GA status, but once you've completed the comments, I would be happy to promote it. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 09:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic, thank you! Ewhite31 (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have completed the comments. I will see if I can find a little more about the timing of the construction of the building as the existing references only give the completion/opening year. I did, however, find the details of the purchase and some of the trustees. Thanks again! :) Ewhite31 (talk) 12:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! I promoted it to GA. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Be my friend, can you date me? Happy New Year. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024. Happy New Year 2025. I wish you happy and successful editing in the new year 2025! thank you! (Strait WikiN (talk) 11:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)) (Strait WikiN (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Happy New Year, Alexeyevitch!

Happy New Year!

Alexeyevitch,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
―Panamitsu (talk) 11:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Happy new year to you and to all of us in New Zealand being one of the first countries to enter 2025! :-] Alexeyevitch^(talk) 11:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

WP:GARC: Invitation to review 2011 Cullman–Arab tornado

Hello, You have been paired at good article review circles to review 2011 Cullman–Arab tornado. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #19.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 03:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: GA backlog drive

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the ongoing GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of January. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plants

There are some missing Banks Peninsula plant articles listed at Wikipedia:GLAM/AoWPAL_2025/Flora if you are interested in them. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which will be the focus in March. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I will look into it. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 04:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gaol

Please don't add brackets clarifying what "gaol" means like what you've done here. That'd be like writing "World Health Organization [Organisation]" or "Centers [Centres] for Disease Control and Prevention. " ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pittosporum kirkii

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pittosporum kirkii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pittosporum kirkii

The article Pittosporum kirkii you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pittosporum kirkii for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]