User talk:Aankan Das

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ryan Driller has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ryan Driller was changed by Aankan Das (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926471 on 2018-08-16T06:23:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belgharia High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:32, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aankan Das, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aankan Das! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bengali and Private

List of Indian film music directors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bengali

Narula Institute of Technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Civil

Ramapada Chowdhury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Presidency College

Universities and colleges of West Bengal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vivekananda College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your recent edit removed changes I had made to comply with the Manual of Style concerning Wikilinks. I have restored my changes. Please take time to review WP:OVERLINK for the related guidance to avoid the need for similar changes in the future. Gab4gab (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Aankan Das,

Perhaps you have noticed the issues listed above the article - specifically "This article needs additional citations for verification." Little in the article is referenced. You are adding more material without citing a source which increases the problem. I have removed your recent addition "It is third oldest Ramakrishna Mission school." because you provided no source that can be used to verify the information. Please provide a source if you add it again. I've also added tags for content that I couldn't verify from the source cited. None of the sections below the lead cite any sources. As you add and revise material please keep in mind that all content must be based on published sources. Citations are needed so that readers can use them to verify the content. Content that isn't sourced may be removed.

The URL you restored to the info box gives me a malware warning when I attempt to view it. Do you get a different result? I removed it because I couldn't access any useful information and we certainly don't want to lead people to malware. Let me know your thoughts on this. Gab4gab (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because you made no response and have edited again I have again removed the website from the info box. I've added a discussion to the article talk page. Please discuss it there so that consensus can be reached. Gab4gab (talk) 16:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have both restored the URL to the info box and added the same URL to the External links section without discussion on the article talk page. A pattern of reverting a changes that have been explained and discussed on a talk page without explanation and without participating in the discussion might be considered disruptive editing. I again invite you to engage in discussion on the talk page to reach consensus before restoring the URL that produces a malware warning. Meanwhile I'll again remove the URL with hidden comments so other editors are aware there is an issue. Gab4gab (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously intersted?

I have noticed some of your "school teacher" edits - some one who is looking for mistakes and correcting them. Wikipedia is not really a teaching experience. On hundreds of pages there would be mistakes and there are people going round correcting them. Nothing great really - but well some people enjoy it. If you are one of them, carry on. It is your choice.

I noticed that you have made many edits to the North 24 Parganas district page. Why don't you thinks about redoing the entire page? I have worked on the Purba Bardhaman district page, and if I can devote some more time, I would like to take it to a "Good article" stage. In developing this page I have enriched myself. Wikipedia is a great learning experience. You can think over it. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is the crux of working long-term in Wikipedia. A beginner must learn where to get reliable information from and add that source along with the information. All information added to Wikepedia must be verifiable. Your knowing some thing or many things is not enough. Others must be able to check and recheck what is added is correct. Get ahead. Plan your next edit with a source added. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aankan Das, You recently commented on my talk page: "I was a student of Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School. So I know about this institution. Please don't delete my edits." I on the other hand know only what I can see in the sources cited in the article or what I can find in searching. Here at Wikipedia we only include in the articles information that can be found in reliable published sources, which I've mentioned to you previously. This supports the ability of readers to verify what they have read. You may know things about your former school that don't appear in published sources. Those are things you shouldn't add to the article. Items added that are not supported by sources are subject to removal. Which I have done for some of your edits and will continue to do.

Similarly the Wikipedia has a Manual of Style which covers how we arrange content, how to provide emphasis, how to use internal links and many other topics. Some of your edits did not comply with the Manual of Style so I changed them to comply. You reverted my edits and I inserted them again followed by placing an explanation of why I had done what I had done on your talk page. Of course if you continue to edit in ways that don't follow the Manual of Style then I or other editors will find those things and change them. The Manual of Style is rather complex so no one should feel badly when they are unaware of specific conventions.

This is the Wikipedia that anyone can edit. Having a connection to a subject, such as being a former student, gives you insight that other don't have. On the other hand it can make it difficult to remain neutral and avoid the temptation to add personal knowledge that isn't verifiable.

You might find it helpful to take a break from editing and spend time reviewing some of the Wikipedia guidelines and principals. Here are two links I think would be helpful:

I'm happy to help you if you have questions - just add them to my talk page. You can also find help at the Teahouse where other editors can help you with any 'How to edit Wikipedia' questions. Gab4gab (talk) 18:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schools

I think you added your school name to the North 24 Parganas page. There is a list of just 12 schools on that page. If somebody staying in Europe or America happens to open that page he would probably be shocked - so few schools for so many people! Just have a look at the Barrackpore subdivision#Education section or any of the other subdivision pages. There are 442 high schools and 594 higher secondary schools in the district. How many schools are you going to add to the district page? Just think it over. I would once request you to have a look at Purba Bardhaman district. That page is rated as 'B' grade, while North 24 parganas district is rated as just a 'start'. Redo the North 24 Parganas page and raise it to a "good artile" status. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

continued addition of unsourced content

I noticed you added material again without citing a source. I reverted two of those changes. You have added several new sections without providing any references. I warned you before that sources are needed for verification. If you are adding information based on your personal knowledge rather than published sources that is original research. The Wikipedia policy is no original research. If you don't have published sources to support the content you have added it should be removed. I will remove the new sections if you don't cite your sources soon or explain why you are delayed. We all need to do our best to follow the Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Gab4gab (talk) 13:35, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aankan Das, Today I removed the sections I mentioned above. It's fine to add them again if you cite reliable sources that support them per WP:BURDEN. My searches have not located any helpful sources. Gab4gab (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Narula Institute of Technology, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning 07:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your recent edits reversed edits I had made to comply with the manual of style. I included in my edit summary information about the specific guidelines that applied. Gab4gab (talk) 07:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Lexington Steele. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Shiboprosad Mukherjee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Director and Indian

Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Active

Madhyamik Pariksha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bengali

North 24 Parganas district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rahul Banerjee

Rituparno Ghosh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Salman Khan. DMacks (talk) 17:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Abir Chatterjee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bengali

Shiboprosad Mukherjee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neel Bhattacharya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neel Bhattacharya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people

The article List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncredited, unsourced, unnecessary split from Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School. A list of 4 people doesn't need a separate article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 17:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people is an uncredited split of content from Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School which robs editors of the credit for their work, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Cabayi (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission People

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission People requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 17:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission People. Really?? Another version of it?? Please STOP. Cabayi (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narula Institute of Technology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CE, BCA and CSE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Narula Institute of Technology. Muhandes (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramakrishna Mission Centenary Primary School, Baranagaore

The article Ramakrishna Mission Centenary Primary School, Baranagaore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability. Primary schools are very rarely deemed to be notable and there is nothing here which suggests any possibility of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baranagar Ramakrishna Mission people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 05:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Keiran Lee.2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Keiran Lee.2017.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:45, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Salman Khan in 2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Salman Khan in 2017.jpg, which you've attributed to All over the internet. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 08:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Charles Dera in 2018.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Charles Dera in 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Keiran Lee.2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Keiran Lee.2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British pornographic actors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunny Deol filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahista Ahista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ramakrishna Mission institutions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belur and Along (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Darren James. Given your history—this would be the third block—the block may very well be indefinite. We simply cannot accept this behavior any longer. DMacks (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Jon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jon Jon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliability of sources

Hi Anakan Das, I have just reverted some of your recent edits that refer to IAFD as source. IAFD, similar to IMDb, is a user curated website with little oversight. Therefore, information provided on such sites is not considered reliable and should not be used. If you have any questions, please let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:53, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of male performers in gay porn films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Wilde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm TheRedBox. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ryan Driller without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheRedBox (Talk) 06:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pornographic film actor, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content splitting

Hi Aankan Das, Thanks for your help with those media and entertainment articles. You recently seem to have split quite a few articles. I wanted to draw your attention to the Wikipedia guideline on splitting articles which you may be familiar with. Articles should not per se be arbitrarily split unless there is good cause for it. It's always preferable to keep relevant information in one place unless splitting aids readability. For example, the split out of awards and nominations of Ryan Driller may not have been necessary as the article is fairly short. Also, when splits are warranted, pls follow WP:CORRECTSPLIT and use an edit summary that shows the source article on the new article as well as the new article on the source article. Happy editing! _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aankan Das. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aankan Das. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinod Khanna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. My god.... this talk page... startTerminal {haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc} 07:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darren James, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Binod Basnet. I noticed that you recently removed content from Riteish Deshmukh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Binod Basnet (talk) 06:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Salman Khan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 12:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've recently removed content from actors' pages to create separate filmography/awards articles but without initiating a discussion nor providing the necessary attribution. Continuing this practice might lead to an indefinite ban. MT Train^Talk 04:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Manuel Ferrara, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 07:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of awards and nominations received by Manuel Ferrara) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of awards and nominations received by Manuel Ferrara.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

please take into account the decision Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Tommy_Gunn before recreating similar articles

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article splitting

Hi Aankan. Since Jake Brockman's post above in §Content splitting, you have continued to split some 20 articles, and both Mark the train and Philipnelson99 have issued subsequent warnings of not to do so. Could we have you take a moratorium on article splitting and engage in dialogue here, please? Do you understand when we split articles? Sam Sailor 11:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:BTRoadGovtSchool.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BTRoadGovtSchool.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tathagata Mukherjee.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tathagata Mukherjee.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Keiran Lee fuck.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Keiran Lee fuck.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Keiran Lee 2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Keiran Lee 2017.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Charles Dera 2018.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charles Dera 2018.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BTRoadGovtSchool.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BTRoadGovtSchool.jpg, which you've attributed to derivative of uncited work. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Darren James.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Darren James.jpg, which you've attributed to on various photosharing sites. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Johnny Sins.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Johnny Sins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 14:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BRKMAHS.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:BRKMAHS.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhishek Chatterjee.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abhishek Chatterjee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Danny Mountain.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Danny Mountain.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying images from the Internet

You cannot copy files you find on the Internet and claim them to be your own. Uploading these images to Wikipedia is a copyright violation. Continued uploads like this will result in you being blocked from editting. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sheldybett (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:NiT logo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:NiT logo.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Active (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aankan Das. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Narula Institute of Technology, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of male performers in gay porn films

Hello. I reverted your edits to List of male performers in gay porn films again because you keep citing unreliable sources. Self-published blogs like Blogger and Wordpress are are not reliable sources. Sites with user-generated content like Find a Grave and IMDb are also unsuitable as references for biographical facts. Using a porn site as a reference, as you did when you listed John Homes the first time, is almost never acceptable. Finally, Wikipedia is based on verifiablity, not just truth. If the John Holmes article can't state as a certain fact that he did gay porn, he shouldn't be listed. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Durga puja in Baranagar 2018.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Durga puja in Baranagar 2018.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Saraswati idol at BRKM.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saraswati idol at BRKM.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Saraswati Idol at BRKM.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Saraswati Idol at BRKM.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Logo of BT Road Govt Sponsd HS School.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo of BT Road Govt Sponsd HS School.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Hi . It looks like you copied some content from Emraan Hashmi to Emraan Hashmi filmography. When you copy from one Wikipedia article to another, you need to provide attribution. This is done by saying in your edit summary that the material was copied, and where you got it. Please have a look at this edit summary for an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you have any questions, or have a look at WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Keiran Lee fucking pussy.jpg

The file File:Keiran Lee fucking pussy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFCC#8. No significant sourced commentary about this image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Johnny Sins wearing underwear.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Johnny Sins wearing underwear.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Abhishek Chatterjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Abhishek Chatterjee (Bengali actor).jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tathagata Mukherjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Tathagata Mukherjee (Bengali actor).jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your third block. The next one will likely be indefinite, meaning you will no longer be welome to edit here at all until any unknown time into the future. I recommend you spend the next month reading our policies and taking them to heart. If and when you return, you will definitely want to be following them extremely carefully. DMacks (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keiran Lee fucking pussy.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnny Sins wearing underwear.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tathagata Mukherjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhishek Chatterjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aankan Das (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked due to socpuppets. I abused multiple accounts. But then I did it unwittingly, I did not know about it properly. Now I read wikipedia guidelines carefully about all things and I will not do this type of vandalism in future. So please unblock me and give chances to contribute me for developing wikipedia articles.

Decline reason:

You created a new account and edited with it unwittingly? You seem to be arguing you should be reblocked under WP:CIR grounds. Is that really what you are arguing? Yamla (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aankan Das (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, pardon me, I don't want to argue. I want to say that I did a great mistake to edit abusing multiple accounts. In future, I will not do this type of mistakes. So please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry; I cannot unblock you at this time. There are more issues afoot than the socking, but will begin there. You must disclose all other accounts you have used personally and any accounts you have coordinated with off-wiki. Same with any IP's. I see some warnings and a block for not sourcing edits. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Please affirm understanding of this by telling us what it means in your own words. There are a number of image messages and deletion notices on your talk. It would be best if you only upload images you took with your own camera which are not copyrighted elsewhere. There may be more issues I'm unaware of. Any other admin may add to, subtract from, or modify these unblock conditions w/o consulting me. Now we come to the crux of the matter. You might qualify for the WP:standard offer in 6 months. That means no editing, uploading, block evading/socking for 6 months. Even on your talk page. In 6 months, you can appeal your block and deal with the issues above at that time.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aankan Das (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to say some talks. The image files like File:Saraswati idol at BRKM.jpg, File:Saraswati Idol at BRKM.jpg, Durga puja at Baranagar in 2018.jpg were captured my own mobile phone camera but why these files have copyright problems, I did not understand. When I joined in wikipedia then I did not give good references but after some warnings, I gave good sources for articles improvement (please see my last contributions). So please unblock me and give a chancd to contribute.

Decline reason:

See above. The standard offer allows you to appeal this block no earlier than July 4th, 2019. If you continue to make inappropriate unblock appeals such as this one before that date, your talkpage access will be removed. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not post duplicate unblock requests. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, tell me when will I unblock? Aankan Das (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keiran Lee fucking pussy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keiran Lee fucking pussy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tathagata Mukherjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tathagata Mukherjee (Bengali actor).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abhishek Chatterjee (Bengali actor).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abhishek Chatterjee (Bengali actor).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnny Sins wearing underwear.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnny Sins wearing underwear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Honey Bafna

Hello, Aankan Das. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Honey Bafna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller

The article List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Porncruft created by sockpuppeteer.No independent sourcing. Substantive text copied without proper attribution. No noteworthiness to content, just laundry list of honorifics that porn industry hands out indiscriminately, moatly to benefit advertisers/clients.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Ryan Driller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British pornographic film actors of Indian descent has been nominated for deletion

Category:British pornographic film actors of Indian descent has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]